Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rhinology ; 62(2): 216-222, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37983015

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The skin prick test (SPT) is the gold standard for identifying allergic sensitization in individuals suspected of inhalant allergy. A novel device, SPAT or Skin Prick Automated Test, that enables more standardized allergy testing has been developed. Previous research has shown reduced intra-subject variability of histamine wheals by SPAT. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate within-test agreement (% of patients with consistent test results) to detect sensitization to common inhalant allergens when a SPT is executed automated by SPAT or by manual SPT (SPMT) procedure. METHODS: The 110 volunteers prospectively enrolled underwent both SPAT and SPMT with 3 pricks of house dust mite, timothy grass and birch, 2 pricks of histamine and 1 prick of glycerol. The proportion of consistent (3x positive â€" 3 x negative) and inconsistent (2x positive/negative â€" 1x positive/negative) test results were analysed. RESULTS: The proportion of inconsistent test results was significantly lower in the SPAT compared to the SPMT group. The delta histamine to control pricks was significantly higher in SPAT compared to SPMT group. Coefficient of variation was lower in SPAT compared to SPMT for house dust mite, timothy grass, birch pollen. Visual analogue scale for discomfort was significantly lower in SPAT compared to SPMT group. CONCLUSION: SPAT showed a 34% reduction in the number of inconsistent test results compared to manual SPT with common inhalant allergens. Patient experience is significantly improved when an allergy test is performed by SPAT compared to a manual SPT.


Asunto(s)
Histamina , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Alérgenos , Pruebas Cutáneas/métodos , Escala Visual Analógica
2.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg ; 54(1): 39-43, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10719592

RESUMEN

Sinuspathology must be considered when rapid onset of unilateral orbital edema is found in the absence of ophtalmologic signs. Urgent medical treatment is necessary in these patients when headache, fever, facial pain and vision problems are present. However, symptoms may be more subtle. Three female patients with unilateral orbital edema and facial pain are presented. Inflammation of an ipsilateral Haller's cell should be considered as one of the potential causes of unilateral orbital edema and it can be the only cause. To our knowledge this is the first report of Haller's cell disease resulting in an orbital complication.


Asunto(s)
Edema/etiología , Senos Etmoidales/patología , Enfermedades Orbitales/etiología , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/complicaciones , Adulto , Celulitis (Flemón)/etiología , Senos Etmoidales/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA