Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for cancer cachexia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia affects more than half of all cancer patients, reducing survival rates. Evidence-based approaches are urgently needed to optimize treatment. METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of different pharmacotherapies for cancer cachexia. Three databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched for the period from January 1, 2000, to March 20, 2024. The netmeta package in R software was used to calculate the pooled effect, employing a random effects model. RESULTS: Seven placebo-controlled randomized trials involving 1421 patients were analyzed. Pairwise analysis showed that body weight increases were 4.6 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-8.37 kg) for olanzapine, 3.82 kg (95% CI 0.73-6.91 kg) for espindolol (20 mg), 2.36 kg (95% CI 1.84-2.89 kg) for anamorelin (100 mg), and 1.31 kg (95% CI 0.42-2.19 kg) for anamorelin (50 mg). In terms of safety profiles, olanzapine demonstrated the lowest odds ratio when compared to placebo, at 0.26 (95% CI 0.07-0.94), followed by anamorelin (50 mg) at 0.86 (95% CI 0.30-2.48), and anamorelin (100 mg) at 0.89 (95% CI 0.42-1.88). However, network meta-analysis could not confirm the superiority of olanzapine over anamorelin in terms of efficacy and safety. CONCLUSION: Both olanzapine and anamorelin are useful in improving body weight in patients with cancer cachexia. Personalization may be helpful for different patients.

Neutrophil estimation and prognosis analysis based on existing lung squamous cell carcinoma datasets: the development and validation of a prognosis prediction model.

Background: Notwithstanding the rapid developments in precision medicine in recent years, lung cancer still has a low survival rate, especially lung squamous cell cancer (LUSC). The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays an important role in the progression of lung cancer, in which high neutrophil levels are correlated with poor prognosis, potentially due to their interactions with tumor cells via pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. However, the precise mechanisms of how neutrophils influence lung cancer remain unclear. This study aims to explore these mechanisms and develop a prognosis predictive model in LUSC, addressing the knowledge gap in neutrophil-related cancer pathogenesis. Methods: LUSC datasets from the Xena Hub and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases were used, comprising 473 tumor samples and 195 tumor samples, respectively. Neutrophil contents in these samples were estimated using CIBERSORT, xCell, and microenvironment cell populations (MCP) counter tools. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using DEseq2, and a weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to identify neutrophil-related genes. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model was constructed for prognosis prediction, and the model's accuracy was validated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Additionally, genomic changes, immune correlations, drug sensitivity, and immunotherapy response were analyzed to further validate the model's predictive power. Results: Neutrophil content was significantly higher in adjacent normal tissue compared to LUSC tissue (P<0.001). High neutrophil content was associated with worse overall survival (OS) (P=0.02), disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.02), and progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.03) using different software estimates. Nine gene modules were identified, with blue and yellow modules showing strong correlations with neutrophil prognosis (P<0.001). Eight genes were selected for the prognostic model, which accurately predicted 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival in both the training set [area under the curve (AUC) value =0.60, 0.63, 0.66, respectively] and validation set (AUC value =0.58, 0.58, 0.59, respectively), with significant prognosis differences between high- and low-risk groups (P<0.001). The model's independent prognostic factors included risk group, pathologic M stage, and tumor stage (P<0.05). A further molecular mechanism analysis revealed differences between risk groups were revealed in immune checkpoint and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) gene expression, hallmark pathways, drug sensitivity, and immunotherapy responses. Conclusions: This study established a risk-score model that effectively predicts the prognosis of LUSC patients and sheds light on the molecular mechanisms involved. The findings enhance the understanding of neutrophil-tumor interactions, offering potential targets for personalized treatments. However, further experimental validation and clinical studies are required to confirm these findings and address study limitations, including reliance on public databases and focus on a specific lung cancer subtype.

Efficacy and safety of sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy for recurrent extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) no longer are approved for second-line or later treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and have not been studied in combination with chemotherapy. Exploring the efficacy and safety of second-line or later immunotherapy for ES-SCLC is an urgent clinical question that needs to be addressed, and combination therapies are an important research direction. This study intended to investigate the efficacy and safety of the sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy as a second-line and beyond treatment option for ES-SCLC. Methods: Medical records of patients who received treatment with sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone as a second-line or beyond therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The study evaluated efficacy and safety. Indicators of efficacy included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety indicators included adverse events (AEs). Results: This cohort comprised of 46 patients: 24 in the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group and 22 in the chemotherapy group. Chemotherapy received by both groups was either albumin-bound paclitaxel or irinotecan. Compared with the chemotherapy group, the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group had higher ORR and DCR (ORR: 37.5% vs. 9.1%, P=0.04; DCR: 75.0% vs. 40.9%, P=0.04), and significantly prolonged PFS and OS [median PFS (mPFS): 5.07 vs. 2.45 months, P=0.006; median OS (mOS): 14.43 vs. 10.34 months, P=0.009]. Also, there was no significant increase in the incidence of AEs in the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group, which was well tolerated by patients. Conclusions: Sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy is superior to single-agent chemotherapeutic treatment as second-line or later therapy in ES-SCLC patients who have not received prior immunotherapy. These results need to be confirmed in future clinical trials.

The value of high-risk clinicopathologic features for chemotherapy in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score-matched study.

Background: Surgical resection is the main treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but recurrence remains a concern. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to have survival benefits for resected stage II and III NSCLC, but debate continues regarding its use in stage I NSCLC. High-risk features, such as tumor size and stage, are considered in deciding whether to administer adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: The data of 666,689 patients diagnosed with lung cancer from 2004 to 2016 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Ultimately, 26,160 patients diagnosed with stage I NSCLC were included in the study based on a screening procedure. Results: After matching, 4,285 patients were identified, of whom 1,440 (33.6%) received chemotherapy. High-risk clinicopathologic features, including a high histologic grade, visceral pleural invasion (VPI), the examination of an insufficient number of lymph nodes (LNs), and limited resection, were independent risk factors for a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy significantly improved lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) in stage I patients with VPI [LCSS: hazard ratio (HR): 0.839, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.706-0.998, P=0.047; OS: HR: 0.711, 95% CI: 0.612-0.826, P<0.001], regardless of whether or not the patient had fewer than 11 LNs (LCSS: HR: 0.809, 95% CI: 0.664-0.986, P=0.04; OS: HR: 0.677, 95% CI: 0.570-0.803, P<0.001). Chemotherapy was only observed to improve OS for stage IB patients with a high histologic grade when combined with either or both of the following high-risk factors: the presence of VPI and fewer than 11 LNs examined. Conclusions: The presence of VPI was the dominant predictor and the examination of an insufficient number of LNs was the secondary indicator, and a high histologic grade was a potential indicator of the need to administer chemotherapy in the treatment of stage I NSCLC.

A single arm Phase I/II trial on the combination of carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel and avastin as first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (TORG1424/OLCSG1402: CARNAVAL).

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab with platinum doublet therapy including paclitaxel + carboplatin improves the survival of patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. However, in a previous trial (CA031), paclitaxel + carboplatin led to Grade > 3 neutropenia in a Japanese population. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel exhibits an improved toxicity profile. We evaluated the safety, dosage and response rate of the nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab combination in a Japanese population. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer were included. The dosage schedule was established in the Phase I trial as follows: 4-6 cycles of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve = 6 on Day 1) + nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8 and 15) + bevacizumab (15 mg/kg on Day 1), followed by maintenance therapy (nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel + bevacizumab). The response rate and presence of adverse effects were evaluated in the Phase II trial. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 56.5% (90% confidence interval: 44.5-68.5), and 93% of patients (43/46) showed tumor shrinkage or maintained a stable disease course. The primary endpoint was achieved. At the median follow-up duration of 42 months, the median overall survival was 18.9 (range: 10.5-32.4) months. The most frequently observed Grade ≥ 3 adverse effects were neutropenia (72%), leukopenia (50%) and anemia (30%). CONCLUSIONS: All adverse effects were manageable and none resulted in patient death. In conclusion, the nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab combination is favorable and well tolerated in Japanese patients as first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Biology and Development of DNA-Targeted Drugs, Focusing on Synthetic Lethality, DNA Repair, and Epigenetic Modifications for Cancer: A Review.

DNA-targeted drugs constitute a specialized category of pharmaceuticals developed for cancer treatment, directly influencing various cellular processes involving DNA. These drugs aim to enhance treatment efficacy and minimize side effects by specifically targeting molecules or pathways crucial to cancer growth. Unlike conventional chemotherapeutic drugs, recent discoveries have yielded DNA-targeted agents with improved effectiveness, and a new generation is anticipated to be even more specific and potent. The sequencing of the human genome in 2001 marked a transformative milestone, contributing significantly to the advancement of targeted therapy and precision medicine. Anticipated progress in precision medicine is closely tied to the continuous development in the exploration of synthetic lethality, DNA repair, and expression regulatory mechanisms, including epigenetic modifications. The integration of technologies like circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis further enhances our ability to elucidate crucial regulatory factors, promising a more effective era of precision medicine. The combination of genomic knowledge and technological progress has led to a surge in clinical trials focusing on precision medicine. These trials utilize biomarkers for identifying genetic alterations, molecular profiling for potential therapeutic targets, and tailored cancer treatments addressing multiple genetic changes. The evolving landscape of genomics has prompted a paradigm shift from tumor-centric to individualized, genome-directed treatments based on biomarker analysis for each patient. The current treatment strategy involves identifying target genes or pathways, exploring drugs affecting these targets, and predicting adverse events. This review highlights strategies incorporating DNA-targeted drugs, such as PARP inhibitors, SLFN11, methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT), and ATR kinase.

Multicenter, Retrospective Study to Evaluate Necitumumab Plus Cisplatin and Gemcitabine After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer in Japan: The NINJA Study.

Introduction: Necitumumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GCN) is a standard therapy for patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSqCC). However, the efficacy and tolerability of GCN in second-line or later treatment for patients previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain unknown. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of GCN initiated between November 1, 2019 and March 31, 2022 as second-line to fourth-line treatment in patients with advanced LSqCC who had been pretreated with ICIs. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 93 patients from 35 institutions in Japan were enrolled. The median PFS, median overall survival (OS), and objective response rate were 4.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8-5.3), 13.3 months (95% CI: 9.6-16.5), and 27.3% (95% CI: 18.3-37.8), respectively. The median PFS, median OS, and objective response rate for second-line, third-line, and fourth-line treatment groups were 4.8 months, 3.8 months, and 4.3 months (p = 0.24); 15.7 months, 11.6 months, and 10.1 months (p = 0.06); and 31.0%, 13.6%, and 37.5% (p = 0.22), respectively. The severity of GCN-related skin disorders was associated with longer PFS (p < 0.05) and OS (p < 0.05). The frequencies of grade ≥3 skin disorders, hypomagnesemia, pneumonitis, and febrile neutropenia were 16.1%, 7.5%, 1.1%, and 4.3%, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: GCN for ICI-pretreated patients with LSqCC seems tolerable and offers promising efficacy regardless of treatment line, and ICI pretreatment might enhance GCN efficacy.

Association between the modified lung immune predictive index and clinical outcomes of advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy.

Background: As revealed by previous studies, the modified lung immune predictive index (mLIPI) can predict outcomes in patients with lung cancer receiving single-agent immunotherapy. However, the application value of the mLIPI for patients treated with combination immunotherapy requires further investigation. In this study, we aimed to explore the relationship between the mLIPI and the efficacy of treatment together with the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: In this retrospective study, we enrolled patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs plus chemotherapy from March 2019 to June 2022. The patients were classified into good, intermediate, and poor/very poor groups according to their mLIPI before treatment. We further calculated the disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of the three groups. The predictive ability of the mLIPI was evaluated by plotting a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calculating the area under the curve (AUC). Results: A total of 209 patients were included in this study. There were 75 patients in the good group, 114 patients in the intermediate group, and 20 patients in the poor/very poor group. The median PFS was 11.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.763-13.704] in the good group; 8.1 months (95% CI: 7.354-8.846) in the intermediate group; and 5.4 months (95% CI: 2.142-8.658) in the poor/very poor group. The median OS was not reached in the good group, 29.5 months (95% CI: 23.555-35.512) in the intermediate group, and 14.5 months (95% CI: 8.567-20.366) in the poor/very poor group (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the mLIPI was independently associated with PFS and OS (P<0.05); the AUC values of the mLIPI for predicting PFS at 3, 6, and 9 months were 0.673, 0.637, and 0.614, respectively, and for predicting OS at 6, 12, and 24 months were 0.715, 0.655, and 0.625, respectively. Conclusions: The pretreatment mLIPI could be used to predict outcomes in patients with NSCLC receiving first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy.

Prospective exosome-focused translational research for afatinib (EXTRA) study of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation: an observational clinical study.

Background: The exosome-focused translational research for afatinib (EXTRA) study is the first trial to identify novel predictive biomarkers for longer treatment efficacy of afatinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) via a comprehensive association study using genomic, proteomic, epigenomic, and metabolomic analyses. Objectives: We report details of the clinical portion prior to omics analyses. Design: A prospective, single-arm, observational study was conducted using afatinib 40 mg/day as an initial dose in untreated patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Dose reduction to 20 mg every other day was allowed. Methods: Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Results: A total of 103 patients (median age 70 years, range 42-88 years) were enrolled from 21 institutions in Japan between February 2017 and March 2018. After a median follow-up of 35.0 months, 21% remained on afatinib treatment, whereas 9% had discontinued treatment because of AEs. The median PFS was 18.4 months, with a 3-year PFS rate of 23.3%. The median afatinib treatment duration in patients with final doses of 40 (n = 27), 30 (n = 23), and 20 mg/day (n = 35), and 20 mg every other day (n = 18) were 13.4, 15.4, 18.8, and 18.3 months, respectively. The median OS was not reached, with a 3-year OS rate of 58.5%. The median OS in patients who did (n = 25) and did not (n = 78) receive osimertinib during the entire course of treatment were 42.4 months and not reached, respectively (p = 0.654). Conclusions: As the largest prospective study in Japan, this study confirmed favorable OS following first-line afatinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC in a real-world setting. Further analysis of the EXTRA study is expected to identify novel predictive biomarkers for afatinib. Trial registration: UMIN-CTR identifier (UMIN000024935, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_his_list.cgi?recptno=R000028688.

Multicenter, single-arm phase II study of modified carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel in untreated performance status 2 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: TORG1426.

Background: Currently, only a few treatment options exist for performance status (PS) 2 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas the carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel (CBDCA/nab-PTX) regimen is attracting attention as a standard of care for PS 0-1 patients because of its wide suitability and modest risk of peripheral neuropathy. However, the treatment dose and schedule should be optimized for PS 2 patients. Therefore, we planned a single-arm phase II study to characterize the efficacy and tolerability of our modified CBDCA/nab-PTX regimen for untreated PS 2 patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: Enrolled patients were treated with CBDCA (area under the curve 5 on day 1) plus nab-PTX (70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15) every 4 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. As exploratory analyses, the reasons for PS 2 (disease burden versus comorbidities/indeterminant) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were evaluated as efficacy indicators. Results: This study was terminated early because of slow accrual. Seventeen patients [median age, 68 years (range, 50-73 years)] received a median of three cycles. The 6-month PFS rate, median PFS, and median overall survival were 20.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0-41.6], 3.0 months (95% CI: 1.7-4.3), and 9.5 months (95% CI: 5.0-14.0), respectively. Exploratory analyses suggested better overall survival in patients whose PS was not attributable to the disease burden (median, 9.5 vs. 7.2 months) or whose CCI was ≤3 (median, 15.5 vs. 7.2 months). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 12 (71%) patients, and grade 5 pleural infection occurred in one (6%) patient. Meanwhile, only one (6%) patient each experienced grade 1 peripheral neuropathy and grade 2 interstitial pneumonitis. Conclusions: No conclusion could be drawn from this study because of its early termination. However, our modified CBDCA/nab-PTX regimen might be useful for PS 2 patients who hesitate to use regimens other than nab-PTX, and particularly patients concerned about peripheral neuropathy or interstitial pneumonitis. The potential role of PS 2 and CCI as efficacy predictors for this regimen should be further examined.

Staphylococcus haemolyticus attenuates the antibacterial effect of teicoplanin via aggregates and biofilms.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the inhibitory and bactericidal effects of teicoplanin (TEC) on TEC-susceptible Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolated from a patient with cancer in whom infection persisted despite TEC therapy. We also focused on the biofilm-forming ability of the isolate in vitro. METHODS: S. haemolyticus clinical isolate (strain 1369A) and its control strain, ATCC 29970 were cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth with TEC. The inhibitory and bactericidal effects of TEC on planktonic, adherent, biofilm-dispersed, and biofilm-embedded cells of these strains were analyzed by using a biofilm formation/viability assay kit. The expression of biofilm-related genes was measured using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Biofilm formation was determined by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: The clinical isolate of S. haemolyticus had enhanced ability to bacterial growth, adherence, aggregation, and biofilm formation, thus the inhibitory and bactericidal effects of TEC on planktonic, adherent, biofilm-dispersed, and biofilm-embedded cells of the isolate were attenuated. Additionally, TEC induced cell aggregation, biofilm formation, and some biofilm-related gene expression of the isolate. CONCLUSION: The clinical isolate of S. haemolyticus is resistant to TEC treatment due to cell aggregation and biofilm formation.

Randomized, Phase II study of pemetrexed plus bevacizumab versus pemetrexed alone after treatment with cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab in advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer: TORG (thoracic oncology research group) 1321.

INTRODUCTION: Cisplatin plus pemetrexed followed by pemetrexed is an efficacious platinum combination regimen for advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data regarding the addition of bevacizumab, especially in maintenance treatment, are insufficient. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included: no prior chemotherapy; advanced, non-squamous, NSCLC; performance status ≤1; and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-negative. Patients (N = 108) received induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab every 3 weeks for four cycles, and tumor response was needed to confirm four-week response duration. Patients with at least stable disease were randomized to pemetrexed/bevacizumab or pemetrexed alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) after induction chemotherapy. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) counts of peripheral blood samples were also analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients each were randomized to the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group and the pemetrexed alone group. PFS was significantly better in the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group than in the pemetrexed alone group (7.0 vs. 5.4 months, hazard ratio: 0.56 [0.34-0.93], log-rank p = 0.023). In patients with partial response to induction therapy, median overall survival was 23.3 months in the pemetrexed alone group and 29.6 months in the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group (log-rank p = 0.077). Pretreatment monocytic (M)-MDSC counts tended to be greater in the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group with poor PFS than in those with good PFS (p = 0.0724). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of bevacizumab to pemetrexed as maintenance therapy prolonged PFS in patients with untreated, advanced, non-squamous NSCLC. Furthermore, an early response to induction therapy and pretreatment M-MDSC counts may be related to the survival benefit of the addition of bevacizumab to the combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed.

Is Low Volume Drainage of Ascites Associated With Improved Survival in Digestive System Cancer Patients With Malignant Ascites?-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objectives: To determine whether the volume of paracentesis for malignant ascites in acute care hospital wards is associated with survival and symptom relief. Methods: Patients with malignant ascites caused by digestive system cancer who underwent paracentesis between January 2010 and April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed from medical records. Collected data included the drainage volume per paracentesis procedure, survival time from the first paracentesis procedure, symptoms, and adverse events. According to the volume per paracentesis procedure, we divided the patients into the "small-drainage" (≤1500 mL) and "standard-drainage" (>1500 mL) groups. Results: The median age of the 144 patients was 69 years, 33% were female, and 64% had gastrointestinal cancer. The median survival from the first paracentesis procedure was 36 days. Eighty-nine (61.8%) and 55 (38.2%) patients were allocated to the small-drainage and standard-drainage groups, respectively. The median number of paracentesis procedures in the small-drainage and standard-drainage groups was 12 and 7, respectively (P=.001). The median survival in the small-drainage and standard-drainage groups was 50 and 44 days, respectively (P=.76). The multivariate analysis showed that the amount of drainage per session was not significantly associated with survival. Symptoms improved similarly in the 2 groups. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Paracentesis was demonstrated to be effective and safe, irrespective of the amount of fluid drained, for patients with malignant ascites in an acute care hospital. Thus, a strategy of limiting the amount of drainage is not associated with longer survival.

Comparative analysis of different response criteria at early phase after PD-1 blockade in non-small lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare different response criteria using computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) in measuring response and survival in the early phase after programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A total of 54 patients with advanced NSCLC who had 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-D-glucose PET or CT at baseline, and 4 and 9 weeks after PD-1 blockade, were registered. Therapeutic response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), the immune-modified RECIST (irRECIST), the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), the immune-modified PERCIST (iPERCIST), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria for dichotomous groups, such as responders vs. non-responders and controlled vs. uncontrolled diseases. Cohen's κ was used to evaluate the concordance among the different criteria. RESULTS: The concordance between CT and PET response criteria was fair or slight for responders vs. non-responders, but the agreement between iPERCIST and irRECIST was moderate for controlled vs. uncontrolled diseases. The agreement between EORTC and PERCIST or iPERCIST in detecting responders was higher in the application of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) than in the standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SUL)peak. To distinguish controlled from uncontrolled disease, RECIST, irRECIST, and PET criteria (PERCIST, iPERCIST, and EORTC) defined by MTV or TLG were found to be significant predictors of progression-free survival. To distinguish responders from non-responders, iPERCIST by SULpeak or EORTC by TLG were identified as significant indicators. The EORTC criteria using TLG for the detection of responders or uncontrolled diseases had a significantly higher predictive value for response assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The EORTC criteria based on TLG for the early detection of responders and uncontrolled disease were effective as a response assessment at 4 weeks after the PD-1 blockade. When SULpeak was not used but MTV or TLG was, the agreement between EORTC and PERCIST or iPERCIST was almost perfect.

Predictors of central line-associated bloodstream infections in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy through implanted venous access ports: a retrospective, observational study.

Background: Central venous catheters (CVCs) are sometimes superior to peripheral vascular access for chemotherapy. Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are an important complication of CVCs in chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted to investigate patients with implanted venous access ports (PORTs) from July 2010 to June 2021 in a teaching hospital. General conditions of the PORTs, backgrounds, and characteristics of patients were compared between CLABSI cases and uninfected cases to identify predictors of CLABSI. Results: A total of 566 patients with PORTs who underwent chemotherapy were enrolled in this study, with CLABSI identified in 41 patients, for a total of 436,597 catheter-days. The median duration of PORT use was 26 vs. 494 days (P<0.001) in the CLABSI and uninfected groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in tumor classification, staging, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil proportion, lymphocyte proportion, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and performance status between the CLABSI and uninfected groups. Multivariable analysis showed that antibiotic usage within the previous week, total protein (TP), and immediate PORT use were independently associated with CLABSI, and their odds ratios (ORs) were 4.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.67, 14.35], 1.95 (95% CI: 1.14, 3.53), and 3.13 (95% CI: 1.18, 8.30), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic curve for TP was 0.63, and the cutoff value was 5.9 g/dL. Conclusions: PORT implantation should be avoided in patients who had antibiotic treatment episodes within 1 week, especially for those with low serum TP levels.

A phase II study of S-1 and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy followed by durvalumab for unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Japan (SAMURAI study): primary analysis.

Background: The standard of care for unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab, based on the PACIFIC study. Although multiple Japanese phase II studies have shown high efficacy and tolerability of CRT with cisplatin plus S-1 (SP), no prospective study using durvalumab after SP-based CRT has been reported. Objectives: We conducted a multicenter phase II study of this approach, the interim analysis of which showed a high transition rate to durvalumab consolidation therapy. Here, we report the primary analysis results. Design: In treatment-naïve LA-NSCLC, cisplatin (60 mg/m2, day 1) and S-1 (80-120 mg/body, days 1-14) were administered with two 4-week cycles with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy) followed by durvalumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks for up to 1 year. Methods: The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). The expected 1-year PFS and its lower limit of the 80% confidence interval (CI) were set as 63% and 47%, respectively, based on the results of TORG1018 study. Results: In all, 59 patients were enrolled, with 51 (86.4%) proceeding to durvalumab. The objective response rate throughout the study was 72.9% (95% CI: 59.7-83.6%). After median follow-up of 21.9 months, neither median PFS nor OS was reached. The 1-year PFS was 72.5% (80% CI: 64.2-79.2%, 95% CI: 59.1-82.2%), while the 1-year overall survival was 91.5% (95% CI: 80.8-96.4%). No grade 5 adverse events were observed throughout the study. The most common adverse event during the consolidation phase was pneumonitis (any grade, 78.4%; grade ⩾3, 2.0%). Eventually, 52.5% of patients completed 1-year durvalumab consolidation therapy from CRT initiation. Conclusion: This study of durvalumab after SP-based CRT met its primary endpoint and found a 1-year PFS of 73% from CRT initiation. This study provides the first prospective data on the prognosis and tolerability of durvalumab consolidation from the initiation of CRT. Trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031190127, registered 1 November, 2019, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs031190127.

Immune thrombocytopenia in a small cell lung cancer patient treated with atezolizumab: a case report.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), an enormous oncological breakthrough in the last 10 years, have become the standard treatments for several types of solid cancers. Although ICIs are generally well tolerated and result in favorable outcomes, they also cause unique immune-related adverse events (irAEs) across bodily systems and organs. Compared to most common irAEs, which occur in the endocrine, skin, pulmonary system, and gastrointestinal tract, haematological irAEs (haem-irAEs) are relatively rare but potentially life-threatening events that are occasionally irreversible and refractory. Currently, haem-irAEs are not sufficiently understood, management, and lack consensus, while other common irAEs have well been characterized and managed. The reports of ICI-related thrombocytopenia in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are rarely seen. Hence, we reported a rare case of severe steriod-resistant ICI-related thrombocytopenia after received chemotherapy plus anti-PD-L1 inhibitor in SCLC patient. Our case exemplifies the diagnosis, diagnosis of exclusion, treatment, and prognosis of thrombocytopenia in the pattern of combination therapy, meanwhile, the subject of diagnosis, therapies, therapeutic strategies for refractory type and incidence, potential biomarkers, mechanisms and prognosis in ICI-related thrombocytopenia have been fully discussed. Case Description: Herein, we present a 64-year-old man diagnosed advanced SCLC developed refractory immune-related severe thrombocytopenia, who achieved favorable outcomes of cancer following chemotherapy combined with atezolizumab administrated. Routine blood re-examination on the third day of 6th therapy showed a thrombocyte count of 11×109/L. Combined the medical history and the results of laboratory tests, the diagnosis of ICI-induced thrombocytopenia was confirmed. Despite large doses of methylprednisolone, immunoglobulin, and rituximab, intermittent platelet transfusion, thrombopoietin being administrated to the patient, there were no signs of platelet count and hemoglobin improvement. Currently, this is the first case about atezolizumab induced thrombocytopenia in SCLC patient, while there is extremely rare haem-irAEs reported in SCLC. Conclusions: Although ICI-related severe thrombocytopenia is rare, it may persist or even be fatal. Clinicians should pay more attention to its diagnosis and prompt treatment. Once developed thrombocytopenia, large doses of methylprednisolone, ntermittent platelet transfusion, thrombopoietin should be timely administrated, also plasma exchange or rilzabrutinib, other immunosuppressive drugs, or IL-6 inhibitor warrant apply if steriod-resistant.

Plasma exosomal DOK3 reflects immunological states in lung tumor and predicts prognosis of gefitinib treatment.

To identify liquid biomarkers that predict clinical outcomes of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), we enrolled patients with EGFR gene mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer who were intended to receive gefitinib treatment. Using plasma samples obtained prior to gefitinib treatment from 12 enrolled patients, we performed comprehensive proteomic analysis of plasma exosomes to explore proteins correlating with tumor reduction rate (TRR), progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS). Of the detected 1769 proteins, 119, 130, or 119 proteins demonstrated a strong correlation (|r| > 0.5) with TRR, PFS, or OS, respectively. Interestingly, 34 (29%), 41 (32%), or 27 (23%) of them, respectively, were functionally involved in the regulation of the immune response. CD8α chain was consistently listed as a molecule positively correlated with PFS and OS, suggesting that the long-lasting effects of gefitinib may be due to the antitumor effects of CD8+ T cells, as well as the induction of immunogenic apoptosis of tumor cells by blocking the EGFR signaling pathway. Notably, Doking Protein 3 (DOK3), a molecule involved in B-cell receptor signaling, and some immunoglobulin and complement molecules exhibited a clear correlation with PFS longevity of gefitinib treatment. Indeed, the strong expression of DOK3 in B cells was confirmed within tertiary lymphoid structures of lung cancer tissues derived from patients with long PFS. These findings suggest that the patients with active B-cell and T-cell immunity as a host immunological feature are more likely to benefit from gefitinib therapy. Circulating exosomal DOK3 has the potential as a predictive marker of response to gefitinib indicating this immunological feature.

Prospective analysis of factors precluding the initiation of durvalumab from an interim analysis of a phase II trial of S-1 and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy followed by durvalumab for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Japan (SAMURAI study).

Background: The standard of care for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab, based on the PACIFIC trial. Disease progression and pneumonitis were reported as the main reasons to preclude the initiation of durvalumab in multiple retrospective studies. However, the transition rate and the reasons for failure to proceed to consolidation therapy with durvalumab after CRT were not evaluated prospectively. Although phase II studies in Japan have shown high efficacy and tolerability of CRT with cisplatin + S-1 (SP), no prospective study using durvalumab after SP-based CRT has yet been reported. We therefore conducted a phase II study to verify the efficacy and safety of durvalumab following SP-based CRT. In this interim analysis, we report the transition rate and the reasons for its failure. Methods: In treatment-naïve LA-NSCLC, cisplatin (60 mg/m2, day 1) and S-1 (80-120 mg/body, days 1-14) were administered with two 4-week cycles with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy) followed by durvalumab every 2 weeks for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint was 12 month progression-free survival rate. Results: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled, of whom 86.4% (51/59) proceeded to durvalumab. All of them initiated durvalumab within 42 days after CRT [median 18 days (range: 3-38)], including 27.5% (14/51) in <14 days. Common reasons for failure to proceed to durvalumab were disease progression (2/59, 3.4%) and adverse events (6/59, 10.2%). Among the latter cases, four resumed treatment and proceeded to durvalumab within 42 days on off-protocol. The objective response rate and the disease control rate were 62.7% and 93.2%, respectively. The incidences of ⩾grade 3 pneumonitis, febrile neutropenia, and esophagitis were 0%, 8.5%, and 3.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Regarding durvalumab after CRT, this interim analysis of the SAMURAI study clarified the high transition rate, early introduction, and reasons for failure to proceed to consolidation therapy, which were not determined in the PACIFIC trial. Trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031190127, registered 1 November, 2019, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs031190127.