Lung cancer from suspicion to treatment: An indicator of healthcare access in Turkey.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Before beginning lung cancer treatment, it is necessary to complete procedures such as suspecting lung cancer, obtaining a pathologic diagnosis, and staging. This study aimed to investigate the processes from suspicion of lung cancer to diagnosis, staging, and treatment initiation. METHODS: The study was designed as a multicenter and cross-sectional study. Patients with lung cancer from various health institutions located in all geographic regions of Turkey were included in the study. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, the characteristics of the health institutions and geographic regions, and other variables of the lung cancer process were recorded. The time from suspicion of lung cancer to pathologic diagnosis, radiologic staging, and treatment initiation, as well as influencing factors, were investigated. RESULTS: The study included 1410 patients from 29 different medical centers. The mean time from the initial suspicion of lung cancer to the pathologic diagnosis was 48.0 ± 52.6 days, 39.0 ± 52.7 days for radiologic staging, and 74.9 ± 65.5 days for treatment initiation. The residential areas with the most suspected lung cancer cases were highly developed socioeconomic zones. Primary healthcare services accounted for only 0.4% of patients with suspected lung cancer. The time to pathologic diagnosis was longer in the Marmara region, and the wait time for staging and treatment initiation was longer in Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia. Patients who presented to chest disease referral hospitals with peripheral lesions, those with early-stage disease, and those who were diagnosed surgically had significantly longer wait times. CONCLUSION: The time between pathologic diagnosis, staging, and treatment initiation in lung cancer was longer than expected. Increasing the role of primary healthcare services and distributing socioeconomic resources more equally will contribute to shortening the time to diagnosis and improve treatment processes for lung cancer.

The F-18 FDG PET/CT and CT evaluation of pleural plaques.

INTRODUCTION: Pleural plaques have the possibility of bearing malignancy thus investigation of this entity is important and the most important indicator of malignancy in general is fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) accumulation in radiological appearance. However there is discrepancy between results of previous studies in the literature about this subject. The aim of this study is to analyze the standardized uptake value of pleural plaques and the cut off levels for malignancy in comparison with computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy one patients were included in the study (27F, 44M; mean: 59.9 ± 13.1 years). Oncologic F-18 FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was performed to all the subjects for a different primary tumor. Pleural plaques were identified in all patients in CT component of PET/CT examination. Contrast enhanced and nonenhanced CT images were evaluated by a Radiology Physician independently according to the gold standard pathology. RESULT: The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity of CT was; 39%, 79% respectively and if the cut-off SUVmax level was accepted "4.8" the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of PET was 71%, and 63% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results and ROC curves determined in the study the cut-off level for evaluation of pleural plaques in PET examination was "4.8". The sensitivity and accuracy of PET was higher compared to CT with this cut-off value.