Concurrent versus sequential adjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy in hormone-receptor positive early stage breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although in clinical practice adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and endocrine therapy (ET) are administered sequentially in patients with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, the optimal timing, i.e. concurrent or sequential administration, of these treatments has been scarcely investigated. To better clarify this issue we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing these two modalities of administrations in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed, Web of Knowledge and the proceedings of the major conferences with no date restriction up to March 2016. The summary risk estimates (pooled hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence intervals [CI]) for DFS and OS were calculated using random effect models (DerSimonian and Laird method). RESULTS: A total of three randomized studies were eligible including 2021 breast cancer patients. Overall, 755 DFS events were observed, 365 in the sequential arm and 390 in the concomitant arm, with a pooled HR of 0.95 (95% CI = 0.76 to 1.18, P = 0.643). No association between timing of treatment and OS was observed (HR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.12, P = 0.529). CONCLUSION: Our pooled analysis showed no association between the timing of administration of adjuvant CT and ET and DFS and OS in breast cancer patients candidates for both adjuvant treatments. Because of the small number of published trials, the lack of data on the timing with modern adjuvant treatments, i.e. taxane-containing CT and aromatase inhibitors, this topic remain still controversial and requires further studies to be clarified.

CXCR3/CCR5 pathways in metastatic melanoma patients treated with adoptive therapy and interleukin-2.

BACKGROUND: Adoptive therapy with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) induces durable complete responses (CR) in ∼20% of patients with metastatic melanoma. The recruitment of T cells through CXCR3/CCR5 chemokine ligands is critical for immune-mediated rejection. We postulated that polymorphisms and/or expression of CXCR3/CCR5 in TILs and the expression of their ligands in tumour influence the migration of TILs to tumours and tumour regression. METHODS: Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes from 142 metastatic melanoma patients enrolled in adoptive therapy trials were genotyped for CXCR3 rs2280964 and CCR5-Δ32 deletion, which encodes a protein not expressed on the cell surface. Expression of CXCR3/CCR5 in TILs and CXCR3/CCR5 and ligand genes in 113 available parental tumours was also assessed. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte data were validated by flow cytometry (N=50). RESULTS: The full gene expression/polymorphism model, which includes CXCR3 and CCR5 expression data, CCR5-Δ32 polymorphism data and their interaction, was significantly associated with both CR and overall response (OR; P=0.0009, and P=0.007, respectively). More in detail, the predicted underexpression of both CXCR3 and CCR5 according to gene expression and polymorphism data (protein prediction model, PPM) was associated with response to therapy (odds ratio=6.16 and 2.32, for CR and OR, respectively). Flow cytometric analysis confirmed the PPM. Coordinate upregulation of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL5 in pretreatment tumour biopsies was associated with OR. CONCLUSION: Coordinate overexpression of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL5 in pretreatment tumours was associated with responsiveness to treatment. Conversely, CCR5-Δ32 polymorphism and CXCR3/CCR5 underexpression influence downregulation of the corresponding receptors in TILs and were associated with likelihood and degree of response.

Multicenter phase III randomized trial of polychemotherapy (CVD regimen) versus the same chemotherapy (CT) plus subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha2b in metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The addition of cytokines to chemotherapy (CT) has obtained encouraging but contradictory results in metastatic melanoma. In this phase III trial, we compared the effects of CT [cisplatin, vindesine and dacarbazine (CVD)] with those of concurrent biochemotherapy (bioCT) consisting of CVD plus interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha2b. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 151 untreated metastatic melanoma patients were randomized, 75 on arm A (cisplatin 30 mg/m2 on days 1-3, vindesine 2.5 mg/m2 on day 1 and dacarbazine 250 mg/m2 on days 1-3), and 76 on arm B (same CVD scheme plus interferon-alpha2b on days 1-5 and interleukin-2 on days 1-5 and 8-15, both administered subcutaneously), either recycled every 3 weeks. Response was assessed every two cycles. RESULTS: Ten percent of the patients were alive at a median of 52 months from start of therapy. We observed a response rate (RR) of 21% on arm A versus 33% on arm B; three patients (4%) given bioCT had complete responses (CRs). Median time to progression (TTP) was identical; median overall survival (OS) time was 12 months on arm A and 11 months on arm B. CONCLUSIONS: BioCT is not better than CT alone; the trend in favor of the bioCT in terms of RR did not translate into better TTP or OS. Therefore, bioCT cannot be recommended as standard first-line therapy for metastatic melanoma.

Prevention of chemotherapy-induced menopause by temporary ovarian suppression with goserelin in young, early breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Standard methods to prevent chemotherapy-induced early menopause in young, breast cancer patients are unavailable to date. Preclinical data has suggested that luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) analogs given during treatment can decrease the gonado-toxicity induced by chemotherapy. This phase II study aimed to assess the activity of such a method in young, breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Premenopausal patients received the LH-RH analog goserelin 3.6 mg every 4 weeks before and during chemotherapy. According to two-stage optimal phase II Simon design, treatment was considered clinically interesting if it was able to prevent menopause in 19 out of 29 patients of the study population. The resumption of ovarian function was defined by a resumption of menstrual activity or by a follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) value < or = 40 IU/l within 12 months after the last cycle of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled and 29 were evaluable. Median age was 38 years (range 29-47). All but one patient received CEF regimen (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil). Resumption of menstrual activity was observed in 21 patients (72%; 95% CI 52% to 87%) and a FSH value < or = 40 IU/l in 24 patients (83%; 95% CI 63% to 93%). Menses resumption was observed in 16 out of 17 patients (94%) with age <40 years and in five out of 12 patients (42%) with age > or = 40 years. CONCLUSION: Goserelin given before and during chemotherapy may prevent premature menopause in the majority of patients. The different success rate by age, however, indicates the need of a prospective evidence of the efficacy of such a strategy.

Upfront high-dose sequential therapy (HDS) versus VACOP-B with or without HDS in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: long-term results by the NHLCSG.

BACKGROUND: There is not univocal concordance for using high-dose sequential therapy (HDS) as first-line treatment for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We designed this study to evaluate the usefulness of HDS followed by high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation as front-line treatment in different subsets of aggressive NHL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 223 patients aged 15-60 years with aggressive, advanced stage NHL, 106 patients were randomized to VACOP-B (etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, bleomycin) for 12 weeks (plus HDS/HDT in case of persistent disease) (arm A), and 117 patients to VACOP-B for 8 weeks plus upfront HDS/HDT (arm B). RESULTS: According to the intention-to-treat analysis, the complete response rate was 75% for arm A and 72.6% for arm B. With a median follow-up of 62 months there was no difference in 7-year probability of survival (60% and 57.8%; P = 0.5), disease-free survival (DFS) (62% and 71%; P = 0.2) and progression-free survival (PFS) (44.9% and 40.9%; P = 0.7) between the two arms. Subgroup analyses confirmed that the best results in terms of survival, DFS and PFS were achieved by patients with large B-cell NHL without bone marrow (BM) involvement, independently of the treatment arm. Results were poorer in other categories of patients and poorest in patients with BM involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive NHL patients do not benefit from upfront HDS/HDT.

High-dose chemotherapy shows a dose-dependent toxicity to bone marrow osteoprogenitors: a mechanism for post-bone marrow transplantation osteopenia.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a sequela of hemopoietic cell transplantation with a complex multifactorial pathogenesis in which the relative role of chemotherapy and irradiation is not completely understood. Therefore, the authors investigated the toxicity of chemotherapy-only conditioning regimens on bone homeostasis and bone marrow osteoprogenitors, its dose dependency, and the mechanism of chemotherapy-induced osteopenia. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma or breast carcinoma who had been treated previously with high-dose + peripheral blood progenitor cell or conventional chemotherapy or who had not received any treatment (prechemotherapy) were enrolled. The authors measured the bone marrow colony-forming unit fibroblast (CFU-f) and long-term culture-initiating cell frequency, forearm bone mineral density, serum osteotropic hormones and metabolic markers of bone formation (plasma osteocalcin), and resorption (urinary collagen I C-crosslinks). RESULTS: Both high-dose chemotherapy regimens caused a 50% reduction in CFU-f frequency, independently of gonadal function status, whereas conventional chemotherapy and prechemotherapy groups were unaffected. Bone mineral density was measured in 26 non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients and again only high-dose chemotherapy caused a 10% loss in cortical bone and 20% in trabecular bone. No endocrine abnormality was found except for the secondary amenorrhea uniformly induced in the high-dose chemotherapy group. In these patients, plasma osteocalcin unexpectedly failed to increase in response to the menopausal increase in bone resorption rate, showing a selective impairment of the osteoblast compartment to cope with increased functional demand. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy without irradiation shows a dose-dependent toxicity to bone marrow stromal osteoprogenitors and can cause osteopenia by direct damage of the osteoblastic compartment, as a mechanism distinct from and summable to hypogonadism.

A feasibility study using polychemotherapy (cisplatin + vindesine + dacarbazine) plus interferon-alpha or monochemotherapy with dacarbazine plus interferon-alpha in metastatic melanoma.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: This trial evaluated the feasibility and tolerability of an immunochemotherapeutic approach that uses cisplatin, vindesine, and dacarbazine (DTIC), or only DTIC, in combination with interferon alpha-2a (IFN-alpha), in patients with metastatic melanoma, considering the significant toxicity of several different regimens used up to now. METHODS: Between May 1995 and September 1997, 51 melanoma patients (50 of whom were assessable) entered a multicentric trial and were randomized to receive cisplatin (30 mg/m2 daily for 3 days) + vindesine (2.5 mg/m2 only day 1) + DTIC (250 mg/m2 daily for 3 consecutive days) + IFN-alpha (3 MIU i.m. 3x/wk continuously) (CVD arm) versus DTIC (800 mg/m2 day 1) + IFN-alpha (3 MIU i.m. 3x/wk continuously) (DTIC arm). The chemotherapy was recycled every 21 days. Patient reevaluation was performed every two cycles, and the treatment was continued in case of objective response or stabilization of disease. RESULTS: We observed 3 complete responses, 2 partial responses and 5 stable diseases in the CVD arm, and 2 partial responses and 4 stabilizations of disease in the DTIC arm. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that these chemotherapeutic regimens are well tolerated regimens with modest toxicity. Future trials will be conducted associating the CVD regimen with biological response modifiers (IFN, IL-2) in order to improve the results.

Intensified chemotherapy supported by DMSO-free peripheral blood progenitor cells in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The majority of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC)-related complications results from bone marrow aplasia, but the graft infusion per se may cause adverse reactions due to the injection of both dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and cell lysis products. We evaluated the feasibility of a two-step chemotherapy regimen with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support in association with a novel procedure to remove DMSO and products of cell lysis from the cryopreserved cells. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage III and IV breast cancer patients received induction chemotherapy with three cycles of CEF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2) followed by three cycles of HDC consisting of escalating doses of cyclophosphamide (dose range 1200 3000 mg/m2) and carboplatin (dose range 600-1000 mg/m2), supported by DMSO-free PBPC reinfusion. DMSO was removed by a washing/enzymatic digestion procedure. RESULTS: Twenty patients received induction chemotherapy and eighteen completed the entire chemotherapy program; a total of fifty-four cycles of HDC were administered. Dose limiting toxicity of HDC was long-lasting grade 4 neutropenia associated with documented infection. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was cyclophosphamide 3000 mg/m2 and carboplatin 600 mg/m2. No side effects related to PBPC reinfusion were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed two-step chemotherapy regimen, associated with a novel washing/enzymatic digestion procedure, is feasible in advanced breast cancer patients in the absence of complications related to the specific toxicity of PBPC reinfusion.

Fludarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide or with cyclophosphamide plus mitoxantrone for relapsed or refractory low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We report the activity of two combinations of fludarabine (FLU), one with cyclophosphamide (FLU/CY) and the second with CY plus mitoxantrone (FLU/CY/MITO). The aim of the study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of these two schedules in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with recurrent low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (LGL) received FLU/CY (FLU 25 mg/m(2) days 1 to 3, CY 300 mg/m(2) days 1 to 3), and 31 patients received FLU/CY/MITO (FLU 25 mg/m(2) days 1 to 3, CY 300 mg/m(2) days 1 to 3, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2) day 1). Patients received antibiotic oral prophylaxis during all treatments and growth factors (G-CSF) when grade III granulocytopenia (WHO scale) occurred. RESULTS: Of the 53 patients, 31 achieved complete remission (CR) (58%) and 16 partial remission (PR) (30%). Response was similar in both arms of the study. After 3 courses, 77% of patients who achieved CR showed a complete disappearance of disease. Seventy-nine per cent of patients experienced granulocytopenia. Few patients had fever, all without infection. One patient died with fever of unknown origin three months after completion of six courses of treatment. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments were seen to be effective in recurrent low-grade NHL. Antibiotic prophylaxis with G-CSF support seems to reduce treatment-related infection.

Thymidine labeling index analysis in early breast cancer patients randomized to receive perioperative chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify through a substudy of a larger, multicenter study of adjuvant treatment in primary operable breast cancer patients any possible correlation between cellular proliferation rate, measured by thymidine labeling index (TLI), and perioperative chemotherapy (periCT). METHODS: TLI was measured in slices of early breast carcinoma patients. The main trial was designed to randomize patients after primary surgery to receive one cycle of periCT consisting of cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil, or no periCT. RESULTS: Of 600 patients randomized into the main study, 197 were eligible for inclusion in this substudy. Characteristics of patients were quite similar to those of the entire population entered into the main study. The TLI cutoff value in our series was 0.7% expressed as the median percentage ratio of thymidine-labeled cells undergoing DNA synthesis in the tumor cell population of specimens from the 197 patients. No differences were observed in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after grouping the patients by TLI value (low and high) and by treatment. Among node-negative patients, a significant improvement in terms of OS (p = 0.02), but not RFS (p = 0.06), was seen in patients with a high-TLI value who underwent periCT versus controls. CONCLUSIONS: TLI may be a useful tool for the identification of node-negative patients with high-TLI values who may benefit from periCT.

Amifostine cytotoxicity and induction of apoptosis in a human myelodysplastic cell line.

Amifostine (AMF), a phosphorylated aminothiol, has been used to treat myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), where it produces a stimulatory effect on hematopoiesis in bone marrow. To determine if AMF also produced a direct effect on human MDS cells, we planned a study to evaluate the effect of a continuous exposure to AMF on a human MDS cell line. AMF was shown to have a growth-inhibitory effect on MDS cells, with an IC(50) of 14 microM after a 5 day exposure. Cell cycle analysis revealed that a 5 day exposure to 20 microM AMF increased the percentage of cells in G0/G1 and this was accompanied by a decrease in the percentage of cells in S phase. Cytoflorometric and agarose-gel electrophoretic analysis revealed that this effect correlated with cell membrane alterations and DNA fragmentation consistent with an induction of apoptosis without affecting the expression of p53 protein or inducing any lymphoid or myeloid differentiation in the MDS cell line. We conclude that the continuous exposure of a human MDS cell line to AMF is cytotoxic and associated with an induction of apoptosis independent of alterations in p53 expression.

VACOP-B, high-dose cyclophosphamide and high-dose therapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with bone marrow involvement: a study by the non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Co-operative Study Group.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sequential treatment with the addition of high-dose therapy (HDT) and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) rescue has been reported to be active as front-line therapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with bone marrow (BM) involvement. We designed an intensive sequential therapy as front-line therapy in this subset of patients and conducted a phase II study. DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and BM involvement at diagnosis received 8 weeks of VACOP-B chemotherapy as induction therapy. The second phase included high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDCY) (7 g/m(2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) followed by leukaphereses. The third phase included HDT according to the BEAM protocol or melphalan (140 mg/m(2)) plus total body irradiation (8 Gy in a single dose). RESULTS: Forty patients were included in the study. According to the intention-to-treat, after VACOP-B, 11 (27.5%) and 22 (55%) patients achieved complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR), respectively. Thirty-four received HDCY. After HDCY, 18 patients (45%) were in CR and 13 (32.5%) in PR. Twenty-nine underwent HDT plus peripheral blood cell rescue (PBPC) rescue. At the completion of treatment 29 patients (72.5%) were in CR, and 3 patients (7.5%) in PR. The actuarial 3-year overall survival, disease free survival and failure free survival are 48%, 55% and 40%, respectively. Overall severe toxicity was 7.5%. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study suggests that the intensified treatment described is feasible and active in aggressive NHL with BM involvement. A randomized trial is now underway to test this approach.

Multi-institutional phase II randomized trial of integrated therapy with cisplatin, dacarbazine, vindesine, subcutaneous interleukin-2, interferon alpha2a and tamoxifen in metastatic melanoma. BREMIM (Biological Response Modifiers in Melanoma).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of a monochemotherapy regimen of dacarbazine (DTIC), tamoxifen , interferon-alpha2a and interleukin-2 (IL-2) and two polychemotherapy regimens of cisplatin, DTIC, vindesine, tamoxifen, interferon-alpha2a with or without IL-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma. Consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma were enrolled in this trial and were randomized to arm A, consisting of DTIC 800 mg/m2 every 21 days, IL-2 9 MIU subcutaneously days 1-5 and 8-12, arm B, consisting of cisplatin 30 mg/m2 days 1-3, DTIC 250 mg/m2 days 1-3 and vindesine 2.5 mg/m2 day 1 every 28 days (CVD), or arm C, consisting of CVD plus IL-2 6 MIU days 1-5 and 8-12 every 28 days. In all three arms Interferon 3 MU subcutaneously three times a week and tamoxifen 20 mg orally were given throughout. Ninety-two patients were included in this study. Patient characteristics in the three groups were well balanced. The three regimens were delivered on an outpatient basis without major toxicity. The toxicities that did occur consisted primarily of flu-like symptoms in the IL-2 arms (A and C) and haematological toxicities in the CVD arms (B and C). No grade IV toxicities were encountered and no treatment-related deaths occurred. The total response rate was 13% in arm A, 35% in arm B and 37% in arm C. The median duration of response was 6 months and the median survival was 11 months. According to this phase II randomized trial polychemoimmunotherapy with CVD has an objective response rate of 35-36%, while monochemoimmunotherapy with DTIC has a response rate of 13%.

Adoptive immunotherapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and subcutaneous recombinant interleukin-2 plus interferon alfa-2a for melanoma patients with nonresectable distant disease: a phase I/II pilot trial. Melanoma Istituto Scientifico Tumori Group.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of our previous experience, we designed this study to determine the activity and toxicity of outpatient treatment with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) together with intermediate-dose recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) and low-dose recombinant interferon alfa-2a (rIFN-alpha2a), for patients with metastatic melanoma. METHODS: Between April 1992 and October 1994, we processed 38 melanoma samples derived from 36 patients with metastases. Proliferative cultures of expanded lymphocytes (TIL) were infused only once into patients with metastatic melanoma. rIL-2 was administered subcutaneously for 1 month, starting on the day of TIL infusion, at an escalating dose of 6-18 x 10(6) IU/m2/day for the first week and at the maximum-tolerated dose for the subsequent 3 weeks and then, after a 15-day interval, for 1 week/month for 3 months. rIFN-alpha2a was administered subcutaneously at 3 X 10(6) IU three times each week until progression. RESULTS: Of 38 melanoma samples, 19 (50%) resulted in proliferative cultures and were infused. The median number of expanded lymphocytes was 18 x 10(9) (range, 1-43 x 10(9)), and the median period of culture was 52 days (range, 45-60). rIL-2 was administered at doses ranging between 6 and 18 x 10(6) IU/m2/day. Toxicity was mild or moderate, and no life-threatening side effects were encountered. Two of 19 treated patients experienced complete responses of their metastatic sites (soft tissue), 10 had stable disease, and 7 showed progressive disease. The response rate was 11% (95% confidence interval, 2-35%). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient treatment with TIL plus rIL-2 and rIFN-alpha2a is feasible, although, within the context of the small sample size, the activity of the combination was no different from the reported activity of any of the components used alone.

High-dose cyclophosphamide followed by autografting can improve the outcome of relapsed or resistant non-Hodgkin's lymphomas with involved or hypoplastic bone marrow.

We report our experience of high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDCY) followed by high-dose therapy (HDT) and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autografting in patients with diffuse, intermediate and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas who have failed conventional treatment. From 1991 to 1996, 54 consecutive patients pre-treated with a median of two chemotherapy lines entered the study. Eighteen patients (33%) were still responders to conventional chemotherapy (sensitive relapse), and 20 patients (37%) were in partial response (PR) after chemotherapy (CT). Sixteen patients (30%) were resistant to conventional CT either at presentation (non responder) or in relapse (resistant relapse). Thirty-nine patients had bone marrow involved by disease and fifteen had an hypoplastic marrow following conventional treatment. Patients received HDCY (7gr/m2) and G-CSF or GM-CSF in order to collect PBPC. Median collected CD34+ cells was 12.3 x 10(6)/Kg (range 0.7-197). After HDT (BEAM or Melphalan + TBI) 50 patients underwent PBPC autografting. According to intention to treat, 44 (81%) of 54 patients achieved complete remission (CR) (50% after HDCY and 31% after HDT). Procedure related death occurred in 6 patients (11%), one after HDCY and 5 after autografting. Twenty-nine (66%) of 44 patients are still in CR, 7 to 63 months (median 27 months) after the procedure. Three-year probability of survival, disease-free survival and progression-free survival are 63%, 64% and 52% respectively. In conclusion, HDCY is an effective procedure not only in mobilizing PBPC, but also in reducing tumour burden. HDT with PBPC support may further improve the outcome in this category of high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.

Adoptive immunotherapy of advanced solid tumors: an eight year clinical experience.

BACKGROUND: Adoptive immunotherapy (AI) of cancer, based upon the injection of in vitro manipulated autologous lymphocytes is still in an experimental phase. Our group started different clinical trials of AI in early 1990, and, at present, some specific targets for this approach seem to have been identified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 296 patients with solid tumors (melanoma, kidney carcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, mesothelioma, neoplastic pleural effusion, and liver cancer) were treated with either locoregional or systemic adoptive immunotherapy (AI) using both LAK and TIL cells in combination with s.c. rIL-2. RESULTS: The surgery/AI combination resulted in good clinical results, characterized by enhanced survival and long lasting disease free periods in a significant number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: AI seems to be efficacious in the treatment of melanoma, lung and hepatic cancers. Further studies will expand the application of the treatment to other malignancies.

Sentinel node biopsy in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

The role of elective lymph node dissection (ELND) for treatment of cutaneous melanoma is still debated. Initially, lymphatic mapping technique was performed by an intradermic injection of vital blue dye; subsequently, it was improved by the use of radioguided surgery (RGS). Preliminary experience with this technique proved effective for detection of clinical occult lymph node metastasis; it may also enable the surgeon to perform a selective lymph node dissection (SLND) to concentrate on pathologic node-positive patients for the same potential benefits that have been provided by ELND. We performed sentinel node biopsy on 48 patients with stage pT3N0M0 melanoma. Vital blue dye mapping only was carried out on 39 patients; the remaining nine patients had a combined lymphatic mapping with both blue dye and RGS. The sentinel lymph node (SLN) was identified in 46 of 48 patients (95.8%). Ten patients (20.8%) were found to have metastatic melanoma cells in their SLN(s); all these patients underwent SLND of the affected basin. Our findings confirm that the intraoperative lymphatic mapping of the SLN using both blue dye and radiodetection is an appropriate and simple technique for selecting patients who are more likely to benefit from lymph node dissection.

VACOP-B versus VACOP-B plus autologous bone marrow transplantation for advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial by the non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group.

PURPOSE: The aim of this multicenter randomized study was to compare conventional therapy with conventional plus high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) as front-line treatment for poor-prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1991 and June 1995, 124 patients, aged 15 to 60 years, with diffuse intermediate- to high-grade NHL (Working Formulation criteria), stages II bulky (> or = 10 cm), III, or IV were enrolled. Sixty-one patients were randomized to receive etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin (VACOP-B) for 12 weeks and cisplatin, cytarabine, and dexamethasone (DHAP) as a salvage regimen (arm A), and 63 to receive VACOP-B for 12 weeks plus HDT and ABMT (Arm B). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of complete remissions (CRS) in the two groups: 75% in arm A, and 73% in arm B. The median follow-up observation time was 42 months. The 6-year survival probability was 65% in both arms. There was no difference in disease-free survival (DFS) or progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. DFS was 60% and 80% (P = .1) and PFS was 48% and 60% (P = .4) for arms A and B, respectively. Procedure feasibility was the major problem. In arm B, 29% of enrolled patients did not undergo HDT and ABMT. A statistical improvement in terms of DFS (P = .008) and a favorable trend in terms of PFS (P = .08) for intermediate-/high- plus high-risk group patients assigned to HDT and ABMT was observed. CONCLUSION: In this study, conventional chemotherapy followed by HDT and ABMT as front-line therapy seems no more successful than conventional treatment in terms of overall results. However, our results suggest that controlled studies of HDT plus ABMT should be proposed for higher risk patients.

Overview of randomized perioperative polychemotherapy trials in women with early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether perioperative polychemotherapy (PeCT) can significantly prolong the overall survival of women with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS: A meta-analysis that used updated individual patient data from all available randomized trials of PeCT, both published and unpublished, was conducted. Data on 6,093 patients (1,124 deaths and 1,912 recurrences) from five clinical trials were available (median follow-up duration, 5.3 years; maximum, 11.3 years). RESULTS: No significant effect of PeCT on overall survival was observed. However, patients who received PeCT had a significantly longer disease-free survival (hazards ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 0.98; P = .02). Time to local recurrence was significantly prolonged in the PeCT arm (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.80; P < .0001). Likewise, there was a borderline significant difference in favor of PeCT in terms of time to distant metastases (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.00; P = .05). Subgroup analyses suggest that node-negative women benefited the most from treatment. CONCLUSION: At present, there is no evidence that PeCT is able to prolong overall survival in patients with early-stage breast cancer; however, further follow-up evaluation is required. PeCT significantly prolongs disease-free survival, especially in node-negative women, which emphasizes once more the need for clinical trials in this subgroup.