Guidelines in Neurosurgery: a critical appraisal.

BACKGROUND: The process of grading and stratifying evidence in the extensive literature on neurosurgical guidelines has evolved significantly, ranging from high-quality standards to suggested options. However, the methodology for guideline development has become increasingly complex, leading to challenges in their application across various neurosurgical specialties and settings. This mini review aims to explore the practical implications of published suggestions for managing neurosurgical patients. METHODS: A critical and focused collection of published literature concerning guidelines in different neurosurgical topics, from Pubmed and other sources formed the basis of this non-systematic narrative review. Only guidelines produced by neurosurgeons in the era of evidence based medicine (after 1996) were included. RESULTS: Neurosurgical guidelines often rely on a limited number of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and Class I evidence, particularly in surgical and emergency contexts where randomization of patient treatments may conflict with established clinical practices. Challenges also include the timely update of guidelines, which sometimes lags behind rapid shifts in evidence, and varying methodologies in guideline production that can result in divergent recommendations. Geographical disparities in disease burden and literature production further influence guideline applicability, suggesting a need for greater inclusion of authors from Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) to enhance realism and global relevance. Consensus conferences and expert reviews may serve as viable alternatives to address these challenges. CONCLUSION: While Evidence-Based Medicine remains pivotal, critical appraisal and practical application of guidelines must consider these complexities to optimize patient care and outcomes.

Collaborative Initiatives in Neurosurgery Research and Publications Between High-Income and Low/Middle-Income Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Despite the globalization of health information, collaborations between high-income countries (HICs) and low/middle-income countries (LMICs), while present, could still increase. This study builds on previous research highlighting LMIC underrepresentation in neurosurgery literature. We conducted a comprehensive bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database to investigate collaborative neurosurgical research between HIC institutions and those in low-income country (LIC)/LMICs. Articles published between 2018 and 2020 were examined. Articles were categorized into 3 groups: guidelines, conferences, and consensus statements; articles related to training and collaborations; and other articles. We categorized articles and authors by country, role, and specific subtopic. We included 238 reports from 34 neurosurgical journals for analysis. Geographic distribution indicated that India led LIC/LMIC contributions (25.21%). Among HICs, the United States had the highest contribution (47.76%). In collaborative studies, Uganda, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Nigeria made significant contributions. LICs and LMICs accounted for 446 authors, while HICs contributed with 592. India has presented the highest number of authors in significant positions. In HICs, significant positions are recognized in USA articles. When scoring authors' position in collaborative papers, still HICs had a clear prevalence. The highest number of collaborations between HICs and LICs/LMICs has been observed in articles related to training and collaborations. Kenya matched India's contributions in training and collaborations. Global guidelines and consensus papers can enhance patient care, but LMICs' involvement remains limited. Further attention to training and collaboration initiatives is needed. This study emphasizes the importance of promoting collaboration and training between countries with varying resources to advance neurosurgical care globally.

Outcomes of non-contiguous two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Non-contiguous two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) may be a viable option for patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy and imaging-evident spine and radicular compression at two non-contiguous cervical levels. The risk of hastening degeneration and triggering Adjacent Segment Disease at the spine levels located between the fused levels is a putative adverse event, which was assessed in a few studies. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing non-contiguous two levels ACDF and to assess biomechanical modifications at non-fused segments. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with noncontiguous two-level spine and radicular compression, who underwent simultaneous noncontiguous two-level ACDF at our center. We analyzed clinical and radiological outcomes and investigated the rate of adjacent segment disease. Radiographic parameters were calculated on pre- and postoperative images. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent simultaneous noncontiguous two-level ACDF for cervical myelo-radiculopathy between 2015 and 2021 and were followed up for a mean period of 43.3 months. For all patients, the mJOA score significantly improved from 14.57 ± 2.3 to 16.5 ± 2.1 (p<0.01) and the NDI score significantly decreased from 21.45 ± 4.3 to 12.8 ± 2.3 (p<0.01) postoperatively. Cervical lordosis increased after surgery (from 9.65° ±9.47 to 15.12° ± 6.09); intermediate disc height decreased (5.68 mm ± 0.57 to 5.27 mm ±0.98); the ROMs of intermediate (from 12.45 ± 2.33 to 14.77 ± 1.98), cranial (from 14.63 ± 1.59 to 15.71 ± 1.02), and caudal (from 11.58 ± 2.32 to 13.33 ± 2.67) segments slightly increased. During follow-up assessment, in one patient the myelopathy worsened due to spine compression at the intermediate level. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous and non-contiguous two-level ACDF is a safe and effective procedure. The occurrence of postoperative adjacent and intermediate segment disease is rare.

Monocentric Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Adjacent Segment Disease in 507 Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a leading cause of nontraumatic spinal cord injury. Surgery aims to arrest neurological decline and improve conditions, but controversies surround risks and benefits in elderly patients, outcomes in mild myelopathy, and the risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD). METHODS: Retrospective data of patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for DCM in our hospital were collected. Patients were stratified by preoperative modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) (mild, moderate, severe) and age (under 70, over 70). Clinical outcomes, complications, and ASD rate were analyzed. We evaluated the relationship between mJOA recovery rate and the risk of complications and various preoperative parameters. RESULTS: Five hundred seven consecutive patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up of 43.52 months (12-71). Improvement in all outcome variables was observed in mild, moderate, and severe myelopathy categories, with elderly patients showing a lower improvement. Except for age, no other variable correlated with mJOA recovery rate. We observed 45 complications (11.1% of patients), with 14 in the U70 group and 31 in the O70 group (P value < 0.001). Age, Charlson comorbidity index, and ASA score were found to be predictors of complications. Fourteen patients (2.8% of total), mean age 54.2, developed radiological and clinical ASD. Most had cranial-level ASD with Pfirmann grade ≥ 2 before index surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Most myelopathic patients improve after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Elderly patients show a lower improvement and higher complication rates than their younger counterparts. ASD rates are low, and younger patients with preexisting cranial level alterations are more susceptible.

The Use of Technology-Based Simulation among Medical Students as a Global Innovative Solution for Training.

BACKGROUND: Technological advancements have been rapidly integrated within the neurosurgical education track since it is a high-risk specialty with little margin for error. Indeed, simulation and virtual reality during training can improve surgical performance and technical skills. Our study aims to investigate the impact of neurosurgical technology-based simulation activities on medical students. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The "Suturing Mission-The Symposium" was a three-day event held at Humanitas University. Participants had access to live-streamed conferences held by worldwide experts in several fields of neurosurgery and practical simulations of dura mater sutures, microvascular anastomosis, and augmented reality neurosurgical approaches. An anonymous survey was conducted at the beginning and end of the event. RESULTS: 141 medical students with a mean age of 21 participated. After the course, 110 participants (77.5%) showed interest in pursuing a surgical path, with a great prevalence in those who had planned to have a surgical career before the event (88.7% vs. 41.4%, p < 0.001). Participants were also asked about their comfort levels while handling surgical instruments, and a good outcome was reached in 72.7% of participants, with a significant difference between those who had previously attended a suture course (87.8% vs. 66.3%, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Training sessions on surgical simulators were effective in increasing participants' interest in pursuing a surgical path, improving their understanding of postgraduate orientation, and boosting their confidence with surgical instruments.

A guide to interpreting systematic reviews and meta-analyses in neurosurgery and surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) are methods of data analysis used to synthesize information presented in multiple publications on the same topic. A thorough understanding of the steps involved in conducting this type of research and approaches to data analysis is critical for appropriate understanding, interpretation, and application of the findings of these reviews. METHODS: We reviewed reference texts in clinical neuroepidemiology, neurostatistics and research methods and other previously related articles on meta-analyses (MAs) in surgery. Based on existing theories and models and our cumulative years of expertise in conducting MAs, we have synthesized and presented a detailed pragmatic approach to interpreting MAs in Neurosurgery. RESULTS: Herein we have briefly defined SRs sand MAs and related terminologies, succinctly outlined the essential steps to conduct and critically appraise SRs and MAs. A practical approach to interpreting MAs for neurosurgeons is described in details. Based on summary outcome measures, we have used hypothetical examples to illustrate the Interpretation of the three commonest types of MAs in neurosurgery: MAs of Binary Outcome Measures (Pairwise MAs), MAs of proportions and MAs of Continuous Variables. Furthermore, we have elucidated on the concepts of heterogeneity, modeling, certainty, and bias essential for the robust and transparent interpretation of MAs. The basics for the Interpretation of Forest plots, the preferred graphical display of data in MAs are summarized. Additionally, a condensation of the assessment of the overall quality of methodology and reporting of MA and the applicability of evidence to patient care is presented. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of pragmatic guides to appraise MAs for surgeons who are non-statisticians. This article serves as a detailed guide for the interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses with examples of applications for clinical neurosurgeons.

Consensus-based recommendations for diagnosis and surgical management of cranioplasty and post-traumatic hydrocephalus from a European panel.

Introduction: Planning cranioplasty (CPL) in patients with suspected or proven post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) poses a significant management challenge due to a lack of clear guidance. Research question: This project aims to create a European document to improve adherence and adapt to local protocols based on available resources and national health systems. Methods: After a thorough non-systematic review, a steering committee (SC) formed a European expert panel (EP) for a two-round questionnaire using the Delphi method. The questionnaire employed a 9-point Likert scale to assess the appropriateness of statements inherent to two sections: "Diagnostic criteria for PTH" and "Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction." Results: The panel reached a consensus on 29 statements. In the "Diagnostic criteria for PTH" section, five statements were deemed "appropriate" (consensus 74.2-90.3 %), two were labeled "inappropriate," and seven were marked as "uncertain."In the "Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction" section, four statements were considered "appropriate" (consensus 74.2-90.4 %), six were "inappropriate," and five were "uncertain." Discussion and conclusion: Planning a cranioplasty alongside hydrocephalus remains a significant challenge in neurosurgery. Our consensus conference suggests that, in patients with cranial decompression and suspected hydrocephalus, the most suitable diagnostic approach involves a combination of evolving clinical conditions and neuroradiological imaging. The recommended management sequence prioritizes cranial reconstruction, with the option of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt when needed, preferably with a programmable valve. We strongly recommend to adopt local protocols based on expert consensus, such as this, to guide patient care.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Custom-Made Porous Hydroxyapatite Cranioplasties: Analysis of Infections in Adult and Pediatric Patients.

In neurosurgery, cranioplasty (CP) stands as a pivotal surgical intervention, particularly following head trauma or various neurosurgical interventions. This study scrutinizes the intricacies of CP, emphasizing its prevalence and associated complications, with a specific focus on custom-made porous hydroxyapatite (PHA) implants. The investigation spans 687 patients (with 80 patients of pediatric age, less than 14 years old) across 26 neurosurgical centers in five European countries. Methodologically, this study delves into patient characteristics, complications, and infection data through a comprehensive post-marketing on-site surveillance approach. Notably, infections emerged as the primary complication, affecting 41 patients (6% of implants) with a clear distinction in onset patterns between pediatric (with more infections, 10% versus 5.4% in adults and an earlier onset of complications) and adult populations. Out of these 41 cases, cranioplasty explantation was required in 30 patients, 4.4% of the total population. Furthermore, bifrontal decompression correlated with a significantly elevated infection risk as compared to unilateral decompression (12.5% versus 5.1%) which remains after the examination of possible confounding factors. These findings provide substantial insights into the complexities of CP, suggesting the necessity for tailored strategies in pediatric and adult cases and cautioning against bifrontal decompressions. Despite acknowledging limitations and calling for prospective studies with long term follow-up, this research advances our understanding of the use of PHA CP, guiding clinical decision-making and emphasizing the importance of customized approaches for diverse patient cohorts.

The Current Landscape of Neurosurgical Oncology in Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC): Strategies for the Path Forward.

OBJECTIVE: To promote global equity in research, innovation, and care, sharing knowledge and grasping current benchmarks is crucial. Despite LIC/LMIC constituting around 80% of the global population, their contribution to neurosurgery research is less than 5%. This study aims to assess the status of neurosurgical oncology in LIC/LMIC using published data, offering strategic insights for progress. METHODS: Conducting a retrospective bibliometric analysis via PubMed and Scopus databases, we documented reports published (2015-2021) by neurosurgical department-affiliated investigators in LICs/LMICs. World Bank classifications identified LIC and LMIC. Reviewed papers underwent further scrutiny based on independent and associated keyword lists. RESULTS: Our systematic approach revealed 189 studies from LMIC in 10 neurosurgery journals. Of these, 53% were case reports, with 88% focusing on brain pathologies and 12% on the spine. Intra-axial brain tumors (45.8%), extra-axial/skull base (38.4%), and metastasis (3.68%) were prominent. Among noncase report publications, surgical technique and outcome were common themes. India, Egypt, and Tunisia led in publications, with 94% appearing in journals with an impact factor below 5. No papers originated from LIC. CONCLUSIONS: This study reinforces existing findings that data from LMIC inadequately represent their populations, impeding a comprehensive understanding of their neurosurgical oncology landscape. Language barriers and data collection difficulties contribute to this gap. Addressing these challenges could significantly enhance progress in shaping the future of neurosurgical oncology in these regions.

Innovations in craniovertebral junction training: harnessing the power of mixed reality and head-mounted displays.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the potential and convenience of using mixed reality as a teaching tool for craniovertebral junction (CVJ) anomaly pathoanatomy. METHODS: CT and CT angiography images of 2 patients with CVJ anomalies were used to construct mixed reality models in the HoloMedicine application on the HoloLens 2 headset, resulting in four viewing stations. Twenty-two participants were randomly allocated into two groups, with each participant rotating through all stations for 90 seconds, each in a different order based on their group. At every station, objective questions evaluating the understanding of CVJ pathoanatomy were answered. At the end, subjective opinion on the user experience of mixed reality was provided using a 5-point Likert scale. The objective performance of the two viewing modes was compared, and a correlation between performance and participant experience was sought. Subjective feedback was compiled and correlated with experience. RESULTS: In both groups, there was a significant improvement in median (interquartile range [IQR]) objective performance with mixed reality compared with DICOM: 1) group A: case 1, median 6 (IQR 6-7) versus 5 (IQR 3-6), p = 0.009; case 2, median 6 (IQR 6-7) versus 5 (IQR 3-6), p = 0.02; 2) group B: case 1, median 6 (IQR 5-7) versus 4 (IQR 2-5), p = 0.04; case 2, median 6 (IQR 6-7) versus 5 (IQR 3-7), p = 0.03. There was significantly higher improvement in less experienced participants in both groups for both cases: 1) group A: case 1, r = -0.8665, p = 0.0005; case 2, r = -0.8002, p = 0.03; 2) group B: case 1, r = -0.6977, p = 0.01; case 2, r = -0.7417, p = 0.009. Subjectively, mixed reality was easy to use, with less disorientation due to the visible background, and it was believed to be a useful teaching tool. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed reality is an effective teaching tool for CVJ pathoanatomy, particularly for young neurosurgeons and trainees. The versatility of mixed reality and the intuitiveness of the user experience offer many potential applications, including training, intraoperative guidance, patient counseling, and individualized medicine; consequently, mixed reality has the potential to transform neurosurgery.

Neurosurgery as a Top-Drawer Choice for Residency in India: Reality or Myth?

INTRODUCTION: This survey was conducted to explore the perceptions of undergraduate (UG) medical students regarding enrolling in a neurosurgical training program. The purpose was to understand' expectations, reasons, apprehensions, and variables influencing students' decisions to pursue a career in neurosurgery. The results shed light on students' perceptions and can help educational institutions and training programs draw in and encourage aspiring neurosurgeons. METHODS: A 35-point online questionnaire was created using Google Forms (Google LLC) after content and face validation and circulated using social media platforms among various public medical colleges across India. Responses were collected over a period of 3 months, from February 2023 to April 2023. A 5-point Likert scale was used to collect the responses wherever applicable. RESULTS: A total of 1042 respondents from 47 medical colleges completed the survey. The majority of the students were not exposed to neurosurgery during their UG program, but despite this, 60.1% (n = 627) were willing to consider it as their career option. Around 91.4% of the respondents perceived neurosurgery to be a challenging but prestigious specialty that has a long learning curve and the worst work-life balance when compared with other specialties. The majority of the respondents (strongly disagree = 24.3%, n = 253; disagree = 31.7%, n = 330) did not view neurosurgery as a male-dominated specialty. Most students preferred a 6-year training program over a 3-year program (P = 0.001) if their medical college had such a course. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that although a majority of the UG students would like to join neurosurgery residency, there are significant barriers in the form of less exposure, negative perceptions, and apprehensions toward the branch. Enhancing medical students' awareness about neurosurgery necessitates the integration of hands-on workshops, simulation-based training, didactic lectures, and neurosurgery rotations into the UG curriculum.

Consensus-Based Development of a Global Registry for Traumatic Brain Injury: Establishment, Protocol, and Implementation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Global disparity exists in the demographics, pathology, management, and outcomes of surgically treated traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the factors underlying these differences, including intervention effectiveness, remain unclear. Establishing a more accurate global picture of the burden of TBI represents a challenging task requiring systematic and ongoing data collection of patients with TBI across all management modalities. The objective of this study was to establish a global registry that would enable local service benchmarking against a global standard, identification of unmet need in TBI management, and its evidence-based prioritization in policymaking. METHODS: The registry was developed in an iterative consensus-based manner by a panel of neurotrauma professionals. Proposed registry objectives, structure, and data points were established in 2 international multidisciplinary neurotrauma meetings, after which a survey consisting of the same data points was circulated within the global neurotrauma community. The survey results were disseminated in a final meeting to reach a consensus on the most pertinent registry variables. RESULTS: A total of 156 professionals from 53 countries, including both high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries, responded to the survey. The final consensus-based registry includes patients with TBI who required neurosurgical admission, a neurosurgical procedure, or a critical care admission. The data set comprised clinically pertinent information on demographics, injury characteristics, imaging, treatments, and short-term outcomes. Based on the consensus, the Global Epidemiology and Outcomes following Traumatic Brain Injury (GEO-TBI) registry was established. CONCLUSION: The GEO-TBI registry will enable high-quality data collection, clinical auditing, and research activity, and it is supported by the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies and the National Institute of Health Research Global Health Program. The GEO-TBI registry ( https://geotbi.org ) is now open for participant site recruitment. Any center involved in TBI management is welcome to join the collaboration to access the registry.

Intrasellar Dermoid Cyst: Case Report of a Rare Lesion and Systematic Literature Review Comparing Intrasellar, Suprasellar, and Parasellar Locations.

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial dermoid cyst (DC) is a rare benign, slow-growing lesion, most commonly arising along the midline. They can occur in the supratentorial compartment, very rarely involve the sellar region and only exceptionally are intrasellar. The aim of our study is to address the challenges in the diagnosis and management of sellar DCs. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of sellar DCs, in keeping with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and described an intrasellar DC in a 32-year-old female who presented with bilateral blurring vision. RESULTS: The review identified 4 intrasellar, 29 suprasellar, and 28 parasellar cases. Intrasellar DCs more likely present with progressive visual impairment and pituitary hormone dysfunctions during the fifth decade of life. Suprasellar and parasellar DCs are typically diagnosed during the third decade of life because of diplopia, ptosis, trigeminal hypoaesthesia/para-esthesia or cyst's rupture. Sellar DCs are typically hypodense on computed tomography scans and contain calcifications. Magnetic resonance imaging features include T1 hyperintensity, T2 heterogeneous intensity, no restriction on diffusion-weighted images, and no contrast enhancement. Surgery is the treatment of choice. Gross total resection is achieved in 60% of intrasellar and 61.9% of suprasellar and parasellar DCs. Early postoperative complications are reported in 40.0%, 16.7%, and 23.8% of intrasellar, suprasellar, and parasellar DCs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intrasellar DCs are rare lesions typically diagnosed later than suprasellar and parasellar DCs due to their different clinical presentations. However, they should be considered in the differential diagnosis of cystic lesions of the sella, including epidermoid cysts, craniopharyngiomas, Rathke's cleft cysts, and teratomas.

Reducing the Gap in Neurosurgical Education in LMICs: A Report of a Non-Profit Educational Program.

INTRODUCTION: Central to neurosurgical care, neurosurgical education is particularly needed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where opportunities for neurosurgical training are limited due to social and economic constraints and an inadequate workforce. The present paper aims (1) to evaluate the validity and usability of a cadaver-free hybrid system in the context of LMICs and (2) to report their learning needs and whether the courses meet those needs via a comprehensive survey. METHODS: From April to November 2021, a non-profit initiative consisting of a series of innovative cadaver-free courses based on virtual and practical training was organized. This project emerged from a collaboration between the Young Neurosurgeons Forum of the World Federation of Neurological Societies (WFNS), the NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, and UpSurgeOn, an Italian hi-tech company specialized in simulation technologies, creator of the UpSurgeOn Box, a hyper-realistic simulator of cranial approaches fused with augmented reality. Over that period, 11 cadaver-free courses were held in LMICs using remote hands-on Box simulators. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight participants completed an online survey after course completion of the course. The anatomical accuracy of simulators was overall rated high by the participant. The simulator provided a challenging but manageable learning curve, and 86% of participants found the Box to be very intuitive to use. When asked if the sequence of mental training (app), hybrid training (Augmented Reality), and manual training (the Box) was an effective method of training to fill the gap between theoretical knowledge and practice on a real patient/cadaver, 83% of participants agreed. Overall, the hands-on activities on the simulators have been satisfactory, as well as the integration between physical and digital simulation. CONCLUSIONS: This project demonstrated that a cadaver-free hybrid (virtual/hands-on) training system could potentially participate in accelerating the learning curve of neurosurgical residents, especially in the setting of limited training possibilities such as LMICs, which were only worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Non-surgical management of chronic subdural hematoma: insights and future perspectives from an international survey including neurosurgeons from 90 countries worldwide.

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical conditions. Although surgical evacuation is still the gold standard for treatment, recent advances have led to the development of other management strategies, such as medical therapies and endovascular middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization. Through this international survey, we investigated the global trends in cSDH management, focusing on medical and endovascular treatments. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A 14-question, web-based, anonymous survey was distributed to neurosurgeons worldwide. RESULTS: Most responders do not perform MMA embolization (69.5%) unless for specific indications (29.6%). These indications include residual cSDH after surgical evacuation (58.9%) or cSDH in patients on antiplatelet medications to avoid surgical evacuation (44.8%). Survey participants from teaching versus non-teaching hospitals (p = 0.002), public versus private hospitals (p = 0.022), and Europe versus other continents (p < 0.001) are the most users of MMA embolization. A large number of participants (51%) declare they use a conservative/medical approach, mainly to avoid surgery in patients with small cSDH (74.8%). CONCLUSIONS: This survey highlights the current trends of cSDH management, focusing on conservative and MMA embolization treatment strategies. Most responders prefer a conservative approach for patients with small cSDHs not requiring surgical evacuation. However, in higher-risk scenarios such as residual hematomas after surgery or patients on antiplatelet medications, MMA embolization is regarded as a reasonable option by participants. Future studies should clarify the indications of MMA embolization, including appropriate patient selection and efficacy as a stand-alone procedure.

An international, prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury epidemiology study protocol: GEO-TBI: Incidence.

Background: The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unclear - it is estimated to affect 27-69 million individuals yearly with the bulk of the TBI burden in low-to-middle income countries (LMICs). Research has highlighted significant between-hospital variability in TBI outcomes following emergency surgery, but the overall incidence and epidemiology of TBI remains unclear. To address this need, we established the Global Epidemiology and Outcomes following Traumatic Brain Injury (GEO-TBI) registry, enabling recording of all TBI cases requiring admission irrespective of surgical treatment. Objective: The GEO-TBI: Incidence study aims to describe TBI epidemiology and outcomes according to development indices, and to highlight best practices to facilitate further comparative research. Design: Multi-centre, international, registry-based, prospective cohort study. Subjects: Any unit managing TBI and participating in the GEO-TBI registry will be eligible to join the study. Each unit will select a 90-day study period. All TBI patients meeting the registry inclusion criteria (neurosurgical/ICU admission or neurosurgical operation) during the selected study period will be included in the GEO-TBI: Incidence. Methods: All units will form a study team, that will gain local approval, identify eligible patients and input data. Data will be collected via the secure registry platform and validated after collection. Identifiers may be collected if required for local utility in accordance with the GEO-TBI protocol. Data: Data related to initial presentation, interventions and short-term outcomes will be collected in line with the GEO-TBI core dataset, developed following consensus from an iterative survey and feedback process. Patient demographics, injury details, timing and nature of interventions and post-injury care will be collected alongside associated complications. The primary outcome measures for the study will be the Glasgow Outcome at Discharge Scale (GODS) and 14-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures will be mortality and extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) at the most recent follow-up timepoint.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant global health problem, which affects 27­69 million people every year. After-effects of TBI commonly affect the injured individuals for years. Most patients who sustain a TBI are from developing countries. Research has shown that there are differences in patients' recovery after TBI between countries and hospitals. The causes of these differences are unclear and tackling them could improve TBI treatment worldwide. To address this need, we have recently established the Global Epidemiology and Outcomes Following Traumatic Brain Injury (GEO-TBI) registry. The international collaborative registry aims to collect data related to the causes, treatments and outcomes related to TBI patients. This data will hopefully enable future research to elucidate the causes of the recovery differences between hospitals, which could lead to improved patient outcomes. The GEO-TBI: Incidence study collects data from all TBI patients that are admitted to participating hospitals or undergo a neurosurgical operation due to TBI during a 90-day period. This study looks at the patient's recovery at discharge using the Glasgow Outcome at Discharge Scale (GODS), and at the 2-week mortality. In addition, the study also evaluates recovery at the most recent follow-up timepoint. We hope that this information will enhance our understanding on the causes, treatments, and commonness of TBI. The study results will also help local hospitals compare their treatment results to an international standard.

Perceived Utility of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Seattle International Brain Injury Consensus Conference Consensus-Based Analysis and Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is widely practiced, but the indications are incompletely developed, and guidelines are poorly followed. OBJECTIVE: To study the monitoring practices of an established expert panel (the clinical working group from the Seattle International Brain Injury Consensus Conference effort) to examine the match between monitoring guidelines and their clinical decision-making and offer guidance for clinicians considering monitor insertion. METHODS: We polled the 42 Seattle International Brain Injury Consensus Conference panel members' ICP monitoring decisions for virtual patients, using matrices of presenting signs (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] total or GCS motor, pupillary examination, and computed tomography diagnosis). Monitor insertion decisions were yes, no, or unsure (traffic light approach). We analyzed their responses for weighting of the presenting signs in decision-making using univariate regression. RESULTS: Heatmaps constructed from the choices of 41 panel members revealed wider ICP monitor use than predicted by guidelines. Clinical examination (GCS) was by far the most important characteristic and differed from guidelines in being nonlinear. The modified Marshall computed tomography classification was second and pupils third. We constructed a heatmap and listed the main clinical determinants representing 80% ICP monitor insertion consensus for our recommendations. CONCLUSION: Candidacy for ICP monitoring exceeds published indicators for monitor insertion, suggesting the clinical perception that the value of ICP data is greater than simply detecting and monitoring severe intracranial hypertension. Monitor insertion heatmaps are offered as potential guidance for ICP monitor insertion and to stimulate research into what actually drives monitor insertion in unconstrained, real-world conditions.