Impact of intrapulmonary tumour location of non-small-cell lung cancer on surgical outcomes for segmentectomy.

OBJECTIVES: While segmentectomy is considered a viable option for small peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer, its efficacy for central lesions remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the oncological outcomes of segmentectomy for central lesions compared to peripheral ones. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 338 clinical stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer patients who underwent thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy at our institution from January 2013 to December 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on intrapulmonary tumour location: inner two-thirds (central group, n = 82) and outer one-third (peripheral group, n = 256). RESULTS: The gender, body mass index, performance score, smoking, comorbidities and preoperative pulmonary function were similar in both groups. On computed tomography images, tumour diameter and consolidation-to-tumour ratio were comparable between the groups. The central group had significantly greater tumour-to-pleura distances [mm, 23 (18-27) vs 11 (8-14); P < 0.001], shorter margin distances [mm, 20 (15-20) vs 20 (20-20); P < 0.001] and larger resected lung volumes based on subsegment count [4 (3-6) vs 3 (3-5); P = 0.004] than the peripheral group. Surgery duration, bleeding, hospitalization or drainage period, mortality, readmission and pathological stage were equivalent between the groups. The central group showed significantly more postoperative pleural effusions (5% vs 1%; P = 0.03) than the peripheral group, with no adverse impact on postoperative pulmonary functions. During the follow-up period, local-only recurrence rates were 0% and 8% in the respective groups (Gray test P = 0.07), and total recurrence rates were 6% and 11% (Gray test P = 0.70), with no significant differences. Moreover, no significant inter-group difference in overall survival rates was observed (82% vs 93%; P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Segmentectomy may be a promising therapeutic option for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer located in the inner two-thirds of the parenchyma.

Usefulness of the Global Leadership Initiative on malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in preoperative nutritional assessment of patients with primary lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) developed a new method for evaluating malnutrition; however, no consensus has been reached regarding the use of these criteria. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between nutritional status assessed using the GLIM criteria and outcomes of lung cancer after surgery. METHODS: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung resection and bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate muscle mass before surgery were included. Their background, pathological stage, recurrence, and prognosis were investigated. Patients were divided into two groups according to the GLIM criteria: normal nutrition and malnutrition groups. RESULTS: The normal and malnutrition groups comprised 110 and 88 patients, respectively. Malnutrition was significantly associated with poor overall survival after surgery (P = 0.025) but not with disease-free survival. Multivariate analysis showed that malnutrition (hazard ratio [HR]:2.374, P = 0.020), advanced pathological stage of lung cancer (HR: 1.919, P = 0.002), and the presence of postoperative complications (HR: 2.035, P = 0.047) were significantly associated with poor overall survival. CONCLUSION: Malnutrition assessed using the GLIM criteria was associated with the prognosis of patients with postoperative non-small cell lung cancer. Preoperative assessment using the GLIM criteria would allow for effective nutritional and rehabilitative interventions to improve prognosis.