RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) is a long-acting injectable antipsychotic approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder (SCA) in adults. OBJECTIVE: To assess treatment patterns and schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization following payer rejection, patient reversal, or payment of an initial PP1M claim. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the IQVIA Formulary Impact Analyzer database linked to the Medical Claims, Hospital Charge Detail Master, and Experian consumer databases. Patients with schizophrenia/SCA and ≥1 PP1M pharmacy claim from January 1, 2018, to February 28, 2022, were identified and stratified into 3 cohorts based on the transaction status of the initial PP1M claim (index date): rejected (payer not approved), reversed (payer approved, patient abandoned), and paid (payer approved, patient filled). Patient characteristics during the 12 months before the index date, subsequent treatment patterns, and schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization for patients with >6 months of follow-up were assessed by cohort. RESULTS: The rejected, reversed, and paid cohorts included 1,260, 1,046, and 1,686 patients, respectively. Across these cohorts, the mean ages ranged between 39.2 and 44.5 years; more than half were male (50.8%-51.6%) and White (50.6%-58.3%); 19.8%-24.6% of patients had a Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index score of ≥2. Rates of prior atypical oral and long-acting injectable antipsychotic use ranged between 76.4%-80.3% and 7.8%-12.7%, respectively. Among patients with ≥6 months of follow-up, 52.2% in the rejected and 53.1% in the reversed cohorts had a subsequent paid PP1M claim during the study period; the median (quartile 1-quartile 3) time to the first paid PP1M claim was 22 (5-74) days for rejection and 11 (1-41) days for reversal. In the rejected and reversed cohorts, 10.2% (n = 111) and 9.8% (n = 90) of patients, respectively, did not receive any paid claim for an antipsychotic after the initial PP1M rejection/reversal. The prevalence of schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization during follow-up was similar between patients with a paid (7.4%) and rejected PP1M claim (7.0%; P = 0.689) but higher among patients with a reversed claim (10.8%; P = 0.004). After adjusting for confounders, patients in the reversed cohort were 39% more likely to have a schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization than those in the paid cohort (odds ratio = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.03-1.87). CONCLUSIONS: Payer rejection and patient reversal of initial PP1M claims is a form of primary nonadherence and may influence patient trajectory. Data from this study suggest that patient reversal of PP1M may lead to an increased risk of schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalizations, potentially caused by missed or delayed treatment. Policy initiatives that remove barriers to primary adherence or fulfillment may help improve patients' clinical outcomes.
RESUMEN
This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in commercially insured patients living with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and explore end-of-life (EOL)-related HCRU and costs. Data from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database (October 2014 to May 2020) were analyzed to identify adults (≥18 years) with PAH (PAH cohort) and those without PH (non-PH cohort). Patients were required to have data for ≥12 months before (baseline) and ≥6 months after (follow-up) the first observed PH diagnosis (index date) for PAH cohort or pseudo index date for non-PH cohort. A PAH EOL cohort was similarly constructed using a broader data window (October 2014 to March 2022) and ≥1 month of follow-up. Annualized all-cause HCRU and costs during follow-up were compared between PAH and non-PH cohorts after 1:1 matching on propensity scores derived from patient characteristics. EOL-related HCRU and costs were explored within 30 days and 6 months before the death date and estimated by a claims-based algorithm in PAH EOL cohort. The annual all-cause total ($183,616 vs. $20,212) and pharmacy ($115,926 vs. $7862; both p < 0.001) costs were 8 and 14 times higher, respectively, in the PAH cohort versus matched non-PH cohort (N = 386 for each). In PAH EOL cohort (N = 28), the mean EOL-related costs were $48,846 and $167,524 per patient within 30 days and 6 months before the estimated death, respectively. Hospitalizations contributed 58.8%-70.8% of the EOL-related costs. The study findings indicate substantial HCRU and costs for PAH. While pharmacy costs were one of the major sources, hospitalization was the primary driver for EOL-related costs.
RESUMEN
Objective: To evaluate treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) patients in the USA. Methods: A retrospective cohort study, using the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus claims database from 1 April 2011 to 30 November 2021, identified PTCL patients receiving systemic treatments. Three mutually exclusive subcohorts were created based on line of therapy (LOT): 1LOT, 2LOT and ≥3LOT. Common treatment regimens, median time on treatment, all-cause and PTCL-related HRU and costs were estimated. Results: Among 189 PTCL patients identified, 61.9% had 1LOT, 21.7% had 2LOT and 16.4% had ≥3LOT. The most common treatment regimens in the 1LOT were CHOP/CHOP-like, CHOEP/CHOEP-like and brentuximab vedotin; monotherapies were most common in the 2LOT and ≥3LOT. All-cause and PTCL-related hospitalizations and prescriptions PPPM increased with increasing LOT. Nearly 70% of total treatment costs were PTCL related. Conclusion: Higher utilization of combination therapies in the 1LOT and monotherapies in subsequent LOTs were observed, alongside high PTCL-related costs.
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a rare and fast-growing form of blood cancer. About 800012,000 people in the USA are diagnosed with PTCL every year. As it is a rare disease and has many types, and there is a limited understanding of the patients who have PTCL and the treatments they receive in the real world. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how these patients are treated, what are they treated with and what are the costs of these treatments in the USA. The data collected on these patients was divided into three groups based upon the number of lines of treatment/therapy (LOT) they received: 1LOT, 2LOT and ≥3LOT. This study researched different treatments and their duration in each line of therapy. Among 189 PTCL patients included in the study, the average age of patients was 55 years and 62% were male. Among these patients, 62% had 1LOT, 22% had 2LOT and 16% had ≥3LOT. The most common treatments in the 1LOT were traditional chemotherapy regimens followed by targeted therapies: CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) or CHOP-like, CHOEP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide and prednisone) or CHOEP-like, and brentuximab vedotin. Treatment regimens with only one drug were most common in the 2LOT and ≥3LOT. The total cost of PTCL treatment in the USA is very high; 70% of this cost is related to their treatment with various drugs. More research is needed to better understand the treatment and cost of this rare cancer.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células T Periférico , Humanos , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Brentuximab Vedotina/uso terapéutico , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Doxorrubicina , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Vincristina/uso terapéutico , PrednisonaRESUMEN
ObjectiveS: This study examined prescription NSAIDs as one of the leading predictors of incident depression and assessed the direction of the association among older cancer survivors with osteoarthritis. Methods: This study used a retrospective cohort (N = 14, 992) of older adults with incident cancer (breast, prostate, colorectal cancers, or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) and osteoarthritis. We used the longitudinal data from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results -Medicare data for the study period from 2006 through 2016, with a 12-month baseline and 12-month follow-up period. Cumulative NSAIDs days was assessed during the baseline period and incident depression was assessed during the follow-up period. An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was built with 10-fold repeated stratified cross-validation and hyperparameter tuning using the training dataset. The final model selected from the training data demonstrated high performance (Accuracy: 0.82, Recall: 0.75, Precision: 0.75) when applied to the test data. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret the output from the XGBoost model. Results: Over 50% of the study cohort had at least one prescption of NSAIDs. Nearly 13% of the cohort were diagnosed with incident depression, with the rates ranging between 7.4% for prostate cancer and 17.0% for colorectal cancer. The highest incident depression rate of 25% was observed at 90 and 120 cumulative NSAIDs days thresholds. Cumulative NSAIDs days was the sixth leading predictor of incident depression among older adults with OA and cancer. Age, education, care fragmentation, polypharmacy, and zip code level poverty were the top 5 predictors of incident depression. Conclusion: Overall, 1 in 8 older adults with cancer and OA were diagnosed with incident depression. Cumulative NSAIDs days was the sixth leading predictor with an overall positive association with incident depression. However, the association was complex and varied by the cumulative NSAIDs days.
RESUMEN
Background: In the United States, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused increased mental health symptoms and mental illness. Specific subgroups such as Asian Indians in the US have also been subject to additional stressors due to unprecedented loss of lives in their home country and increased Asian hate due to the misperception that Asians are to be blamed for the spread of the SARS-CoV-2. Objective: We examined the various factors including discrimination associated with COVID-19-related mental health symptoms among Asian Indians. Methods: We administered an online survey between May 2021 and July 2021 using convenient and snowball sampling methods to recruit Asian Indian adults (age > 18 years, N = 289). The survey included questions on mental health and the experience with unfair treatment in day-to-day life. Descriptive analysis and logistic regressions were performed. Results: Overall, 46.0% reported feeling down, depressed, or lonely and feeling nervous, tense, or worried due to the COVID-19 pandemic; 90.0% had received at least one dose of vaccination and 74.7% reported some form of discrimination. In the fully-adjusted logistic regression, age (AOR = 0.95; 95%CI- 0.92, 0.97;p < 0.01) and general health (AOR=0.84; 95%CI- 0.73, 0.97; p < 0.015) were negatively associated with mental health symptoms. Participants who experienced discrimination were more likely (AOR=1.26; 95%CI- 1.08, 1.46; p < 0.01) to report mental health symptoms. Conclusion: In this highly vaccinated group of Asian Indians discriminatory behaviors were associated with mental health symptoms suggesting the need for novel institutional level policy responses to reduce anti-Asian racism.
RESUMEN
Objective: Many patients with osteoarthritis experience pain which can lead to higher healthcare expenditures. It is important to understand the factors that drive the excess expenditures associated with pain in osteoarthritis. Design: Cross-sectional. Study sample: Our study sample consisted of adults (age ⩾ 18 years) from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS, 2018). Methods: Adults who were alive during the calendar year and had pain status were included in this study (N = 2804 weighted N = 32.03 million). Osteoarthritis was identified from the medical conditions file and household file. We used multivariable ordinary least squares regression to identify the statistically significant association of pain with direct healthcare expenditures. The Blinder-Oaxaca post-linear decomposition on log-transformed total direct healthcare expenditures was used to estimate the extent to which differences in characteristics contribute to the excess expenditures associated with pain. Results: Adults with osteoarthritis and pain had higher average expenditures ($21 814 vs $10 827, P < .001; 9.318 vs 8.538 in logtransformed expenditures) compared to those without pain. Pooled regression weights explained 62.9% of excess expenditures differences in characteristics between the 2 groups. The 2 main drivers of excess healthcare expenditures among adults with osteoarthritis and pain were (i) comorbidities (diabetes, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, heart diseases, cancer, and non-cancer pain conditions and (ii) prescription medications (NSAIDs, opioids, and polypharmacy). Conclusion: Need factors such as comorbid conditions, and prescription treatment explained the excess healthcare expenditures among adults with osteoarthritis and pain. The study findings suggest that reducing polypharmacy and appropriate management of comorbid conditions may be a pathway to reduce excess expenditures among adults with osteoarthritis and pain.
RESUMEN
During the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in poor mental health among Asian Indians was observed in the United States. However, the leading predictors of poor mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in Asian Indians remained unknown. A cross-sectional online survey was administered to self-identified Asian Indians aged 18 and older (N = 289). Survey collected information on demographic and socio-economic characteristics and the COVID-19 burden. Two novel machine learning techniques-eXtreme Gradient Boosting and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to identify the leading predictors and explain their associations with poor mental health. A majority of the study participants were female (65.1%), below 50 years of age (73.3%), and had income ≥ $75,000 (81.0%). The six leading predictors of poor mental health among Asian Indians were sleep disturbance, age, general health, income, wearing a mask, and self-reported discrimination. SHAP plots indicated that higher age, wearing a mask, and maintaining social distancing all the time were negatively associated with poor mental health while having sleep disturbance and imputed income levels were positively associated with poor mental health. The model performance metrics indicated high accuracy (0.77), precision (0.78), F1 score (0.77), recall (0.77), and AUROC (0.87). Nearly one in two adults reported poor mental health, and one in five reported sleep disturbance. Findings from our study suggest a paradoxical relationship between income and poor mental health; further studies are needed to confirm our study findings. Sleep disturbance and perceived discrimination can be targeted through tailored intervention to reduce the risk of poor mental health in Asian Indians.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/epidemiología , Salud Mental , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , Pueblo AsiaticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental absenteeism-related wage loss associated with multimorbidity and examine the influence of paid sick leave policy (PSLP) on multimorbidity-associated absenteeism wage loss. METHODS: We used the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 2015 data. Two-part generalized linear models (GLM) were employed, using binomial distribution and gamma distribution with a log link. RESULTS: Nationally, multimorbidity was associated with a $9 billion incremental absenteeism-related wage loss annually among working adults. Absenteeism-related wage loss was higher among those with multimorbidity than those without multimorbidity. The incremental annual absenteeism-related wage loss associated with multimorbidity was lower in settings that offered paid sick leave than that did not offer paid sick leaves. CONCLUSION: Multimorbidity is associated with higher absenteeism-related wage loss. Paid sick leave policies can reduce the impact of multimorbidity on absenteeism-related wage loss.
Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Multimorbilidad , Adulto , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Salarios y Beneficios , Ausencia por Enfermedad , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With the emerging opportunities for pharmacists to gain provider status, the need for understanding interest to become a pharmacist provider has never been greater. OBJECTIVE: To determine which entrepreneurial traits (locus of control, innovativeness, autonomy, risk-taking propensity, proactiveness, achievement motivation, people liking, problem-solving, and leadership) are associated with interest in becoming a pharmacist provider. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among second- and third-year student pharmacists. Exploratory factor analysis (principal components with varimax rotation) was used to determine any underlying dimensions. Significant differences in interest in becoming a pharmacist provider by demographic and other characteristics were determined using t tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA; P ≤ .05). Multiple linear regression was used to determine the factors associated with interest in becoming a pharmacist provider. RESULTS: A total of 137 completed questionnaires were received. Gender (P = .003) and preference of workplace (P < .001) were significantly associated with interest in becoming a pharmacist provider. All factor loadings were more than 0.50 and Cronbach alpha values were more than .68. In the multiple linear regression analysis model, proactiveness (P = .036) and achievement motivation (P = .018) were positive predictors of interest in becoming a pharmacist provider. Females (P = .006) and individuals who preferred to work in a hospital (P < .001) or in specialty care (P = .007) had a significantly greater interest in becoming a pharmacist provider. CONCLUSIONS: Proactiveness and achievement motivation can be predictors of interest in becoming a pharmacist provider.
Asunto(s)
Liderazgo , Farmacéuticos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Estudiantes , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Objective. To develop a questionnaire for measuring entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial intentions among student pharmacists and to identify characteristics and personality traits that are associated with these intentions. Methods. A 105-item survey instrument was developed and administered to all Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students (incoming to third year) at a large public university. It consisted of nine scales pertaining to entrepreneurism including previously validated and some newly developed scales adapted for use among student pharmacists. Data analysis consisted of factor analysis to determine scale constructs, reliability assessment, and systematic item-reduction analysis. Multiple linear regression and structural equation modeling was used to determine and confirm the association of personality traits and demographic characteristics with entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial intentions. Results. Of 289 students surveyed, 286 useable survey instruments were included in the analysis. Factor analysis was conducted for each scale, and items that did not load on their theorized factor or had cross-loadings above the permissible limits were removed, reducing the survey to 69 items. Findings demonstrated that gender, joint degree program, and autonomy were significant predictors of entrepreneurial intentions, and achievement motivation, leadership self-efficacy, and problem-solving were significant predictors of intrapreneurial intentions. Conclusion. A multi-dimensional questionnaire to measure entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial intentions of student pharmacists was developed and a few key predictors of such intentions were identified. When fully validated, the questionnaire may be used in pharmacy schools for several purposes, including in the PharmD admission process to gain additional insights into a student's potential to become a future innovative entrepreneurial or intrapreneurial practitioner.
Asunto(s)
Educación en Farmacia/estadística & datos numéricos , Emprendimiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes de Farmacia/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Intención , Liderazgo , Masculino , Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Autoeficacia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Universidades/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The association of prescription NSAIDs to presence of depression among adults with inflammatory chronic conditions in adults with and without depression and seeking care in routine clinical practice remains unknown. We examined the association of prescription NSAIDs to depression among adults with inflammatory chronic conditions in a nationally representative sample of the US non-institutionalized civilian population. We used a retrospective cross-sectional design. Data on 10,713 adults with inflammatory chronic conditions were derived from 2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). The dependent variable was the presence or absence of depression and the key independent variable was prescription NSAIDs use. Logistic regression models were used to examine the adjusted associations of prescription NSAIDs to depression. In these regressions, other independent variables (biological, sociocultural, socio-economic, access to healthcare services, medical conditions and treatment factors, behavioural, and environmental factors) that may affect the relationship of prescription NSAIDs to depression were also included. All analyses accounted for the complex survey design of MEPS. Overall, 18.2% reported depression. Almost 21% used prescription NSAIDs. In the unadjusted model, prescription NSAIDs use had higher odds of depression (OR = 1.59;95%CI = [1.40, 1.82]) as compared to those without NSAIDs. In the fully-adjusted logistic regression model, with controls for other independent variables, adults using prescription NSAIDs had no significant association with depression (AOR = 0.97;95%CI = [0.84, 1.13]) compared to those without NSAIDs. In this first real-world study of all adults (with and without depression) in the US, we did not observe a statistically significant association of prescription NSAIDs to the presence of depression.