Exploring Family Physician Training Needs to Improve Cancer Patient Care.

Family physicians have multifaceted roles in cancer patient care and oncology education among this group is unfortunately inadequate. This study explored the needs and perspectives of family physicians regarding their oncology training and experiences. As well, physician cancer care experiences, knowledge use, and continuing education practices were elucidated. The authors employed a qualitative approach with family physicians participating in semi-structured interviews. General practitioners in oncology were excluded. Purposeful sampling was used, with recruitment through Ontario regional primary cancer care leads and social media. Interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was conducted. Thirteen participants were interviewed-1.6:1 female: male, ages 30-39, practicing for an average of 9 years (0.5-30 years), with urban and suburban practices. Most trained in Canada as undergraduates and completed their residency in Ontario; 62% had participated in at least one oncology continuing medical education session. Three major themes emerged: delineation of roles, oncology knowledge and education, and palliative care. Participants reported role uncertainty after cancer diagnosis, with oncology teaching at all levels described as lacking relevance. Palliative care rotations were an avenue for oncology education and where participants returned to cancer care. Changing existing teaching, information access, and avenues of oncology experiences may be the next step to supporting successful cancer care by family physicians.

Review of 20 years of adult medulloblastoma treatment: Chemotherapy prescription trends and survival.

Background: The historic standard of care for adult medulloblastoma has been considered surgery and radiation, while chemotherapy is increasingly being prescribed. This study reviewed 20-year chemotherapy trends at a high-volume center, as well as overall and progression free-survival. Methods: Adults with medulloblastoma treated at an academic center from January 1, 1999 to -December 31, 2020 were reviewed. Patient baseline data were summarized and Kaplan-Meier estimators were used for survival. Results: Forty-nine patients were included; median age was 30 years and male: female ratio was 2:1. Desmoplastic and classical histologies were most common. Of all patients, 23 (47%) were high risk and 7 (14%) metastatic at diagnosis. Only 10 (20%) received initial chemotherapy, of which 70% were high risk and 30% metastatic, with most treated from 2010 to 2020. Forty percent of initial chemotherapy patients received salvage chemotherapy for recurrence or metastases (of all patients, 49% required salvage). Initial chemotherapy regimens were mainly cisplatin/lomustine/vincristine, and at recurrence cisplatin/etoposide. Median overall survival was 8.6 years (95% CI 7.5-∞), with 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival at 95.8%, 72%, and 46.7%. Median overall survival for those who did not receive initial chemotherapy was 12.4 years and 7.4 years for those who did (P-value .2). Conclusions: Twenty years of adult medulloblastoma treatment was reviewed. Initial chemotherapy patients, most of whom were high risk, trended towards worse survival, but this was nonsignificant. The ideal timing and choice of chemotherapy for adult medulloblastoma is unknown-challenges of administering chemotherapy following photon craniospinal irradiation may have prevented it from becoming routine.

Clinical Objectives of the Canadian Licensing Examination: Exploring the Representation of Oncology.

Every physician should be comfortable caring for cancer patients, yet medical education in oncology is known as inadequate. Our study explored this issue from an assessment perspective, by determining the representation of oncology and other health priorities in the clinical learning objectives for the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part 1 (MCCQE Part 1). The Medical Council of Canada lists objectives for the MCCQE Part 1, based on CanMEDS roles for medical graduate competency. These objectives guide exam question development and can be used as a study guide for learners. Our study focused on the Medical Expert role and mapped the clinical objectives for oncologic, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and chronic lower respiratory disease. The clinical objectives contained 190 topics under the Medical Expert role. Oncology content was found in 57 (30%), cardiovascular disease in 56 (29.5%), cerebrovascular disease in 21 (11%) and chronic lower respiratory disease in 7 (3.7%). In objectives with oncology content, gastrointestinal cancer (16, 28%), non-specific indicators of cancer (7, 12%) and genitourinary/musculoskeletal cancers (6, 10.5%) were most frequent. Content coding had inter-rater agreement greater than 99%, with kappas from 0.73 to 1.00. Oncology was highly represented in the clinical objectives listed for the MCCQE Part 1. With existing research showing limited oncology content on examinations and in medical curricula, our results were unexpected. This finding could signal the efficacy of initiatives seeking to improve oncology education and emphasizes the importance of continuing improvements in oncology education to meet patient and healthcare system needs.

Increasing Undergraduate Exposure to Oncology: the Role of Oncology Interest Groups.

This study describes a medical school oncology interest group (OIG) and assesses its influence on student perceptions of oncology, interest in pursuing oncology as a career, and comfort levels with oncology topics such as breaking bad news. From 2015 to 2017, the OIG annual event took place at a satellite campus of a larger Canadian undergraduate medical school. The event provided a question and answer period with a panel of physicians from multiple oncology specialties-discussions focused around lifestyle, training, clinical work, lifestyle, and career focus. Small physician-led groups taught breaking bad news using the SPIKES framework. The interest group also provided a mentoring and networking opportunity to interested students. Pre- and post-event surveys were distributed to students and physicians. For three consecutive years, the student-run, and physician-mentored OIG successfully recruited student and physician participants, providing a clinical skill teaching session as well as mentorship opportunities to students. Pre-event surveys found that only 20% of students believed their current curriculum was adequate as it relates to oncology education. In pre-session, 13% (6/45) of students indicated comfort with the skill of breaking bad news, compared with that in post-session with 81% (34/42) of students feeling comfortable. When asked "How likely are you to pursue a future elective opportunity in oncology?" 49% (20/41) of students indicated "likely" as their response in the pre-session. This response increased post-session to 70% (28/40). The event highlighted the potential for OIGs to increase student interest in pursuing oncology electives and student-perceived comfort with breaking bad news. OIGs are important in promoting interest in the field of oncology and in improving confidence in breaking bad news. This medical student-created, run and maintained oncology interest group supplemented standard curriculum by providing relevant educational and mentorship opportunities to students. This study highlights the feasibility of implementing a self-sustaining medical school oncology interest group and its potential to positively impact student learning and interest in oncology.