The long-term time course of septic arthritis.

Aims: The aims of this study were to: 1) report on a cohort of skeletally mature patients with native hip and knee septic arthritis over a 14-year period; 2) to determine the rate of joint failure in patients who had experienced an episode of hip or knee septic arthritis; and 3) to assess the outcome following septic arthritis relative to the infecting organism, whether those patients infected by Staphylococcus aureus would be more likely to have adverse outcomes than those infected by other organisms. Methods: All microbiological samples from joint aspirations between March 2000 and December 2014 at our institution were reviewed in order to identify cases of culture-proven septic arthritis. Cases in children (aged < 16 years) and prosthetic joints were excluded. Data were abstracted on age at diagnosis, sex, joint affected (hip or knee), type of organisms isolated, cause of septic arthritis, comorbidities within the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), details of treatment, and outcome. Results: A total of 142 patients were confirmed to have had an episode of septic arthritis in a native hip (n = 17) or knee joint (n = 125). S. aureus accounted for 57.7% of all hip and knee joint infections. There were 13 inpatient deaths attributed to septic arthritis. The median age of the patients who died was 77.5 (46.9 to 92.2) and their median age-adjusted CCI was 8 (6 to 12). A failure of the joint occurred in 26 knees (21%) and nine hips (53%). Of the knee joints infected by S. aureus (n = 71), 23 knees (32%) went into failure of joint, whereas of those infected by other organisms (n = 54), only three knees (6%) failed. Conclusion: Based on our study findings, hip and knee septic arthritis long-term outcomes were substantially worse than their immediate outcome suggested. Failure of knee joint is 6.1 times more likely to occur in those infected with S. aureus.

Anaesthetic management of obstetric patients with Chiari type I malformation: a retrospective case series and literature review.

The peripartum management of obstetric patients with Chiari type I malformation remains a challenge due to the degree of cerebellar tonsillar herniation and a paucity of published evidence. There is concern about neuraxial anaesthetic blocks and uncertainty regarding the optimum mode of delivery. We systematically searched the literature for the obstetric management of patients with Chiari type I malformation, independent of publication date and language. We also searched our local hospital database from December 2009 to December 2022 for all deliveries to patients with this condition. We identified 137 cases comprising 103 deliveries described in 40 publications that met our inclusion criteria; 34 deliveries were identified in our local database. There were 84 spontaneous vaginal deliveries, 52 caesarean deliveries, and one delivery by unknown modality. Sixty neuraxial blocks were performed; approximately half of these were epidural procedures for labour analgesia. Six patients had new or worsened symptoms following delivery, but it is unclear whether these were related to their Chiari malformation. We identified no cases with brainstem herniation or severe symptoms. We discuss our findings in relation to other published literature and address the concerns described. Our review reveals the use of a variety of modes of delivery and anaesthetic techniques and that most patients suffered no neurological complication. We conclude there is no of evidence to avoid any one approach to labour analgesia, delivery and anaesthesia. We propose a holistic, individualised and patient-centred approach with an appraisal of the risks and benefits to support shared-decision making.

Chondroprotection of articular cartilage integrity: Utilizing ultrasonic scalpel and hyperosmolar irrigation solution during cutting.

Objectives: Ultrasonic (US) cutting of cartilage in orthopaedic surgery has received little attention despite its potential to reduce chondrocyte death which could enhance cartilage repair. We aimed to investigate whether an ultrasonically-vibrating scalpel to cut human articular cartilage could reduce chondrocyte death, and to determine if hyper-osmolarity could provide chondroprotection during the procedure. Methods: A scalpel (no. 15) was mounted on an ultrasonic transducer to resonate at 35 â€‹kHz with 30 â€‹µm vibrational displacement. Thirty-six fresh human femoral cartilage samples were divided into four groups based on ultrasonic activation (US or non-US) and saline osmolarity (300 or 600 mOsm/L). Cell viability was assessed using a live/dead cell assay and analysed quantitatively by confocal microscopy. Histology illustrated tissue surface changes at the cut site. Results: The overall chondrocyte death percentage at both the US and non-US cut sites showed comparable results (p â€‹> â€‹0.05) in both osmolarities. However, the zone of chondrocyte death was reduced by 31 â€‹± â€‹5% and 36 â€‹± â€‹6%, respectively, when comparing US cutting at 300 mOsm/L and 600 mOsm/L to the control group (non-US cutting; 300 mOsm/L) (p â€‹< â€‹0.05). The width of the cut was consistent at both sites, regardless of the method of cutting. Conclusion: Cutting human cartilage with US in the presence of 300 or 600 mOsm/L media was chondroprotective compared to normal (non-US) scalpel cutting in 300 mOsm/L medium. These results suggest chondroprotection can be achieved while cutting using a US scalpel and raised osmolarity, potentially improving cartilage regeneration and repair following injury.

Assessment of the comparative agreement between chest radiographs and CT scans in intensive care units.

PURPOSE: Chest radiographs in critically ill patients can be difficult to interpret due to technical and clinical factors. We sought to determine the agreement of chest radiographs and CT scans, and the inter-observer variation of chest radiograph interpretation, in intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: Chest radiographs and corresponding thoracic computerised tomography (CT) scans (as reference standard) were collected from 45 ICU patients. All radiographs were analysed by 20 doctors (radiology consultants, radiology trainees, ICU consultants, ICU trainees) from 4 different centres, blinded to CT results. Specificity/sensitivity were determined for pleural effusion, lobar collapse and consolidation/atelectasis. Separately, Fleiss' kappa for multiple raters was used to determine inter-observer variation for chest radiographs. RESULTS: The median sensitivity and specificity of chest radiographs for detecting abnormalities seen on CTs scans were 43.2% and 85.9% respectively. Diagnostic sensitivity for pleural effusion was significantly higher among radiology consultants but no specialty/experience distinctions were observed for specificity. Median inter-observer kappa coefficient among assessors was 0.295 ("fair"). CONCLUSIONS: Chest radiographs commonly miss important radiological features in critically ill patients. Inter-observer agreement in chest radiograph interpretation is only "fair". Consultant radiologists are least likely to miss thoracic radiological abnormalities. The consequences of misdiagnosis by chest radiographs remain to be determined.

New quality outcome indicators for bone metastases: expert consensus analysis of patients, their families and specialist healthcare professionals.

OBJECTIVES: As workload increases, surgical care for patients with bone metastases is increasingly decentralised, with a shift in management away from primary bone tumour units to local centres. We must ensure that patients have similar outcomes regardless of where they receive their treatment. The aim was to develop and validate a set of quality outcome indicators (QOIs) to evaluate treatment success for patients undergoing surgery for bone metastases. METHODS: Outcome recommendations were adapted from the literature and field tested in a retrospective patient cohort to determine feasibility. The provisional outcome indicators were assessed during a modified RAND/Delphi consensus process by a group of patients, relatives and healthcare professionals with validated targets added. RESULTS: 1534 articles were reviewed. 38 quality objectives were extracted and assessed for feasibility using clinical records for 117 patients. 28 provisional outcome indicators proceeded to expert consensus and were reviewed by a group of 22 panellists including 10 patients and 4 relatives/carers. After two rounds, 15 QOIs were generated, with validated targets based on expert consensus. These included specific statements such as 'surgery improves pain and reduces the need for morphine, target: at follow-up, pain is documented in 80% of individuals and 50% of these have reduced need for morphine'. CONCLUSIONS: The published evidence and guidelines were adapted into a set of outcome indicators validated by patients, their family/carers and healthcare professionals. These can be used to compare care between centres and identify units of excellence in maximising good outcome after surgery for bone metastases.

A preoperative package of care for osteoarthritis, consisting of weight loss, orthotics, rehabilitation, and topical and oral analgesia (OPPORTUNITY): a two-centre, open-label, randomised controlled feasibility trial.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knee is a major cause of disability worldwide. Non-operative treatments can reduce the morbidity but adherence is poor. We hypothesised that adherence could be optimised if behavioural change was established in the preoperative period. Therefore, we aimed to assess feasibility, acceptability, and recruitment and retention rates of a preoperative package of non-operative care in patients awaiting knee replacement surgery. METHODS: We did an open-label, randomised controlled, feasibility trial in two secondary care centres in the UK. Eligible participants were aged 15-85 years, on the waiting list for a knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, and met at least one of the thresholds for one of the four components of the preoperative package of non-operative care intervention (ie, weight loss, exercise therapy, use of insoles, and analgesia adjustment). Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to either the intervention group or the standard of care (ie, control) group. All four aspects of the intervention were delivered weekly over 12 weeks. Participants in the intervention group were reviewed regularly to assess adherence. The primary outcome was acceptability and feasibility of delivering the intervention, as measured by recruitment rate, retention rate at follow-up review after planned surgery, health-related quality of life, joint-specific scores, and adherence (weight change and qualitative interviews). This study is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN96684272. FINDINGS: Between Sept 3 2018, and Aug 30, 2019, we screened 233 patients, of whom 163 (73%) were excluded and 60 (27%) were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n=40) or the control group (n=20). 34 (57%) of 60 participants were women, 26 (43%) were men, and the mean age was 66·8 years (SD 8·6). Uptake of the specific intervention components varied: 31 (78%) of 40 had exercise therapy, 28 (70%) weight loss, 22 (55%) analgesia adjustment, and insoles (18 [45%]). Overall median adherence was 94% (IQR 79·5-100). At the final review, the intervention group lost a mean of 11·2 kg (SD 5·6) compared with 1·3 kg (3·8) in the control group (estimated difference -9·8 kg [95% CI -13·4 to -6·3]). A clinically significant improvement in health-related quality o life (mean change 0·078 [SD 0·195]) were reported, and joint-specific scores showed greater improvement in the intervention group than in the control group. No adverse events attributable to the intervention occurred. INTERPRETATION: Participants adhered well to the non-operative interventions and their health-related quality of life improved. Participant and health professional feedback were extremely positive. These findings support progression to a full-scale effectiveness trial. FUNDING: Versus Arthritis.

Effect of skin color on optical properties and the implications for medical optical technologies: a review.

Significance: Skin color affects light penetration leading to differences in its absorption and scattering properties. COVID-19 highlighted the importance of understanding of the interaction of light with different skin types, e.g., pulse oximetry (PO) unreliably determined oxygen saturation levels in people from Black and ethnic minority backgrounds. Furthermore, with increased use of other medical wearables using light to provide disease information and photodynamic therapies to treat skin cancers, a thorough understanding of the effect skin color has on light is important for reducing healthcare disparities. Aim: The aim of this work is to perform a thorough review on the effect of skin color on optical properties and the implication of variation on optical medical technologies. Approach: Published in vivo optical coefficients associated with different skin colors were collated and their effects on optical penetration depth and transport mean free path (TMFP) assessed. Results: Variation among reported values is significant. We show that absorption coefficients for dark skin are ∼6% to 74% greater than for light skin in the 400 to 1000 nm spectrum. Beyond 600 nm, the TMFP for light skin is greater than for dark skin. Maximum transmission for all skin types was beyond 940 nm in this spectrum. There are significant losses of light with increasing skin depth; in this spectrum, depending upon Fitzpatrick skin type (FST), on average 14% to 18% of light is lost by a depth of 0.1 mm compared with 90% to 97% of the remaining light being lost by a depth of 1.93 mm. Conclusions: Current published data suggest that at wavelengths beyond 940 nm light transmission is greatest for all FSTs. Data beyond 1000 nm are minimal and further study is required. It is possible that the amount of light transmitted through skin for all skin colors will converge with increasing wavelength enabling optical medical technologies to become independent of skin color.

Ultrasound assessment of humeral shaft nonunion risk: a feasibility and proof of concept study.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility and reliability of ultrasound in the assessment of humeral shaft fracture healing and estimate the accuracy of 6wk ultrasound in predicting nonunion. METHODS: Twelve adults with a non-operatively managed humeral shaft fracture were prospectively recruited and underwent ultrasound scanning at 6wks and 12wks post-injury. Seven blinded observers evaluated sonographic callus appearance to determine intra- and inter-observer reliability. Nonunion prediction accuracy was estimated by comparing images for patients that united (n = 10/12) with those that developed a nonunion (n = 2/12). RESULTS: The mean scan duration was 8 min (5-12) and all patients tolerated the procedure. At 6wks and 12wks, sonographic callus (SC) was present in 11 patients (10 united, one nonunion) and sonographic bridging callus (SBC) in seven (all united). Ultrasound had substantial intra- (weighted kappa: 6wk 0.75; 12wk 0.75) and inter-observer reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 6wk 0.60; 12wk 0.76). At 6wks, the absence of SC demonstrated sensitivity 50%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) 91% in nonunion prediction (overall accuracy 92%). The absence of SBC demonstrated sensitivity 100%, specificity 70%, PPV 40% and NPV 100% in nonunion prediction (overall accuracy 75%). Of three patients at risk of nonunion (Radiographic Union Score for HUmeral fractures < 8), one had SBC on 6wk ultrasound (that subsequently united) and the others had non-bridging/absent SC (both developed nonunion). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound assessment of humeral shaft fracture healing was feasible, reliable and may predict nonunion. Ultrasound could be useful in defining nonunion risk among patients with reduced radiographic callus formation.

Regional variations and deprivation are linked to poorer access to laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery: a national study in England.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic and now robotic colorectal surgery has rapidly increased in prevalence; however, little is known about how uptake varies by region and sociodemographics. The aim of this study was to quantify the uptake of minimally invasive colorectal surgery (MIS) over time and variations by region, sociodemographics and ethnicity. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of routinely collected healthcare data (Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics) for all adults having elective colorectal resectional surgery in England from 1 January 2006 to 31 March 2020. Sociodemographics between modalities were compared and the association between sociodemographic factors, region and year on MIS was compared in multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 93,735 patients were included: 52,098 open, 40,622 laparoscopic and 1015 robotic cases. Laparoscopic surgery surpassed open in 2015 but has plateaued; robotic surgery has rapidly increased since 2017, representing 3.2% of cases in 2019. Absolute differences up to 20% in MIS exist between regions, OR 1.77 (95% CI 1.68-1.86) in South Central and OR 0.75 (95% CI 0.72-0.79) in the North West compared to the largest region (West Midlands). MIS was less common in the most compared to least deprived (14.6% of MIS in the most deprived, 24.8% in the least, OR 0.85 95% CI 0.81-0.89), with a greater difference in robotic surgery (13.4% vs 30.5% respectively). Female gender, younger age, less comorbidity, Asian or 'Other/Mixed' ethnicity and cancer indication were all associated with increased MIS. CONCLUSIONS: MIS has increased over time, with significant regional and socioeconomic variations. With rapid increases in robotic surgery, national strategies for procurement, implementation, equitable distribution and training must be created to avoid worsening health inequalities.

Pooled prevalence of lymphopenia in all-cause hospitalisations and association with infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lymphopenia is defined as a decrease below normal value (often 1.0 x 109 cells/L) of blood circulating lymphocyte count. In the general population, lymphopenia is associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation secondary to infection, independent of traditional clinical risk factors. In hospital, lymphopenia is associated with increased risk of healthcare-associated infection and mortality. By summarising lymphopenia's prevalence and impact on clinical outcomes, we can identify an at-risk population and inform future studies of immune dysfunction following severe illness. METHODS: Peer-reviewed search strategy was performed on three databases. Primary objective was to summarise the pooled prevalence of lymphopenia. Primary outcome was infection including pre-existing lymphopenia as a risk factor for admission with infection and as an in-hospital risk factor for healthcare-associated infection. Secondary outcomes were length of stay and mortality. Mortality data extracted included in-hospital, 28/30-day ('early'), and 90-day/1-year ('late') mortality. Meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects models for each outcome measure. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistic. Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for cohort studies was used to assess risk of bias. The protocol was published on PROSPERO. RESULTS: Fifteen observational studies were included. The pooled prevalence of lymphopenia in all-cause hospitalisations was 38% (CI 0.34-0.42, I2= 97%, p< 0.01). Lymphopenia was not associated with an infection diagnosis at hospital admission and healthcare associated infection (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.26-3.99, p=0.97, I2 = 55% and RR 1.31; 95% CI 0.78-2.20, p=0.31, I2=97%, respectively), but was associated with septic shock (RR 2.72; 95% CI 1.02-7.21, p=0.04, I2 =98%). Lymphopenia was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and higher 'early' mortality rates (RR 2.44; 95% CI 1.71-3.47, p < 0.00001, I2 = 89% and RR 2.05; 95% CI 1.64-2.56, p < 0.00001, I2 = 29%, respectively). Lymphopenia was associated with higher 'late' mortality (RR 1.59; 1.33-1.90, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates the high prevalence of lymphopenia across all-cause hospitalisations and associated increased risk of septic shock, early and late mortality. Lymphopenia is a readily available marker that may identify immune dysfunctional patients. Greater understanding of immune trajectories following survival may provide insights into longer-term poor clinical outcomes.

Is human immunodeficiency virus a risk factor for the development of nonunion?-a case-control study.

Objective: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of the development of nonunion after a fracture. This prospective matched case-control study in South Africa investigated common risk factors, including HIV status, that influence the development of a nonunion after a femur or tibia fracture. Methods: Adult participants (cases) with established nonunions of the femur or tibia shaft were recruited over a 16-month period, between December 2017 and April 2019. They were matched for (1) age; (2) sex; (3) fracture site; and (4) fracture management type, with "control" participants who progressed to fracture union within 6 months of injury. All participants were tested for HIV. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to investigate associations between known risk factors for the development of nonunion and impaired fracture healing. Results: A total of 57 cases were matched with 57 "control" participants (44/57 male, 77.2% vs. 13/57 female, 22.8%, median age 36 years). HIV status was not associated with the development of nonunion after the management of tibia and femur fractures, on both univariate (odds ratio, 0.40; confidence interval, 0.10-1.32; P = 0.151) or multivariable (odds ratio, 0.86; confidence interval, 0.18-3.73; P = 0.831) analysis. No other confounding factors were shown to have any statistically significant impact on the odds of developing nonunion in this study cohort. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that HIV does not seem to increase the risk of the development of nonunion and HIV-positive individuals who sustain a fracture can be managed in the same manner as those who are HIV negative.

Relevance and utility of the in-vivo and ex-vivo optical properties of the skin reported in the literature: a review [Invited].

Imaging non-invasively into the human body is currently limited by cost (MRI and CT scan), image resolution (ultrasound), exposure to ionising radiation (CT scan and X-ray), and the requirement for exogenous contrast agents (CT scan and PET scan). Optical imaging has the potential to overcome all these issues but is currently limited by imaging depth due to the scattering and absorption properties of human tissue. Skin is the first barrier encountered by light when imaging non-invasively, and therefore a clear understanding of the way that light interacts with skin is required for progress on optical medical imaging to be made. Here we present a thorough review of the optical properties of human skin measured in-vivo and compare these to the previously collated ex-vivo measurements. Both in-vivo and ex-vivo published data show high inter- and intra-publication variability making definitive answers regarding optical properties at given wavelengths challenging. Overall, variability is highest for ex-vivo absorption measurements with differences of up to 77-fold compared with 9.6-fold for the in-vivo absorption case. The impact of this variation on optical penetration depth and transport mean free path is presented and potential causes of these inconsistencies are discussed. We propose a set of experimental controls and reporting requirements for future measurements. We conclude that a robust in-vivo dataset, measured across a broad spectrum of wavelengths, is required for the development of future technologies that significantly increase the depth of optical imaging.

Lessons learned from hip fracture registries - From the Scottish perspective to global practice.

Hip fracture is the most common serious orthopaedic injury affecting older people. In Scotland, 7000 patients sustain a hip fracture each year, and this is projected to rise to 10,300 a year by 2029. In this narrative review, we describe the origin and evolution of the Scottish Hip Fracture Audit, including key elements which have improved hip fracture care and outcomes within Scotland, and the current state of play of hip fracture registries around the world. We go on to discuss future directions for data driven improvements in hip fracture care, including international standardised data collection and a global minimum common dataset for hip fracture registries.

Mechanisms of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty and current treatment options.

Purpose: Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment which is increasing in use for both elderly and younger patients. With the overall increasing life span of the general population, the rate of revision TKA is projected to increase significantly over the coming decades. Analyses from the national joint registry of England and Wales support this prediction with an increase in primary TKA of 117% and an increase in revision TKA of 332% being forecast by 2030. Bone loss presents a challenge in revision TKA so an understanding of the aetiology and principles behind this is essential for the surgeon undertaking revision. The purpose of this article is to review the causes of bone loss in revision TKA, discuss the mechanisms of each cause and discuss the possible treatment options. Methods: The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification and zonal classification of bone loss are commonly used in assessing bone loss in pre-operative planning and will be used in this review. The recent literature was searched to find advantages and limitations of each commonly used method to address bone loss at revision TKA. Studies with the highest number or patients and longest follow-up period were selected as significant. Search terms were: "aetiology of bone loss", "revision total knee arthroplasty", "management of bone loss". Results: Methods for managing bone loss have traditionally been cement augmentation, impaction bone grafting, bulk structural bone graft and stemmed implants with metal augments. No single technique was found to be superior. Megaprostheses have a role as a salvage procedure when the bone loss is deemed to be too significant for reconstruction. Metaphyseal cones and sleeves are a newer treatments with promising medium to long term outcomes. Conclusion: Bone loss encountered at revision TKA presents a significant challenge. No single technique currently has clear superiority treatment should be based on a sound understanding of the underlying principles.