Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Urol ; 27(2): 96-8, 1995.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7744165

RESUMEN

We performed a prospective study to evaluate fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology as a screening tool of carcinoma of the prostate in 159 men with normal digital rectal examinations and acid phosphatase prior to open prostatectomy for voiding symptoms. The incidence of carcinoma of the prostate was 5.6%. 4 patients had A1 lesions and 5 had A2 lesions. Only one A2 lesion was malignant cytologically. The sensitivity was 56%, specificity 69%, positive predictive value 24% and negative predictive value 90%. Sufficient cytologic specimens were provided in 66% of cases. While FNA is at least equal to core biopsy as a diagnostic modality of palpable prostatic abnormalities, it does not prove to be an adequate screening modality for occult carcinoma of the prostate in the prostatectomy candidate.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
J Urol ; 151(6): 1518-21, 1994 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8189560

RESUMEN

Despite current practice there is no evidence to demonstrate the efficacy of intraurethral lidocaine gel as an anesthetic for rigid cystoscopy. To evaluate the usefulness of lidocaine in decreasing pain associated with cystoscopy, we performed a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study comparing lidocaine gel with a water based lubricant. The effects of pre-procedure anxiety and prior experience with cystoscopy on pain perception were also evaluated. Physician perception of pain experienced by the patient was compared with the actual pain experienced. We found no decrease in pain perception in men or women following lidocaine gel instillation with a 5 or 10-minute dwell time compared to instillation of the plain lubricant. Increased preprocedure anxiety correlated with increased pain perception in women. Personal experience with prior cystoscopic procedures significantly decreased the current pain perception in men. Physicians underestimated the patient pain perception in all groups. Overall, we found the use of lidocaine gel to be of no benefit in routine rigid cystoscopy. Lowering pre-procedure anxiety may decrease the amount of pain perceived by women but not by men.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Cistoscopía/efectos adversos , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Dolor/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiedad/etiología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Instilación de Medicamentos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Uretra
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA