Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Am J Transplant ; 16(4): 1238-47, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26820618

RESUMEN

In a randomized, open-label trial, de novo heart transplant recipients were randomized to everolimus (3-6 ng/mL) with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (CNI; cyclosporine) to weeks 7-11 after transplant, followed by increased everolimus exposure (target 6-10 ng/mL) with cyclosporine withdrawal or standard-exposure cyclosporine. All patients received mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. A total of 110 of 115 patients completed the 12-month study, and 102 attended a follow-up visit at month 36. Mean measured GFR (mGFR) at month 36 was 77.4 mL/min (standard deviation [SD] 20.2 mL/min) versus 59.2 mL/min (SD 17.4 mL/min) in the everolimus and CNI groups, respectively, a difference of 18.3 mL/min (95% CI 11.1-25.6 mL/min; p < 0.001) in the intention to treat population. Multivariate analysis showed treatment to be an independent determinant of mGFR at month 36. Coronary intravascular ultrasound at 36 months revealed significantly reduced progression of allograft vasculopathy in the everolimus group compared with the CNI group. Biopsy-proven acute rejection grade ≥2R occurred in 10.2% and 5.9% of everolimus- and CNI-treated patients, respectively, during months 12-36. Serious adverse events occurred in 37.3% and 19.6% of everolimus- and CNI-treated patients, respectively (p = 0.078). These results suggest that early CNI withdrawal after heart transplantation supported by everolimus, mycophenolic acid and steroids with lymphocyte-depleting induction is safe at intermediate follow-up. This regimen, used selectively, may offer adequate immunosuppressive potency with a sustained renal advantage.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/uso terapéutico , Everolimus/uso terapéutico , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto/efectos de los fármacos , Trasplante de Corazón , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Vasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Aloinjertos , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Cardiopatías/cirugía , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Receptores de Trasplantes , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vasculares/etiología , Privación de Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Am J Transplant ; 15(7): 1967-75, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25783974

RESUMEN

Early initiation of everolimus with calcineurin inhibitor therapy has been shown to reduce the progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in de novo heart transplant recipients. The effect of de novo everolimus therapy and early total elimination of calcineurin inhibitor therapy has, however, not been investigated and is relevant given the morbidity and lack of efficacy of current protocols in preventing CAV. This 12-month multicenter Scandinavian trial randomized 115 de novo heart transplant recipients to everolimus with complete calcineurin inhibitor elimination 7-11 weeks after HTx or standard cyclosporine immunosuppression. Ninety-five (83%) patients had matched intravascular ultrasound examinations at baseline and 12 months. Mean (± SD) recipient age was 49.9 ± 13.1 years. The everolimus group (n = 47) demonstrated significantly reduced CAV progression as compared to the calcineurin inhibitor group (n = 48) (ΔMaximal Intimal Thickness 0.03 ± 0.06 and 0.08 ± 0.12 mm, ΔPercent Atheroma Volume 1.3 ± 2.3 and 4.2 ± 5.0%, ΔTotal Atheroma Volume 1.1 ± 19.2 mm(3) and 13.8 ± 28.0 mm(3) [all p-values ≤ 0.01]). Everolimus patients also had a significantly greater decline in levels of soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 as compared to the calcineurin inhibitor group (p = 0.02). These preliminary results suggest that an everolimus-based CNI-free can potentially be considered in suitable de novo HTx recipients.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/uso terapéutico , Everolimus/uso terapéutico , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Cardiopatías/cirugía , Trasplante de Corazón , Receptores de Trasplantes , Enfermedades Vasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Aloinjertos , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Cardiopatías/complicaciones , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vasculares/etiología
3.
Am J Transplant ; 14(8): 1828-38, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25041227

RESUMEN

In a randomized, open-label trial, everolimus was compared to cyclosporine in 115 de novo heart transplant recipients. Patients were assigned within 5 days posttransplant to low-exposure everolimus (3­6 ng/mL) with reduced-exposure cyclosporine (n = 56), or standard-exposure cyclosporine (n = 59), with both mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. In the everolimus group, cyclosporine was withdrawn after 7­11 weeks and everolimus exposure increased (6­10 ng/mL). The primary efficacy end point, measured GFR at 12 months posttransplant, was significantly higher with everolimus versus cyclosporine (mean ± SD: 79.8 ± 17.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. 61.5 ± 19.6 mL/min/1.73 m2; p < 0.001). Coronary intravascular ultrasound showed that the mean increase in maximal intimal thickness was smaller (0.03 mm [95% CI 0.01, 0.05 mm] vs. 0.08 mm [95% CI 0.05, 0.12 mm], p = 0.03), and the incidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) was lower (50.0% vs. 64.6%, p = 0.003), with everolimus versus cyclosporine at month 12. Biopsy-proven acute rejection after weeks 7­11 was more frequent with everolimus (p = 0.03). Left ventricular function was not inferior with everolimus versus cyclosporine. Cytomegalovirus infection was less common with everolimus (5.4% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.001); the incidence of bacterial infection was similar. In conclusion, everolimus-based immunosuppression with early elimination of cyclosporine markedly improved renal function after heart transplantation. Since postoperative safety was not jeopardized and development of CAV was attenuated, this strategy may benefit long-term outcome.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Corazón , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Ciclosporina/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Everolimus , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/metabolismo , Función Ventricular Izquierda
4.
Am J Transplant ; 12(10): 2700-9, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22958738

RESUMEN

In this 12-month multicenter Scandinavian study, 78 maintenance heart transplant (HTx) recipients randomized to everolimus with reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure or continued standard CNI-therapy underwent matched virtual histology (VH) examination to evaluate morphological progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Parallel measurement of a range of inflammatory markers was also performed. A similar rate of quantitative CAV progression was observed in the everolimus (n = 30) and standard CNI group (n = 48) (plaque index 1.9 ± 3.8% and 1.6 ± 3.9%, respectively; p = 0.65). However, VH analysis revealed a significant increase in calcified (2.4 ± 4.0 vs. 0.3 ± 3.1%; p = 0.02) and necrotic component (6.5 ± 8.5 vs. 1.1 ± 8.6%; p = 0.01) among everolimus patients compared to controls. The increase in necrotic and calcified components was most prominent in everolimus patients with time since HTx >5.1 years and was accompanied by a significant increase in levels of von Willebrand (vWF) factor (p = 0.04) and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM) (p = 0.03). Conversion to everolimus and reduced CNI is associated with a significant increase in calcified and necrotic intimal components and is more prominent in patients with a longer time since HTx. A significant increase in vWF and VCAM accompanied these qualitative changes and the prognostic implication of these findings requires further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Enfermedades Vasculares/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Everolimus , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico
5.
Am J Transplant ; 12(10): 2744-53, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22812414

RESUMEN

In an open-label, multicenter trial, de novo kidney transplant recipients at low to medium immunological risk were randomized at week 7 posttransplant to remain on CsA (n = 100, controls) or convert to everolimus (n = 102), both with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint, change in measured GFR (mGFR) from week 7 to month 12, was significantly greater with everolimus than controls: 4.9 (11.8) mL/min versus 0.0 (12.9) mL/min (p = 0.012; analysis of covariance [ANCOVA]). Per protocol analysis demonstrated a more marked difference: an increase of 8.7 (11.2) mL/min with everolimus versus a decrease of 0.4 (12.0) mL/min in controls (p < 0.001; ANCOVA). There were no differences in graft or patient survival. The 12-month incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was 27.5% (n = 28) with everolimus and 11.0% (n = 11) in controls (p = 0.004). All but two episodes of BPAR in each group were mild. Adverse events occurred in 95.1% of everolimus patients and 90.0% controls (p = 0.19), with serious adverse events in 53.9% and 38.0%, respectively (p = 0.025). Discontinuation because of adverse events was more frequent with everolimus (25.5%) than controls (3.0%; p = 0.030). In conclusion, conversion from CsA to everolimus at week 7 after kidney transplantation was associated with a greater improvement in mGFR at month 12 versus CNI-treated controls but discontinuations and BPAR were more frequent.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Calcineurina , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Everolimus , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico
6.
Clin Transplant ; 22(3): 366-71, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18279419

RESUMEN

In a single-center study, 20 kidney transplant patients without prior rejection were abruptly converted from cyclosporine to everolimus at seven wk post-transplant. All patients received basiliximab induction with maintenance enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and corticosteroids. Biopsy-proven acute rejection had occurred in three of 20 patients (15.0%) by the end of week seven post-conversion. All episodes were mild and reversible, with subsequent recovery of renal function. Calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) improved significantly (51 +/- 11 mL/min at time of conversion, 58 +/- 12 mL/min at week seven post-conversion, 57 +/- 17 mL/min at month six post-conversion; p = 0.001). No patient developed proteinuria in the nephrotic range. Twenty-two adverse events were reported in 10 patients, three of which had a suspected relationship to everolimus. Mean leukocyte and platelet count decreased significantly, and triglyceride level increased. This study suggests that kidney transplant patients without prior rejection can be converted abruptly from cyclosporine to everolimus at seven wk post-transplant, resulting in significantly improved renal function with no apparent increase, in risk of rejection and good tolerability.


Asunto(s)
Ciclosporina/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Riñón , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Basiliximab , Everolimus , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/administración & dosificación , Proyectos Piloto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/efectos adversos
8.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 6(10): 725-30, 1991.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1836548

RESUMEN

The renal effects of the calcium-channel antagonist isradipine were evaluated in cyclosporin A (CsA)-treated renal allografted patients more than 5 months after transplantation. Twelve patients with stable renal function were given placebo for 2 weeks and then isradipine 1.25 mg x 2 for 1 week and 2.5 mg x 2 for the next 3 weeks in an open trial. The CsA dose was unchanged during the study. Isradipine did not interfere with the pharmacokinetics of CsA as both whole blood trough and peak levels were unchanged. Isradipine reduced mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) from 117.0 +/- 1.8 to 106.3 +/- 1.9 mmHg (P less than 0.01). The renal effects were studied during water diuresis 1-3 h after drug intake. Para-aminohippurate clearance (CPAH) increased from 256.4 +/- 21.5 to 291.5 +/- 26.3 ml/min (P less than 0.05), renal vascular resistance was reduced by 21.5% (P less than 0.01) and inulin clearance (CIn) was unchanged. Fractional proximal reabsorption, calculated from lithium clearance (CLi), was reduced by 11.9% (P less than 0.01) by isradipine. Isradipine also reduced proximal reabsorption of sodium (APRNa) and increased distal sodium delivery (DDNa). Distal sodium reabsorption (ADRNa) and free-water clearance (CH2O) were significantly increased. Urinary excretion of enzymes and proteins was unchanged by isradipine.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/farmacología , Ciclosporina/efectos adversos , Dihidropiridinas/farmacología , Trasplante de Riñón , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Anciano , Agua Corporal/metabolismo , Ciclosporina/sangre , Electrólitos/metabolismo , Femenino , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Isradipino , Riñón/metabolismo , Litio/farmacocinética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA