Interferon-free cure of chronic Hepatitis C is associated with weight gain during long-term follow-up.

Background and aim The advent of direct-acting antivirals has revolutionized treatment of chronic hepatitis C with very high cure rates and excellent tolerability compared to interferon-based hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. However, long-term effects of interferon-free cure of HCV infection on the metabolic condition of patients have not been investigated so far. Methods We investigated weight development during and after antiviral treatment of hepatitis C. In a prospective single-center cohort study, interferon-free antiviral treatment was initiated in 284 patients. Each patient's weight was monitored 1 year before the start of treatment, at baseline (BL), end of treatment (EOT), follow-up week 24 (FU24), and follow-up week 48 (FU48). Results Weight gain after HCV cure was observed in 20 %, 33 %, and 44 % of patients at EOT, FU24, and FU48, respectively. The mean overall weight change at FU48 compared to baseline was 1.45 kg (95 % CI 0.44; 2.46, p = 0.02, compared to the pretreatment period). Multivariate regression revealed age as the only factor predicting weight change at FU48 (B - 0.107, 95 % CI, - 0.202 to - 0.011, p = 0.03), while gender, cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, ribavirin, and body mass index had no influence. In the subgroup of patients younger than 60 years, mean weight gain at FU48 compared to baseline was 2.8 kg (95 % CI, 1.23 - 4.4). In contrast, patients 60 years and older had a mean weight change of - 0.04 kg (95 % CI, - 1.12 to 1.03, p = 0.005). Conclusions Cure of HCV by interferon-free antiviral treatment was associated with weight gain in up to 44 % of patients during long-term follow-up. Weight gain occurred predominantly in patients younger than 60 years. The precise mechanism of weight gain remains to be elucidated.

Frequent detection of HCV RNA and HCVcoreAg in stool of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: HCV is transmitted mainly by parenteral routes. However, unprotected anal intercourse has also been identified as a risk factor for HCV infection. HCV RNA can be detected in blood, saliva, and bile, but the presence of HCV in stool has not been investigated yet. STUDY DESIGN: Therefore, stool samples of 98 patients were collected prospectively. Specific HCV primers were used to identify samples positive for HCV RNA. HCV RNA-positive samples were tested for HCVcoreAg with the Architect HCVAg assay (Abbott). Presence of occult blood was investigated by the hemoCARE guajak test. Viral stability and infectivity of recombinant HCV particles was investigated in vitro by incubation of genotype 2a chimeric virus Jc1 with bile and stool suspensions. RESULTS: HCV RNA could be detected in 68 out of 98 stool samples from patients with chronic hepatitis C and 16 samples also tested positive for HCVcoreAg. Presence of HCV RNA in stool was more frequent in male than in female and in patients with low platelet counts but was not associated with the detection of occult blood. Stool suspensions and to a lesser extent bile reduced the in vitro infectivity of genotype 2a chimeric Jc1 virus even though infection of Huh7 cells was not completely abrogated. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this study shows for the first time that HCV can frequently be detected in stool samples of chronically infected patients irrespective of occult bleeding. We suggest that stool can be a potential source for HCV infection and thus unprotected anal intercourse should be avoided.

Eligibility and safety of the first interferon-free therapy against hepatitis C in a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Several real world data demonstrated that eligibility for and tolerability of triple therapy against hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with a first-wave protease inhibitor is limited. With the approval of sofosbuvir (SOF) effective treatment with and without pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) has become available for most genotypes. However, no data are available regarding the added benefit of an interferon-free treatment concerning eligibility and tolerability in a real-world scenario. We aimed to assess the eligibility and safety of SOF based therapies in patients with primarily advanced cirrhosis, including decompensated cirrhosis, in a real-world setting. RESULTS: In total, 207 patients were evaluated for a SOF based treatment with and without PEG-IFN. Twenty-six patients did not receive treatment because of safety reasons. Common causes were severe concomitant cardiac disease and advanced renal disease. Autoimmune disease, thrombopaenia, anaemia or hepatic dysfunction did not preclude treatment. Eighty-four patients started treatment, 15 with decompensated cirrhosis. During the first 12 weeks hospitalization occurred in 11 patients most frequently because of typical complications of advanced liver disease. Risk factors for hospitalization were low platelet count and deteriorated liver function. Overall, 982 of 1008 planned treatment weeks (97%) were successfully completed within the first 12 weeks of therapy. CONCLUSION: With the better safety profile of interferon-free therapies, eligibility for HCV treatment will expand broadly, including patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Current limitations are renal failure and concomitant cardiac disease. Patients with advanced cirrhosis still have a high risk for hospitalization even with interferon-free therapies, but can continue HCV treatment in most cases.

Eligibility and safety of triple therapy for hepatitis C: lessons learned from the first experience in a real world setting.

BACKGROUND: HCV protease inhibitors (PIs) boceprevir and telaprevir in combination with PEG-Interferon alfa and Ribavirin (P/R) is the new standard of care in the treatment of chronic HCV genotype 1 (GT1) infection. However, not every HCV GT1 infected patient is eligible for P/R/PI therapy. Furthermore phase III studies did not necessarily reflect real world as patients with advanced liver disease or comorbidities were underrepresented. The aim of our study was to analyze the eligibility and safety of P/R/PI treatment in a real world setting of a tertiary referral center. METHODS: All consecutive HCV GT1 infected patients who were referred to our hepatitis treatment unit between June and November 2011 were included. Patients were evaluated for P/R/PI according to their individual risk/benefit ratio based on 4 factors: Treatment-associated safety concerns, chance for SVR, treatment urgency and nonmedical patient related reasons. On treatment data were analyzed until week 12. RESULTS: 208 patients were included (F3/F4 64%, mean platelet count 169/nl, 40% treatment-naïve). Treatment was not initiated in 103 patients most frequently due to safety concerns. 19 patients were treated in phase II/III trials or by local centers and a triple therapy concept was initiated at our unit in 86 patients. Hospitalization was required in 16 patients; one patient died due to a gastrointestinal infection possibly related to treatment. A platelet count of <110/nl was associated with hospitalization as well as treatment failure. Overall, 128 patients were either not eligible for therapy or experienced a treatment failure at week 12. CONCLUSIONS: P/R/PI therapies are complex, time-consuming and sometimes dangerous in a real world setting, especially in patients with advanced liver disease. A careful patient selection plays a crucial role to improve safety of PI based therapies. A significant number of patients are not eligible for P/R/PI, emphasizing the need for alternative therapeutic options.