RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the first three months after Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), a remarkable number of patients have an unfavorable outcome. An inflammatory response after TAVI is suspected to have negative effects. The exact mechanisms remain unclear. We examined the influence of monocyte subpopulations on the clinical outcome, along with the degree of monocyte activation and further parameters of inflammation and platelet activation. METHODS: Flow-cytometric quantification analyses of peripheral blood were done in 120 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI (one day before TAVI and on day 1 and 7 after TAVI). Monocyte-subsets were defined by their CD14 and CD16 expression, monocyte-platelet-aggregates (MPA) by CD14/CD41 co-expression. The extent of monocyte activation was determined by quantification of CD11b-expression (activation epitope). Additionally, pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, C-reactive protein were measured with the cytometric bead array method or standard laboratory tests. RESULTS: Elevated Mon2 (CD14++CD16+) - monocytes (38 vs. 62 cells/µl, p < 0.001) and a high expression of CD11b prior to TAVI (MFI 50.1 vs. 84.6, p < 0.05) were independently associated with death 3 months after TAVI. Mon2 showed the highest CD11b-expression and CD11b correlated with platelet activation and markers of systemic inflammation. Even CRP and IL-8 before TAVI were associated with death after TAVI. In contrast, a systemic inflammation response shortly after TAVI was not associated with early death. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated Mon2-monocytes and a high level of monocyte activation before TAVI are associated with early mortality after TAVI. Chronic inflammation in aging patients seems to be an important risk factor after TAVI.
Asunto(s)
Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Válvula Aórtica , Biomarcadores , Plaquetas , Humanos , Monocitos , Activación Plaquetaria , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversosRESUMEN
New protocols for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) could lower the radiation dose for patients but influence the image quality. To compare image quality and radiation exposure in step-and-shoot CCTA and high-pitch spiral CCTA. Fifty-nine pairs of patients matched for weight, height, sex and heart rate were included in this study (74 m, 44 f, average age 60 years, age range 29-94 years). Step-and-shoot CCTA and high-pitch spiral CCTA was performed on a third generation dual-source CT in equally sized patient groups. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the ascending aorta and the coronary arteries were determined for each dataset. Image quality was rated using a five-point scale. We used the t-test for paired samples to compare SNR and effective dose, and the Wilcoxon test to compare image quality scores. Mean effective dose for the step-and-shoot protocol (4.15 ± 3.07 mSv) was significantly higher in comparison to the high-pitch spiral protocol (1.2 ± 0.69 mSv; p < 0.0001). Mean SNR was higher with the step-and-shoot protocol compared to the high-pitch spiral protocol in the aorta, in the left main and peripheral coronary arteries (p < 0.01), in the proximal right coronary artery (p = 0.027). Image quality scores were significantly better for the step-and-shoot protocol (p = 0.0003). Step-and-shoot CCTA has significantly better SNR and overall image quality compared to high-pitch spiral CCTA, but with a mean effective dose more than thrice as high.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/métodos , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación , Tomografía Computarizada Espiral/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aortografía/métodos , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tomografía Computarizada Espiral/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Fibrilación Ventricular/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Ventricular/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía Coronaria , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Atrios Cardíacos/cirugía , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal/efectos adversos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Ecocardiografía Tridimensional , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Falla de Prótesis , Tromboembolia/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia/etiologíaRESUMEN
Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma is an aggressive tumour in adulthood, in which cardiac troponin T seems to be a tumour marker and course parameter. We present the clinical course of a young man suffering from this rare disease and the development of troponin T during therapy. Noninvasive cardiac imaging was used to exclude cardiac involvement, myocardial infarction or inflammation processes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) shape and function serves as an indicator in several types of heart disease such as arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD). However, there is no in-depth knowledge of RV motion, even in healthy subjects. The aim of our study was to provide a quantitative analysis of normal variations in RV wall motion in healthy subjects by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 65 consecutive patients referred for the evaluation of cardiac function by 3 Tesla CMR. Balanced steady-state free-precession images were obtained and areas of disordered RV wall motion were evaluated and classified based on a standardised segmental model for the right ventricle. RESULTS: In 59 patients (90.8 %) wall motion abnormalities (WMA) of the right ventricle were evident. WMA were predominately detected in the apicolateral segments (72 %) compared with mediolateral (24 %, P < 0.001) and inferolateral segments (4 %, P < 0.001). Dyskinesia was the most frequent wall motion disorder (62.4 %), followed by hypokinesia (20.8 %) and bulging (16.8 %). The mean WMA diameter in the transverse plane (6.4 ± 1.9 mm) was significantly shorter compared with the diameter in the horizontal long-axis (8.1 ± 3.6 mm, P = 0.002) and short-axis plane (10.7 ± 4.6 mm). CONCLUSION: WMA of the right ventricle are common. Therefore, one should be aware that these nonpathological wall motion disorders can easily be mistaken for a pathological regional wall motion contraction, particularly in ARVD where to date, clear wall motion criteria are lacking.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Accurate determination of right ventricular volume and ejection fraction (RVEF) is established using MRI. Automatic contour detection of the right ventricular endocardial border is not established in clinical practice, resulting in considerable manual efforts to quantify RVEF. Using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) has proved its worth for quantification of RVEF and risk prediction. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify whether TAPSE assessed with MRI as a fast and easily obtainable parameter correlated with volumetric quantification of RVEF. METHODS: Right ventricular volumes and RVEF were measured with the standardised slice-summation method at MRI. MRI-TAPSE was defined as maximum apical excursion of lateral tricuspid annular plane and measured in a four-chamber view using steady-state free precession sequences. Additionally, MRI-TAPSE was compared with TAPSE assessed using TTE. RESULTS: 76 consecutive patients (aged 58±17 years) were examined. At MRI, right end-diastolic volumes were 97±36 ml, right end-systolic volumes were 57±27 ml and the mean RVEF was 42±14%. MRI-TAPSE was determined with 19±6 mm and correlated well at linear regression analysis with volumetric RVEF (r=0.72, p<0.001). Furthermore, MRI-TAPSE discriminated sufficiently between patients with impaired and normal RVEF. Multiplying MRI-TAPSE by 2.5 led to values close to the RVEF by volumetry. Additionally, MRI-TAPSE correlated well with TAPSE determined using TTE. The inter- and intra-observer variabilities of MRI-TAPSE determination were low (3.1% and 1.8%). CONCLUSION: TAPSE assessed with MRI is a fast and easily obtainable parameter which correlates well with volumetric quantification of RVEF.