ECMO support may be associated with improved survival in tuberculosis associated severe ARDS.

BACKGROUND: Data describing outcome of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support in Tuberculosis (Tbc)-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain sparce and are mostly confined to singular case reports. The aim of this case series was to analyze intensive care unit (ICU) survival in patients with Tbc-associated ARDS receiving veno-venous (vv-) ECMO support and to compare those to patients not receiving ECMO. CASE PRESENTATION: ICU survival was analyzed retrospectively in 14 patients treated for Tbc-associated ARDS at three ECMO-referral university hospitals (Hannover Medical School, University Hospital Bonn (both Germany) and University Hospital Zurich (Switzerland)) during the last 14 years, of which eight patients received additional vv-ECMO support and six standard care only. ICU survival was significantly higher in patients receiving additional vv-ECMO support (62.5%, n = 5/8) compared to those that did not (16.7%, n = 1/6) (p = 0.021). ECMO support was associated with reduced ICU mortality (Hazard ratio adjusted for baseline SOFA score [adj. HR] 0.125 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.023-0.689), p = 0.017). Median (IQR) time on ECMO and invasive ventilation in the vv-ECMO group were 20 (11-26) and 37 (27-53) days, respectively. Major bleeding defined as transfusion requirement of 4 units of blood or more or surgical and/or radiologic intervention occurred only in one patient, in whom pulmonary bleeding was fatal. Thromboembolic events occurred in none of the vv-ECMO patients. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis from three large ECMO centers with similar SOPs suggests vv-ECMO support as a feasible approach in patients with severe Tbc-associated ARDS. Although affiliated with extended runtimes, vv-ECMO might be associated with improved survival in those patients. Vv-ECMO support should thus be considered in Tbc-associated ARDS to enable lung protective strategies during prolonged lung recovery.

Effect of therapeutic plasma exchange on tissue factor and tissue factor pathway inhibitor in septic shock.

BACKGROUND: Coagulopathy is part of the pathological host response to infection in sepsis. Higher plasma concentrations of both tissue factor (TF) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) are associated with occurrence of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), multi-organ dysfunction and increased mortality in patients with sepsis. Currently no treatment approaches specifically targeting this axis are available. We hypothesize that therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) might limit this coagulopathy by restoring the balance of plasma proteins. METHODS: This was a pooled post-hoc biobank analysis including 51 patients with early (shock onset < 24 h) and severe (norepinephrine dose > 0.4 µg/kg/min) septic shock, who were either receiving standard of care treatment (SOC, n = 14) or SOC + one single TPE (n = 37). Plasma concentrations of TF and TFPI were measured both at- and 6 h after study inclusion. The effect of TPE on concentrations of TF and TFPI was investigated and compared to SOC patients. Further, baseline TF and TFPI concentrations were used to modulate and predict clinical response to adjunctive TPE, indicated by longitudinal reduction of lactate concentrations over the first 24 h following study inclusion. RESULTS: TPE led to a significant reduction in circulating concentrations of both TF and TFPI while no difference was observed in the SOC group. Relative change of TF within 6 h was + 14 (-0.8 to + 30.4) % (p = 0.089) in the SOC and -18.3 (-32.6 to -2.2) % (p < 0.001) in the TPE group (between group p < 0.001). Similarly, relative change of TFPI was + 14.4 (-2.3 to + 30.9) % (p = 0.076) in the SOC and -20 (-32.8 to -7.9) % (p < 0.001) in the TPE group (between group p = 0.022). The ratio of TF to TFPI remained unchanged in both SOC and TPE groups. SOC patients exhibited an increase in lactate over the initial 24 h when TF and TFPI concentrations were higher at baseline. In contrast, patients undergoing TPE experienced a sustained longitudinal reduction of lactate concentrations across all levels of baseline TF and TFPI elevations. In a multivariate mixed-effects model, higher baseline TF (p = 0.003) and TFPI (p = 0.053) levels led to greater longitudinal lactate concentration reduction effects in the TPE group. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive TPE in septic shock is associated with a significant removal of both TF and TFPI, which may contribute to the early hemodynamic improvement observed in septic shock patients receiving TPE. Higher baseline TF (and TFPI) plasma concentrations were identified as a putative predictor of treatment response that could be useful for predictive enrichment strategies in future clinical trials.

[What is confirmed in the treatment of sepsis? : An update]. / Was ist gesichert in der Therapie der Sepsis? : Ein Update.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is defined as "being evoked as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by an inadequate host response to infection". The most recent German S3 guidelines were published in 2018 and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) last published the current recommendations for the treatment of sepsis and septic shock in 2021. OBJECTIVE: This article explores and discusses which evidence in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock has been confirmed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Discussion of the 2018 German S3 guidelines, supplementation of the content of the 2021 international guidelines and recent research results since 2021. RESULTS: The primary objective for managing sepsis and septic shock still includes rapid identification, early initiation of anti-infective treatment, and focus cleansing when feasible. In addition, the focus is on hemodynamic stabilization, including the early use of vasopressors for prevention of hypervolemia and, if necessary, the use of organ support procedures. Supportive treatment, such as the administration of corticosteroids and the use of apheresis, can be advantageous in specific scenarios. The focus is increasingly shifting towards post-intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up care, improving the quality of life after surviving sepsis and the close involvement of relatives of the patient. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that considerable progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis, the early administration of anti-infective agents, focus control, nuanced volume therapy and the use of catecholamines continue to be fundamental to sepsis management. New recommendations emphasize the early use of vasopressors (primarily norepinephrine) and the administration of corticosteroids, especially in cases of septic shock and pneumonia.

Clinical significance of transjugular liver biopsy in acute liver failure - a real-world analysis.

BACKGROUND: Histopathological characterization obtained by transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) may theoretically contribute to clarification of the exact aetiology of acute liver failure (ALF). It's unclear whether the histopathological information from TJLB, due to the small specimen size, significantly contributes to diagnosing ALF causes, guiding therapy decisions, or predicting overall prognosis. This retrospective study aimed to analyse safety and clinical significance of TJLB in patients with ALF. METHODS: This retrospective, monocentric study investigated safety and efficacy of TJLB in patients with ALF over a ten-year period at a tertiary care transplant-center. The predictive value of various clinical and laboratory characteristics as well as histopathological findings obtained by TJLB on 28-day liver-transplant-free survival were evaluated by calculating uni- and multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression models. Additional univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the influence of degree of intrahepatic necrosis on the secondary endpoints intensive-care-unit (ICU) admission, need for endotracheal intubation, renal replacement therapy and high-urgency listing for LTX. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients with ALF receiving TJLB were included into the study. In most cases (n = 39/43 cases) TJLB confirmed the initially already clinically presumed ALF aetiology and the therapeutic approach was unchanged by additional histological examination in the majority of patients (36/43 cases). However, in patients with a high suspicion for aetiologies potentially treatable by medical immunosuppression (e.g. AIH, GvHD), TJLB significantly influenced further treatment planning and/or adjustment. While the degree of intrahepatic necrosis showed significance in the univariate analysis (p = 0.04), it did not demonstrate a significant predictive effect on liver transplant-free survival in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.1). Only consecutive ICU admission was more likely with higher extent of intrahepatic necrosis (Odds ratio (OR) 1.04 (95% CI 1-1.08), p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Performance of TJLB in ALF led to a change in suspected diagnosis and to a significant change in therapeutic measures only in those patients with a presumed high risk for aetiologies potentially responsive to immunosuppressive therapy. Clinical assessment alone was accurate enough, with additional histopathological examination adding no significant value, to predict overall prognosis of patients with ALF.

[Extracorporeal Support Strategies in Liver Failure - Focus on Albumin Dialysis and Therapeutic Plasma Exchange]. / Extrakorporale Unterstützungsstrategien beim Leberversagen.

Combining albumin dialysis for the removal of hydrophobic substances with classical haemodialysis in the treatment of acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has a strong theoretical rational and clinical data showed a positive effect on laboratory and partly clinical characteristics of ALF and ACLF. However, neither the MARS nor the Prometheus System has so far been able to demonstrate a mortality benefit in ALF or ACLF patients. To date, only the use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has demonstrated significant removal of pathogen-associated (PAMPs), damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and pro-inflammatory cytokines. In addition, TPE also acts simultaneously by replacing protective but depleted mediators, thus improving multiple key pathophysiological principles of both ALF and ACLF. In ALF, both high-volume and standard-volume TPE showed a significant improvement in survival. The data on the use of TPE in ACLF is still sparse, with only two Chinese monocentric studies in patients with exclusively hepatitis B-associated ACLF suggesting potentially improved survival with TPE. The currently recruiting APACHE study will include patients with the modern EASL-CLIF definition of ACLF.

Carboxyhemoglobin predicts oxygenator performance and imminent oxygenator change in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: The continuous exposure of blood to a non-biological surface during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may lead to progressive thrombus formation in the oxygenator, hemolysis and consequently impaired gas exchange. In most centers oxygenator performance is monitored only on a once daily basis. Carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) is generated upon red cell lysis and is routinely measured with any co-oximetry performed to surveille gas exchange and acid-base homeostasis every couple of hours. This retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate COHb in the arterial blood gas as a novel marker of oxygenator dysfunction and its predictive value for imminent oxygenator change. RESULTS: Out of the 484 screened patients on ECMO 89, cumulatively requiring 116 oxygenator changes within 1833 patient days, including 19,692 arterial COHb measurements were analyzed. Higher COHb levels were associated with lower post-oxygenator pO2 (estimate for log(COHb): - 2.176 [95% CI - 2.927, - 1.427], p < 0.0001) and with a shorter time to oxygenator change (estimate for log(COHb): - 67.895 [95% CI - 74.209, - 61.542] hours, p < 0.0001). COHb was predictive of oxygenator change within 6 h (estimate for log(COHb): 5.027 [95% CI 1.670, 15.126], p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: COHb correlates with oxygenator performance and can be predictive of imminent oxygenator change. Therefore, longitudinal measurements of COHb in clinical routine might be a cheap and more granular candidate for ECMO surveillance that should be further analyzed in a controlled prospective trial design.

Prevention of peri-interventional hypothermia during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a forced-air heating system.

Background and study aims Perioperative hypothermia is associated with significant complications and can be prevented with forced-air heating systems (FAHS). Whether hypothermia occurs during prolonged endoscopic sedation is unclear and prevention measures are not addressed in endoscopic sedation guidelines. We hypothesized that hypothermia also occurs in a significant proportion of patients undergoing endoscopic interventions associated with longer sedation times such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP), and that FAHS may prevent it. Patients and methods In this observational study, each patient received two consecutive ERCPs, the first ERCP following current standard of care without FAHS (SOC group) and a consecutive ERCP with FAHS (FAHS group). The primary endpoint was maximum body temperature difference during sedation. Results Twenty-four patients were included. Median (interquartile range) maximum body temperature difference was -0.9°C (-1.2; -0.4) in the SOC and -0.1°C (-0.2; 0) in the FAHS group ( P < 0.001). Median body temperature was lower in the SOC compared with the FAHS group after 20, 30, 40, and 50 minutes of sedation. A reduction in body temperature of > 1°C ( P < 0.001) and a reduction below 36°C ( P = 0.01) occurred more often in the SOC than in the FAHS group. FAHS was independently associated with reduced risk of hypothermia ( P = 0.006). More patients experienced freezing in the SOC group ( P = 0.004). Hemodynmaic and respiratory stability were comparable in both groups. Conclusions Hypothermia occurred in the majority of patients undergoing prolonged endoscopic sedation without active temperature control. FAHS was associated with higher temperature stability during sedation and better patient comfort.

Current clinical practice in using adjunctive extracorporeal blood purification in sepsis and septic shock: results from the ESICM "EXPLORATION" survey.

BACKGROUND: Despite a lack of clear evidence extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) is increasingly used as an adjunctive treatment in septic shock based on its biological plausibility. However, current state of praxis and believes in both efficacy and level of evidence are very heterogeneous. METHODS: The "EXPLORATION" (Current Clinical Practice in using adjunctive extracorporeal blood purification in septic shock), a web-based survey endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), questioned both the current local clinical practices as well as future perspectives of EBP in sepsis and septic shock. RESULTS: One hundred and two people participated in the survey. The majority of three quarters of participants (74.5%) use adjunctive EBP in their clinical routine with a varying frequency of description. Unselective cytokine adsorption (CA) (37.5%) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) (34.1%) were by far the most commonly used modalities. While the overall theoretical rational was found to be moderate to high by the majority of the participants (74%), the effectively existing clinical evidence was acknowledged to be rather low (66%). Although CA was used most frequently in clinical practice, both the best existing clinical evidence endorsing its current use (45%) as well the highest potential to be explored in future clinical trials (51.5%) was attributed to TPE. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of participants use EBP techniques in their clinical practice and acknowledge a subjective good theoretical rationale behind it, the clinical evidence is assessed to be limited. While both CA and TPE are by far the most common used technique, both clinical evidence as well as future potential for further exploration in clinical trials was assessed to be the highest for TPE.

Immunosuppressive effects of circulating bile acids in human endotoxemia and septic shock: patients with liver failure are at risk.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis-induced immunosuppression is a frequent cause of opportunistic infections and death in critically ill patients. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms is needed to develop targeted therapies. Circulating bile acids with immunosuppressive effects were recently identified in critically ill patients. These bile acids activate the monocyte G-protein coupled receptor TGR5, thereby inducing profound innate immune dysfunction. Whether these mechanisms contribute to immunosuppression and disease severity in sepsis is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine if immunosuppressive bile acids are present in endotoxemia and septic shock and, if so, which patients are particularly at risk. METHODS: To induce experimental endotoxemia in humans, ten healthy volunteers received 2 ng/kg E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Circulating bile acids were profiled before and after LPS administration. Furthermore, 48 patients with early (shock onset within < 24 h) and severe septic shock (norepinephrine dose > 0.4 µg/kg/min) and 48 healthy age- and sex-matched controls were analyzed for circulating bile acids. To screen for immunosuppressive effects of circulating bile acids, the capability to induce TGR5 activation was computed for each individual bile acid profile by a recently published formula. RESULTS: Although experimental endotoxemia as well as septic shock led to significant increases in total bile acids compared to controls, this increase was mild in most cases. By contrast, there was a marked and significant increase in circulating bile acids in septic shock patients with severe liver failure compared to healthy controls (61.8 µmol/L vs. 2.8 µmol/L, p = 0.0016). Circulating bile acids in these patients were capable to induce immunosuppression, as indicated by a significant increase in TGR5 activation by circulating bile acids (20.4% in severe liver failure vs. 2.8% in healthy controls, p = 0.0139). CONCLUSIONS: Circulating bile acids capable of inducing immunosuppression are present in septic shock patients with severe liver failure. Future studies should examine whether modulation of bile acid metabolism can improve the clinical course and outcome of sepsis in these patients.

Reduced anticoagulation strategy is associated with a lower incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage in COVID-19 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Optimal anticoagulation strategies for COVID-19 patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) remain uncertain. A higher incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) during VV ECMO support compared to non-COVID-19 viral ARDS patients has been reported, with increased bleeding rates in COVID-19 attributed to both intensified anticoagulation and a disease-specific endotheliopathy. We hypothesized that lower intensity of anticoagulation during VV ECMO would be associated with a lower risk of ICH. In a retrospective, multicenter study from three academic tertiary intensive care units, we included patients with confirmed COVID-19 ARDS requiring VV ECMO support from March 2020 to January 2022. Patients were grouped by anticoagulation exposure into higher intensity, targeting anti-factor Xa activity (anti-Xa) of 0.3-0.4 U/mL, versus lower intensity, targeting anti-Xa 0.15-0.3 U/mL, cohorts. Mean daily doses of unfractionated heparin (UFH) per kg bodyweight and effectively measured daily anti-factor Xa activities were compared between the groups over the first 7 days on ECMO support. The primary outcome was the rate of ICH during VV ECMO support. RESULTS: 141 critically ill COVID-19 patients were included in the study. Patients with lower anticoagulation targets had consistently lower anti-Xa activity values over the first 7 ECMO days (p < 0.001). ICH incidence was lower in patients in the lower anti-Xa group: 4 (8%) vs 32 (34%) events. Accounting for death as a competing event, the adjusted subhazard ratio for the occurrence of ICH was 0.295 (97.5% CI 0.1-0.9, p = 0.044) for the lower anti-Xa compared to the higher anti-Xa group. 90-day ICU survival was higher in patients in the lower anti-Xa group, and ICH was the strongest risk factor associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR] 6.8 [CI 2.1-22.1], p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For COVID-19 patients on VV ECMO support anticoagulated with heparin, a lower anticoagulation target was associated with a significant reduction in ICH incidence and increased survival.

BISCIT: Biliary interventions in critically ill patients with secondary sclerosing cholangitis-a study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, controlled parallel group trial.

BACKGROUND: Progress of cholangitis to cholangiosepsis is a frequent observation in patients with secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients (SSC-CIP). Adequate biliary drainage may reduce episodes of cholangiosepsis and therefore stabilize liver function and improve survival. The primary objective of the BISCIT study is to demonstrate that scheduled biliary interventions will reduce incidence of cholangiosepsis, liver transplantation, or death in patients with SSC-CIP. METHODS: A total of 104 patients will be randomized at ten study sites. Patients with SSC-CIP, confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), will be randomized 1:1 either in the intervention group which will be treated with scheduled biliary interventions (i.e., therapeutic ERC) every 8 weeks for 6 months or in the control group which will receive standard of care. The randomization will be stratified by center. The composite primary efficacy endpoint is defined as (1) occurrence of death, (2) necessity of liver transplantation, or (3) occurrence of cholangiosepsis within 6 months following randomization. DISCUSSION: Prospective evaluation of endoscopic treatment procedures is urgently needed to establish an evidence-based therapeutic treatment algorithm in SSC-CIP. A positive trial result could change the current standard of care for patients with SSC-CIP. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentations at international congresses, workshops, and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05396755, date of registration: May 31, 2022, last update: May 31, 2022).

EXCHANGE-2: investigating the efficacy of add-on plasma exchange as an adjunctive strategy against septic shock-a study protocol for a randomized, prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, parallel-group trial.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection. The mortality of sepsis and particular of septic shock is very high. Treatment mostly focuses on infection control but a specific intervention that targets the underlying pathological host response is lacking to the present time. The investigators hypothesize that early therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) will dampen the maladaptive host response by removing injurious mediators thereby limiting organ dysfunction and improving survival in patients with septic shock. Although small prospective studies demonstrated rapid hemodynamic stabilization under TPE, no adequately powered randomized clinical trial has investigated hard outcomes. METHODS: This is a randomized, prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, parallel-group interventional trial to test the adjunctive effect of TPE in patients with early septic shock. Patients with a refractory (defined as norepinephrine (NE) ≥ 0.4 µg/kg/min ≥ 30 min OR NE 0.3 µg/kg/min + vasopressin) and early (shock onset < 24 h) septic shock will be included. The intervention is a standard TPE with donor fresh frozen plasma (1.2 × individual plasma volume) performed within 6 h after randomization and will be compared to a standard of care (SOC) control arm. The primary endpoint is 28 days mortality for which the power analysis revealed a group size of 137 / arm (n = 274) to demonstrate a benefit of 15%. The key secondary objective will be to compare the extent of organ failure indicated by mean SOFA over the first 7 days as well as organ support-free days until day 28 following randomization. Besides numerous biological secondary, safety endpoints such as incidence of bleeding, allergic reactions, transfusion associated lung injury, severe thrombocytopenia, and other severe adverse events will be assessed during the first 7 days. For exploratory scientific analyses, biomaterial will be acquired longitudinally and multiple predefined scientific subprojects are planned. This study is an investigator-initiated trial supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, DA 1209/7-1), in which 26 different centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria will participate over a duration of 33 months. DISCUSSION: This trial has substantial clinical relevance as it evaluates a promising adjunctive treatment option in refractory septic shock patients suffering from an extraordinary high mortality. A positive trial result could change the current standard of care for this septic subgroup. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentations at international congresses, workshops, and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05726825 , Registered on 14 February 2023.