Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 363
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 14(20)2024 Oct 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39451629

RESUMEN

Anaemia in pregnancy is a global problem of significance in all settings. The most common cause is iron deficiency. Large numbers of women are affected, ranging up to 25-30% antenatally and 20-40% postnatally. It is associated with serious adverse outcomes for both the mother and her baby. The risk of low birth weight, preterm birth, postpartum haemorrhage, stillbirth, and neonatal death are all increased in the presence of anaemia. For the infants of affected pregnancies, complications may include neurocognitive impairment. Making an accurate diagnosis during pregnancy has its challenges, which include the choice of thresholds of haemoglobin below which a diagnosis of anaemia in each trimester of pregnancy can be made and, aligned with this question, which are the most appropriate biomarkers to use to define iron deficiency. Treatment with oral iron supplements increases the haemoglobin concentration and corrects iron deficiency. But high numbers of women fail to respond, probably due to poor adherence to medication, resulting from side effects. This has resulted in an increased use of more expensive intravenous iron. Doubts remain about the optimal regimen to of oral iron for use (daily, alternate days, or some other frequency) and the cost-effectiveness of intravenous iron. There is interest in strategies for prevention but these have yet to be proven clinically safe and effective.

3.
J Pediatr ; 276: 114302, 2024 Sep 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39277077

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To survey practices of iron and recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEpo) administration to infants born preterm across Europe. STUDY DESIGN: Over a 3-month period, we conducted an online survey in 597 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of 18 European countries treating infants born with a gestational age of <32 weeks. RESULTS: We included 343 NICUs (response rate 56.3%) in the survey. Almost all NICUs (97.7%) routinely supplement enteral iron, and 74.3% of respondents to all infants born <32 weeks of gestation. We found that 65.3% of NICUs routinely evaluate erythropoiesis and iron parameters beyond day 28 after birth. Most NICUs initiate iron supplementation at postnatal age of 2 weeks and stop after 6 months (34.3%) or 12 months (34.3%). Routine use of rhEpo was reported in 22.2% of NICUs, and in individual cases in 6.9%. RhEpo was mostly administered subcutaneously (70.1%) and most frequently at a dose of 250 U/kg 3 times a week (44.3%), but the dose varied greatly between centers. CONCLUSIONS: This survey highlights wide heterogeneity in evaluating erythropoietic activity and iron deficiency in infants born preterm. Variation in iron supplementation during infancy likely reflects an inadequate evidence base. Current evidence on the efficacy and safety profile of rhEpo is only poorly translated into clinical practice. This survey demonstrates a need for standards to optimize patient blood management in anemia of prematurity.

4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(9): e2434077, 2024 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39298172

RESUMEN

Importance: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are frequently administered to preterm infants born before 32 weeks of gestation in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Two randomized clinical trials (Effects of Transfusion Thresholds on Neurocognitive Outcomes of Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants [ETTNO] and Transfusion of Prematures [TOP]) found that liberal RBC transfusion thresholds are nonsuperior to restrictive thresholds, but the extent to which these results have been integrated into clinical practice since publication in 2020 is unknown. Objective: To describe neonatal RBC transfusion practice in Europe. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international prospective observational cohort study collected data between September 1, 2022, and August 31, 2023, with a 6-week observation period per center, from 64 NICUs in 22 European countries. Participants included 1143 preterm infants born before 32 weeks of gestation. Exposure: Admission to the NICU. Main Outcomes and Measures: Study outcome measures included RBC transfusion prevalence rates, cumulative incidence, indications, pretransfusion hemoglobin (Hb) levels, volumes, and transfusion rates, Hb increment, and adverse effects of RBC transfusion. Results: A total of 1143 preterm infants were included (641 male [56.1%]; median gestational age at birth, 28 weeks plus 2 days [IQR, 26 weeks plus 2 days to 30 weeks plus 2 days]; median birth weight, 1030 [IQR, 780-1350] g), of whom 396 received 1 or more RBC transfusions, totaling 903 transfusions. Overall RBC transfusion prevalence rate during postnatal days 1 to 28 was 3.4 transfusion days per 100 admission days, with considerable variation across countries, only partly explained by patient mix. By day 28, 36.5% (95% CI, 31.6%-41.5%) of infants had received at least 1 transfusion. Most transfusions were given based on a defined Hb threshold (748 [82.8%]). Hemoglobin levels before transfusions indicated for threshold were below the restrictive thresholds set by ETTNO in 324 of 729 transfusions (44.4%) and TOP in 265 of 729 (36.4%). Conversely, they were between restrictive and liberal thresholds in 352 (48.3%) and 409 (56.1%) transfusions, respectively, and above liberal thresholds in 53 (7.3%) and 55 (7.5%) transfusions, respectively. Most transfusions given based on threshold had volumes of 15 mL/kg (470 of 738 [63.7%]) and were administered over 3 hours (400 of 738 [54.2%]), but there was substantial variation in dose and duration. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of very preterm infants, most transfusions indicated for threshold were given for pretransfusion Hb levels above restrictive transfusion thresholds evaluated in recent trials. These results underline the need to optimize practices and for implementation research to support uptake of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Humanos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/métodos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Europa (Continente) , Estudios Prospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Recien Nacido Prematuro
5.
Anesthesiology ; 141(5): 904-912, 2024 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39115454

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Trauma hemorrhage induces a coagulopathy with a high associated mortality rate. The Implementing Treatment Algorithms for the Correction of Trauma Induced Coagulopathy (ITACTIC) randomized trial tested two goal-directed treatment algorithms for coagulation management: one guided by conventional coagulation tests and one by viscoelastic hemostatic assays (viscoelastic). The lack of a difference in 28-day mortality led the authors to hypothesize that coagulopathic patients received insufficient treatment to correct coagulopathy. METHODS: During ITACTIC, two sites were coenrolling patients into an ongoing prospective observational study, which included serial blood sampling at the same intervals as in ITACTIC. The subgroup in both studies had conventional and viscoelastic test results for each patient available for analysis. A goal-directed treatment was defined as one triggered by an ITACTIC algorithm. Coagulopathy was defined as rotational thromboelastometry EXTEM A5 less than 40 mm. The primary outcome was correction of coagulopathy by the 12th unit of erythrocyte transfusion during resuscitation. RESULTS: Full viscoelastic and conventional coagulation test results were available for 133 patients. Of these patients, 71% were coagulopathic on admission, and 16% developed a coagulopathy during resuscitation. ITACTIC viscoelastic hemostatic assay group patients were more likely to receive goal-directed treatment than the standard group (76% vs. 47%; odds ratio, 3.73; 95% CI, 1.64 to 8.49; P = 0.002). However, only 54% of patients received goal-directed treatment, and only 20% corrected their coagulopathy (vs. 0% with empiric treatment alone; not significant). Median time to first goal-directed treatment was 68 (53 to 88) min for viscoelastic and 110 (77 to 123) min for standard (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In ITACTIC, many bleeding trauma patients did not receive an indicated goal-directed treatment. Interventions arrived late during resuscitation and were only partially effective at correcting coagulopathy.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea , Tratamiento Precoz Dirigido por Objetivos , Heridas y Lesiones , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Algoritmos , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/etiología , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/terapia , Pruebas de Coagulación Sanguínea/métodos , Tratamiento Precoz Dirigido por Objetivos/métodos , Hemorragia/terapia , Hemorragia/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resucitación/métodos , Tromboelastografía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Heridas y Lesiones/sangre
6.
EJHaem ; 5(4): 772-777, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39157598

RESUMEN

Thrombocytopenic patients have an increased risk of bleeding when undergoing invasive procedures. In a multicentre, phase II, blinded, randomised, controlled feasibility trial, critically ill patients with platelet count 100 × 109/L or less were randomised 1:1 to intravenous desmopressin (0.3 µg/kg) or placebo before an invasive procedure. Forty-three participants (18.8% of those eligible) were recruited, with 41 eligible for analysis. Post-procedure bleeding occurred in one of 22 (4.5%) in the placebo arm and zero of 19 in the desmopressin arm. Despite liberal inclusion criteria, there were significant feasibility challenges recruiting patients in the critical care setting prior to invasive procedures.

7.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 32(1): 71, 2024 Aug 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39160625

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Trauma induced coagulopathy remains to be an important cause of high transfusion requirements and mortality and shock induced endotheliopathy (SHINE) has been implicated. METHODS: European multicenter observational study of adult trauma patients with injury severity score ≥ 16 arriving within 2 h from injury to the trauma centers. Admission blood samples obtained were used for analysis of the SHINE biomarkers (syndecan-1, soluble thrombomodulin, adrenaline) and extensive analysis of coagulation, -and fibrinolytic factors together with collection of clinical data. Hierarchical clustering of the SHINE biomarkers was used to identify the SHINE phenotypes. RESULTS: The 313 patients clustered into four SHINE phenotypes. Phenotype 2, having the highest glycocalyx shedding, encompassing 22% of the whole cohort, had severe coagulopathy with lower levels of prothrombin, FV, IX, X, XI and severe hyperfibrinolysis with higher plasmin - alpha 2-antiplasmin (PAP) - and tPA levels and lower alpha2 - antiplasmin levels. This phenotype had significantly higher transfusion requirements and higher mortality (39% vs. 23%, 15% and 14%) but similar injury severity score (ISS) compared to the others phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Hierarchical clustering identified four SHINE phenotype in a cohort of trauma patients. Trauma induced coagulopathy was confined to only one of the SHINE phenotypes, encompassing 22% of the total cohort. This phenotype was characterized by severe hypocoagulability and hyperfibrinolysis, which translated to significantly higher transfusion requirements and higher mortality compared to the other SHINE phenotypes with similar injury severity, warranting further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Fenotipo , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/etiología , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/sangre , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Heridas y Lesiones/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Endotelio Vascular/fisiopatología , Endotelio Vascular/lesiones , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología
8.
Blood Adv ; 2024 Aug 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39208353

RESUMEN

The burden of iron-deficiency anemia remains significant during pregnancy. Oral iron is first-line medication, but there is uncertainty about a range of factors including adherence and side-effects of different doses. We conducted a pilot randomized trial to investigate the impact of different doses of oral iron supplementation started early in pregnancy, in non-anemic women, for four main outcomes; recruitment and protocol compliance, adherence, maintenance of maternal hemoglobin and side-effects. Participants at antenatal clinic visits were allocated to one of three trial arms, in a 1:1:1 ratio, as 200mg ferrous sulphate daily, alternate days or three-times per week, with follow-up to delivery. Baseline characteristics of 300 recruited participants were well matched between trial arms. The mean proportion of tablets taken as expected per participant was 82.5% overall (72.3%, 89.6% and 84.5% for the daily, alternate days and three-times a week arm, respectively). There was a lower overall adherence rate in the daily arm (47%) compared with alternate days (62%) and three times per week (61%). Reduction in hemoglobin between randomization and 28 weeks appeared smaller for the daily arm. A range of side-effects were commonly reported at baseline before starting interventions, and by later antenatal visits. Many side effects of iron overlapped with normal pregnancy symptoms. A daily iron dosing schedule might give the best opportunity for delivering an adequate iron load during pregnancy in non-anemic women. Further randomized trials powered on clinical outcomes are needed to establish the clinical effectiveness of oral iron supplementation to prevent iron deficiency anemia. (ISRCTN12911644).

9.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 68(10): 1319-1326, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39034625

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This Intensive Care Medicine Rapid Practice Guideline (ICM-RPG) provides an evidence-based recommendation to address the question: in adult patients in intensive care units (ICUs), should we use small-volume or conventional blood collection tubes? METHODS: We included 23 panelists in 8 countries and assessed and managed financial and intellectual conflicts of interest. Methodological support was provided by the Guidelines in Intensive Care, Development, and Evaluation (GUIDE) group. We conducted a systematic review, including evidence from observational and randomized studies. Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, we evaluated the certainty of evidence and developed recommendations using the Evidence-to-Decision framework. RESULTS: We identified 8 studies (1 cluster and 2 patient-level randomized trials; 5 observational studies) comparing small-volume to conventional tubes. We had high certainty evidence that small-volume tubes reduce daily and cumulative blood sampling volume; and moderate certainty evidence that they reduce the risk of transfusion and mean number of red blood cell units transfused, but these estimates were limited by imprecision. We had high certainty that small-volume tubes have a similar rate of specimens with insufficient quantity. The panel considered that the desirable effects of small-volume tubes outweigh the undesirable effects, are less wasteful of resources, and are feasible, as demonstrated by successful implementation across multiple countries, although there are upfront implementation costs to validate small-volume tubes on laboratory instrumentation. CONCLUSION: This ICM-RPG panel made a strong recommendation for the use of small-volume sample collection tubes in adult ICUs based on overall moderate certainty evidence.


Asunto(s)
Recolección de Muestras de Sangre , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Humanos , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/métodos , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos/métodos
10.
Transfus Med ; 34(4): 268-277, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39032121

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is a primary outcome for many transfusion-related trials in acute leukaemia (AL) patients, typically graded using the World Health Organisation (WHO) bleeding scale (clinically significant bleed (CSB) is ≥grade 2). This composite outcome fails to differentiate minor bleeds that may not be significant, poorly represents the total burden of bleeding and lacks input from healthcare providers (HCPs) and patients. As part of a multi-step project to create a better bleeding tool for trials, our objective was to identify HCPs' perspectives on the components of CSB in AL patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Using qualitative description, we interviewed 19 physicians and nurses who care for AL patients undergoing induction chemotherapy. Participants were recruited from professional organisations, networks and social media. An inductive approach to conventional content analysis was used. RESULTS: HCPs identified features of CSB as the anatomical site of bleeding, amount of bleeding, need for intervention and changes in vital signs. Using these characteristics, bleeding events were categorised into three groups: clinically significant, could evolve into a CSB and not clinically significant. HCPs considered the patient's condition, bleeding history and clinical intuitions when deciding whether a bleed could escalate into serious bleeding. DISCUSSION: Using data from HCPs, we categorised bleeds as clinically significant, could evolve into a CSB, and not significant. A study of patients' perspectives on the importance of different kinds of bleeding is the next step to creating a bleeding definition that is informed by evidence, clinicians and patients.


Asunto(s)
Hemorragia , Humanos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Femenino , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Investigación Cualitativa , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Leucemia/terapia , Leucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Personal de Salud/psicología
11.
Blood Adv ; 8(17): 4593-4605, 2024 Sep 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39024544

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: We report 1- and 5-year survival after acute myeloid leukemia (AML) diagnosis and early mortality within 30 days of systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) treatments, using national cancer registry data in England. Patients aged 18 to 99 years diagnosed between 2013 and 2020 were included. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methodology, and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs; adjusted for intensity of treatment, age at diagnosis, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, comorbidity, and year of diagnosis) using Cox proportional hazards regression. Odds of 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratios [aORs], adjusted for aforementioned characteristics), along with performance status and body mass index, were calculated using logistic regression. Among 17 107 patients identified, older age and comorbidity were associated with worse survival. Asian and Black patients had better survival than White patients: 5-year OS of 34.6%, 29.7%, and 17.8%, respectively; aHR of 0.86; (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.96) Asian vs White, and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73-0.96) Black vs White. Socioeconomic deprivation was associated with worse survival. Overall, 7906 (46.2%) patients were documented as having received SACT. Thirty-day mortality was lower for patients receiving intensive rather than nonintensive SACT. After adjustment for cofactors, the risk was higher in those treated intensively (aOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.92). We show that ethnicity and socioeconomic status affects outcomes in AML. Further work is needed to understand how these effects may differ in different health care settings, and whether this because of effects on disease biology, responsiveness to treatment, or drug toxicity. Selection of intensive vs nonintensive treatment should be based on individual patient factors, balancing improved long-term survival against higher early mortality.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidad , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Resultado del Tratamiento , Demografía , Historia del Siglo XXI
12.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 30(9): 844-863, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38851322

RESUMEN

There is wide interindividual variation in the efficacy of CD34+ cell mobilization and collection in healthy allogenic hematopoietic stem cell donors. Donor characteristics, blood cell counts, and various factors related to mobilization and collection have been associated with blood CD34+ cell count and CD34+ cell yield after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization and collection. Given the heterogenous nature of the literature reporting these associations, in this scoping review we clarify the determinants of CD34+ count and yield. Studies published between 2000 and 2023 reporting allogeneic donors undergoing G-CSF mobilization and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection were evaluated. Eligible studies were those that assessed blood CD34+ cell count or CD34+ cell yield in the first PBSC collection after mobilization with 4 or 5 days of G-CSF treatment. Associations were recorded between these outcomes and donor factors (age, sex, weight, ethnicity), mobilization factors (G-CSF scheduling or dose), collection factors (venous access, processed blood volume [PBV]) or laboratory factors (blood cell counts at baseline or after mobilization). The 52 studies evaluated between 15 and 20,884 donors. Forty-three studies were retrospective, 33 assessed blood CD34+ cell counts, and 39 assessed CD34+ cell yield from PBSCs. Blood CD34+ cell counts consistently predicted CD34+ cell yield. Younger donors usually had higher blood CD34+ cell counts and CD34+ cell yield. Most studies that investigated the effect of donor ancestry found that donors of non-European ancestry had higher blood CD34+ cell counts after mobilization and higher CD34+ cell yields from collection. The poor consensus about the best predictors of blood CD34+ cell count and yield necessitates further prospective studies, particularly of the role of donor ancestry. The current focus on donor sex as a major predictor requires re-evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética , Donantes de Tejidos , Humanos , Donantes de Tejidos/estadística & datos numéricos , Antígenos CD34 , Células Madre de Sangre Periférica/metabolismo , Trasplante Homólogo/métodos , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/citología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Masculino , Femenino
13.
J Thromb Haemost ; 22(9): 2653-2669, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823454

RESUMEN

While advanced liver disease was previously considered to be an acquired bleeding disorder, there is increasing recognition of an associated prothrombotic state with patients being at higher risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke and venous thromboembolism (VTE) including portal vein thrombosis (PVT). We review the available literature on epidemiology, pathophysiology, and risk factors and provide guidance on anticoagulant management of these conditions in adults with cirrhosis. In patients with Child-Pugh A or B cirrhosis and AF, we recommend anticoagulation with standard-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in accordance with cardiology guideline recommendations for patients without liver disease. In those with Child-Pugh C cirrhosis, there is inadequate evidence with respect to the benefit and risk of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF. In patients with cirrhosis and acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, we recommend anticoagulation and suggest use of either a DOAC or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)/vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in Child-Pugh A or B cirrhosis and LMWH alone (or as a bridge to VKA in patients with a normal baseline international normalized ratio) in Child-Pugh C cirrhosis. We recommend anticoagulation for patients with cirrhosis and symptomatic PVT. We suggest anticoagulation for those with asymptomatic, progressing PVT and recommend continuing extended anticoagulation for liver transplant candidates with PVT.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Cirrosis Hepática , Vena Porta , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Trombosis de la Vena/prevención & control , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Medición de Riesgo , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/administración & dosificación
14.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2417431, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38874929

RESUMEN

Importance: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a common medical intervention to treat anemia in very preterm neonates; however, best transfusion practices, such as thresholds, remain uncertain. Objective: To develop recommendations for clinicians on the use of RBC transfusions in very preterm neonates. Evidence Review: An international steering committee reviewed evidence from a systematic review of 6 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared high vs low hemoglobin-based or hematocrit-based transfusion thresholds. The steering committee reached consensus on certainty-of-evidence ratings and worked with a panel from stakeholder organizations on reviewing the evidence. With input from parent representatives and the stakeholder panel, the steering committee used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to develop recommendations. Findings: A systematic review of 6 RCTs encompassing 3483 participants (1759 females [51.3%]; mean [SD] age range, 25.9-29.8 [1.5-3.0] weeks) was used as the basis of the recommendations. The ranges for higher hemoglobin concentration (liberal) vs lower hemoglobin concentration (restrictive) threshold study arms were similar across the trials. However, specific thresholds differed based on the severity of illness, which was defined using variable criteria in the trials. There was moderate certainty of evidence that low transfusion thresholds likely had little to no difference in important short-term and long-term outcomes. The recommended hemoglobin thresholds varied on the basis of postnatal week and respiratory support needs. At postnatal weeks 1, 2, and 3 or more, for neonates on respiratory support, the recommended thresholds were 11, 10, and 9 g/dL, respectively; for neonates on no or minimal respiratory support, the recommended thresholds were 10, 8.5, and 7 g/dL, respectively (to convert hemoglobin to grams per liter, multiply by 10.0). Conclusions and Relevance: This consensus statement recommends a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy, with moderate certainty of evidence, for preterm neonates with less than 30 weeks' gestation.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Anemia Neonatal/terapia , Anemia Neonatal/sangre , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/normas , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/métodos , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Recien Nacido Extremadamente Prematuro , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
15.
Transfusion ; 64(7): 1223-1232, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769631

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Blood components are costly and scarce. The Blood Stocks Management Scheme (BSMS) was established in the United Kingdom (UK) to support hospital transfusion services and national blood services through collection, analysis, and monthly feedback of data on blood component inventory and wastage management. There is a growing evidence base on how best to deliver feedback for quality improvement. We assessed the quality and utility of the monthly BSMS component reports. METHODS: We assessed the content of BSMS reports issued in March 2023 against established criteria for effective feedback. Two researchers independently rated whether criteria spanning the five domains of goal setting, data collection, feedback content, feedback display and feedback delivery were fully, partially or not met. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. We conducted an online questionnaire survey of recipients of BSMS reports during March 2023 to assess their use of reports and seek suggestions for improvement. RESULTS: Five out of 20 criteria for effective feedback were fully met. Areas for improvement included placing more emphasis in the feedback on positive change, linking data and summary messages, and including specific suggestions for action. Respondents highlighted the value of benchmarked comparisons with other hospital transfusion services. CONCLUSION: There is scope for enhancing the effectiveness and utility of BSMS feedback reports and hence reducing wastage of blood components. This methodology for evaluation of feedback could be utilized to improve other areas of transfusion practice.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos , Humanos , Reino Unido , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Retroalimentación , Bancos de Sangre/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Transfusión Sanguínea/normas
16.
Vox Sang ; 119(8): 842-850, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769720

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: E-learning programmes are increasingly offered in transfusion medicine (TM) education. The aim of this study was to explore facilitators and barriers to TM e-learning programmes, including assessment of learning outcomes and measures of effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants selected from a prior survey and representing a diverse number of international e-learning programmes were invited to participate. A mixed methodology was employed, combining a survey and individual semi-structured one-on-one interviews. Interview data were analysed inductively to explore programme development, evaluation, and facilitators and barriers to implementation. RESULTS: Fourteen participants representing 13 institutions participated in the survey and 10 were interviewed. The e-learning programmes have been in use for a variable duration between 5 and 16 years. Funding sources varied, including government and institutional support. Learner assessment methods varied and encompassed multiple-choice-questions (n = 12), direct observation (n = 4) and competency assessment (n = 4). Most regional and national blood collection agencies rely on user feedback and short-term learning assessments to evaluate their programmes. Only one respondent indicated an attempt to correlate e-learning with clinical practices. Factors that facilitated programme implementation included support from management and external audits to ensure compliance with regulatory educational and training requirements. Barriers to programme implementation included the allocation of staff time for in-house development, enforcing compliance, keeping educational content up-to-date and gaining access to outcome data for educational providers. CONCLUSION: There is evidence of considerable diversity in the evaluation of e-learning programmes. Further work is needed to understand the ultimate impact of TM e-learning on transfusion practices and patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Transfusional , Humanos , Medicina Transfusional/educación , Masculino , Femenino , Instrucción por Computador/métodos , Transfusión Sanguínea/métodos , Educación a Distancia/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
18.
Blood Transfus ; 22(4): 292-302, 2024 Jul 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38557319

RESUMEN

Thrombocytopenia (defined as a platelet count <150×109/L) is a common condition in preterm neonates and may occur in 18-35% of all infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Neonatal platelet functionality in terms of reactivity is often described as reduced compared to adults, even in healthy, term neonates. However, this platelet "hyporeactivity" does not correspond to a global functional impairment of the normal delicately balanced neonatal hemostatic system. The extent to which neonatal thrombocytopenia and platelet hyporeactivity contribute to the bleeding risk in preterm neonates remains unknown. Prophylactic platelet transfusions are often administered to them to reduce the risk of bleeding. However, recent literature indicates that adopting a higher platelet transfusion threshold than a lower one results in significantly higher death rates or major bleeding and can be harmful. Although the mechanism by which this occurs is not entirely clear, a mismatch between adult transfused platelets and the neonatal hemostatic system, as well as volume overload, are speculated to be potentially involved. Therefore, future research should consider novel transfusion products that may be more suitable for premature neonates. Blood products derived from umbilical cord blood (UCB) are promising, as they might perfectly match neonatal blood features. Here, we discuss the current knowledge about UCB-derived products, focusing on UCB-derived platelet concentrates and their potential for future clinical application. We will discuss how they may overcome the potential risks of transfusing adult-derived platelets to premature infants while maintaining efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Plaquetas , Sangre Fetal , Transfusión de Plaquetas , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Transfusión de Plaquetas/métodos , Sangre Fetal/citología , Plaquetas/citología , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Trombocitopenia Neonatal Aloinmune/terapia , Femenino , Hemorragia/terapia , Hemorragia/etiología
19.
Transfusion ; 64(6): 1116-1131, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38623793

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews have revealed an inconsistency of outcome definitions as a major barrier in providing evidence-based guidance for the use of plasma transfusion to prevent or treat bleeding. We reviewed and analyzed outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide a methodology for describing and classifying outcomes. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: RCTs involving transfusion of plasma published after 2000 were identified from a prior review (Yang 2012) and combined with an updated systematic literature search of multiple databases (July 1, 2011 to January 17, 2023). Inclusion of publications, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments were performed in duplicate. (PROSPERO registration number is: CRD42020158581). RESULTS: In total, 5579 citations were identified in the new systematic search and 22 were included. Six additional trials were identified from the previous review, resulting in a total of 28 trials: 23 therapeutic and five prophylactic studies. An increasing number of studies in the setting of major bleeding such as in cardiovascular surgery and trauma were identified. Eighty-seven outcomes were reported with a mean of 11 (min-max. 4-32) per study. There was substantial variation in outcomes used with a preponderance of surrogate measures for clinical effect such as laboratory parameters and blood usage. CONCLUSION: There is an expanding literature on plasma transfusion to inform guidelines. However, considerable heterogeneity of reported outcomes constrains comparisons. A core outcome set should be developed for plasma transfusion studies. Standardization of outcomes will motivate better study design, facilitate comparison, and improve clinical relevance for future trials of plasma transfusion.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos , Hemorragia , Plasma , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Hemorragia/terapia , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Hemorragia/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA