Immunohistochemical detection of V600E BRAF mutation is a useful primary screening tool for malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: We compared the use of an immunohistochemical (IHC) method using a monoclonal antibody to BRAF V600E (which detects the main BRAF mutation) with existing DNA probe screening in tissue samples from 71 patients with malignant melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paraffin blocks were cut to provide consecutive slides for haematoxylin and eosin staining, and for known positive micro-array DNA control material. IHC was performed by the Optiview detection system. All slides were scored independently by the clinical lead and the laboratory lead using a positive/negative system. RESULTS: The DNA method found 26 samples to be positive, the IHC found 21 to be positive, giving a sensitivity value for IHC of 80.8%. However, all of the 45 samples found to be negative by DNA were also negative by IHC, giving a specificity of 100%. There were 66 instances of full agreement, giving a concordance of 93%. Together, these data give a kappa statistic of 0.843, indicating very good agreement. CONCLUSION: The data reveal a very close link between the two methods, supporting the use of the V600E as a primary screen for BRAF mutations in malignant melanoma. Samples found to be negative by this method may be retested by the DNA probe method. IHC detection conserves patient DNA from tumour blocks as only one section is required to perform the assay. The V600E antibody method is considerably cheaper and faster than the DNA probe assay, with a turn-around time of 24-48 hours, enabling more rapid clinical management.

Alopecia areata incognita in Cronkhite-Canada syndrome.

Cronkhite-Canada syndrome is an acquired inflammatory polyposis syndrome in which alopecia, onychomadesis and hyperpigmentation occur concurrently with gastrointestinal symptoms. The pathophysiology of alopecia in Cronkhite-Canada syndrome has not been definitively elucidated. We present evidence for alopecia areata incognita as a possible mechanism of hair loss.

Catamenial dermatoses: has anyone ever considered prostaglandins?

Catamenial dermatoses are unusual, cyclic, perimenstrual reactions to hormones produced during the menstrual cycle. They occur in a variety of clinical presentations, including urticaria, eczema, fixed drug eruptions, erythema multiforme and anaphylaxis. Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis is the most common, and is caused by an autoimmune response to endogenous progesterone in women of reproductive age. We report a case of catamenial dermatosis in a 42-year-old Jamaican woman with a 10-year history of cyclic blistering and ulcerative eruptions of her mouth and limbs. Her symptoms were fully in keeping with a Stevens-Johnson-type reaction, and were associated with production of prostaglandins occurring during her menstrual cycle.

Panniculitis with vasculitis.

Panniculitides encompass a great number of different entities; however, once a vasculitis has been detected histopathologically within the subcutaneous tissue, the differential diagnosis is mainly restricted to polyarteritis (panarteritis) nodosa (PAN), nodular vasculitis (NV), and Bazin's erythema induratum (EI). Patients with PAN may have the disease confined to the skin, but must be followed over a long period because many of them develop late systemic disease. The NV/EI group represents by far the most common type of lobular panniculitis with vasculitis; we prefer keeping the distinction between the two entities by underlining the equation NV positive tuberculin skin test = EI. Other lobular panniculitides with vasculitis are exceedingly rare and set in a systemic background which can be infectious (lepromatous leprosy panniculitides) or autoimmune/dysreactive (neutrophilic lobular panniculitis in rheumatoid arthritis, lobular panniculitis in inflammatory bowel disease).

A cutaneous lymphoma international prognostic index (CLIPi) for mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: There is no prognostic index for primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas such as mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary syndrome (SS). METHOD: Two prognostic indices were developed for early (IA-IIA) and late stage (IIB-IVB) disease based on multivariate data from 1502 patients. End-points included overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). External validation included 1221 patients. FINDINGS: Significant adverse prognostic factors at diagnosis consisted of male gender, age >60, plaques, folliculotropic disease and stage N1/Nx for early stage, and male gender, age >60, stages B1/B2, N2/3 and visceral involvement for late stage disease. Using these variables we constructed two separate models each defined using 3 distinct groups for early and late stage patients: 0-1 (low risk), 2 (intermediate risk), and 3-5 factors (high risk). 10 year OS in the early stage model was 90.3% (low), 76.2% (intermediate) and 48.9% (high) and for the late stage model 53.2% (low), 19.8% (intermediate) and 15.0% (high). For the validation set significant differences in OS and PFS in early stage patients (both p<0.001) were also noted. In late stage patients, only OS differed between the groups (p=0.002). INTERPRETATION: This proposed cutaneous lymphoma prognostic index provides a model for prediction of OS in early and late stage MF/SS enabling rational therapeutic choices and patient stratification in clinical trials.