Neither significant osteoarthritic changes nor deteriorating subjective outcomes occur after hybrid fixation of osteochondritis dissecans in the young adult.

PURPOSE: The goal of the fixation of painful osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyles in adults is to integrate the osteochondral fragment and thus achieve a normal hyaline cartilaginous coverage. The addition of a biological process to primary fixation may result in improved fragment integration (hybrid fixation). Osteochondral plugs may fulfil this role. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical and radiological results after hybrid fixation of unstable osteochondritis dissecans. The hypothesis was that the rate of secondary osteoarthritis would be low. METHODS: Nine patients treated by hybrid fixation were retrospectively reviewed at a median follow-up of 10.1 years (range 7-14). The median age at surgery was 21 (range 17-28). Six of them were evaluated as ICRS grade II and three, as ICRS grade III. The mean surface of the lesion was 4.5 cm2. All patients were followed up clinically (IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm) and radiologically [Kellgren-Lawrence score (KL)]. RESULTS: During arthroscopic assessment at the time of screw removal (3 months after surgery), the fragments were stable, and autograft plugs were all well integrated. At the most recent follow-up visit, the median IKDC score was 85.8 (range 51.72-100), the KOOS score was 87.7 (52.4-100), and the Lysholm scale score was 89.8 (77-100). In 7 out of 9 patients, radiographs showed a joint space KL grade of 0 or 1. CONCLUSION: Hybrid fixation for treating osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the femoral condyles using mechanical and biological fixation provides healing of the osteochondral fragments with good long-term outcomes. No significant osteoarthritic change was seen with this technique at a mid-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV-case series.

Meniscal sizing before allograft: Comparison of three imaging techniques.

BACKGROUND: Accuracy of meniscal sizing is an important issue before allograft transplantation. To date, there is no consensus on the best imaging method. The purpose of this study was to compare plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) arthrography in the assessment of meniscal size. We hypothesized that MRI and CT arthrography had better correlations than plain radiographs. METHODS: All patients operated on by meniscal allograft between January 2005 and May 2015 were screened. Among them, 32 patients had both preoperative radiographs, MRI and CT arthrography of the affected knee. The meniscal dimensions were evaluated, blindly and randomly, using three imaging methods. A correlation analysis between each technique was made. For radiographic methods, an additional comparison was made between original Pollard's method and the modified method (Yoon). Bone dimensions (tibial metaphysis) were also collected, using radiographs and MRI, in order to build new equations allowing determination of meniscal dimensions from those bone measurements. RESULTS: The radiographic methods offered satisfying evaluations of the meniscal dimensions in the sagittal plane, without significant difference when compared with CT arthrography or MRI. In the frontal plane, the radiograph methods were less effective. With new equations, allowing determination of meniscal dimensions from tibial plateau dimensions, the mean correlation coefficient was 0.39 (0.14-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between radiographic methods and MRI depended on which parameter (frontal or sagittal) was measured. Thus, we proposed a new method for sizing of meniscus, easily measurable from bony landmarks, aiming to improve the accuracy of graft selection.

Is distal femoral torsion the same in both of a patient's legs? Morphometric CT study.

INTRODUCTION: The rotational position of the femoral component is a primary driver of success in total knee arthroplasty. However, distal femoral torsion (DFT) varies greatly between individuals. Measuring DFT preoperatively by CT in combination with computer-assisted surgery can significantly improve the rotational positioning of the femoral component. However, a preoperative CT scan is costly and exposes the patient to radiation. These are doubled when the patient is undergoing bilateral arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to determine the DFT in both knees of a patient undergoing bilateral arthroplasty. We hypothesized that DFT was symmetric between a patient's two knees and was independent of frontal alignment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study of TKA cases performed between December 2008 and March 2015, 82 patients (mean age 73years) who underwent two-stage bilateral TKA (164 knees) were included. A preoperative CT scan of each knee was performed to measure the DFT using the surgical posterior condylar angle (PCA) described by Yoshioka. Two observers performed the measurements twice each, to allow calculation of the intraclass and interclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The mean PCA was 5.4° (±1.48) in the right knee and 5.4° (±1.45) in the left knee, with a left/right difference ranging from 0 to 2.2° (p=0.8). In the entire cohort, 84.6% of patients had a left/right difference of less than 1°. We found no significant differences in DFT in knees with large or small frontal deformity (deformity<10°, p=0.7; deformity>10°, p=0.5) or the presence of varus or valgus (p=0.9). The intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (94%) and the interclass correlation coefficient was moderate to good (60% for left knees, 53% for right knees). DISCUSSION: Based on CT scan measurements, the DFT in both knees of an arthritic patient is comparable and this measurement is reproducible. This means that a single, unilateral preoperative CT scan is sufficient for planning purposes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (retrospective cohort study).

Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy without bone grafting in severe varus osteoarthritic knee. Rate and risk factors of non-union in 41 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Using locking plates in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) via a medial opening theoretically allows early weight-bearing without need for bone or bone-substitute grafting. It incurs a risk of non-consolidation in case of large correction (>10°), although rates and risk factors of non-union are not known. The present retrospective study compared OWHTO with correction <10° versus >10°, with a view to determining: (1) complications rates (non-union) according to degree of correction, and (2) risk factors for such complications. HYPOTHESIS: OWHTO with correction greater than 10° without graft shows normal consolidation and allows early weight-bearing. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Forty-one patients treated by OWHTO for medial osteoarthritis of the knee between January 2101 and November 2015 were included in a retrospective study. HKA angle was assessed by long-leg axis radiographs, preoperatively and at 3 months. Clinical and radiological follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months assessed consolidation in terms of >40% filling of the osteotomy site. Partial (contact) weight-bearing was allowed from the first postoperative day, with full weight-bearing at 6 weeks. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 59±5 years. Mean body-mass index (BMI) was 30.3±5.2; 17 patients (41.5%) had BMI >30. Mean initial HKA angle was 173.5°±3° (range, 167-178°) and mean correction was 10.7°±2.7° (range, 5-15°). There were 27 corrections of 10° or more, and 14 less than 10°. At 3 months, mean HKA was 182.9°±2.5° (range, 178-187°). Twelve cases showed lateral tibial cortex fracture after opening. Thirty-six patients (87.8%) showed consolidation, at a mean 5±3 months. Five patients showed osteotomy site non-union; in all these cases, the lateral cortex was broken initially (P=0.003); all had BMI >30 (mean, 37.2±3.8; P<0.03); none were smokers. On univariate analysis, lateral tibial cortex fracture (OR=10; 95% CI, (1.59-196.30)), BMI >30 (OR=1.18; 95% CI, (1.03-1.41)) and correction ≥10° (OR=10.50; 95% CI, (2.49-53.86)) were associated with delayed consolidation. On multivariate analysis, only degree of osteotomy was significantly associated with delayed consolidation (OR=11.51; 95% CI, (2.13-95.74)). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Obesity and initial lateral cortex fracture appeared as risk factors for non-consolidation of OWHTO with large correction. Systematic bone or bone-substitute grafting may therefore be considered in this population in case of >10° correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, prospective cohort study.

Anterior tibial laxity using the GNRB® device in healthy knees.

BACKGROUND: GRNB® is a non-radiating power tool that allows the evaluation of the anterior tibial translation. HYPOTHESIS: The pressure exerted by the system against the patella and the body mass index (BMI) could affect the anterior tibial translation when we repeat the measurements in healthy knees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the measurements of anterior knee laxity in healthy knees carried out by the GNRB® in 69 consecutive patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair in the contralateral knee. Two measurements were carried out, the initial measurements (M1), and then repeated at a mean of seven months (M2) (4.9 to 13months). RESULTS: There were 38 women and 31 men with an average age of 31years. In healthy knees, the Mean average anterior translation was 5.4±4mm with an average patellar force of 35.8 at time M1. The average anterior translation was 4.9±4mm with an average patellar force of 47 at time M2. There was a significant difference between the measurements M1 and M2 (P<0.03). The tightening force was significantly different between the two sets of measurements (P<10-7). There was a negative correlation between the pressure applied on the patella and anterior knee laxity (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The pressure force exerted on the patella during GNRB® affects the measurement of anterior laxity in healthy knees. This raises the problem of the reproducibility of the measurements during repeated examinations at different times.

Hybrid fixation in adult osteochondritis dissecans of the knee.

Osteochondritis dissecans progresses to osteoarthritis if integration of the fragment is not obtained. The prognosis of osteochondritis dissecans is more severe in adults, as spontaneous integration due to physeal closure does not occur. Hybrid fixation consists in combining screw fixation of the fragment with mosaicplasty through the fragment to promote integration into the native condyle. We describe this technique with reference to 17 patients.

Combined intra- and extra-articular grafting for revision ACL reconstruction: A multicentre study by the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA).

BACKGROUND: A careful analysis of the reasons for ACL reconstruction failure is essential to selection of the optimal surgical revision technique designed to ensure good rotational stability and to minimise the risk of re-rupture. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate anterolateral ligament (ALL) stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: ALL stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction provides good rotational stability without increasing the risk of complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This multicentre study included 349 patients, 151 retrospectively and 198 prospectively. There were 283 males and 66 females. Inclusion criteria were an indication for revision ACL reconstruction surgery with combined intra-articular reconstruction and ALL stabilisation after failed autograft ACL reconstruction, and intact PCL. Exclusion criteria were primary ACL reconstruction and concomitant peripheral medial and/or lateral lesions. Each patient underwent a clinical and radiographic evaluation before and after revision surgery. Before revision surgery, the mean IKDC score was 56.5±15.5 and 96% of patients were IKDC C or D. RESULTS: Rates were 5.0% for early and 10.5% for late postoperative complications. Lachmann's test had a hard stop at last follow-up in 97% of patients. The pivot-shift test was positive in 1% of patients. The mean subjective IKDC score was 84.5±13.0 and 86.5% of patients were IKDC A or B. The proportions of patients with radiographic knee osteoarthritis at last follow-up was unchanged for the lateral tibio-femoral and patello-femoral compartments but increased by 9.7% to 21.2% for the medial tibio-femoral compartment. The re-rupture rate was 1.2% and the further surgical revision rate was 5.4%. CONCLUSION: Anterior laxity at last follow-up was consistent with previous studies of revision ACL reconstruction. However, rotational stability and the re-rupture risk were improved. ALL stabilisation is among the techniques that deserve consideration as part of the therapeutic options for revision ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective and prospective cohort study.

Short-term complications in intra- and extra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Comparison with the literature on isolated intra-articular reconstruction. A multicenter study by the French Arthroscopy Society.

INTRODUCTION: Lateral tenodesis (LT) is performed to limit the risk of iterative tear following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in at-risk patients. By adding an extra procedure to isolated ACL graft, LT reconstruction increases operating time and may complicate postoperative course. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the rate of early complications. The study hypothesis was that associating ALL reconstruction to ACL reconstruction does not increase the complications rate found with isolated ACL reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter study included 392 patients: 70% male; mean age, 29.9 years; treated by associated ACL and LT reconstruction. All adverse events were inventoried. RESULTS: Mean hospital stay was 2 days, with 46% day-surgery. Walking was resumed at a mean 27 days, with an advantage for patients treated by the hamstring technique. The early postoperative complications rate was 12%, with 1.7% specifically implicating LT reconstruction: pain, hematoma, stiffness in flexion and extension, and infection. There was a 5% rate of surgical revision during the first year, predominantly comprising arthrolysis for extension deficit. The 1-year recurrence rate was 2.8%. DISCUSSION: The complications rate for combined intra- and extra-articular reconstruction was no higher than for isolated intra-articular ACL reconstruction, with no increase in infection or stiffness rates. The rate of complications specific to ALL reconstruction was low, at 1.7%, and mainly involved fixation error causing lateral soft-tissue impingement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, prospective multicenter study.

Midterm results of combined intra- and extra-articular ACL reconstruction compared to historical ACL reconstruction data. Multicenter study of the French Arthroscopy Society.

INTRODUCTION: During anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedures, anterolateral reconstruction (ALR) can also be performed to improve the knee's rotational stability. However, the effectiveness of this supplemental technique and its impact on the risk of retears and on the onset of secondary degenerative changesare controversial. HYPOTHESIS: ALR improves control over the pivot shift, reduces the retear risk and delays the appearance of secondary degenerative lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical examination, knee laxity measurements and X-ray evaluations were done in 478 patients with more than 3years' follow-up after combined ACL and ALR from 11 participating hospitals. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 28years. Eighty-eight percent of the patients participated in pivot sports and 45% were competitive athletes. The findings of this study were compared to historical isolated ACL reconstruction data. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 6.8years. No detectable pivot shift was found in 83% of patients, while 12.8% of patient had a smooth glide. The side-to-side difference in anteroposterior knee laxity with maximum manual force was less than 3mm in 66% of patients and less than 5mm in 95%. The retear rate was 5.4%, with half of these patients undergoing revision ACL surgery. Secondary meniscus damage requiring surgery occurred in 6.3% of patients; the radiological osteoarthritis rate was 17.5%. DISCUSSION: When compared to historical ACL reconstruction data, combined intra- and extra-articular reconstruction does not increase the complication rate. At a mean follow-up of 6.8years, it provides better control over the pivot shift along with a low retear rate and low occurrence of secondary meniscus injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, multicenter study.

Anatomical knee postero-lateral corner reconstruction: The "Versailles" technique.

Postero-lateral knee instability raises surgical challenges. Of the many available reconstruction techniques, few ensure anatomical reconstruction of the postero-lateral corner (PLC). The "Versailles" technique ensures the anatomical reconstruction of the three main PLC stabilisers (lateral collateral ligament, popliteus tendon, and popliteo-fibular ligament) by using either a hamstring autograft or a tendon allograft.

High failure rate of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bimeniscal repair: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Bimeniscal lesions are common in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. However, bimeniscal repair is rarely performed during ACL reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes after ACL reconstruction with bimeniscal repair. HYPOTHESIS: Bimeniscal lesions, even when repaired, are associated with poorer outcomes of ACL reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control design was used. The cases were 15 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, without procedures on any other ligaments, combined with bimeniscal repair, between May 2009 and May 2013 (3.2% of all ACL reconstructions during the study period). This group (2-Mc group) was matched on age, gender, body mass index, and time to surgery to 30 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and had no meniscal lesions (0-Mc group) and to 30 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and repair of the medial meniscus (1-Mc group). After a mean follow-up of 3.6 years, clinical outcomes were assessed based on the KOOS, Lysholm, and IKDC scores and knee laxity based on TELOS and GNRB measurements. The primary outcome measure was the rate of ACL re-rupture. Secondary outcome measures were functional outcomes and rate of delayed meniscectomy. RESULTS: The ACL re-rupture rate was significantly higher in the 2-Mc group than in the 0-Mc and 1-Mc groups pooled (20%, vs. 1.7%; P=0.02). The functional scores showed no significant differences across groups. Post-operative differential laxity was significantly greater in the 2-Mc group (3.3mm by TELOS, P=0.02; and 2.5mm by GNRB, P=0.03) than in the 0-Mc and 1-Mc groups pooled. Delayed meniscectomy was performed in none of the 2-Mc group patients and in 2 of the 1-Mc group patients. CONCLUSION: ACL reconstruction combined with bimeniscal repair is a rarely performed procedure. It is associated with a high ACL re-rupture rate and greater differential laxity. Meniscal outcomes of bimeniscal repair, in contrast, are good. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, matched case-control study.

Actifit® polyurethane meniscal scaffold: MRI and functional outcomes after a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of the Actifit® polyurethane meniscal scaffold in patients who have pain after partial meniscectomy provides short-term pain relief and better function. But there is a lack of information about medium-term outcomes. The objective of this longitudinal study was to evaluate the MRI and functional outcomes after a minimum follow-up of 5 years. It was hypothesized that the results are stable over time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients (8 men, 7 women; mean age 30 years, range 19-47, mean BMI 25) were enrolled in the study between February 2008 and January 2011. Five patients also underwent ACL reconstruction and one underwent mosaicplasty. Nine lateral and six medial Actifit® implants were evaluated prospectively before the surgery and at a minimum of 12, 24 and 60 months' follow-up using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the objective and subjective IKDC scores, radiological and MRI analysis with measurement of the ICRS score, Genovese score and extrusion. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 6 years (range 5-8.1). Two patients were lost to follow-up. Three patients were re-operated at 7, 19 and 30 months because they had not improved functionally and the implant appeared damaged on MRI. Partial removal of the implant did not improve the functional outcomes (mean subjective IKDC pre- and post-revision: 37.0 vs. 34.9). Two patients were lost to follow-up. In intention to treat (13 cases), the pain (VAS) and subjective IKDC score were improved between the preoperative period and the last follow-up (5.46 vs. 2.92, P=0.007 and 51.2 vs. 66.1, P=0.05). In per protocol (10 cases, failures excluded), the pain (VAS) and subjective IKDC score were improved (5.3 vs. 1.9, P=0.0009; 49.6 vs. 75.4, P=0.002) along with the pain, daily activities and quality of life components of the KOOS (60.6 vs. 86.0, P=0.0008; 70.3 vs. 90.2, P=0.001; 42.7 vs. 71.0, P=0.0058). The functional scores were stable between months 12, 24 and 60. ICRS cartilage score and mean meniscal extrusion were unchanged at the last follow-up (1.6 vs. 1.6 and 2.41 vs. 2.79). In all patients, the meniscal implant had an intermediate signal and reduced size on MRI. DISCUSSION: Despite an abnormal MRI appearance suggesting the meniscal scaffold is not fully mature after 5 years, the functional scores and cartilage status are stable at this time point. However, the failure rate is still high and removing the implant in patients with poor function does not improve the outcome. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective cohort study Level IV.

Clinical outcomes after multiligament injured knees: medial versus lateral reconstructions.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyse the clinical outcomes of multiligament injured knees with respect to the medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner (PMC) repair or reconstruction versus the posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction in patients operated according to a codified surgical protocol. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether PMC or PLC was injured. Cruciate ligaments as well as PMC or PLC were reconstructed/repaired in a one-stage procedure. At minimum of 1-year follow-up, objective and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) forms, Lysholm score and sports activity level were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with a median follow-up time of 57 months (range 12-129) were reviewed. No significant difference was found for functional scores between acute PMC and PLC subgroups. In Group PLC, subjective outcomes tend to be better in the acute than in chronic reconstruction subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: A one-stage protocol with early surgery rather than delayed reconstruction produced better clinical outcomes whatever the injured collateral ligament, medial or lateral. In the future, early and chronic reconstructions as well as each injury pattern should be considered as separate entities in studies on multiple ligament injured knees to reach a better level of evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Knee extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction following chronic disruption.

The management of chronic extensor mechanism disruption can be complex. One of the options is allograft reconstruction. The goal of this study was to present the surgical procedure and provide preliminary results with this technique. The allograft uses the whole extensor mechanism (anterior tibial tubercle, patellar ligament, patella, quadriceps tendon). The native patella can be completely removed if the quality of the bone is poor, otherwise a bone groovecan be created to receive the allograft. The allograft is tightly tensioned with the knee in full extension. This surgical technique was performed 5 times with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Active extension was recovered in all cases. The mean postoperative KOOS was 55.5 the IKS function score was 68.5 and the IKS knee score was 83.

Unstable odontoid fracture: surgical strategy in a 22-case series, and literature review.

Surgical treatment of unstable odontoid fracture (type II OBAR or HTAL) has progressed, with a range of techniques, the specificities of which need to be known so as to determine their respective roles in the therapeutic arsenal now available. A retrospective study of 22 patients operated on in our center for odontoid fracture between 2005 and 2010 examined the operative techniques employed and analyzed results in the light of the literature, so as to construct an updated decision tree. Two populations could be distinguished: elderly victims of simple fall (mean age, 82.1 years), and younger victims of high-energy trauma (mean age, 42.6 years). Surgical techniques comprised: anterior odontoid screwing (n=14), transarticular C1-C2 screwing on the posterior Magerl (n=3) or anterior Vaccaro approach (n=1), Harms' posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis (n=3), and occipitocervical arthrodesis (n=3). The overall complications rate for the series was 28%, including one case of non-union, at a mean 11 months' follow-up. The risk/benefit ratio may be hard to assess in elderly patients. However, anterior screwing restores odontoid anatomy and is the technique of choice in first intention for reducible fracture. In second intention, transarticular C1-C2arthrodesis may be performed on an anterior or posterior approach, depending on local vertebral artery anatomy. Harms' posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis allows fixation of non-reduced fractures. Occipitocervical arthrodesis is a last resort, as the associated morbidity rate is higher.