Incorporating citizen science into IUCN Red List assessments.

Many citizen scientists are highly motivated to help address the current extinction crisis. Their work is making valuable contributions to protecting species by raising awareness, identifying species occurrences, assessing population trends, and informing direct management actions, such as captive breeding. However, clear guidance is lacking about how to use existing citizen science data sets and how to design effective citizen science programs that directly inform extinction risk assessments and resulting conservation actions based on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List criteria. This may be because of a mismatch between what citizen science can deliver to address extinction risk and the reality of what is needed to inform threatened species listing based on IUCN criteria. To overcome this problem, we examined each IUCN Red List criterion (A-E) relative to the five major types of citizen science outputs relevant to IUCN assessments (occurrence data, presence-absence observations, structured surveys, physical samples, and narratives) to recommend which outputs are most suited to use when applying the IUCN extinction risk assessment process. We explored real-world examples of citizen science projects on amphibians and fungi that have delivered valuable data and knowledge for IUCN assessments. We found that although occurrence data are routinely used in the assessment process, simply adding more observations of occurrence from citizen science information may not be as valuable as inclusion of more nuanced data types, such as presence-absence data or information on threats from structured surveys. We then explored the characteristics of citizen science projects that have already delivered valuable data to support assessments. These projects were led by recognized experts who champion and validate citizen science data, thereby giving greater confidence in its accuracy. We urge increased recognition of the value of citizen science data within the assessment process.

Integración de la ciencia ciudadana a las evaluaciones de la Lista Roja de la UICN Resumen Existe mucha motivación entre los ciudadanos científicos para ayudar a enfrentar la actual crisis de extinción. Sus contribuciones son valiosas para la protección de las especies mediante la concientización, la detección de especies, la evaluación de las tendencias poblacionales y la información sobre acciones directas de gestión, como la cría en cautiverio. Sin embargo, faltan directrices claras sobre cómo utilizar los conjuntos de datos de ciencia ciudadana existentes y cómo diseñar programas de ciencia ciudadana eficaces que informen directamente las evaluaciones del riesgo de extinción y las acciones de conservación resultantes basadas en los criterios de la Lista Roja de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza (UICN). Esto puede deberse a un desajuste entre lo que la ciencia ciudadana puede aportar para abordar el riesgo de extinción y la realidad de lo que se necesita para fundamentar la inclusión de especies amenazadas en las listas según los criterios de la UICN. Para superar este obstáculo, analizamos cada criterio de la Lista Roja de la UICN (A­E) en relación a los cinco tipos principales de resultados de la ciencia ciudadana relevantes para las evaluaciones de la UICN (datos de presencia, observaciones de presencia­ausencia, encuestas estructuradas, muestras físicas y narraciones) para recomendar cuáles resultados son los más adecuados para la evaluación del riesgo de extinción de la UICN. Exploramos ejemplos reales de proyectos de ciencia ciudadana sobre anfibios y hongos que han aportado datos y conocimientos valiosos para las evaluaciones de la UICN. Descubrimos que, aunque los datos de presencia se utilizan de forma rutinaria en el proceso de evaluación, la adición de más observaciones de presencia a partir de información de ciencia ciudadana puede no ser tan valioso como la inclusión de tipos de datos más matizados, como datos de presencia­ausencia o información sobre amenazas a partir de encuestas estructuradas. Después analizamos las características de los proyectos de ciencia ciudadana que ya han aportado datos valiosos en apoyo de las evaluaciones. Estos proyectos fueron dirigidos por expertos reconocidos que defienden y validan los datos de la ciencia ciudadana, lo que da mayor confianza en su exactitud. Instamos a un mayor reconocimiento del valor de los datos de la ciencia ciudadana en el proceso de evaluación.

Insect pollination for most of angiosperm evolutionary history.

Most contemporary angiosperms (flowering plants) are insect pollinated, but pollination by wind, water or vertebrates occurs in many lineages. Though evidence suggests insect pollination may be ancestral in angiosperms, this is yet to be assessed across the full phylogeny. Here, we reconstruct the ancestral pollination mode of angiosperms and quantify the timing and environmental associations of pollination shifts. We use a robust, dated phylogeny and species-level sampling across all angiosperm families to model the evolution of pollination modes. Data on the pollination system or syndrome of 1160 species were collated from the primary literature. Angiosperms were ancestrally insect pollinated, and insects have pollinated angiosperms for c. 86% of angiosperm evolutionary history. Wind pollination evolved at least 42 times, with few reversals to animal pollination. Transitions between insect and vertebrate pollination were more frequent: vertebrate pollination evolved at least 39 times from an insect-pollinated ancestor with at least 26 reversals. The probability of wind pollination increases with habitat openness (measured by Leaf Area Index) and distance from the equator. Our reconstruction gives a clear overview of pollination macroevolution across angiosperms, highlighting the long history of interactions between insect pollinators and angiosperms still vital to biodiversity today.

Workers' sons rescue genetic diversity at the sex locus in an invasive honey bee population.

The hallmark of eusociality is the division of labour between reproductive (queen) and nonreproductive (worker) females. Yet in many eusocial insects, workers retain the ability to produce haploid male offspring from unfertilized eggs. The reproductive potential of workers has well-documented consequences for the structure and function of insect colonies, but its implications at the population level are less often considered. We show that worker reproduction in honey bees can have an important role in maintaining genetic diversity at the sex locus in invasive populations. The honey bee sex locus is homozygous-lethal, and, all else being equal, a higher allele number in the population lead to higher mean brood survival. In an invasive population of the honey bee Apis cerana in Australia, workers contribute significantly to male production: 38% of male-producing colonies are queenless, and these contribute one-third of all males at mating congregations. Using a model, we show that such male production by queenless workers will increase the number of sex alleles retained in nascent invasive populations following founder events, relative to a scenario in which only queens reproduce. We conclude that by rescuing sex locus diversity that would otherwise be lost, workers' sons help honey bee populations to minimize the negative effects of inbreeding after founder events and so contribute to their success as invaders.