Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Ultrasound Med ; 38(3): 741-745, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30232819

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Local anesthetic injection into the interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of the knee (IPACK) has the potential to provide motor-sparing analgesia to the posterior knee after total knee arthroplasty. The primary objective of this cadaveric study was to evaluate injectate spread to relevant anatomic structures with IPACK injection. METHODS: After receipt of Institutional Review Board Biospecimen Subcommittee approval, IPACK injection was performed on fresh-frozen cadavers. The popliteal fossa in each specimen was dissected and examined for injectate spread. RESULTS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaver knees were included in the study. Injectate was observed to spread in the popliteal fossa at a mean ± SD of 6.1 ± 0.7 cm in the medial-lateral dimension and 10.1 ± 3.2 cm in the proximal-distal dimension. No injectate was noted to be in contact with the proximal segment of the sciatic nerve, but 3 specimens showed injectate spread to the tibial nerve. In 3 specimens, the injectate showed possible contact with the common peroneal nerve. The middle genicular artery was consistently surrounded by injectate. CONCLUSIONS: This cadaver study of IPACK injection demonstrated spread throughout the popliteal fossa without proximal sciatic involvement. However, the potential for injectate to spread to the tibial or common peroneal nerve was demonstrated. Consistent surrounding of the middle genicular artery with injectate suggests a potential mechanism of analgesia for the IPACK block, due to the predictable relationship between articular sensory nerves and this artery. Further study is needed to determine the ideal site of IPACK injection.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/farmacocinética , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Cadáver , Humanos
2.
J Clin Anesth ; 46: 79-83, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29414627

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Continuous brachial plexus catheters are often used to decrease pain following elbow surgery. This investigation aimed to assess the rate of early failure of infraclavicular (IC) and axillary (AX) nerve catheters following elbow surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Postoperative recovery unit and inpatient hospital floor. PATIENTS: 328 patients who received IC or AX nerve catheters and underwent elbow surgery were identified by retrospective query of our institution's database. MEASUREMENTS: Data collected included unplanned catheter dislodgement, catheter replacement rate, postoperative pain scores, and opioid administration on postoperative day 1. Catheter failure was defined as unplanned dislodging within 24 h of placement or requirement for catheter replacement and evaluated using a covariate adjusted model. MAIN RESULTS: 119 IC catheters and 209 AX catheters were evaluated. There were 8 (6.7%) failed IC catheters versus 13 (6.2%) failed AX catheters. After adjusting for age, BMI, and gender there was no difference in catheter failure rate between IC and AX nerve catheters (p = 0.449). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that IC and AX nerve catheters do not differ in the rate of early catheter failure, despite differences in anatomic location and catheter placement techniques. Both techniques provided effective postoperative analgesia with median pain scores < 3/10 for patients following elbow surgery. Reasons other than rate of early catheter failure should dictate which approach is performed.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/métodos , Catéteres/efectos adversos , Análisis de Falla de Equipo/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Adulto , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/instrumentación , Articulación del Codo/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
3.
J Ultrasound Med ; 37(4): 897-903, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29027690

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To identify any anatomic barriers to local anesthetic spread between the sciatic nerve (SN) and the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve (PFCN) at the level of the infragluteal crease and to describe a potential technique for an ultrasound (US)-guided subgluteal PFCN block in a cadaveric model. METHODS: Bilateral US-guided subgluteal injections of a colored latex solution were performed around the SN (15 mL) and PFCN (10 mL) in 4 unembalmed cadavers, for a total of 8 cadaver thighs. The specimens were dissected after latex polymerization to observe the spread of the latex solutions. RESULTS: With US guidance, the PFCN was visualized deep to the gluteus maximus and slightly superficial or lateral to the SN at the level of the infragluteal crease. The SN and PFCN were found on dissection to be coated with their respective colored latex in all 8 thighs. The SN and PFCN were consistently separated by the deep investing muscular fascia of the thigh, with only 2 thighs showing substantial mixing of latex injectates. CONCLUSIONS: The deep investing muscular fascia of the thigh appears to impede the spread of injectate between the SN and PFCN in a most unembalmed cadaver specimens. A US-guided subgluteal PFCN blockade may be a feasible technique to complement an SN block when complete anesthesia of the posterior thigh is required.


Asunto(s)
Nalgas/inervación , Nervio Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Nalgas/diagnóstico por imagen , Cadáver , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA