[Acute liver injury in a patient with anorexia nervosa]. / Een anorexiapatiënt met acute leverproefstoornissen.

BACKGROUND: Anorexia nervosa is associated with somatic complications. Mildly abnormal liver tests are frequently seen; however, severe acute liver injury is rare in anorexia. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 23-year-old woman was admitted with acutely elevated liver enzymes and hypoglycemia. All diagnostic tests for acute hepatitis were negative. Therefore, we made the diagnosis of 'acute liver injury due to anorexia'. With supportive care such as rehydration, drip-feed and infusions with glucose, the patient recovered and her liver tests improved. CONCLUSION: Severe acute liver injury is a rare but life-threatening complication of anorexia nervosa. Its aetiology is unknown. Autophagy of hepatocytes, hypoperfusion of the liver and oxidative stress may play a role in the pathogenesis. Treatment consists of rehydration and nutritional support.

Recording of family history is associated with colorectal cancer stage.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) associated with Lynch syndrome usually presents at a relatively young age. The Revised Bethesda Guidelines advise screening for Lynch syndrome in patients diagnosed with CRC and a positive family history (FH) of CRC and other Lynch-related cancers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate recording of the FH and identify factors associated with recording in young patients with CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In one academic and two nonacademic hospitals, of all patients diagnosed with CRC at the age of 60 years or younger between 1999 and 2007, electronic medical records were evaluated for a recorded FH of CRC and other Lynch-related cancers. Patient and tumor characteristics were retrieved from the Dutch Comprehensive Cancer Centre and the Dutch Pathological Archive. RESULTS: A total of 676 patients were identified. FH was recorded in 395/676 (58%) patients. From 1999 to 2007, recording improved with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.17] per year. Stage III CRC (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.07-2.75) and administration of chemotherapy (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.17-2.89) were associated with recording in multivariate analysis. Other factors, including age at diagnosis, sex, surgery, radiotherapy, proximal tumor localization, poor differentiation, and mucinous histology, were not associated with recording. CONCLUSION: A FH of CRC and other Lynch-related cancers was not recorded in ∼40% of young CRC patients and recording improved only slightly over the years. As a first step in the identification of Lynch-related cancer families, physicians should be trained to record a detailed FH in the work-up of all newly diagnosed CRC patients.

Patient burden and patient preference: comparing magnetic resonance enteroclysis, capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted enteroscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We aimed to prospectively determine patient burden and patient preference for magnetic resonance enteroclysis, capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted enteroscopy in patients with suspected or known Crohn's disease (CD) or occult gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). METHODS: Consecutive consenting patients with CD or OGIB underwent magnetic resonance enteroclysis, capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted enteroscopy. Capsule endoscopy was only performed if magnetic resonance enteroclysis showed no high-grade small bowel stenosis. Patient preference and burden was evaluated by means of standardized questionnaires at five moments in time. RESULTS: From January 2007 until March 2009, 76 patients were included (M/F 31/45; mean age 46.9 years; range 20.0-78.4 years): 38 patients with OGIB and 38 with suspected or known CD. Seventeen patients did not undergo capsule endoscopy because of high-grade stenosis. Ninety-five percent (344/363) of the questionnaires were suitable for evaluation. Capsule endoscopy was significantly favored over magnetic resonance enteroclysis and balloon-assisted enteroscopy with respect to bowel preparation, swallowing of the capsule (compared to insertion of the tube/scope), burden of the entire examination, duration and accordance with the pre-study information. Capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance enteroclysis were significantly preferred over balloon-assisted enteroscopy for clarity of explanation of the examination, and magnetic resonance enteroclysis was significantly preferred over balloon-assisted enteroscopy for bowel preparation, painfulness and burden of the entire examination. Balloon-assisted enteroscopy was significantly favored over magnetic resonance enteroclysis for insertion of the scope and procedure duration. Pre- and post-study the order of preference was capsule endoscopy, magnetic resonance enteroclysis and balloon-assisted enteroscopy. CONCLUSION: Capsule endoscopy was preferred to magnetic resonance enteroclysis and balloon-assisted enteroscopy; it also had the lowest burden. Magnetic resonance enteroclysis was preferred over balloon-assisted enteroscopy for clarity of explanation of the examination, bowel preparation, painfulness and burden of the entire examination, and balloon-assisted enteroscopy over magnetic resonance enteroclysis for scope insertion and study duration.

The Global Rating Scale in clinical practice: a comprehensive quality assurance programme for endoscopy departments.

BACKGROUND: The Global Rating Scale is an endoscopy quality assurance programme, successfully implemented in England. It remains uncertain whether it is applicable in another health care setting. AIM: To assess the applicability of the Global Rating Scale as benchmark tool in an international context. METHODS: Eleven Dutch endoscopy departments were included for a Global Rating Scale-census, performed as a cross-sectional evaluation, July 2010. Two Global Rating Scale-dimensions - 'clinical quality' and 'patient experience' - were assessed across six items using a range of levels: from level-D (basic) to level-A (excellent). Construct validity was assessed by comparing department-specific colonoscopy audit data to GRS-levels. RESULTS: For 'clinical quality', variable scores were achieved in items 'safety' (9%=B, 27%=C, 64%=D) and 'communication' (46%=A, 18%=C, 36%=D). All departments achieved a basic score in 'quality' (100%=D). For 'patient experience', variable scores were achieved in 'timeliness' (18%=A, 9%=B, 73%=D) and 'booking-choice' (36%=B, 46%=C, 18%=D). All departments achieved basic scores in 'equality' (100%=D). Departments obtaining level-C or above in 'information', 'comfort', 'communication', 'timeliness' and 'aftercare', achieved significantly better audit outcomes compared to those obtaining level-D (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The Global Rating Scale is appropriate to use outside England. There was significant variance across departments in dimensions. Most Global Rating Scale-levels were in line with departments' audit outcomes, indicating construct validity.

The incidence of 30-day adverse events after colonoscopy among outpatients in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: Colonoscopy is the gold standard for visualization of the colon. It is generally accepted as a safe procedure and major adverse events occur at a low rate. However, few data are available on structured assessment of (minor) post-procedural adverse events. METHODS: Consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy were asked for permission to be called 30 days after their procedure. A standard telephone interview was developed to assess the occurrence of (i) major adverse events (hospital visit required), (ii) minor adverse events, and (iii) days missed from work. Adverse events were further categorized in definite-, possible-, and unrelated adverse events. Patients were contacted between January 2010 and September 2010. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1,528 patients who underwent colonoscopy and gave permission for a telephone call, 1,144 patients were contacted (response: 75%), 49% were male, the mean age was 59 years (s.d.: 14). Thirty-four patients (3%) reported major adverse events. These were definite-related in nine (1%) patients, possible-related in 6 (1%), and unrelated in 19 patients (2%). Minor adverse events were reported by 466 patients (41%). These were definite-related in 336 patients (29%), possible-related in 36 (3%), and unrelated in the remaining 94 patients (8%). Female gender (odds ratio (OR): 1.5), age <50 years (OR: 1.5), colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening/surveillance (OR: 1.6), and fellow-endoscopy (OR: 1.7) were risk factors for the occurrence of any definite-related adverse event. Patients who reported definite-related adverse events were significantly less often willing to return for colonoscopy (81 vs. 88%, P<0.01) and were less often positive about the entire colonoscopy experience (84 vs. 89%, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Structured assessment of post-colonoscopy adverse events shows that these are more common than generally reported. Close to one-third of patients report definite-related adverse events, which are major in close to 1 in 100 patients. The occurrence of adverse events does have an impact on the willingness to return for colonoscopy.

Small bowel Crohn's disease: MR enteroclysis and capsule endoscopy compared to balloon-assisted enteroscopy.

New modalities are available to visualize the small bowel in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE) and capsule endoscopy (CE) to balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) in patients with suspected or established CD of the small bowel. Consecutive, consenting patients first underwent MRE followed by CE and BAE. Patients with high-grade stenosis at MRE did not undergo CE. Reference standard for small bowel CD activity was a combination of BAE and an expert panel consensus diagnosis. Analysis included 38 patients, 27 (71%) females, mean age 36 (20-74) years, with suspected (n = 20) or established (n = 18) small bowel CD: 16 (42%) were diagnosed with active CD, and 13 (34%) by MRE with suspected high-grade stenosis, who consequently did not undergo CE. The reference standard defined high-grade stenosis in 10 (26%) patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value of MRE and CE for small bowel CD activity were 73 and 57%, 90 and 89%, 88 and 67%, and 78 and 84%, respectively. CE was complicated by capsule retention in one patient. MRE has a higher sensitivity and PPV than CE in small bowel CD. The use of CE is considerably limited by the high prevalence of stenotic lesions in these patients.

The additional value of EUS-guided Tru-cut biopsy to EUS-guided FNA in patients with mediastinal lesions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: EUS-guided FNA is a sensitive method to obtain cytologic specimens from solid lesions in close proximity to the GI tract. Although FNA provides cells for analysis, large-caliber Tru-cut biopsy (EUS-TCB) needles obtain samples that can be used for additional histopathologic analysis. We assessed the additional diagnostic yield of EUS-TCB in patients with solid mediastinal lesions in whom EUS-FNA was performed. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: In the period from July 2003 to July 2007, all patients with mediastinal lesions accessible to EUS-FNA and EUS-TCB were evaluated. In all patients, a mean of 3 passes of EUS-FNA was followed by EUS-TCB. Cytologic and histologic specimens were evaluated by 2 pathologists blinded for patient condition. A final diagnosis was obtained by combining all information present (EUS-FNA and EUS-TCB results, mediastinoscopy, bronchoscopy [if performed], and other investigations). RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA, EUS-TCB, and the combination of both techniques was 93%, 90%, and 98%, respectively (not significant). In EUS-FNA-negative patients, EUS-TCB provided a final diagnosis in an additional 3 patients (5%). Malignant disease found by EUS-FNA could be specified by EUS-TCB in 15 patients (25% of patients). The granulomatous disease established by cytologic samples of clinically suspected tuberculosis could be specified by EUS-TCB in 2 patients (3%). In 1 patient (2%), both FNA and TCB were inconclusive. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA and EUS-TCB is comparable. We recommend limiting the use of EUS-TCB to specific cases in which EUS-FNA is not conclusive.

Clinical consequences of videocapsule endoscopy in GI bleeding and Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) has a high diagnostic yield in the analysis of GI bleeding and Crohn's disease. Little information is available on the impact of VCE findings on clinical care. OBJECTIVE: Assess the impact of VCE findings on clinical management and outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study. SETTING: General hospital. PATIENTS: VCE was performed in 150 patients for GI bleeding (n = 97), Crohn's disease (n = 36), and miscellaneous reasons (n = 17). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Clinical consequences were evaluated by using a questionnaire and were divided into change of management or unchanged management. Change of medication, endoscopic procedures, surgical procedures, other consequences, and avoidance of additional investigations were considered a change of management. For all patients, an assessment of the actual clinical condition and the most recent Hb level were registered. RESULTS: A definite diagnosis was established in 34%, a probable diagnosis in 34%, and no diagnosis in 32%. Management was changed in 38% of patients, increasing to 59% if a definite diagnosis was established at VCE. No relation between change of management and clinical improvement or increased Hb level could be established. LIMITATIONS: The start of ethinylestradiol/norethisterone in case of telangiectasia was considered a change of management, although controversy on the rationale of this treatment exists. A more detailed and objective evaluation of the clinical condition should be performed to assess the clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: VCE findings have a serious impact on clinical practice. VCE in particular leads to a change of management in 59% of the patients in whom a definite diagnosis is established.

New endoscopic techniques for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

The case of a postmenopausal woman with a congenital aortic stenosis is presented. She presented with severe iron deficiency anemia. After negative extensive gastrointestinal analysis, she was treated with octreotide for six months. After cessation of octreotide, anemia rapidly recurred. A second capsule endoscopy and a double balloon enteroscopy were performed, and an intestinal vascular malformation was found. After surgical segment resection, the patient had stable, normal levels of hemoglobin and no complaints after 14 months of follow-up.

Assessment of intestinal vascular malformations in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic teleangiectasia and anemia.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary hemorrhagic teleangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant disorder with mucocutaneous teleangiectasia and visceral arteriovenous malformations. Mutations of endoglin and Activin A receptor like kinase-1 have different phenotypes, HHT1 and HHT2, respectively. The gastrointestinal tract is frequently affected, but limited information is available on the relationship with genotype. AIM: To determine whether different genotypes have different phenotypes with respect to intestinal teleangiectasia. METHODS: HHT patients, referred for anemia, underwent videocapsule endoscopy. Chart review was performed for information on genotype and HHT manifestations. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were analyzed (men/women 13/9, mean age 49+/-15 years.), 14 HHT1, eight HHT2 and three without known mutation. Epistaxis occurred in 96% of patients. Gastroduodenoscopy revealed teleangiectasia in 7/12 (58%) HHT1 and 3/8 (38%) HHT2 patients. Videocapsule endoscopy found teleangiectasia in all HHT1 and 5/8 (63%) HHT2 patients. In 9/14 HHT1 patients, teleangiectasia were large. Teleangiectasia in the colon was restricted to 6/11 (55%) HHT1 patients. Hepatic arteriovenous malformations were present in 1/7 HHT1 and 5/6 HHT2 patients. CONCLUSION: Large teleangiectasia in small intestine and colon appear to occur predominantly in HHT1. Hepatic arteriovenous malformations are mainly found in HHT2. In HHT patients with unexplained anemia, videocapsule endoscopy should be considered to determine the size and extent of teleangiectasia and exclude other abnormalities.

Detection of small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors by video capsule endoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: Carcinoid tumors are the most common GI neuroendocrine tumors (NET). They often originate in the small intestine. The primary tumor is often difficult to locate, and resection in an early phase is recommended to prevent complications. This study evaluated the value of videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) in the detection of small-intestinal primary carcinoid tumor. DESIGN: Prospective descriptive study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Twenty consecutive patients (13 men, 7 women; 60.5 +/- 9.3 years) with metastatic NET of unknown primary tumor. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent CT, enteroclysis, nuclear imaging, and VCE of the small bowel. RESULTS: CTs and enteroclysis did not detect a primary small-intestinal carcinoid tumor. Nuclear imaging demonstrated abnormalities in the abdominal area in 13 patients but was unable to relate this to an intestinal localization in any patient. VCE revealed a small-intestinal tumor in 9 patients. Three other patients showed external compression and erosions. At surgery, 5 patients had a small-intestinal carcinoid tumor, and, in 2 patients, a small-intestinal ischemic segment was present. LIMITATIONS: The number of false-positive VCE findings was not clear, because not all patients underwent surgery. The absence of abnormalities at VCE in patients with abnormalities at nuclear imaging might be related to the presence of carcinoid tumor restricted to the mesenterium or to a false-negative VCE. CONCLUSIONS: VCE had a high diagnostic yield of 45% for identification of primary small-intestinal carcinoid tumors. Although nuclear imaging had a comparable diagnostic yield, it could not differentiate between intestinal and mesenterial localization of the carcinoid.

Severe hepatic side effects of ezetimibe.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ezetimibe was introduced recently as a new class of cholesterol-lowering drugs. Until now only limited increases of transaminase levels were reported. METHODS: We studied 2 patients with severe hepatic side effects of ezetimibe in a general community hospital. RESULTS: Ezetimibe may lead to 2 distinct types of severe hepatic side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Ezetimibe may rarely cause hepatotoxicity, severe cholestatic hepatitis, or acute autoimmune hepatitis.