Compound heterozygosity of a de novo submicroscopic deletion and an inherited frameshift pathogenic variant in the PKHD1 gene in a fetus with bilaterally enlarged and echogenic kidneys, enlarged abdomen and oligohydramnios.

We present a fetus with bilaterally enlarged and echogenic kidneys. Prenatal testing detected compound heterozygosity for a 0.676 Mb de novo deletion and an inherited pathogenic variant in PKHD1. This is the first case of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) with a prenatally detected disease-causing PKHD1 deletion.

Prioritization of Candidate Genes for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in a Critical Region on Chromosome 4p16 using a Machine-Learning Algorithm.

Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is caused by partial deletion of the short arm of chromosome 4 and is characterized by dysmorphic facies, congenital heart defects, intellectual/developmental disability, and increased risk for congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). In this report, we describe a stillborn girl with WHS and a large CDH. A literature review revealed 15 cases of WHS with CDH, which overlap a 2.3-Mb CDH critical region. We applied a machine-learning algorithm that integrates large-scale genomic knowledge to genes within the 4p16.3 CDH critical region and identified FGFRL1 , CTBP1 , NSD2 , FGFR3 , CPLX1 , MAEA , CTBP1-AS2 , and ZNF141 as genes whose haploinsufficiency may contribute to the development of CDH.

Reproductive genetic counseling challenges associated with diagnostic exome sequencing in a large academic private reproductive genetic counseling practice.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnostic whole exome sequencing (WES) is rapidly entering clinical genetics, but experience with reproductive genetic counseling aspects is limited. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review and report on our experience with preconception and prenatal genetic counseling for diagnostic WES. METHOD: We performed a retrospective chart review over 34 months in a large private prenatal genetic counseling practice and analyzed data for referral indications, findings, and results of genetic counseling related to diagnostic WES. RESULTS: Ten of 14 patients counseled about diagnostic WES for ongoing pregnancies pursued the test, resulting in identification of three pathogenic variants (30%). Five of 15 patients seeking counseling about familial WES results in an affected proband pursued prenatal diagnosis, resulting in identification of one affected fetus and five unaffected fetuses. We experienced challenges related to complexity and uncertainty of results, turnaround time, cost and insurance overage, and multidisciplinary fetal care coordination. CONCLUSION: Despite having experienced complexity and identified challenges of the reproductive genetic counseling, availability of diagnostic WES contributed important information that aided in prenatal care planning and decision-making. Future enhanced provider education and larger studies to systematically study the integration of WES in reproductive genetic counseling and prenatal care will be important.