Charlson comorbidity index and success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: We examined the potential correlation between Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and stone free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-six adult patients were treated with 241 ESWL procedures for a renal or ureteral stone(s) over a 3 year period. Age, race, comorbidities, CCI, stone size and location, number of shocks and power level were determined. Treatment efficacies were evaluated at a mean of 56.1 days after each ESWL with computed tomography, abdominal x-ray, intravenous pyleography and/or renal ultrasound. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: There was no correlation between CCI and any of the following: stone burden, number of shocks, or power level. There was no difference in stone burden, number of shocks or power level between those who were and were not stone free. Stone free rates for patients with CCI of zero, one, and two or greater were 44.7% (71/159), 27% (13/48) and 41.2% (14/34) respectively. Patients with an index of one were 2.1 times more likely to have a residual stone burden than patients with an index of zero (95% CI 0.99-4.42, p = 0.05). Patients with one comorbidity were 2.4 times more likely to have a residual stone burden than patients with none (95% CI 1.04-5.72, p = 0.04). Patients with upper ureteral stones were less likely to have a residual stone burden than patients with renal stones (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-0.98, p = 0.04). Those with lower ureteral stones were less likely to have a residual stone burden than those with renal stones (RR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.43, p <0.0001). The only significant predictors of the stone free rate were stone location and number of comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Stone location and number of comorbidities were significant predictors of ESWL outcome. The CCI may underestimate the magnitude of comorbidities and their effect on stone treatment efficacy.

Medical therapy versus surgery and minimally invasive surgical therapies for lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia: what makes better economic sense?

From a clinical standpoint, the emergence of selective pharmacologic therapies and minimally invasive procedural treatments has changed clinical management paradigms for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Choosing from among the available treatment options can be complex for both patient and physician as factors including clinical outcomes, cost, and reimbursement are weighed and evaluated. Pharmacologic therapies produce modest improvements in objective outcomes measures and subject patients to long-term costs and risks including disease progression and the potential need for subsequent procedural treatment. Procedural interventions for obstructive BPH have changed dramatically in the past several decades as minimally invasive therapies have been developed to produce substantial improvement in outcomes measures and limit the potential morbidity associated with traditional surgical therapies. This paper reviews the current literature to provide a framework for understanding the relationship between clinical outcomes and costs with respect to commonly used medical and procedural therapies for the management of symptomatic BPH and associated lower urinary tract symptoms. The objective is to provide the clinician with an assessment of peer-reviewed evidence-based data to facilitate informed decision making on patient treatment for obstructive BPH.

A clinical outcomes and cost analysis comparing photoselective vaporization of the prostate to alternative minimally invasive therapies and transurethral prostate resection for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: We critically evaluated the clinical outcomes and cost characteristics of alternative procedural treatment options for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An outcomes and cost analysis was performed for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatments, including photoselective vaporization, microwave thermotherapy, transurethral needle ablation, interstitial laser coagulation and transurethral resection. Clinical outcomes were measured by the percent improvement in American Urological Association/International Prostate Symptom Score, the maximum uroflowmetry rate and quality of life score. An economic simulation model was constructed to estimate the expected cost of benign prostatic hyperplasia procedural therapies from a payer perspective. The model included costs of initial treatment, followup care, adverse events and re-treatment. Sensitivity and threshold analyses tested the impact of changing model inputs on base case results. RESULTS: Ablative therapies showed better improvement in symptom score, flow rate and quality of life score compared to thermotherapy procedures. Photoselective vaporization resulted in the largest beneficial changes in American Urological Association/International Prostate Symptom Score, the maximum uroflowmetry rate and the quality of life score at all time points evaluated, followed by transurethral resection and then interstitial laser coagulation. The estimated cost was lower for photoselective vaporization than for any other procedural option at any interval studied. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the results of baseline analyses were robust to reasonable changes in clinical and economic inputs to the model. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to alternative treatment options photoselective vaporization of the prostate is a clinically efficacious and cost-effective treatment for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.

A novel computer based expert decision making model for prostate cancer disease management.

PURPOSE: We propose a strategic, computer based, prostate cancer decision making model based on the analytic hierarchy process. We developed a model that improves physician-patient joint decision making and enhances the treatment selection process by making this critical decision rational and evidence based. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups (patient and physician-expert) completed a clinical study comparing an initial disease management choice with the highest ranked option generated by the computer model. Participants made pairwise comparisons to derive priorities for the objectives and subobjectives related to the disease management decision. The weighted comparisons were then applied to treatment options to yield prioritized rank lists that reflect the likelihood that a given alternative will achieve the participant treatment goal. Aggregate data were evaluated by inconsistency ratio analysis and sensitivity analysis, which assessed the influence of individual objectives and subobjectives on the final rank list of treatment options. RESULTS: Inconsistency ratios less than 0.05 were reliably generated, indicating that judgments made within the model were mathematically rational. The aggregate prioritized list of treatment options was tabulated for the patient and physician groups with similar outcomes for the 2 groups. Analysis of the major defining objectives in the treatment selection decision demonstrated the same rank order for the patient and physician groups with cure, survival and quality of life being more important than controlling cancer, preventing major complications of treatment, preventing blood transfusion complications and limiting treatment cost. Analysis of subobjectives, including quality of life and sexual dysfunction, produced similar priority rankings for the patient and physician groups. Concordance between initial treatment choice and the highest weighted model option differed between the groups with the patient group having 59% concordance and the physician group having only 42% concordance. CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully validated the usefulness of a computer based prostate cancer management decision making model to produce individualized, rational, clinically appropriate disease management decisions without physician bias.