RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe a subtalar extra-articular screw arthroereisis (SESA) technique for the correction of flexible flatfoot (FFF) in children and report the outcome. METHODS: From 1990 to 2012, data were collected on 485 patients who underwent SESA at the San Raffaele Hospital. The average age of the patient cohort was 11.5 ± 1.81 years (range 5.0-17.9 years; median 11.5 years). Inclusion criteria were FFF and marked flexible hindfoot valgus, and the exclusion criterion was rigid flatfoot. SESA was performed in 732 cases of FFF-bilaterally in 247 patients and monolaterally in 238 patients. RESULTS: The values of the pre- and post-SESA weight-bearing X-ray angles were 146° ± 7° and 129° ± 5°, respectively, for the Costa-Bartani angle, 43° ± 8° and 25° ± 6°, respectively, for the talar inclination angle and 11° ± 6° and 14° ± 5°, respectively, for calcaneal pitch (p <0.001). All data were analysed statistically with Student's t test. Data on 398 patients were ultimately available for analysis. In 93.7 % of cases the results were good in terms of improved clinical aspects and X-ray measurement, absence of complications, normal foot function 3 months post-SESA and no requirement for further surgery. The complication rate was 6.3 % and included ankle joint effusion, painful contracture of peroneal muscles and fourth metatarsal bone stress fractures. A sample of 76 patients (121 feet) were evaluated after screw removal, which occurred on average 2.9 years after SESA. The angle measurements of this sample showed no statistically significant modification. CONCLUSION: Based on our >20 years of experience, we believe that SESA is an optimal technique for the correction of FFF as it is simple and can be performed rapidly, and the corrective effect results from the screw's mechanical and proprioceptive effect. The indication for surgery must be accurate. We suggest that the patient be at least 10 years of age in order that all of the foot's growth potential can be utilized and to allow for spontaneous resolution and thereby avoid the possibility of over-treatment.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients with neuromuscular disorders are not able to adapt their sitting posture continuously. Seating devices, like seating orthoses, braces, seating shells, and custom-made cushions for wheelchairs, however may improve their quality of life by stabilizing their pelvis and trunk. Sitting should be regarded as a dynamic process regulated by motor reactions of trunk and pelvic muscles due to endogenic and exogenic influences. METHODS: Prerequisites for the indication of high-quality and cost effective seating devices are guidelines for planning and fitting which consider both pathomorphologic mechanisms and the patient's personality. In order to avoid functional problems and pain caused by an insufficient seating device it is necessary to pay attention to the exact indication, time, and combination of technical options. Planning within a seating clinic needs teamwork. Primarily the goal of treatment is defined; it depends on the functional deficit, on the daily living activities of the patient, and on the social environmental factors. Secondly, fitting of the devices follows defined treatment guidelines. CONCLUSION: By examination of the sensor and musculoskeletal system, it is possible to classify the patient's sitting or seating ability for simplifying indication: three groups of ACTIVE sitters who are able to change position of trunk and pelvis actively are differentiated from three groups of PASSIVE sitters who have to be seated.