Survival Impact of Inflammation-based Prognostic Scores in Metastatic or Unresectable Esophageal Cancer Treated With Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has been indicated as the first-line treatment for metastatic or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, pretreatment biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes remain unclear. We investigated the predictive value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients treated with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy. The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were calculated before initial treatment in 65 eligible patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer receiving pembrolizumab plus CF therapy, and the relationship between these biomarkers and clinical outcomes was analyzed. The objective response rate (ORR) and progression disease (PD) were observed in 51% and 21% of all patients. Patients with PNI<39 have significantly worse treatment responses than those with PNI≥39 (ORR; 28% vs. 60%, PD; 44% vs. 13%, P=0.020). Progression-free survival (PFS) is significantly associated with the PNI and CAR (P<0.001 and P=0.004, respectively). Overall survival (OS) is associated with PNI, CAR, and PLR (P<0.001, P=0.008, and P=0.018, respectively). The PNI cutoff value of 39 is identified as an independent factor for PFS (odds ratio=0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.81, P=0.012) and OS (odds ratio=0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.59, P=0.003). Patients with PNI<39 have significantly worse 6-month PFS and 1-year OS than those with PNI≥39 (27.8% vs. 66.7%, 27.2% vs. 81.1%, respectively). In conclusion, inflammation-based prognostic scores are associated with survival in patients treated with pembrolizumab plus CF therapy. Pretreatment PNI is a promising candidate for predicting treatment response and survival.

Prognostic impact of nodal status and lymphovascular invasion in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Nodal status is well known to be the most important prognostic factor for esophageal cancer patients, even if they are treated with neoadjuvant therapy. To establish an optimal postoperative adjuvant strategy for patients, we aimed to more accurately predict the prognosis of patients and systemic recurrence by using clinicopathological factors, including nodal status, in patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The clinicopathological factors associated with survival and systemic recurrence were investigated in 488 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall survival differed according to tumor depth, nodal status, tumor regression, and lymphovascular (LV) invasion. In the multivariate analysis, nodal status and LV invasion were identified as independent prognostic factors (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0008). Nodal status was also identified as an independent factor associated with systemic recurrence, although LV invasion was a borderline factor (P = 0.066). In each pN stage, patients with LV invasion showed significantly worse overall survival than those without LV invasion (pN0: P = 0.036, pN1: P = 0.0044, pN2: P = 0.0194, pN3: P = 0.0054). Patients with LV invasion were also more likely to have systemic, and any recurrence than those without LV invasion in each pN stage. Pathological nodal status and LV invasion were the most important predictors of survival and systemic recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. This finding could provide useful information about selecting candidates for adjuvant therapy among these patients. Our analysis showed that LV invasion was an independent prognostic factor in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and that combining LV invasion with pathological nodal status makes it possible to stratify the prognosis in those patients.

Clinical Impact of Conversion Surgery After Induction Therapy for Esophageal Cancer with Synchronous Distant Metastasis: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for advanced esophageal cancer with synchronous distant metastasis is systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Conversion surgery is not established for esophageal cancer with synchronous distant metastasis. This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of conversion surgery for esophageal cancer with synchronous distant metastasis after induction therapy. METHODS: This multi-institutional retrospective study enrolled 66 patients with advanced esophageal cancer, including synchronous distant metastasis, who underwent induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by conversion surgery between 2005 and 2021. Short- and long-term outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: Distant lymph node (LN) metastasis occurred in 51 patients (77%). Distant organ metastasis occurred in 15 (23%) patients. There were 41 patients with metastatic para-aortic LNs, and 10 patients with other metastatic LNs. Organs with distant metastasis included the lung in seven patients, liver in seven patients, and liver and lung in one patient. For 61 patients (92%), R0 resection was achieved. The postoperative complication rate was 47%. The in-hospital mortality rate was 1%, and the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for all the patients were 32.4% and 24.4%, respectively. The OS rates were similar between the patients with distant LN metastasis and the patients with distant organ metastasis (3-year OS: 34.9% vs. 26.7%; P = 0.435). Multivariate analysis showed that pathologic nodal status is independently associated with a poor prognosis (hazard ratio, 2.43; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Conversion surgery after chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer with synchronous distant metastasis is feasible and promising. It might be effective for improving the long-term prognosis for patients with controlled nodal status.

Significance of Comprehensive Analysis of Preoperative Sarcopenia Based on Muscle Mass, Muscle Strength, and Physical Function for the Prognosis of Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of muscle mass loss, muscle strength, and physical function has been recommended in diagnosing sarcopenia. However, only muscle mass has been assessed in previous studies. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of comprehensively diagnosed preoperative sarcopenia on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: The study analyzed 115 patients with esophageal cancer (age ≥ 65 years) who underwent curative esophagectomy. Preoperative sarcopenia was analyzed using the skeletal mass index (SMI), handgrip strength, and gait speed based on the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria. Clinicopathologic factors, incidence of postoperative complications, and overall survival (OS) were compared between the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups. The significance of the three individual parameters also was evaluated. RESULTS: The evaluation identified 47 (40.9%) patients with low SMI, 31 (27.0%) patients with low handgrip strength, and 6 (5.2%) patients with slow gait speed. Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 23 patients (20%) and associated with older age and advanced pT stage. The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. Among the three parameters, only slow gait speed was associated with Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or greater complications. The sarcopenia group showed significantly worse OS than the non-sarcopenia group. Those with low handgrip strength tended to have worse OS, and those with slow gait speed had significantly worse OS than their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative sarcopenia diagnosed using skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical function may have an impact on the survival of patients with esophageal cancer.

Short-term Outcomes of Adjuvant Nivolumab After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Resected Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: CheckMate 577 evaluated adjuvant nivolumab therapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for esophageal cancers. However, the efficacy of this treatment in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unknown. This study investigated the short-term outcomes of adjuvant nivolumab therapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Out of 956 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent radical esophagectomy, 227 who exhibited ypN1-3 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery were included in this study. RESULTS: Among 227 patients, 30 received adjuvant nivolumab and 197 received non-nivolumab adjuvant therapy. The nivolumab group displayed a higher number of lymph node metastases compared to the control group. Patients with ypN1-2 tended to have longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the nivolumab group than in the non-nivolumab group (p=0.095). In the propensity score-matched cohort, no differences in patient characteristics were observed. Adjuvant nivolumab therapy significantly prolonged RFS in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.013). Patients with ypN1-2 in the nivolumab group had significantly longer RFS than their counterparts in the non-nivolumab group (p=0.001), but not in ypN3 (p=0.784). The 1-year postoperative recurrence rates were 59% for the non-nivolumab group and 24% for the nivolumab group (p=0.007). Nivolumab-related adverse events in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were mostly consistent across all grades, while the frequency of increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels was relatively higher compared to CheckMate577. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant nivolumab was more likely to prolong 1-year RFS in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially in those with ypN1-2, and had acceptable adverse events.

Clinical Impact of Early Tumour Shrinkage in Metastatic or Unresectable Oesophageal Cancer Treated with Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic or unresectable locally advanced oesophageal cancer remains a disease with high mortality. More recently, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has been indicated as the first-line treatment for those patients, but the predictive factors for treatment efficacy remain controversial. This study investigated the clinical utility of early tumour shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) in metastatic or unresectable oesophageal cancer treated with pembrolizumab plus CF therapy. METHODS: ETS and DpR, defined as the percent decreases at the second evaluation and the percentage of the maximal tumour shrinkage during treatment, were measured in 53 eligible patients. The ETS and DpR cut-off values were 20% and 30%, respectively, based on survival outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (51%) were treatment-naïve, while 26 (49%) had received any treatment before initiating pembrolizumab plus CF therapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for ETS ≥20% and <20% were 12.7 and 5.5 months and 14.4 and 8.2 months, and 12.7 and 4.9 months and 14.4 and 8.0 months for DpR ≥30% and <30%, respectively. ETS <20% showed early tumour growth, whereas ETS ≥20% had a good response rate with sufficient longer response duration. In addition, an ETS cut-off of 20% predicted the best overall response and was not associated with prior treatment. In multivariable analysis, ETS ≥20% and DpR ≥30% were independent factors of longer PFS. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that an ETS is a promising on-treatment marker for early prediction of further sensitivity to pembrolizumab plus CF therapy.

Prognostic value of a novel index combining the prognostic nutritional index and D-dimer levels for gastric cancer after gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic nutritional index and D-dimer level are two useful measures for gastric cancer prognosis. Since they each comprise different factors, it is possible to employ a more useful combined indicator. This study therefore aimed to establish a prognostic nutritional index-D score-which combines the prognostic nutritional index and D-dimer level-and validate its usefulness as a prognostic marker. METHODS: We collected data from 1,218 patients with gastric cancer who had undergone radical gastrectomy (R0) between January 2004 and December 2015. Patients were divided into three prognostic nutritional index-D score groups based on the following criteria: score 2, low prognostic nutritional index (≤46) and high D-dimer levels (>1.0 µg/ml); score 1, either a low prognostic nutritional index or high D-dimer levels; and score 0, no abnormality. We then defined the PNI-D score as low (score 0 or 1) and high (score 2). RESULTS: The prognostic nutritional index-D score was significantly associated with overall, recurrence-free, and disease-specific survival (all log-rank P<0.0001). The 5-year overall survival rates of the patients with prognostic nutritional index-D scores of low and high were 88.1% and 64.7%, respectively; their 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 86.7% and 61.3%, respectively; and their 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 99.3% and 76.5%, respectively. Cox multivariate analysis revealed that a high prognostic nutritional index-D score was an independent, statistically significant prognostic factor for poor overall (P=0.01) survival in the patients with gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic nutritional index-D is an independent prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy With S-1 Plus Docetaxel Versus S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin in Stage III Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines recommend doublet chemotherapy (S-1 plus another chemotherapy) over S-1 alone for patients with pStage III gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy. However, no consensus exists on adjuvant regimens for patients with pStage III gastric cancer. Therefore, we conducted a comparative study to evaluate the tolerability, safety, and survival outcomes of docetaxel plus S-1 (DS) and S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) therapies as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pStage III gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy and received DS or SOX therapies postoperatively at the Osaka International Cancer Institute between December 2016 and December 2021. We conducted a propensity score matching analysis to balance clinical backgrounds. RESULTS: Eighty patients who met the eligibility criteria were analyzed. After matching, 40 patients were included in the study (20 each in the DS and SOX groups). No significant adverse events were observed. The mean ratios of the delivered dose to the planned dose were 74.1% and 86.6% for S-1 and docetaxel in the DS group, respectively, and 75.8% and 76.9% for S-1 and oxaliplatin in the SOX group, respectively. No significant differences were found in recurrence-free and overall survival between the DS and SOX groups (p=0.688 and p=0.772, respectively). CONCLUSION: DS and SOX therapies as adjuvants were safe and manageable for patients with pStage III gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy. No significant differences were found in prognosis between the two therapies.

Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were intraoperatively diagnosed non-curative.

INTRODUCTION: Curative esophagectomy is not always possible in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, few studies have investigated patients who underwent non-curative surgery with intraoperative judgment. This study aimed to investigate patient characteristics and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing non-curative surgery and compare them between non-resectional and non-radical surgery. METHODS: Among 989 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who were preoperatively expected for curative esophagectomy, 66 who were eligible for non-curative surgery were included in this study. RESULTS: Intraoperative diagnosis of T4b accounted for 93% of the reasons for the failure of curative surgery. In those patients, esophageal cancer locally invaded into the aortobronchial constriction (70%), trachea (25%), or pulmonary vein (5%). LN metastasis mainly invaded into the trachea (50%), or bronchus (28%).The overall survival of patients with non-curative surgery was 51.5%, 25.7%, and 10.4% at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, respectively. Although there were no differences in preoperative patient characteristics between non-resectional and non-radical surgery, distant metastasis, especially pleural dissemination, was significantly observed in T4b patients due to esophageal cancer with non-radical surgery than those with non-resectional surgery (35% vs. 15%, P=0.002). Even in patients with non-curative surgery, R1 resection and postoperative CRT were identified as independent factors for survival 1 year after surgery (P=0.047, and 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: T4b tumor located in aortobronchial constriction or trachea/bronchus makes it difficult to diagnose whether it is resectable or unresectable. Moreover, surgical procedures and perioperative treatment were deeply associated with the clinical outcomes.

Clinical Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Esophagectomy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is expected to improve perioperative outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. However, how ERAS impacts the postoperative body composition and factors related to compliance rate of ERAS have not been fully investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 252 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy. We compared the postoperative outcomes including body composition between the old perioperative program and the new one that aimed to shorten postoperative length of stay (LOS). Compliance-related clinical factors were also examined. RESULTS: From 252 patients, 129 underwent the old program and 123 the new program. Postoperative LOS, postoperative complications, and hospital costs were reduced with the new program. Body weight loss was significantly improved with the new program at discharge and 3-months after esophagectomy (94.9% vs. 96.6%, p=0.013, 89.5% vs. 91.1%, p=0.028, respectively). Patients in the new program had better body composition at discharge than those in the old program [body fat mass (91.6% vs. 94.1%), lean body mass (95.2% vs. 97.2), and skeletal muscle mass (95.3% vs. 97.0%)]. Major reasons for incompliance were dysphagia, pneumonia, and anastomotic leakage. Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥70 years at surgery and sex (male) were independent risk factors for incompliance with the postoperative program. CONCLUSION: The new ERAS program aimed to shorten postoperative LOS had clinical benefits in body composition early after esophagectomy. Personalized ERAS programs based on age might lead to better postoperative outcomes because of low compliance rates for older patients.

Long-term changes in bone mineral density in postoperative patients with esophageal cancer.

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate long-term changes in bone mineral density (BMD) after esophagectomy, identify the risk factors for postoperative osteoporosis in patients with esophageal cancer and survival outcomes related to osteoporosis. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated BMD changes for 197 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who were disease-free for 5 years after radical esophagectomy. Osteoporosis was diagnosed using computed tomography with an L1 attenuation threshold of ≤110 HU. Survival analysis was performed on 381 consecutive patients with 5-year follow-up after radical esophagectomy. Results: BMD decreased annually after esophagectomy. The median attenuation (HU) was 134.2 before surgery and 135.2, 127.4, 123.3, 115.2, 105.6, and 102.4 at 6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after surgery, respectively. Osteoporosis was diagnosed in 25.9% patients before surgery and 23.3%, 29.4%, 40.1%, 46.7%, 54.8%, and 60.4% patients with osteoporosis were observed at 6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after surgery, respectively. Postoperative BMD did not decrease in patients aged ≤54 years, those who had never been smokers, and those with no weight loss after esophagectomy. Multivariate analysis identified that age (≥65 years) at surgery and smoking history were independent risk factors for osteoporosis at 5 years after esophagectomy. Patients with preoperative osteoporosis tended to have worse prognosis in disease-free survival and overall survival than those without osteoporosis, who were more likely to die due to non-esophageal cancer. Conclusion: Esophageal cancer survivors are more likely to develop osteoporosis after esophagectomy, and preoperative osteoporosis might be associated with prognosis.

Nano-particulate Toll-like Receptor 9 Agonist Potentiates the Antitumor Activity of Anti-Glypican-1 Antibody.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target tumor antigens have recently been developed. Their antitumor activity is mainly achieved through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) via effector cells such as tumor-infiltrated macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells. CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) have potent antitumor activity and are considered to increase the tumor infiltration of macrophages and NK cells; however, a completely solubilized novel CpG-schizophyllan (SPG) complex, K3-SPG, displays more potent antitumor activity. We recently reported the significant antitumor activity of anti-glypican-1 (GPC1) mAb against GPC1-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) via ADCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential synergistic antitumor activity of anti-GPC1 mAb and K3-SPG and elucidate the underlying mechanisms using a xenograft model of GPC1-positive human ESCC cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The established human esophageal cancer cell line TE14 was subcutaneously injected into SCID mice. Xenograft mice were treated with anti-GPC1 mAb, K3-SPG, or their combination. Antitumor activity was evaluated by measuring the tumor volume. For FACS analysis, agents were administrated, and tumors were resected 1 day after the final treatment. RESULTS: Anti-GPC1 mAb or K3-SPG monotherapy showed dose-dependent antitumor activity, and combination therapy with anti-GPC1 mAb and K3-SPG showed antitumor activity (p=0.0859). Flow cytometry revealed significantly increased numbers of macrophages (p=0.0133) and of the ratio of activated NK cells/total NK cells (p=0.0058) following K3-SPG or combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with K3-SPG and anti-GPC1 mAb or another antitumor mAb may represent a new cancer treatment option acting via ADCC.

Modified Collard technique is more effective than circular stapled for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a propensity score-matched study.

The anastomotic technique after esophagectomy is of great interest in the prevention of anastomotic complications that adversely affect postoperative recovery. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of modified Collard (MC) and circular stapled (CS) anastomoses after esophagectomy. A total of 504 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastric CS or MC anastomosis from January 2013 to December 2019 were enrolled. Out of 504 patients, 134 and 370 underwent CS and MC anastomoses. The frequency of anastomotic leakage and stricture was significantly lesser in the MC group than in the CS group (3.0 vs. 10.5%, P = 0.0014 and 11.1 vs. 34.3%, P < 0.001, respectively). CS anastomosis was an independent risk factor for anastomotic stricture (odds ratio, 4.89; P < 0.001). Oral intake was significantly higher in the group without anastomotic stricture than in the group with anastomotic stricture at 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.001, P = 0.013, and P < 0.001, respectively). The percentage body weight loss (%BWL) was -12.2% in the group with anastomotic stricture and -7.5% in the group without anastomotic stricture at 3 months postoperatively (P = 0.0012). Anastomotic stricture was an independent factor associated with %BWL (odds ratio, 4.86; P = 0.010). Propensity score-matched analysis, which included 88 pairs of patients, confirmed a significantly lower anastomotic stricture rate in the MC group than in the CS group (10.2 vs. 35.2%, P < 0.001). MC anastomosis is better than CS anastomosis for reducing the frequency of anastomotic stricture, which may be useful for maintaining early postoperative nutritional status.

Clinical Impact of Metastatic Lymph Node Size on Therapeutic Effect and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Underwent Preoperative Chemotherapy Followed by Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Pretreatment metastatic lymph node (LN) size has been reported to be associated with prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, its relationship with response to preoperative chemotherapy or prognosis has not been clarified. We investigated the relationship between metastatic LN size and response to preoperative treatment, and prognosis in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer who underwent surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 212 clinically node-positive patients who underwent preoperative chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy for ESCC were enrolled. Patients were stratified into three groups on the basis of the length of the short axis of the largest LN in pretreatment computed tomography images: < 10 mm (group A), 10-19 mm (group B), and ≥ 20 mm (group C). RESULTS: Group A had 90 patients (42%), group B had 103 patients (49%), and group C had 19 patients (9%). Group C had significantly lower percent reduction in total metastatic LN size than groups A and B (22.5% versus 35.7%, P = 0.037). Group C had significantly more metastatic LNs based on histological examination than groups A and B (10.1 versus 2.4, P < 0.001). Group C patients whose LNs responded had significantly fewer metastatic LNs than nonresponders (5.1 versus 11.9, P = 0.042). Group C had significantly poorer overall survival than groups A and B (3-year survival, 25.4% versus 67.3%, P < 0.001). However, group C patients whose LNs responded had better survival than nonresponders (3-year survival, 57.1% versus 0%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with large metastatic LNs have poor response and poor prognosis. However, if a response is obtained, long-term survival can be expected.

Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) as a treatment for patients with esophageal cancer has recently become more common worldwide. However, differences in the pattern of recurrence between MIE and open esophagectomy (OE) using the transthoracic approach have not been fully investigated, particularly in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We searched the prospective databases of two institutes for patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy between 2011 and 2018. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to reduce bias from confounding patient-related variables. Operative outcomes, regionally harvested lymph nodes (LNs), recurrence pattern, and prognosis were investigated in two groups. RESULTS: We identified 410 patients who underwent OE (n = 263) and MIE (n = 147). After propensity score matching, 131 pairs of patients were selected. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics after matching. The total number of harvested LNs in both groups was similar (55.1 vs. 58.9, P = 0.132). The incidence of LN recurrence in the MIE group was significantly lower than that in the OE group (27% vs. 15%, P = 0.010). In particular, the incidence of mediastinal LN recurrence in the MIE group was significantly lower than that in the OE group (16% vs. 6%, P = 0.017). There were no significant differences between the two groups in hematogenous (19% vs.12%, P = 0.173), dissemination (5% vs. 4%, P = 0.769), local (4% vs. 1%. P = 0.213), and other recurrence (3% vs. 3%, P = 1.000). The 3-year disease-free and overall survival of MIE were significantly better than OE (71.4% vs. 50.5%, P = 0.004 and 80.3% vs. 61.2%, P = 0.002, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the thoracic approach (OE vs. MIE) (HR 1.93, P = 0.004) was an independent prognostic factor, along with the pathological N stage (HR 3.05, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MIE has less intramediastinal LN recurrence than OE and may lead to a better long-term prognosis in patients with advanced esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Antemortem diagnosis of pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy associated with gastric cancer and response to immediate chemotherapy.

Pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy is a rare and fatal complication of cancer that features widespread tumor cell-derived embolisms in the small arteries and arterioles of the lung and is often associated with thrombus formation. We describe the case of a 43-year-old woman who was hospitalized with cough and respiratory distress that lasted for 2 months. Computed tomography findings demonstrated multiple areas of interlobular septal thickening and ground-glass opacities in both lungs. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated a D-shaped left ventricle suggesting right heart overload, and pulmonary blood flow scintigraphy revealed multiple small, peripheral, and patchy areas of reduced blood flow. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a signet-ring carcinoma. The patient was diagnosed with pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy based on her clinical presentation and treatment with tegafur, gimeracil oteracil potassium, oxaliplatin, and an anticoagulant was initiated on the 3rd day after admission. The symptoms improved rapidly after treatment initiation. The patient was discharged 28 days after initiation of chemotherapy without the need for supplemental oxygen. This case suggests that the immediate use of chemotherapy and anticoagulants for treating pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy may improve patient survival.

DUPAN-II normalisation as a biological indicator during preoperative chemoradiation therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Duke pancreatic mono-clonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-II) is a famous tumour maker for pancreatic cancer (PC) as well as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). We evaluated the clinical implications of DUPAN-II levels as a biological indicator for PC during preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT). METHODS: This retrospective analysis included data from 221 consecutive patients with resectable and borderline resectable PC at diagnosis who underwent preoperative CRT between 2008 and 2017. We focused on 73 patients with elevated pre-CRT DUPAN-II levels (> 230 U/mL; more than 1.5 times the cut-off value for the normal range). Pre- and post-CRT DUPAN-II levels and the changes in DUPAN-II ratio were measured. RESULTS: Univariate analysis identified normalisation of DUPAN-II levels after CRT as a significant prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.06, confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-4.24, p = 0.042). Total normalisation ratio was 49% (n = 36). Overall survival (OS) in patients with normalised DUPAN-II levels was significantly longer than that in 73 patients with elevated levels (5-year survival, 55% vs. 21%, p = 0.032) and in 60 patients who underwent tumour resection (5-year survival, 59% vs. 26%, p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Normalisation of DUPAN-II levels during preoperative CRT was a significant prognostic factor and could be an indicator to monitor treatment efficacy and predict patient prognosis.