RESUMEN
The coronavirus disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been spread worldwide for more than 3 years. Although the hospitalization rate and mortality have decreased dramatically due to wide vaccination effort and improved treatment options, the disease is still a global health issue due to constant viral mutations, causing negative impact on social and economic activities. In addition, long COVID and complications arising from COVID-19 weeks after infection have become a concern for public health experts. Therefore, better treatments for COVID-19 are still needed. Herein, we describe a class of macrocyclic peptidomimetic compounds that are potent inhibitors of SARS-Cov-2 3CL protease (3CLpro). Significantly, some of the compounds showed a higher stability against human liver microsomes (HLM t1/2 > 180 min) and may be suitable for oral administration without the need for a pharmacokinetic (PK) boosting agent such as ritonavir.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales , Proteasas 3C de Coronavirus , Compuestos Macrocíclicos , SARS-CoV-2 , Proteasas 3C de Coronavirus/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteasas 3C de Coronavirus/metabolismo , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , Compuestos Macrocíclicos/química , Compuestos Macrocíclicos/farmacología , Compuestos Macrocíclicos/síntesis química , Compuestos Macrocíclicos/farmacocinética , Antivirales/farmacología , Antivirales/química , Antivirales/síntesis química , Antivirales/farmacocinética , Microsomas Hepáticos/metabolismo , Peptidomiméticos/farmacología , Peptidomiméticos/química , Peptidomiméticos/síntesis química , Descubrimiento de Drogas , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Inhibidores de Proteasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Proteasas/química , Inhibidores de Proteasas/síntesis química , Inhibidores de Proteasas/farmacocinética , Relación Estructura-ActividadRESUMEN
Background and aims: The cachexia index (CXI) is a novel biomarker for estimating cancer cachexia. The cachexia index based on hand-grip strength (H-CXI) has been recently developed as a simple proxy for CXI. The present study aims to compare both the H-CXI and CXI for the prediction of cancer cachexia and postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent radical colectomy for colorectal cancer. Methods: Patients who underwent radical operations for colorectal cancer were included in this study. Cancer cachexia was diagnosed according to the international consensus outlined by Fearon et al. The cachexia index (CXI) was calculated as [skeletal muscle index (SMI) × serum albumin/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)]. The H-CXI was calculated as [hand-grip strength (HGS)/height2 × serum albumin/NLR]. The SMI was measured based on the preoperative CT images at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) level. HGS was measured before surgery. Results: From July 2014 to May 2021, a total of 1,411 patients were included in the present study, of whom 361 (25.6%) were identified as having cancer cachexia. Patients with cachexia had a lower CXI (p < 0.001) and lower H-CXI (p < 0.001) than those without cachexia. A low CXI but not low H-CXI independently predicted cancer cachexia in the multivariate analysis (OR 1.448, p = 0.024). Both a low CXI (HR 1.476, p < 0.001 for OS; HR 1.611, p < 0.001 for DFS) and low H-CXI (HR 1.369, p = 0.007 for OS; HR 1.642, p < 0.001 for DFS) were independent predictors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) after adjusting for the same covariates. A low H-CXI but not low CXI was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (OR 1.337, p = 0.044). No significant association was found between cancer cachexia and postoperative complications. Conclusion: The CXI and H-CXI exhibited better prognostic value than cancer cachexia for the prediction of postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent radical colectomy for colorectal cancer. The H-CXI was a superior index over the CXI in predicting short-term clinical outcomes, whereas the CXI demonstrated a closer correlation with Fearon's criteria for cancer cachexia. Ideal tools for the assessment of cancer cachexia should incorporate not only weight loss but also muscle mass, physical function, and inflammatory state.
RESUMEN
S1P5 is one of 5 receptors for sphingosine-1-phosphate and is highly expressed on endothelial cells within the blood-brain barrier, where it maintains barrier integrity in in vitro models (J. Neuroinflamm. 2012, 9, 133). Little more is known about the effects of S1P5 modulation due to the absence of tool molecules with suitable selectivity and drug-like properties. We recently reported that molecule A-971432 (Harris, 2010) (29 in this paper) is highly efficacious in reversing lipid accumulation and age-related cognitive decline in rats (Van der Kam , , AAIC 2014). Herein we describe the development of a series of selective S1P5 agonists that led to the identification of compound 29, which is highly selective for S1P5 and has excellent plasma and CNS exposure after oral dosing in preclinical species. To further support its suitability for in vivo studies of S1P5 biology, we extensively characterized 29, including confirmation of its selectivity in pharmacodynamic assays of S1P1 and S1P3 function in rats. In addition, we found that 29 improves blood-brain barrier integrity in an in vitro model and reverses age-related cognitive decline in mice. These results suggest that S1P5 agonism is an innovative approach with potential benefit in neurodegenerative disorders involving lipid imbalance and/or compromised blood-brain barrier such as Alzheimer's disease or multiple sclerosis.