Neuroaugmentation in the management of sacroiliac joint pain. Report of two cases.

STUDY DESIGN: A report of two cases of severe sacroiliac pain that were resistant to conventional management techniques. Both patients had undergone lumbar fusion. This appeared to be a predisposing factor. OBJECTIVE: To define the source of pain in these patients by performing a series of diagnostic blocks under fluoroscopic guidance to determine if these patients were candidates for neuroaugmentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Mild to moderate sacroiliac joint pain can be managed conservatively with analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs, and physical therapy. Severe sacroiliac joint pain can be incapacitating and more challenging to manage. Fluoroscopically guided intra-articular local anesthetic-steroid injections, followed by joint manipulation, can be effective, intracapsular injections of glycerin, glucose, and phenol also may be beneficial in some patients. The use of neuroaugmentation to manage pain of synovial origin has not been reported previously. Sacral nerve root stimulation in particular has been used to manage urinary bladder dysfunction and pain, but not sacroiliac joint pain. METHODS: Two patients with severe sacroiliac joint pain were treated by implanting a neuroprosthesis at the third sacral nerve roots. The patients had undergone lumbar fusion for back pain that developed as a result of work-related injuries. Stimulation was tried for 1 week with bilateral, percutaneously implanted, cardiac pacing wires at the third sacral nerve roots. RESULTS: Both patients experienced relief of approximately 60% of their pain during the trial period. Therefore, a neuroprosthesis (Medtronics, MN) was implanted permanently bilaterally at the third sacral nerve root in both patients. The use of analgesics was reportedly the same after implantation, but significantly more effective, and the patients' daily living activities were more tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: Two cases of refractory sacroiliac joint pain are reported that were managed with permanently implanted neuroprostheses at the third sacral nerve roots. The authors suggest that neuroaugmentation can be a reasonable option in selected patients with refractory sacroiliac pain.

Acupressure treatment for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting are still common problems after general anesthesia, especially in ambulatory surgery. Drug therapy is often complicated with central nervous system symptoms. We studied a nonpharmacological method of therapy--acupressure--at the Pericardium 6 (P.6) (Nei-Guan) meridian point. Two hundred consecutive healthy patients undergoing a variety of short surgical procedures were included in a randomized, double-blind study: 108 patients were in the acupressure group (Group 1) and 92 patients were in the control group (Group 2). Spherical beads of acupressure bands were placed at the P.6 points in the anterior surface of both forearms in Group 1 patients, while in Group 2 they were placed inappropriately on the posterior surface. The acupressure bands were placed before induction of anesthesia and were removed 6 h postoperatively. They were covered with a soft cotton wrapping to conceal them from the blinded observer who evaluated the patients for presence of nausea and vomiting and checked the order sheet for any antiemetics prescribed. In both groups, the age, gender, height, weight, and type and duration of surgical procedures were all comparable without significant statistical difference. In Group 1, only 25 of 108 patients (23%) had nausea and vomiting as compared to Group 2, in which 38 of 92 patients (41%) had nausea and vomiting (P = 0.0058). We concluded that acupressure at the P.6 (Nei-Guan) point is an effective prophylaxis for postsurgical nausea and vomiting and therefore a good alternative to conventional antiemetic treatment.