Partial Subscapularis Tear: State-of-the-Art.

The Subscapularis (SSC) muscle is a crucial anterior glenohumeral stabilizer and internal rotator of the shoulder joint. The partial tears of the SSC might result from traumatic injury or intrinsic degeneration. Partial SSC tears can range in severity and be classified into different categories based on the location of the tear, size of the lesion, and associated pathology. The tear usually begins from the superolateral margin in the first facet and propagates downwards. It is frequently associated with biceps pathology or anterosuperior lesions. These tears are now increasingly recognized as distinct pathology that requires specific diagnostic and management approaches. The current management approaches are shifting towards operative, as partial SSC tears are increasing recognized as distinct pathology. At present, there is no consensus regarding the timing of repair, but the relative tendency of the SSC to retract much faster than other rotator cuff muscles, and difficulty in mobilization, advocates an early repair for SSC irrespective of the lesion size. An associated biceps pathology can be treated with either tenotomy (biceps delamination/erosion) or tenodesis. The techniques of partial SSC repair are constantly improving. There is no reported difference in use of 2-anchor-based conventional single-row (SR), a 3-anchor-based interconnected double-row technique, or a 2-anchor-based interconnected hybrid double-row construct in the repair construct. However, the 2-anchor-based interconnected double-row provides an advantage of better superolateral coverage with the leading-edge protection, as it helps in placing the superolateral anchor superior and lateral to the original footprint. A timely intervention and restoration of the footprint will help restore and rehabilitate the shoulder. Future directions should prioritise injury prevention, early diagnosis with clinic-radiological cues and targeted interventions to mitigate risk.

Double-Needle Technique for Temporary Stabilization of Unstable Meniscal Tear During All-Inside Meniscal Repair.

Meniscus tears are common in patients with primary or revision anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Given their important mechanical role in the joint, efforts are being made to repair as much of the meniscus tear as possible. However, all-inside repair might be challenging in case of an unstable tear due to the dislocation of the meniscal flap after deploying the first anchor. Therefore, we describe the details of our technique that allows the surgeon to stabilize the meniscal tear before all-inside repair, ensuring the reduction of the tear throughout the entire procedure.

Should I add Orthobiologics to my Knee Osteotomy Practice? A Systematic Review.

IMPORTANCE: Orthobiologics has seen a renaissance over the last decade as an adjunct therapy during osteotomy due to the limited inherent regenerative potential of damaged intraarticular tissues. AIM OR OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to present the latest evidence regarding using orthobiologics with simultaneous high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for knee osteoarthritis. The results of this study may guide surgeons to improve their clinical results and clear the air regarding confusion over whether or not to add orthobiologics to HTO in clinical practice backed by scientific evidence. EVIDENCE REVIEW: According to PRISMA guidelines a systematic search for relevant literature was performed in the PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases of all studies published in English from January 1990 to May 2023. The following search terms were entered into the title, abstract, and keyword fields: "knee" or "osteotomy" AND "valgus" or "varus" AND "regenerative medicine" or "PRP" or "mesenchymal stem cells" or "stem cells" or "BMAC" or "bone marrow" or "growth factors" or "umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell" or "stromal vascular fraction". The AMSTAR-2 checklist was used to confirm the quality of the systematic review. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective comparative cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series were included. Studies that reported clinical outcomes in patients treated with knee osteotomy for varus/valgus knee with concomitant adjunction of regenerative treatment [Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC), Human Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived (HUCBD), Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC), bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), stromal vascular fraction (SVF)] were included. The outcome measures extracted from the studies were the KOOS score, Lysholm score, Subjective IKDC, WOMAC Score, KSS, Tegner, HSS, radiographic tibiofemoral angle, posterior tibial slope and complications. The current systematic review is registered in the PROSPERO Registry (CRD42023439379). FINDINGS: Osteotomy for unicompartmental arthritis with adjunction of orthobiologics such as PRP, ADSC, HUCBD, MSC, BMAC, and SVF presents a consistent statistically significant clinical improvement compared to preoperative scores regardless of the treatment modality used and there were no notable complications associated with the use of these novel agents. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Orthobiologics and knee osteotomies could improve outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis desiring Knee preservation surgeries. However, only a few studies are available on the topic to conclude anything with certainty, the patients included in the studies could not be disintegrated based on the grade of osteoarthritis (OA), type, dosage and frequency of administration of orthobiologic and type of additional surgical procedures used. Therefore, better-structured RCTs are required to implement this finding into routine Orthopaedic practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Outcomes following gel-based autologous chondrocyte implantation for articular cartilage defects of the knee.

BACKGROUND: Gel-based autologous chondrocyte implantation (GACI) enables a simpler and more effective delivery of chondrocytes with reproducible three-dimensional structural restoration of the articular cartilage surface. There is limited documentation of medium-term outcomes. This study assessed safety and effectiveness of GACI for treatment of cartilage defects of the knee. METHODS: This multicentric retrospective study was conducted across eight hospitals in India. Patients who had undergone GACI (CARTIGROW®) between 2008 and 2014 for the treatment of focal articular cartilage defects of the knee (mean defect size 4.5 ± 5.8 cm2) in limbs with normal alignment were analyzed. Primary outcomes were changes in Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale score, and Knee Outcome Sports Activity Scale (SAS). RESULTS: A total of 107 patients (110 knee joints) with mean age 31.0 ± 10.5 years were included. The mean follow-up was 9.8 ± 1.5 years (range 7.85-13.43). Majority had osteochondritis dissecans (n = 51; 46.4%). The mean Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale score (81.23 ± 13.21 vs. 51.32 ± 17.89; p < 0.0001) and SAS score (80.93 ± 8.26 vs. 28.11 ± 12.28; p < 0.0001) improved significantly at follow-up as compared to pre-operative. Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue score in 39 patients at minimum 2 years follow-up was 84.5 ± 4.3. Among 30 patients who were playing sports before treatment, 17 patients (56.7%) could return to the same or higher level of sports post-transplantation. No major intra-operative or post-operative complications were noted. Four patients warranted revision surgery. CONCLUSION: GACI is an effective treatment option for large focal articular cartilage defects of the knee with a low complication rate and revision rate and significant improvement in functional scores.

Specific considerations in female patients with patellar instability: current concepts.

Prior literature suggests that patellofemoral instability (PFI) is significantly more prevalent in women than in men. This higher prevalence is commonly attributed to anatomical differences between sexes, particularly with patellofemoral alignment. These differences encompass a higher rate of trochlear dysplasia (TD), patella alta, an increased Q angle, and soft tissue imbalances. In recent years, worse outcomes have been reported in female patients after patellofemoral stabilization surgery using medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) alone or in combination with a tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO), for this reason an "à la carte" plan (addressing the individuals anatomical risk factors) could be more appropriate for female patients.

Combined knee osteotomy and cartilage procedure for varus knees: friend or foe? A narrative review of the literature.

Varus knees with associated cartilage pathologies are not uncommon scenarios that present to orthopaedic surgeons. There is no agreement on the ideal management of varus knees with concomitant cartilage pathology. Through a literature review, the authors tried to answer three main questions: On October 2022, OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases were searched. Clinical studies reporting on clinical, radiologic, or macroscopic cartilage regeneration following either isolated knee osteotomy or concomitant osteotomy and a cartilage procedure were reviewed. Despite controversies, the literature demonstrated favourable outcomes of combined knee osteotomy and a cartilage procedure in patients with substantial deformity and cartilage defects. Isolated high tibial osteotomy may induce cartilage regeneration in several scenarios and severities of concomitant malalignment and cartilage defects. There are recommendations that knee osteotomy should be added to a cartilage procedure when an extra-articular deformity of > 5° is detected. Some studies report good outcomes for combining a knee osteotomy with cartilage grafting, but they lack a control group of isolated osteotomy. There is still scarce of evidence on the influence of osteotomies on cartilage regeneration and the outcomes of concomitant osteotomy and different cartilage procedures vs isolated osteotomies. With advanced statistical evaluation (artificial intelligence, machine learning) of big datasets, more answers and better results will be delivered.

Revision ACL reconstruction in female athletes: current concepts.

The challenge of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction lies in its complexity, varied presentation, and technical intricacies. A successful ACL reconstruction should allow patients to safely return to preinjury activities. However, it is only sometimes simple, and many risk factors and concurrent pathologies come into play. Evaluating and analysing the cause of failure and associated conditions is paramount to addressing them effectively. Despite a plethora of research and improvements in knowledge and technology, e gaps exist in issues such as optimal techniques of revision surgery, graft options, fixation, concurrent procedures, rehabilitation and protocol for return to sports of high-level athletes. Female athletes need additional focus since they are at higher risk of re-injury, suboptimal clinical outcomes, and lower rates of return to sport following revision reconstruction. Our understanding about injury prevention and the protection of ACL grafts in female athletes needs to be improved. This review focuses on the current state of revision ACL surgery in female athletes and provides recommendations and future directions for optimising outcomes in this high-risk group.

Distal Kaplan fibers and anterolateral ligament injuries are associated with greater intra-articular internal tibial rotation in ACL-deficient knees based on magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to assess the internal rotation of the tibia on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in a series of consecutive athletes with Anterior cruciate Ligament (ACL) tears. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed to include all consecutive patients who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction between January 2022 and June 2022. The angle between surgical epicondylar axes (SEA) of the knee and posterior tibial condyles (PTC) was measured. A negative value was defined as internal torsion. KFs and ALL injuries were reported. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to examine the independent associations between SEA-PTC angle and injuries of KFs and ALL adjusted for physical variables (age, gender and body mass index [BMI]). Statistical significance was set at a p-value of < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 83 eligible patients were included. The result of multiple linear regression analysis showed that internal tibial rotation was associated with KFs and ALL injuries. The estimated average of SEA-PTC angle in relation to ALL injuries controlling the other variables was -5.49 [95%CI -6.79 - (-4.18)] versus -2.99 [95%CI -4.55 - (-1.44)] without ALL injuries. On the other hand, the estimated average of SEA-PTC angle in relation to KFs lesions controlling the other variables was -5.73 [95%CI -7.04 - (-4.43)] versus -2.75 [95%CI -4.31 - (-1.18)] without KFs injuries. CONCLUSIONS: KFs and ALL injuries were associated with an increased intra-articular internal tibial rotation in ACL-deficient knees. The measurement of femorotibial rotation on axial MRI could be useful to detect indirect signs of anterolateral complex (ALC) injuries.

CT scan analysis of implant mating comparing APA versus TEA in simultaneous bilateral TKA: One technique per knee.

BACKGROUND: The optimal landmark for setting femoral component rotation in primary TKA remains a debate. This study compares the Anterior-Posterior Axis (APA) versus the Transepicondylar Axis (TEA) in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA, where one reference line was randomized to each knee. Implant mating was assessed via post-operative CT scans. METHOD: The study included 32 patients with osteoarthritis in both knees with similar varus deformities. All patients underwent the same surgical procedure on both knees, aside from the selected femoral rotation axis line: APA randomized to one side and TEA to the contralateral. Post-operative CT scans were performed in extension to assess in-vivo mating. RESULTS: CT scan analysis showed mean rotation of the femoral implant externally rotated relative to the radiographic TEA with no significant difference between the APA and TEA groups (p = 0.28). Tibial implant rotation was also externally rotated to the radiographic TEA with no significant difference (p = 0.59). Femoral-tibial implant mating showed a mean external rotation of the tibia relative to the femur in both groups: 0.86 ± 4.0° external rotation in the APA group and 0.23 ± 3.7° external rotation in the TEA group. There was no significant difference between groups (p = 0.52). The range of mating mismatch was 15° in the APA group and 16.5° in the TEA group. CONCLUSIONS: When using a measured resection, posterior referencing technique, post-operative femoral-tibial implant mating measured by CT scan showed no superiority comparing the APA method versus the TEA method. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Randomized prospective study.

No difference in patient reported outcomes, laxity, and failure rate after revision ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon compared to hamstring tendon graft: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to synthesize and quantitatively assess the outcomes of ACL Revision using a quadriceps tendon (QT) graft and to compare them with those of ACL Revisions performed with hamstring tendons (HT) graft. METHODS: A comprehensive search based on the PRISMA protocol was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception until February 2022. Clinical studies reporting the outcomes of ACL Revision with QT autograft were included. Subjective and Objective IKDC, Tegner activity level, Lysholm knee score, KOOS score, VAS for pain, knee laxity (KT-1000/2000 arthrometer, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test), and graft failure were assessed. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed and a quality assessment of the included studies was carried out with the MINORS score. RESULTS: Seven studies met the selection criteria and were included in the systematic review for the qualitative synthesis of data. A pooled mean of all the variables was provided for the 7 studies, while 3 studies included a control group of ACL Revision with HT and were included in a meta-analysis. A total of 420 participants with a mean age of 28.9 ± 10.5 years and a mean postoperative follow-up of 39.3 ± 16.4 months were assessed. Of these, 277 patients underwent ACL Revision with QT and 143 patients underwent ACL Revision with HT. In the QT group, average graft failure was 9.8% compared to 17.4% in the HT group. KOOS Sport and pivot-shift test showed better postoperative outcomes in QT than HT, although it was not statistically significant (p = 0.052). CONCLUSION: The QT autograft was associated with an improved trend of rotatory laxity, PROMs and failure rate compared to HT autograft after revision ACL reconstruction. The QT autograft for revision ACL reconstruction is supported by the current literature. It is a viable graft that should be considered for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament surgery. A worldwide benchmark study.

OBJECTIVES: To benchmark current trends on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery. METHODS: The largest worldwide ACLR survey to date was performed during May 2020, targeted to reach representation of all continents. It was submitted electronically to all International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports surgeons (n = 3,026), asking those who perform ACLR to respond. RESULTS: With a final sample size of 2,107, the overall response rate was 69.6%. Median years of practice as orthopaedic surgeon was 15 (range 1-52) and 49.6% of all respondents were defined as high-volume surgeons (>50 ACLR annually). Hamstrings tendon autograft was the preferred graft for primary ACLR (80.3%) and the medial portal femoral drilling was the most frequently used technique (78.5%). Cortical buttons (82.7%) and bioabsorbable screws (62.7%) were the preferred fixation methods for hamstring tendon autograft ACLR in femur and tibia, respectively. Metallic screws (45.2%) were the preferred fixation methods for bone patellar tendon bone autograft in femur and tibia. Most of the respondents routinely used pre-tensioning techniques for their graft preparation (63.8%), but less than half of surgeons preferred antibiotic soaking of the grafts (45.3%). The preferred knee position for graft fixation was 10-30° of knee flexion and neutral rotation (57.0%). The addition of anterolateral augmentation (or extra-articular tenodesis) was infrequent in primary and isolated ACLR (10.0%), but a statistically significant raise was seen for revision surgeries (20.0%). Most used brace in the initial postoperative rehabilitation (54.9%) and the time to allow patients to fully resume sports was at an average of 8.9 ± 2.0 months. Treatment algorithm of paediatric ACL injuries exhibited a low consensus among the respondents. CONCLUSION: This worldwide survey benchmarks the current trends in ACL reconstruction, achieving the largest participation of surgeons to date. Among the great variety of options available for ACL reconstructions, surgeons' preferences showed some differences according to their location and expertise. Reporting trends in practice, and not only the evidence, is important to medical education and providing patients the safest care possible. This is a Level V, expert opinion study.

Short graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Current concepts.

Short graft anterior cruciate igament reconstruction is increasing in popularity for performing a primary ACLR. The short graft coupled with the all-inside technique using closed sockets and suspensory fixation at both femoral and tibial ends are its defining features. The outcomes of this technique have been comparable to well established transportal ACLR techniques. It has the benefits of preserved hamstring strength and less pain attributed to transtibial drilling. However, there is a learning curve involved and will require time before mastery of the technique. Furthermore, in combined osteotomy or multiligament surgery, the use of short graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with sockets preserve bone stock and the single tendon harvest spares the other tendons for use in other ligament reconstruction.

Both low and high knee flexion angles during tibial graft fixation yield comparable outcomes following ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft: A systematic review.

IMPORTANCE: A paucity of clinical evidence surrounds the effect of the knee flexion angle during tibial fixation of the graft during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While biomechanical studies have recently sought to revive this area of study in both single- and double-bundle graft populations, they have done so using variants of the hamstring graft. This does not shed light on the optimal fixation of other autograft options, namely, the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of the knee flexion angle during tibial graft fixation on functional and clinical outcomes following ACL reconstruction using single-bundle QT autograft, inclusive of both soft-tissue and bone-plug graft types. EVIDENCE REVIEW: An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was carried out from database inception to June 2020. Following study screening, patient demographics and fixation technique as well as both subjective and objective clinical outcomes were abstracted. Studies were divided based on the knee flexion angle during tibial fixation of the graft. The low knee flexion angle (L-KFA) group included patients with a tibial fixation angle of < 30° of flexion, and the high knee flexion (H-KFA) group included those with a tibial fixation of exactly 30° of flexion. The data were qualitatively synthesized due to significant heterogeneity across the included studies. FINDINGS: Sixteen studies (1,169 patients) were included for analysis. There were 675 patients in the L-KFA group (mean age range, 18.7-34.5 years) and 494 patients in the H-KFA group (mean age range, of 23.2-32.1 years). Both groups yielded statistically significant improvements from preoperative to postoperative scores across several functional and clinical outcomes. Return to pre-injury activity levels ranged from 64% to 81% in L-KFA studies and from 73.3% to 86.7% in H-KFA studies. All-cause graft failure rates ranged from 1.4% to 4.3% in L-FKA studies and from 0%-10.7% in H-KFA studies. CONCLUSION: Both low- and high-knee flexion angles during tibial graft fixation produce improved postoperative clinical and functional outcomes with comparable outcomes across groups. There is inconclusive evidence to recommend the ideal knee flexion angle for graft fixation in primary ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Anterior Closing Wedge Osteotomy for Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: State of the Art.

The sagittal anatomy of the proximal tibia has a bearing on the forces exerted on the cruciate ligaments. A high posterior tibial slope is now a well-known risk factor causing failure of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. The posterior slope can be calculated on short or full-length radiographs, MRI scans, or three-dimensional CT scans. Reducing the slope surgically by a sagittal tibial osteotomy is biomechanically protective for the ACL graft. An anterior closing wedge osteotomy may be contemplated when the lateral tibial slope is greater than 12°, in the setting of ACL reconstruction failure(s). Careful surgical planning to calculate the correction, taking into account knee hyperextension and patella height, is critical to avoid complications. It can be done above, at, or below the tibial tuberosity level. A transtuberosity correction can be done with or without a tibial tubercle osteotomy. This complex surgery can be conducted safely by meticulous execution to protect the posterior hinge and neurovascular structures and achieving stable fixation with staples. The limited literature available justifies the usage of anterior closing wedge osteotomy in appropriately selected patients.

ACL repair for athletes?

Background: The current gold standard treatment for an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear in an athlete is an arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with autografts. This restores the knee stability but is associated with unique complications like graft re-tear, kinesiophobia and graft donor site morbidity. ACL suture repair (ACLSR) is an attractive alternative method of surgical management of this injury. Current science of ACLSR: The potential advantages of performing a repair are the preservation of native biology and proprioceptive function of ACL, elimination of a graft and preservation of bone stock. The purported benefits are better stability, reduction of kinesiophobia and faster rehabilitation. ACLSR is now performed only for proximal (femoral-sided) tears in the acute phase, when the tissue quality is good and using high-strength nonabsorbable sutures. There are several techniques for performing ACLSR but broadly speaking are either non-augmented, static augmented with suture tape, dynamic augmented or using bio-scaffolds. Clinical outcome of ACLSR: There is a lot of literature on ACLSRs including case series, cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. The results from these studies are encouraging but mostly pertain to patient reported outcome measures, are in small numbers and in the short-term. The results are also inconsistent across different studies and not specifically performed for the athletic population. Moreover, most of these studies are from the innovator or designer surgeons and groups and have not been independently validated. Conclusion: Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend ACLSR as a preferred method of managing even acute proximal tears in athletes. Improved rates of return to sports, lower retear rate and lesser kinesiophobia needs to be proven in athletes.

Prophylaxis for preventing venous thromboembolism in knee arthroscopy and soft tissue reconstruction: consensus statements from an international panel of experts.

PURPOSE: There is a lack of consensus regarding need for Venous Thrombo Embolism (VTE) prophylaxis following arthroscopic knee surgery and open soft tissue knee reconstruction. Clear cut guidelines like ones for trauma surgery and arthroplasty do not exist and the published literature is limited to case reports with a few society guidelines. Given this lack of consensus, we conducted a modified Delphi questionnaire of international experts to provide recommendations on this topic. METHODS: The consensus statements were generated using an anonymised 3 round modified Delphi questionnaire, sent to an international panel of 38 knee surgeons, with an 80% agreement being set as the limit for consensus. The responses were analysed using descriptive statistics with measures like mode, median and box plots. Feedback was provided to all panelists based on responses from the previous rounds to help generate the consensus. RESULTS: Six consensus statements were generated after the three rounds of Delphi. Patient factors, prolonged surgery duration and family history of thrombogenic events emerged as the main points to be taken into consideration for prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: It was established through this study, that there exists a select group of patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery that justify the usage of VTE prophylaxis. The expert responses to most of the questions in different scenarios favoured usage of VTE prophylaxis based on patient factors like advanced age, past history of VTE, smoking, oral contraceptive use etc. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Comparison of Anterior-Posterior Axis Versus Transepicondylar Axis in Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: One Technique per Knee.

BACKGROUND: In primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the preferred reference line for setting femoral component rotation is debatable. This study compared the anterior-posterior axis line (APAL) versus the transepicondylar axis line (TEAL) in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA using a measured resection technique where one reference line was randomized to each knee. METHODS: This prospective study compared the two reference lines using posterior knee referencing with a cemented posterior stabilized knee. The study included 32 patients with osteoarthritis with both knees having similar varus knee deformities. All patients had the same surgical procedure with the only change being the selected femoral rotation axis line. Patients were followed up for a minimum of two years. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in any of the measured radiographic, operative, and clinical parameters, except for a postoperative radiographic limb alignment (APAL 179.7° vs TEAL 180.1° P = .04). The mean femoral external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis line (PCAL) was 3.0 degrees (0-7 degrees) using the APAL and 3.3 degrees (2-7 degrees) using the TEAL (P = .46). Two-year knee flexion and revised Oxford Knee Scores showed no difference. Seventy-five percent of patients stated no preference for either knee technique. CONCLUSION: When using a measured resection, a posterior referencing technique, we found no difference in knee function and scores when setting femoral component rotation using the APAL versus TEAL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2, Randomized prospective study.

Outcomes of Combined Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Repair and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Background: Lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) almost always occur in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Their repair is advocated to restore the stabilizing and load-sharing functions of the meniscus. Purpose: To study the functional outcomes of combined arthroscopic repair of LMPRTs and ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The authors evaluated patients who underwent simultaneous arthroscopic ACLR and LMPRT repair. All patients had chronic injuries, with a mean time since ACL rupture of 7.9 months. Patient characteristics, Lachman and pivot-shift test results, type of LMPRT, associated injuries, and surgery details were documented. Pre- and postoperative functional status was assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Lysholm score. An independent single-tunnel transtibial repair using 2 SutureTapes was performed for Forkel type 1 and 3 tear root avulsions, while side-to-side suture repair was performed for type 2 radial/oblique tears. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the IKDC score were used for statistical analysis. Results: Included were 25 patients with a mean age of 29.6 ± 6.5 years. Of these, 22 patients (88%; 95% CI, 73.1%-100%) had a high-grade (grade 2 or 3) preoperative pivot shift. Diagnosis of the LMPRT on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans was possible only in 5 patients (20%). At final evaluation, performed at 37.4 ± 7.1 months postoperatively, all functional scores had improved significantly from preoperatively: IKDC score, from 47.6 ± 9.5 to 81.8 ± 11.5; KOOS, from 45.5 ± 10.9 to 86.5 ± 10.3, and Lysholm score, from 49.0 ± 11.5 to 88.8 ± 7.6 (P < .001 for all). Twenty-four patients (96%) achieved the MCID for the IKDC score. All knees had a negative pivot shift at final analysis, and no patient underwent revision ACLR or LMPRT repair. Conclusion: LMPRT repair combined with ACLR led to good short-term clinical outcomes in this study. An LMPRT may frequently go undetected on preoperative MRI scans, but a high-grade pivot shift is present in a large majority of these patients.

Anatomic medial knee reconstruction restores stability and function at minimum 2 years follow-up.

PURPOSE: Chronic grade 3 tears of the medial collateral ligament and posterior oblique ligament may result in valgus laxity and anteromedial rotational instability after an isolated or multiligament injury. The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze the restoration of physiologic medial laxity as assessed on stress radiography and patient reported subjective functional outcomes in patients who undergo an anatomic medial knee reconstruction. METHODS: This was a prospective study which included patients with chronic (> 6 weeks old) posteromedial corner injury with or without other ligament and meniscus lesions. Pre- and post-operative valgus stress radiographs were performed in 20° knee flexion and functional outcome was recorded as per the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores. All patients underwent anatomic medial reconstruction with two femoral and two tibial sockets using ipsilateral hamstring tendon autograft. Simultaneous ligament and meniscus surgery was performed as per the associated injury pattern. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months post-surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (23 males, 11 females) were enrolled in the study and all were available till final follow-up of mean 49.7 ± 14.9 months. The mean age was 30.6 ± 7.9 (18-52 years). Two patients had isolated medial sided lesions and 23 had associated ligament injuries. The mean follow up was 49.7 (24-72) months. The mean IKDC score improved from 58 ± 8.3 to 78.2 ± 9.5 (p < 0.001). Post-operatively there were 15 excellent, 11 good and 8 fair outcomes on Lysholm score. The mean pre-operative valgus side-to-side opening improved from 7.5 ± 2.5 mm to 1.2 ± 0.7 mm on stress radiography (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anatomic reconstruction of the superficial medial collateral and posterior oblique ligaments restore stability in a consistent manner cases of chronic grade 3 instability. The objective functional results, subjective outcomes and measures of static medial stability are satisfactory in the short term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.