Lidocaine effect on flotillin-2 distribution in detergent-resistant membranes of equine jejunal smooth muscle in vitro.

Lidocaine is the most commonly chosen prokinetic for treating postoperative ileus in horses, a motility disorder associated with ischaemia-reperfusion injury of intestinal tissues. Despite the frequent use of lidocaine, the mechanism underlying its prokinetic effects is still unclear. Previous studies suggested that lidocaine altered cell membrane characteristics of smooth muscle cells. Therefore, the present study aimed to elucidate effects of lidocaine administration on characteristics of detergent-resistant membranes in equine jejunal smooth muscle. Lidocaine administration caused significant redistribution of flotillin-2, a protein marker of detergent-resistant membranes, in fractions of sucrose-density-gradients obtained from ischaemia-reperfusion injured smooth muscle solubilised with Triton X-100. It was concluded that lidocaine induced disruption of detergent-resistant membranes which might affect ion channel activity and therefore enhance smooth muscle contractility.

In vitro effects of lidocaine on contractility of circular and longitudinal equine intestinal smooth muscle.

The purpose of the study was to compare the contractility-enhancing effects of lidocaine in equine jejunal circular (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) in vitro. In previous studies, more pronounced effects of lidocaine were observed in ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injured smooth muscle. Therefore in this study, effects were examined in both non-injured control tissues and tissues challenged by a defined, artificial IR injury. Isometric contractile performance of CSM and LSM, assessed by frequency (F), amplitude (A) and mean active force (MAF) of contractions, was defined as contractility. LSM featured lower basic contractility compared to CSM. Lidocaine provoked contractility-enhancing effects in both smooth muscle layers, but except for F at high lidocaine concentrations, contractility of LSM remained lower throughout the trial. Additionally, higher lidocaine concentrations were required to cause significant effects in LSM. No differences were observed in contractility of control and IR injured smooth muscle, but higher lidocaine concentrations were needed to provoke effects in IR injured smooth muscle. In contrast to CSM, contractility of LSM did not decrease at comparably high lidocaine concentrations. Differences in basic contractility of CSM and LSM might be explained by physiologically lower activity of LSM per se or by a thinner LSM layer with fewer smooth muscle cells taking part in contractions. The smaller thickness of the LSM layer may also contribute to persisting discrepancies in contractility following lidocaine application. Additionally, variations in lidocaine concentrations necessary for inducing significant effects could result from differences in the molecular structure of CSM and LSM cells.

Lidocaine and structure-related mexiletine induce similar contractility-enhancing effects in ischaemia-reperfusion injured equine intestinal smooth muscle in vitro.

Postoperative ileus (POI) is a severe complication following small intestinal surgery in horses. It was hypothesised that prokinetic effects of lidocaine, the most commonly chosen drug for treatment of POI, resulted from drug integration into smooth muscle (SM) cell membranes, thereby modulating cell membrane properties. This would probably depend on the structural and lipophilic characteristics of lidocaine. To assess the influence of molecular structure and lipophilicity on prokinetic effects in vitro, the current study compared the effects of lidocaine with four structure-related drugs, namely, mexiletine, bupivacaine, tetracaine and procaine. The response to cumulative drug administration and reversibility of effects were tested by measuring isometric contractile performance of equine jejunal circular SM strips, challenged by a standardised, artificial in vivo ischaemia-reperfusion injury. A second set of SM strips were incubated with the different drugs to determine changes in creatine kinase (CK) release. All drugs caused a drug-specific increase in contractility, although only lidocaine and mexiletine induced similar concentration-dependent curve progressions, significantly reduced CK release, and featured shorter recovery times of tissue contractility after washing, compared to bupivacaine and tetracaine. In was concluded that the structural and lipophilic similarity of mexiletine and lidocaine were responsible for the similar effects of these drugs on SM contractility and cell membrane permeability, which supported the hypothesis that prokinetic effects of lidocaine are based on interactions with SM cell membranes modulated by these features.