RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the realm of academia, psychosocial risk factors play a pivotal role, exerting considerable influence on the well-being and performance of scholars. Factors such as excessive workloads, unrelenting performance expectations, time constraints, and competitive atmospheres can detrimentally affect their health and overall quality of life. Moreover, issues like social isolation, work-life imbalance, and academic anxiety further compound these challenges, impeding academic progress and success. OBJECTIVE: Thus, it is imperative to identify, mitigate, and manage psychosocial risk factors effectively to foster a conducive academic environment conducive to productivity and achievement. METHODS: This study employs a novel approach, integrating expert opinions and utilizing sine trigonometry Pythagorean fuzzy numbers to ascertain the degrees of importance and rank psychosocial risk factors through the DEMATEL method. This methodology presents a unique contribution to existing literature, offering fresh insights into this critical area of study. RESULTS: Evaluation of 25 factors reveals burnout, job dissatisfaction, precarious working conditions, lack of trust, unfair treatment, job insecurity, and limited developmental opportunities as primary concerns, underscoring the multifaceted nature of these challenges. CONCLUSIONS: In the occupational sphere, active participation from all stakeholders in addressing psychosocial risks is paramount for effective problem resolution. It is incumbent upon parties involved to discharge their duties, foster collaboration, enhance working conditions, ensure equity, and facilitate avenues for professional growth. Each identified risk factor addressed and preempted translates into a tangible reduction in workplace accidents and occupational ailments, underscoring the tangible benefits of proactive risk management.
RESUMEN
In the construction industry, most safety culture studies are limited to a single country, with minimal attention to cross-country studies. This limits creating a foundation for a robust framework and reliable safety culture scale. This study addresses this gap by studying safety culture in 10 countries, including those without previous studies. The survey instrument, completed by 311 construction employees, identified seven key factors measuring safety culture, with content and construct validity ensuring the reliability and validity of survey findings. Results indicated that work experience, education level and employment status have significant impacts on employees' safety culture. Additionally, similarities and differences in these factors across countries were investigated, and the fatalism and optimism factor and the work pressure and priority factor are the most significant contributors to the weakening of safety culture in the construction industry. This research allows industry practitioners to systematically assess on-site safety culture, oversee practices and improve.