Off-Label Use of Intravenous Olanzapine for Agitation After Neurologic Injury.

Background: Small studies have described the off-label use of intravenous (IV) olanzapine for the management of acute agitation. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IV olanzapine to manage acutely agitated patients with neurological injuries. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of IV olanzapine use in patients admitted to the neurotrauma and neurovascular intensive care units at a single academic center. The primary endpoint was the requirement of additional IV olanzapine, IV benzodiazepine, or IV haloperidol within 60 minutes from the time of first IV olanzapine dose. Secondary safety endpoints included QTc prolongation and respiratory depression. Results: Forty-six patients received IV olanzapine during the study period. One patient required an additional dose of IV olanzapine and two patients received benzodiazepine or antipsychotic agents within 60 minutes of IV olanzapine administration. One patient had a post-administration QTc level >500 ms. Two patients had an increased oxygen requirement, but none required intubation. Conclusion: IV olanzapine appears to be efficacious in reducing the need for sedatives and antipsychotics with low risk for QTc prolongation and respiratory depression in acutely agitated patients with neurological injuries.

Use of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7] as an AKI risk screening tool to manage patients in the real-world setting.

PURPOSE: To determine the application of various components of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) bundle in managing patients at high-risk for AKI progression ([TIMP2]•[IGFBP7] >0.3) in the real-world setting. METHODS: Patients with a [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7] test ordered between 5/23/16-2/28/18 were evaluated. We reviewed the medical record for evidence of implementation of the KDIGO bundle in response to biomarker test results. Evidence including explicit documentation in physicians' note discussing [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7] results and implicit evidence from review of dose adjusted medications, discontinued nephrotoxins and therapeutic drug monitoring. RESULTS: 105 [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7] tests were conducted in 100 patients (54% female; mean age 55.4 ± 16.8; 89% in the ICU). Sixty-one patients had a value of >0.3 and 46 (75.4%) of these patients received at least one management strategy consistent with KDIGO. By contrast, nine patients (23.1%) with [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7] ≤0.3 received one or more components of the KDIGO bundle (p < .001). CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting the use of urinary [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7] as an AKI risk screening tool resulted in differential application of various components of the KDIGO bundle for patient management for those with a positive test result.

Pharmacology for the geriatric surgical patient.

Alterations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics place geriatric patients at an increased risk of experiencing an adverse drug event. The incidence of medication-related adverse events can be decreased with careful selection of agents and appropriate dosage adjustments.

Evaluation of feeding intolerance in patients with pentobarbital-induced coma.

BACKGROUND: There is considerable debate regarding the appropriateness of feeding patients by the enteral route in conjunction with pentobarbital coma therapy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of feeding intolerance (FI) in patients receiving pentobarbital in conjunction with enteral nutrition (EN). METHODS: A retrospective, observational evaluation of patients (>14 y of age) who received a therapeutic pentobarbital coma in combination with EN was conducted. Patients were divided into groups, based on the occurrence of FI defined as aspiration of gastric residuals greater than 75 mL for 2 consecutive measurements. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent (29 of 61) of patients experienced FI based on our definition. The median pentobarbital infusion rate did not differ significantly between patients who experienced FI versus those who did not (median [intraquartile range, IQR] 1.8 mg/kg/h [1.4, 2.1] vs 1.7 mg/kg/h [1.4, 2.5]; p = 0.680). The total pentobarbital bolus dose during the first 24 hours of therapy was lower in patients who experienced FI (700 mg [225, 980] vs 1000 mg [600, 1475]; p = 0.029). Median duration of pentobarbital therapy was comparable between groups (141.0 h [93.3, 217.3] vs 116.3 h [64.0, 174.8]; p = 0.115). Other factors with the potential to influence FI, such as catecholamines, neuromuscular blockade, and hyperglycemia, were similar between groups. The higher narcotic doses and greater percentage of patients receiving benzodiazepines in the FI group warrants further study. CONCLUSIONS: Pentobarbital therapy did not preclude use of EN in the entire study population. In addition, FI did not occur at a greater frequency in patients who received a higher dosage, a longer duration, or an earlier initiation of pentobarbital therapy.