Intraoperative Ultrasound-Guided Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer: No More Time for Blind Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) still remains a blind surgery despite all available tumor localization methods. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) allows real-time visualization during all resection phases. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted at the Veneto Institute of Oncology between January 2021 and June 2022. Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ, T1-2 invasive cancer, or post-neoadjuvant tumors, suitable for BCS, were recruited. All breast cancer lesion types were included, i.e. solid palpable, solid non-palpable, non-solid non-palpable, and post-neoadjuvant treatment residual lesions. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to either IOUS or traditional surgery (TS) in a 1:1 ratio. The main outcomes were surgical margin involvement, reoperation rate, closest margin width, main specimen and cavity shaving margin volumes, excess healthy tissue removal, and calculated resection ratio (CRR). RESULTS: Overall, 160 patients were enrolled: 80 patients were allocated to the TS group and 80 to the IOUS group. IOUS significantly reduced specimen volumes (16.8 cm3 [10.5-28.9] vs. 24.3 cm3 [15.0-41.3]; p = 0.015), with wider closest resection margin width (2.0 mm [1.0-4.0] vs. 1.0 mm [0.5-2.0] after TS; p < 0.001). Tumor volume to specimen volume ratio was significantly higher after IOUS (4.7% [2.5-9.1] vs. 2.9% [0.8-5.2]; p < 0.001). IOUS yielded significantly better CRR (84.5% [46-120.8] vs. 114% [81.8-193.2] after TS; p < 0.001), lower involved margin rate (2.5 vs. 15%; p = 0.009) and reduced re-excision rate (2.5 vs. 12.5%; p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: IOUS allows real-time resection margin visualization and continuous control during BCS. It showed clear superiority over TS in both oncological and surgical outcomes for all breast cancer lesion types. These results disfavor the paradigm of blind breast surgery.

Analysis of insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue of patients with primary aldosteronism.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the effect of high aldosterone levels on insulin sensitivity of adipose tissue in humans. METHODS: Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) was obtained from patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA; n=14) and, as controls, nonfunctioning adenoma (NFA; n=14) undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Homeostasis model assessment index was higher and potassium was lower in APA than NFA (P<0.05). Immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and real-time PCR were used to detect and quantify mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) expression. Transcript levels of peroxisome proliferative-activated receptor-gamma, insulin receptor, glucose transporter 4, insulin receptor substrate-1 and -2, leptin, adiponectin, IL-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-alpha, 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD11B) type 1, and HSD11B2 were quantified. The effect of increasing aldosterone concentrations on 2-deoxy-[3H]d-glucose uptake was tested in human sc abdominal adipocytes. RESULTS: Expression of MR was demonstrated in VAT, with no difference between APA and NFA as to mRNA levels of MR, GRalpha, HSD11B1, and glucose metabolism and inflammation factors. In cultured adipocytes, basal and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake were unaffected by 1-100 nM (normal/hyperaldosteronism) and impaired only by much higher, up to 10 microM, aldosterone concentrations. The impairment was prevented by RU486 but not by eplerenone. CONCLUSIONS: Gene expression of insulin signaling/inflammatory molecules was similar in VAT of APA and NFA patients, not supporting an effect of aldosterone excess on insulin sensitivity of adipose tissues. Only at pharmacological concentrations and through GR activation, aldosterone reduced glucose uptake in adipocytes. Insulin resistance in primary aldosteronism might occur in compartments other than fat and/or depend on concurrent environmental factors.