Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Kidney J ; 17(7): sfae141, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38989279

RESUMEN

Background: The use of diuretics in patients on haemodialysis (HD) is thought to maintain diuresis. However, this assumption and the optimal dose are based on little scientific evidence, and associations with clinical outcomes are unclear. Methods: We reported international variations in diuretic use and loop diuretic dose across 27 759 HD patients with dialysis vintage <1 year in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study phases 2-5 (2002-2015), a prospective cohort study. Doses of torsemide (4:1) and bumetanide (80:1) were converted to oral furosemide-equivalent doses. Adjusted Cox, logistic and linear regressions were used to investigate the association of diuretic use and dose with outcomes. Results: Diuretic utilization varied widely by country at vintage <3 months, ranging from >80% in Germany and Sweden to <35% in the USA, at a median dose ranging from 400-500 mg/day in Germany and Sweden to <100 mg/day in Japan and the USA. Neither diuretic use nor higher doses were associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, a higher risk of hospitalization for fracture or elevated parathyroid hormone levels, but the prescription of higher doses (>200 mg/day) was associated with a higher risk of all-cause hospitalization. Conclusions: Substantial international differences exist in diuretic prescriptions, with use and doses much higher in some European countries than the USA. The prescription and higher doses of loop diuretics was not associated with improved outcomes.

2.
J Nephrol ; 30(5): 653-661, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28386879

RESUMEN

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with mineral and bone disorders (MBD) that are now considered as a syndrome. Bone fragility and a four to tenfold increased rate of skeletal fractures are often reported in CKD patients. The evaluation of the risk of these fractures in CKD patients should explore the same risk factors identified for the general population including low body weight, menopause, personal and familial history of osteoporosis, chronic inflammatory diseases, and corticosteroid therapy. The aim of this article is to provide a critical review of the tools used for the evaluation of bone loss and the risk of fracture in CKD patients, ranging from the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD), fracture risk assessment (Frax™), quantitative computed tomography (QCT), high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQTC), to circulating biomarkers of bone metabolism including vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and some collagen type 1-related molecules indicators of bone remodeling.


Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea , Trastorno Mineral y Óseo Asociado a la Enfermedad Renal Crónica/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastorno Mineral y Óseo Asociado a la Enfermedad Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Hormona Paratiroidea/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Absorciometría de Fotón , Fosfatasa Alcalina/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Trastorno Mineral y Óseo Asociado a la Enfermedad Renal Crónica/etiología , Humanos , Osteocalcina/sangre , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Vitamina D/sangre
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA