Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 143, 2024 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678180

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews suggest that nurse-led interventions improve short-term blood pressure (BP) control for people with hypertension. However, the long-term effects, adverse events, and appropriate target BP level are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of nurse-led interventions. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and CINAHL, as well as three Japanese article databases, as relevant randomized controlled trials from the oldest possible to March 2021. This search was conducted on 17 April 2021. We did an update search on 17 October 2023. We included studies on adults aged 18 years or older with hypertension. The treatments of interest were community-based nurse-led BP control interventions in addition to primary physician-provided care as usual. The comparator was usual care only. Primary outcomes were long-term achievement of BP control goals and serious adverse events (range: 27 weeks to 3 years). Secondary outcomes were short-term achievement of BP control goals and serious adverse events (range: 4 to 26 weeks), change of systolic and diastolic BP from baseline, medication adherence, incidence of hypertensive complications, and total mortality. RESULTS: We included 35 studies. Nurse-led interventions improved long-term BP control (RR 1.10, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.18). However, no significant differences were found in the short-term effects of nurse-led intervention compared to usual care about BP targets. Little information on serious adverse events was available. There was no difference in mortality at both terms between the two groups. Establishing the appropriate target BP from the extant trials was impossible. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led interventions may be more effective than usual care for achieving BP control at long-term follow-up. It is important to continue lifestyle modification for people with hypertension. We must pay attention to adverse events, and more studies examining appropriate BP targets are needed. Nurse-led care represents an important complement to primary physician-led usual care.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Hipertensión/enfermería , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería
2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 166(2): 580-595, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38287690

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of cardiotocography (CTG) to improve neonatal outcomes is controversial. The medical settings, subjects, utilizations, and interpretation guidelines of CTG are unclear for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). OBJECTIVES: To assess and review CTG use for studies identified in LMICs and provide insights on the potential for effective use of CTG to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: The databases Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for published and unpublished literature through September 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: Publications were identified which were conducted in LMICs, based on the World Bank list of economies for 2019; targeting pregnant women in childbirth; and focusing on the utilization of CTG and neonatal outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Publications were screened, and duplicates were removed. A scoping review was conducted using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. RESULTS: The searches generated 1157 hits, of which 67 studies were included in the review. In the studies there was considerable variation and ambiguity regarding the study settings, target populations, utilizations, timing, frequency, and duration of CTG. While cesarean section rates were extensively investigated as an outcome of studies of CTG itself and the effect of additional techniques on CTG, other clinically significant outcomes, including neonatal mortality, were not well reported. CONCLUSIONS: Variations and ambiguities were found in the use of CTG in LMICs. Due to the limited amount of evidence, studies are needed to examine CTG availability in the context of LMICs.


Asunto(s)
Cardiotocografía , Países en Desarrollo , Trabajo de Parto , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Cardiotocografía/métodos , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido , Frecuencia Cardíaca Fetal , Resultado del Embarazo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA