Assessing and treating pain associated with stroke, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury and spasticity. Evidence and recommendations from the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation.

Pain is a common and disabling symptom in patients with stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS), cerebral palsy (CP), spinal cord injury (SCI) and other conditions associated with spasticity, but data on its prevalence, and natural history, as well as guidelines on its assessment and treatment in the field of neurorehabilitation, are largely lacking. The Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation (ICCPN) searched and evaluated current evidence on the frequency, evolution, predictors, assessment, and pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of pain in patients with stroke, MS, CP, SCI and other conditions associated with spasticity. Patients with stroke, MS, CP, and SCI may suffer from pain related to spasticity, as well as nociceptive and neuropathic pain (NP), whose prevalence, natural history, impact on functional outcome, and predictors are only partially known. Diagnosis and assessment of the different types of pain in these patients is important, because their treatment may differ. Botulinum neurotoxin is the first choice treatment for spasticity, while some antidepressant and antiepileptic drugs may be effective on NP, but pharmacological treatment varies according to the underlying disease. In most cases, a single therapy is not sufficient to treat pain, and a multidisciplinary approach, which include pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments is needed. Further studies, and in particular randomized controlled trials, are needed on these topics.

Duloxetine is effective in treating depression in multiple sclerosis patients: an open-label multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: Duloxetine hydrochloride, a dual reuptake inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine, was evaluated for its therapeutic efficacy, safety, and tolerability in the treatment of depression in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Lifetime depression prevalence approaches 50% in MS patients. The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of duloxetine for treatment of depression in MS patients. METHODS: An open-label study evaluated the efficacy of 12 weeks of duloxetine administration (maximal dose = 60 mg/d) in MS patients with clinical depression. The Beck scale score variation after 4 (T1) and 12 (T2) weeks of treatment was used for the primary outcome measurement, whereas secondary outcome was measured using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale. Safety was evaluated by recording treatment-related adverse events, monitoring vital signs, and recording frequency and reasons for interruption or discontinuation of treatment. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were enrolled in the study. Sixty-three patients completed the study by continuing duloxetine treatment for 12 weeks (T2). Twelve subjects dropped out of the study because of adverse effects or noncompliance. Nausea was the most common adverse event reported. A significant reduction in the Beck Depression Inventory and Modified Fatigue Impact Scale scores, after both 4 and 12 weeks of therapy, was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that duloxetine is well tolerated, safe, and effective in reducing depression and fatigue in MS patients.

Prevalence of patient-reported dysphagia in multiple sclerosis patients: an Italian multicenter study (using the DYMUS questionnaire).

OBJECTIVE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) with a chronic course. Dysphagia represents one of the current challenges in clinical practice for the management of MS patients. Dysphagia starts to appear in mildly impaired MS subjects (EDSS 2-3) and becomes increasingly common in the most severely disabled subjects (EDSS 8-9). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of patient-reported dysphagia in MS patients with a multicenter study using the recently developed DYMUS (DYsphagia in MUltiple Sclerosis) questionnaire. DESIGN: Data were collected in a multi-centre, cross-sectional study using a face-to-face structured questionnaire for clinical characteristics and the DYMUS questionnaire. RESULTS: 1875 patients were interviewed. The current study has shown a correlation between patient-reported dysphagia and EDSS and disease course but not with age, gender and disease duration. Questionnaires were divided into "patient-reported dysphagia-yes" (587, 31.3%) and "patient-reported dysphagia-no" (1288, 68.7%). Compared with the patient-reported dysphagia-no group, patients in patient-reported dysphagia-yes group had higher EDSS score (mean EDSS 4.6 vs. 2.8; p<0.001) and had a longer disease duration (mean duration 13 years vs. 11 years; p<0.001), while there was no significant difference in gender (32.7% vs. 30.5% male and 67.3% vs. 69.5% female) and in age composition (46.18 vs. 42.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest, multi-centre sample of MS patients evaluated for patient-reported dysphagia utilizing an ad-hoc questionnaire for this condition.

Pain and multiple sclerosis: pathophysiology and treatment.

Pain is a common symptom in multiple sclerosis (MS) and has recently been estimated to be experienced by up to 75 % of patients. Pain can be present at any point in the course of the disease and patients may experience pain from various causes simultaneously. Pain in MS can also be secondary to other symptoms, such as spasticity, fatigue, and mood disorder. Of all drug use to treat MS symptoms, treatment for pain accounts for nearly 30 % of total use. At the same time, patients report low satisfaction with pain management. Pain affects quality of life and can influence a person's participation in family life and work and affect mood. Most of the pain literature in the field of MS is based on open-label studies involving small numbers of subjects. Placebo-controlled trials in severe pain syndromes such as trigeminal neuralgia are unethical but for other types of MS-related pain conditions, placebo-controlled trials are ethical and necessary to establish efficacy, particularly given the well-documented placebo effect for various painful conditions This review discusses available data and emphasizes areas of pain research that require further attention.