Delayed peak antibody titers after the second dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients: Prospective cohort study.

Poor post-vaccination production of antibody against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a concern among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Furthermore, the timing and kinetics of antibody titers after the second vaccine dose are unknown. We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study that included 614 SOT recipients: 460 kidney, 53 heart, 50 liver, 20 lung, and 31 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK). The participants received two doses of the mRNA vaccine (Pfizer BNT162b2 or Moderna mRNA-1273), as indicated. Serum samples were collected before the first and second vaccinations and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the second vaccine dose, which were then assessed for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The overall seropositivity rate was 43% at 1 month after administration of the second vaccine dose; it gradually increased to 68% at 3 months after second dose administration and to 70% at 6 months. In addition, recipient of kidney, lung or SPK transplants had lower antibody titers at the 3- and 6-month time points than did the other recipients. SOT recipients acquired SARS-CoV-2 S-IgG antibodies slowly, and the peak titer differed significantly from that of the general population.

Letermovir safety and efficacy for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in adult Japanese kidney transplant recipients: a multicenter, open-label, noncomparative Phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Letermovir is approved for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients worldwide and is also approved in the United States for CMV prophylaxis in adult high-risk (D+/R-) kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The safety and efficacy of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in adult Japanese KTRs are reported here. METHODS: In this Phase 3, single-arm, open-label study, adult Japanese KTRs with CMV serostatuses D+/R-, D+/R+, and D-/R+ received letermovir 480 mg daily orally within 7 days post-transplant through Week 28. Participants were followed through Week 52. The primary objective was to evaluate letermovir safety and tolerability. Efficacy was a secondary objective, measured by CMV disease, CMV disease or infection requiring intervention, and quantifiable CMV DNAemia. All CMV disease cases were confirmed by an independent adjudication committee. RESULTS: Among 22 participants (12 were D+/R-) who received letermovir prophylaxis, 20 (90.9%) experienced ≥ 1 AE through Week 28. Most AEs were mild to moderate in severity; no deaths were reported. During the prophylaxis period through Week 28, one transient case of quantifiable CMV DNAemia was detected, but no CMV disease or infection requiring intervention was reported. Through Week 52, four D+/R- participants met the endpoint of CMV disease or infection requiring intervention, of whom two had committee-confirmed CMV syndrome; all recovered with CMV therapy. A total of 5 participants had quantifiable CMV DNAemia through Week 52. CONCLUSION: Letermovir was generally well tolerated, and the data support its use for the prevention of CMV disease/infection in adult Japanese KTRs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04129398.

Renal outcome of living kidney donors aged more than 70 years.

BACKGROUND: The number of marginal living kidney donors has increased. Medically complex donors who have hypertension, older age, or low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) have been more likely to be used. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of living kidney donors at a single center. We analyzed 309 living donors and divided them into three groups: group with older donors (aged ≥70 years) (n = 41), middle-aged (aged 46-69 years) (n = 239), and young donors (aged <46 years) (N = 29). Donor factors associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3b or worse within 5 years post-donation were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 309 live donors, 86 (27.8%) developed CKD stage3b or worse within 5 years post-donation. The incidence of CKD stage3b or worse within 5 years post-donation was significantly higher in older donor (p < 0.01). Cox regression models revealed that older donor ages and lower eGFR were significantly related to the development of CKD stage3b or worse, independent of comorbidities such as obesity and hypertension [hazard ratio (95% CI); 4.59 (1.02-20.6), p = 047, 0.95 (0.94-0.96), p ≤ 0.01, respectively]. However, recovery of eGFR 4-5 years after donation was noted in the middle-aged and older donor groups, whereas the level of eGFR remained unchanged in the young group. CONCLUSIONS: Older donors tend to develop CKD stage3b within 5 years post-donation but with the potential of recovery. Healthy older people (aged ≥70 years) could be candidates for living donors under careful monitoring of kidney function after donation.

En bloc kidney transplantation from pediatric donors to teenage recipients: Two case reports.

Introduction: Since the implementation of the new selection criteria in 2018, kidney donations from pediatric patients have been prioritized for pediatric recipients and kidney donations from pediatric donors have increased in Japan. Herein, we present two cases of en bloc kidney transplantation. Case presentation: Case 1: A 19-year-old male patient who had been on hemodialysis for 5 years due to end-stage renal disease. After brain death, a graft from a 5-year-old boy was transplanted into the right iliac fossa. Case 2: A 19-year-old male patient, who had previously undergone a living kidney transplantation at the age of 3, received a secondary cadaveric kidney transplantation in the left iliac fossa. The graft was procured from a 17-month-old girl following cardiac death. Conclusion: This report will help surgeons perform en bloc kidney transplantation in the growing number of pediatric kidney donations, such as those in Japan.

Safety of Docetaxel in a Patient with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer After Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: There are limitations in treating advanced prostate cancer (PC), especially castration-resistant (CR) cases, in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). We describe the case of RTR with metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) treated with docetaxel. CASE REPORT: A 60-year-old man with end-stage renal disease due to autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) underwent living-related kidney transplantation. A year later, he was diagnosed with PC (prostate-specific antigen level: 998 ng/mL). Prostate biopsy revealed prostatic adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 4 + 4 = 8. Radiographic examination revealed seminal vesicle invasion and multiple bone and lymph node metastases. Combined androgen blockade therapy was initiated; however, the patient was diagnosed with CRPC 6 months later. Triweekly docetaxel therapy was administered 28 months after diagnosis. The patient successfully completed 7 cycles of this therapy without major adverse events. However, after the 7th cycle, he developed a high fever caused by an infection of ADPKD-associated renal cysts. Therefore, docetaxel was discontinued, and enzalutamide was started, followed by abiraterone, but without any effect. We then introduced cabazitaxel but discontinued it because of hepatic dysfunction. Hence, the patient underwent a docetaxel rechallenge. He was administered the PEGylated form of the recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for neutropenia prophylaxis. After 6 cycles of rechallenge docetaxel therapy, the patient accidentally fell, resulting in a cervical spine fracture and subsequent death due to respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel can be safely delivered to patients with CRPC after renal transplantation who are taking oral immunosuppressants. It can be a good treatment option for them.

Higher Donor Age and Severe Microvascular Inflammation Are Risk Factors for Chronic Rejection After Treatment of Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection.

Recent developments in intensive desensitization protocols have enabled kidney transplantation in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-sensitized recipients. However, cases of active antibody-mediated rejection (AABMR), when they occur, are difficult to manage, graft failure being the worst-case scenario. We aimed to assess the impact of our desensitization and AABMR treatment regimen and identify risk factors for disease progression. Among 849 patients who underwent living-donor kidney transplantation between 2014 and 2021 at our institution, 59 were diagnosed with AABMR within 1 year after transplantation. All patients received combination therapy consisting of steroid pulse therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, and plasmapheresis. Multivariable analysis revealed unrelated donors and preformed donor-specific antibodies as independent risk factors for AABMR. Five-year death-censored graft survival rate was not significantly different between patients with and without AABMR although 27 of 59 patients with AABMR developed chronic AABMR (CABMR) during the study period. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that a donor age greater than 59 years and microvascular inflammation (MVI) score (g + ptc) ≥4 at AABMR diagnosis were independent risk factors for CABMR. Our combination therapy ameliorated AABMR; however, further treatment options should be considered to prevent CABMR, especially in patients with old donors and severe MVI.

The medical cost and outcome of desensitization protocol in kidney transplantation recipients with high immunological risks.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is a well-established alternative in renal replacement therapy. Compared with hemodialysis, low-immunological-risk kidney transplantation can reduce the medical treatment costs associated with end-stage renal disease. However, there are few reports on whether high-immunological-risk kidney transplantation reduces the financial burden on governments. We investigated the medical costs of high-immunological-risk kidney transplantation in comparison with the cost of hemodialysis in Japan. METHODS: We compared the medical costs of high-immunological-risk kidney transplantation with those of hemodialysis. 15 patients who underwent crossmatch-positive and/or donor-specific antibody-positive kidney transplantations between 2020 and 2021 were enrolled in this study. The patients received intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and rituximab as desensitizing therapy. RESULTS: Acute antibody-mediated rejection was detected in nine (60%) recipients, while there were no indications of graft function deterioration during the follow-up. For each patient, the transplant hospitalization cost was 38 428 ± 8789 USD. However, the cumulative costs were 59 758 ± 10 006 USD and 79 781 ± 16 366 USD, at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Compared with hemodialysis (34 286 USD per year), high-immunological-risk kidney transplantation tends to be expensive in the first year, but the cost is likely to be lower than that of hemodialysis after 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although kidney transplantation is initially expensive compared with hemodialysis, the medical cost becomes advantageous after 3 years even in kidney transplant recipients with high immunological risk.

Clinical Course of Candidate Renal Transplant Recipients Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer During Pre-transplant Screening Test.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Occasionally, candidate renal transplant recipients (RTRs) are incidentally diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) during pre-transplant screening examinations; however, their clinical course remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the clinical course of RTR diagnosed with PCa during pre-transplant screening tests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2008 and April 2022, 15 candidates for RTRs were newly diagnosed with PCa during the screening test. We analyzed the patients' treatment choices, initial treatment results, waiting duration for renal transplantation, and whether they finally underwent transplantation. RESULTS: The median patient age was 64 years (range=52-75 years). The median prostate-specific antigen level was 6.9 ng/ml (5.2-56.9 ng/ml). According to D'Amico risk stratification, one, 10, and four patients were at low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively. As for treatment choice, 13 patients chose surgery. Moreover, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and hormone therapy were chosen by one patient each. Of these, seven patients underwent transplantation, with a median waiting time from initial treatment to transplantation of 20.3 months (9.2-40.0 months). One patient discontinued transplantation owing to poor cancer control, four patients had donor issues (change in mind, aging, or disease), and one patient waited because pathological findings revealed locally invasive cancer. CONCLUSION: PCa diagnosis in candidate RTRs during the pre-transplant screening test impacts the candidate's clinical course.

Kidney Transplantation After Multiple Urinary Tract Conversion with an Ileal Conduit: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation (KTx) after urinary tract conversion surgery is extremely difficult due to several complications. In our case, KTx was performed after multiple operative procedures, including diversion urethrostomy. CASE REPORT: The patient was a 46-year-old woman with a right atrophic kidney, an ectopic opening of the left ureter, and urethral dysplasia since birth. The patient underwent a right nephrectomy, left ureteral sigmoidostomy, Stamey surgery, augmentation ileocystoplasty, and left ureteroileostomy. Thereafter, she underwent nephrostomy, ileal conduit diversion, open sigmoid colectomy, and total cystectomy because of persistent urinary incontinence, sigmoid colon cancer, and recurrent cystitis. Her renal function gradually deteriorated, and hemodialysis was initiated. Before the KTx, she underwent laparoscopic left nephrectomy, an intraperitoneal adhesion debridement, and left ileal conduit resection. We dissected the left ileal conduit in the abdominal cavity and penetrated the anorectal side of the free ileal conduit into the wall of the right side of the abdomen. Thereafter, a kidney from a living donor was transplanted into the right iliac fossa through the existing right ileal conduit when the patient was 46 years old. The allograft function was stable without rejection for 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: We report the case of a patient who underwent multiple urethral modifications followed by ileal conduit transfer and living donor KTx, which progressed without major postoperative complications.

Pregnancy Complications and Impact on Kidney Allograft After Kidney Transplantation in IgA Nephropathy.

Pregnancy in kidney transplantation (KT) recipients has been challenging because of the high risk of maternal, fetal, and renal complications. Although patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN)-chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at a high risk for hypertension in pregnancy (HIP), the maternal risk in KT recipients with IgAN as the etiology remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pregnant KT recipients who delivered at our hospital. The incidence of maternal and fetal complications and the impact on kidney allografts between the group with IgAN as the primary kidney disease and the group with other primary diseases were compared. The analysis included 73 pregnancies in 64 KT recipients. The IgAN group had a higher incidence of HIP than the non-IgAN group (69% vs. 40%, p = 0.02). IgAN as primary kidney disease and interval from transplantation to conception were associated with HIP (OR 3.33 [1.11-9.92], p = 0.03, OR 0.83 [0.72-0.96], p < 0.01, respectively). The 20-year graft survival or prevention of CKD stage 5 in group with IgAN was lower than that in the group with other primary disease (p < 0.01). KT recipients should be informed of the risk of HIP and possibility of long-term worsening of postpartum renal function.

Long-time Survival of a Renal Transplant Recipient With Metastatic Mucinous Tubular and Spindle Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) of the kidney is a rare histological type of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). There are few reports of MTSCC occurring in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). The aim of this study was to report a case of long-term survival of a RTR with metastatic MTSCC of the kidney with sarcomatoid changes. CASE REPORT: A 53-year-old male with a left retroperitoneal tumor was referred to our department. He had been receiving hemodialysis since 1991 and underwent kidney transplantation in 2015. Computed tomography (CT) revealed suspected RCC, and a radical nephrectomy was performed in June 2020. Pathological findings revealed MTSCC with sarcomatoid changes. After the surgery, multiple metastases appeared in the bilateral adrenals, skin, para-aortic lymph nodes, muscles, mesocolon, and liver. We treated the patient with metastasectomy, radiation therapy, and sequential systemic therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Two years after the initial surgery, the patient died of cancer while controlling its progression. CONCLUSION: We report a RTR with aggressive and metastatic MTSCC with sarcomatoid changes, resulting in a longer survival time relative to multimodal therapy.

Long-term prolonged-release tacrolimus outcomes in living donor kidney transplantation: The Japan Academic Consortium of Kidney Transplantation study-II.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the 10-year efficacy and safety of a prolonged-release tacrolimus-based combination immunosuppressive regimen on longer-term outcomes in living donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: Data from Japanese living donor kidney transplant recipients (n = 410) maintained on continuous prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppression from 2009-2013 were analyzed with a median follow-up of 9.9 years. RESULTS: A prolonged-release, tacrolimus-based combination regimen provided death-censored graft failure and all-cause death rates at 10 years of 7.0% and 6.8%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, acute and chronic rejection and 'throughout' (new-onset plus preexisting) diabetes mellitus were risk factors for death-censored graft failure. Recipient age ≥ 65 years, throughout diabetes mellitus and malignancy were common risk factors for all-cause death. Throughout diabetes mellitus was the most common risk factor for both death-censored graft failure and all-cause death. Additional analyses showed 10-year cumulative rates of death-censored graft failure were 14.0% and 5.4% for recipients with or without preexisting diabetes mellitus, respectively (log-rank test: p = 0.009). All-cause death rates were 12.7% and 5.4% in the preexisting and non-diabetes mellitus groups, respectively (log-rank test: p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world, retrospective, living donor kidney transplantation study, a prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive combination regimen provided 10-year death-censored graft failure rates of 14.0% and 5.4% in diabetes mellitus and non-diabetes mellitus patients, respectively; Similarly, 10-year all-cause death rates were 12.7% and 5.4% in diabetes mellitus and non-diabetes mellitus patients, respectively. To our knowledge, the data in this study are the first to provide 10-year transplant outcomes in living donor kidney transplant recipients under prolonged-release tacrolimus-based regimen.

The efficacy of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies in transplant recipients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Transplant recipients (TRs) are at high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are used for treating mild-to-moderate COVID-19. However, reports comparing the efficacy of COVID-19 treatment without/with mAbs in TRs are limited. We assessed the efficacy of casirivimab/imdevimab against mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in TRs. METHODS: Forty-one patients were retrospectively evaluated. The duration until defervescence, oxygen (O2) requirement ≥5 L, and neutralizing antibody levels were compared in TRs with COVID-19 without/with casirivimab/imdevimab. RESULTS: Casirivimab/imdevimab was correlated with shorter duration until defervescence and non-requirement of O2 ≥ 5 L in TRs with COVID-19 [mean: without/with: 6 vs. 2; P = 0.0002, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.3333, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.1763-0.6301; 15 vs. 8; P < 0.0001, HR = 0.5333, 95% CI = 0.2878-0.9883; P = 0.0377, HR = 0.1502, 95% CI = 0.02511-0.8980]. Casirivimab/imdevimab was associated with early defervescence after adjusting for sex and age (P = 0.013, HR = 0.412, 95% CI = 0.205-0.826). The antibody levels between patients without/with casirivimab/imdevimab on the day of hospitalization were not significantly different (P = 0.1055), including 13 TRs with vaccination. Antibody levels were higher in patients with casirivimab/imdevimab at 3-5 days after hospitalization than in those without, at 7-9 days after hospitalization (P < 0.0001, mean, without/with: 414.9/40000 AU/mL). CONCLUSION: Casirivimab/imdevimab was effective and increased the neutralizing antibody in TRs with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, it may contribute toward preventing the progression.

Efficacy and safety of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in lung transplant recipients: a possible trigger of rejection.

OBJECTIVE: Solid organ transplant recipients have an increased risk of developing severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination has been strongly recommended for solid organ transplant recipients, its efficacy and safety have remained unknown. METHODS: We performed an observational prospective cohort study in 18 lung transplant recipients who received two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine, including BNT162b2 (n = 17) or mRNA-1273 (n = 1), between June and October 2021. The titers of IgG antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S-IgG) were measured in serum samples collected before the prime dose, three weeks after the prime dose, and four weeks after the booster dose. Reactogenicity and adverse events were evaluated after vaccination. RESULTS: There were no recipients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination. S-IgG levels were elevated in 2/18 (11.1%) recipients after the prime dose and in 5/18 recipients (27.8%) after the booster dose (31.7 ± 30.6 U/ml). The time from transplantation to vaccination tended to be longer in the seropositive group than the seronegative group [7.5 (3.9-10.2) vs 2.8 (1.9-4.0) years, p = 0.059]. Maintenance dose of mycophenolate mofetil tended to be lower in the seropositive group than in the seronegative group [500 (250-500) vs 1000 (1000-1000) mg/day, p = 0.088]. Regarding the adverse events after vaccination, the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) or antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) were observed in two seropositive patients. CONCLUSIONS: The antibody response to the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine was quite poor in lung transplant recipients. We experienced cases that developed clinical CLAD or AMR that was likely related to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Comparison of BNT162b2 and mRNA1273 vaccines in solid organ transplant recipients: Post-Hoc analysis of a Japanese national prospective study.

The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) vaccine efficacy and immunogenicity in the immunocompetent population are well established. However, in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, because of their use of immunosuppressive medication, the immunogenicity of these severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines remains suboptimal. Both BNT162b2 and mRNA1273 have been used for some time, but their immunogenicity has not been directly compared in this immunocompromised patient group. We performed a post-hoc analysis of a previous prospective cohort study. The inclusion criteria were adult SOT recipients with active grafts at least 1 month after SOT. After giving consent, participants chose to receive either BNT162b2 or mRNA1273 vaccine. Anti-spike-protein-S antibody against SARS-CoV-2 was measured. Propensity scores were calculated via logistic regression to transform the probability of having received either BNT162b2 or mRNA1273 vaccine, and a model was developed. We enrolled 623 SOT recipients. In the propensity score-matched analysis, 100 recipients were selected for BNT162b2 and 100 for mRNA1273. SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike protein antibody positivity with BNT162b2 versus mRNA1273 at 3 weeks after the first dose, 1 month after the second dose, 3 months after the second dose, and 6 months after the second dose were 10% versus 19% (P = .07), 51% versus 58% (P = .30), 74% versus 88% (P = .01), and 78% versus 87% (P = .13), respectively. We conducted a propensity score-matched comparison of BNT162b2 and mRNA1273 vaccines as the primary series of COVID-19 vaccines in SOT recipients. We found significantly better immunogenicity with the mRNA1273 vaccine than with BNT162b2.

A Comparative Study on the Variation in Seropositivity Rates After 2-Dose COVID-19 Vaccination Before or After Transplant: A Single-Center Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Many researchers have demonstrated that the seropositivity rate after SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus vaccination is lower in patients receiving oral immunosuppressants. In this article, we report on a comparative study on the seropositivity rate after 2 doses of coronavirus vaccine before or after kidney transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 111 recipients vaccinated after transplant, 19 patients vaccinated before transplant, and 10 healthy patients. We retrospectively measured antibody titers using preserved serum samples. The antibody testing was performed 1 month and 3 months after vaccination. The measurement was via LABScreen COVID Plus, which enables simultaneous determination of 5 coronavirus protein antigens. RESULTS: Seropositivity to coronavirus antibodies was observed in all 19 patients vaccinated before transplant (100%) and in all the 10 healthy patients (100%). Forty- six of the 111 recipients (42%) vaccinated after transplant developed seropositivity. Analyzed at each time point after vaccination, the mean fluorescence intensity of antibodies was unchanged between 1 month and 3 months after vaccination in transplant recipients who were vaccinated after transplant and developed seropositivity. On the other hand, the antibody mean fluorescence intensity in patients vaccinated before transplant was markedly lower at 3 months (posttransplant). CONCLUSIONS: All patients with renal failure who were vaccinated before transplant showed a high seropositivity rate, similar to that in healthy patients. The seropositivity rate for each of the viral fragment antibodies in patients vaccinated before transplant was maintained, as seen in healthy patients. However, in patients vaccinated before transplant who tested positive for antibody production at 1 month after vaccination,the antibody mean fluorescence intensity at 3 months after vaccination (posttransplant) was remarkedly lower than the mean fluorescence intensity at 1 month, which was probably caused by the types of immunosuppressive regimens used atthe time of transplant.

Treatment with bortezomib for recurrent proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits in kidney allograft. Case report and review of the literature.

Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin IgG deposits (PGNMID) is an already described form of renal involvement by monoclonal gammopathy. PGNMID is known to recur in kidney allografts. Bortezomib has shown clinical success in the treatment of multiple myeloma. However, its effect for recurrent PGNMID in kidney allografts has rarely been reported. We present the case of a 61-year-old woman who developed recurrent PGNMID 3 weeks after kidney transplantation. This patient was initially treated with steroid pulses (500 mg/day for 2 days) and two cycles of rituximab therapy (200 mg/body). However, disease progression was observed with mesangial matrix expansion and subendothelial deposits by light microscopy and stronger staining for IgG3 and kappa in the mesangial area by Immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy. Thus, we started treatment with bortezomib therapy (1.3 mg/m2, once weekly, on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in a 5-week cycle, for a total of six cycles). Bortezomib therapy reduced massive proteinuria, although monoclonal immune deposits on IF and the serum creatinine level did not change during the treatment period. Seven months after completion of the first bortezomib course, we decided to prescribe a second course of bortezomib with the same regimen. Each course resulted in a > 50% reduction of proteinuria. Bortezomib may delay the progress of PGNMID in kidney allograft patients.

Safe Renal Transplantation to the Extraperitoneal Cavity in Children Weighing Less Than 15 kg.

Pediatric renal transplantation is associated with various surgical complications due to the complexity of the technique and the often-fragile condition of patients with end-stage renal disease. We evaluated the surgical complications associated with renal transplantation via the extraperitoneal approach in pediatric recipients. This retrospective study enrolled 280 patients younger than 16 years old who underwent renal transplantation via the extraperitoneal approach: 216 patients underwent transplant placement in the iliac fossa like in adults, and 64 underwent transplant placement in the distal part of the original renal lower pole (the extraperitoneal cavity). On the basis of the Clavien-Dindo classification, 30 patients (10.7%) showed grade 2 complications and 12 patients (4.3%) showed grade 3 or higher complications. None of the patients showed gastrointestinal complications. In a Cox regression analysis, grade 2 or higher complications were significantly associated with weight less than 15 kg (P = .027) and operative times longer than 245 minutes (P = .029). Among the 49 patients weighing less than 15 kg with an allograft placed in a distal portion of the original renal lower pole, only 3 patients (6.1%) developed surgical complications. Thus, allograft placement in the extraperitoneal cavity can be performed safely in children weighing less than 15 kg.

Desensitization Regimen Consisting of High-Dose Intravenous Immunoglobulin, Plasmapheresis, and Rituximab (an Anti-CD20 Antibody), Without Eculizumab and/or Bortezomib, in 41 Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Antibody-mediated rejection in patients with positive crossmatches can be severe and result in sudden onset of oliguria, leading to graft loss. In an attempt to prevent posttransplant oliguria, we adopted a preoperative desensitization protocol involving the use of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin/plasmapheresis and the anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, in 41 transplant recipients with positive crossmatch test results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined the clinical courses of the 41 kidney transplant recipients, paying special attention to renal graft function, urine volume, and changes in the titers of donor-specific antibodies. RESULTS: Four grafts were lost during an average of 4.5-year follow-up. Average graft function was excellent, with a serum creatinine level of 1.3 ± 0.4 mg/dL. Sufficient urine output, with no oliguria or anuria, was achieved postoperatively in 40 of the 41 patients. However, among the 34 patients who underwent graft biopsies, the biopsies revealed acute antibody-mediated rejection in 21 patients (62%), and chronic antibodymediated rejection in 10 patients (30%). CONCLUSIONS: The high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin treatment included in our desensitization protocol was shown to be safe and effective for achieving successful transplant outcomes and allowed the avoidance of more aggressive B-cell-targeted treatments, such as C5 inhibitors and/or proteosome inhibitors, for preventing posttransplant oliguria and anuria.

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Allograft Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Nephron-sparing surgery is required for patients with kidney transplant with organ-confined renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the allograft kidney to preserve renal function. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is expected to be the optimal surgical approach for these patients, as in the general population. However, RAPN for RCC arising in the allograft kidney is rarely reported. Here, we report 2 cases of patients who underwent RAPN for allograft RCC. CASE PRESENTATION: Two patients were diagnosed with RCC in the renal allograft based on enhanced computed tomography findings. Case 1 was a 69-year-old man with a 32-mm mass in the middle portion of the right iliac fossa renal allograft, and case 2 was a 55-year-old man with a 24-mm mass in the lower pole of the right iliac fossa renal allograft. In each patient, RAPN was performed for the renal mass through a transperitoneal approach, with clamping of the renal artery. No major perioperative complications occurred in either patient, negative surgical margins were achieved, and no significant changes in kidney function were observed during either surgery. Pathologic findings showed clear cell RCC in case 1 and papillary RCC in case 2. CONCLUSION: RAPN can be a feasible and effective treatment option for allograft RCC.