Reducing drain use with paraspinal muscle flaps for spinal closures: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Paraspinal muscle (PSM) flaps can be mobilized with superficial undermining and lateral release from the thoracolumbar fascia and/or deep undermining and medial release from the transverse processes and ribs. The objective of the study was to compare the effect of the PSM flap technique on drain use, retention, and complication rates. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent spinal coverage with PSM flaps at a single institution from April 2020 to June 2021. Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, surgical technique, drain usage, and postoperative complications were analyzed to compare the effects of different PSM flap surgical techniques on postoperative drain use and complications. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included. Both superficial and deep releases were performed in half (47%) of the cases, while the remainder was split between superficial (25%) and deep (28%) releases. Drains were used less frequently for the deep release (35%) than the superficial (93%) or both releases (96%, p < 0.01). The deep release had shorter mean drain retention time (5.8 days) than the superficial (30.3 days) or both releases (24.8 days, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the techniques in terms of complications. For the deep release, the use of drains was not associated with a reduction in complications (odds ratio 0.91 [0.84 - 0.98], p = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: In a selected patient population, a "deep release only" PSM flap technique may allow for drainless spinal closure without an increased risk of seroma or other complications.

Community hospital decreases narcotic usage in postoperative bariatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Opioids have long been used as an effective form of analgesia for pain in the postoperative setting; however, their addictive potential and associated complications have become a detriment. There has been an increasing movement to decrease opioid prescribing. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to look at common bariatric surgery procedures at a single institution and compare opioid usage before and after the implementation of a multimodal pain regimen. SETTING: Community program, hospital-employed, and private practice, United States. METHODS: Six hundred twelve laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients were included in this single-institution retrospective cohort study. Data were obtained from chart review. Comparison was made between patients from 2016 and patients from a 3-month period in 2017 when the new pain management protocol had been instituted. RESULTS: The postoperative opioid usage of 516 patients from 2016 was compared with that of 96 patients from a 3-month period in 2017 after initiating the new pain management protocol. The mean intravenous hydromorphone usage of the control group, 16.0 ± 14.6 morphine milligram equivalent (or 4.0 mg ± .2), over the postoperative inpatient stay decreased to 7.3 ± 6.7 morphine milligram equivalent (or 1.8 mg ± .2) in the study group. This represents a 55% decrease. The study group did show less 30-day postoperative complications compared with the control, 1.04% and 2.13%, respectively, although this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A multimodal pain regimen is an effective way to cut opioid usage with no statistical difference in overall 30-day complications.

Health-Care Workers' Perception of Reimbursement for Complex Surgical Oncology Procedures.

Perception of physician reimbursement for surgical procedures is not well studied. The few existing studies illustrate that patients believe compensation to be higher than in reality. These studies focus on patient perceptions and have not assessed health-care workers' views. Our study examined health-care workers' perception of reimbursement for complex surgical oncology procedures. An anonymous online survey was distributed to employees at our cancer center with descriptions and illustrations of three oncology procedures-hepatectomy, gastrectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy. Participants estimated the Medicare fee and gave their perceived value of each procedure. Participants recorded their perception of surgeon compensation overall, both before and after revealing the Medicare fee schedule. Most of the 113 participants were physicians (33.6%) and nurses (28.3%). When blinded to the Medicare fee schedules, most felt that reimbursements were too low for all procedures (60-64%) and that surgeons were overall undercompensated (57%). Value predictions for each procedure were discordant from actual Medicare fee schedules, with overestimates up to 374 per cent. After revealing the Medicare fee schedules, 55 per cent of respondents felt that surgeons were undercompensated. Even among health-care workers, a large discrepancy exists between perceived and actual reimbursement. Revealing actual reimbursements did not alter perception on overall surgeon compensation.

Increasing Onshore Oil Production: An Unexpected Explosion in Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Few data currently exist which are focused on type and severity of onshore oil extraction-related injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate injury patterns among onshore oil field operations. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all trauma patients aged 18 and older with an onshore oil field-related injury admitted to an American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2003 and June 30, 2012. Data collected included demographics, injury severity and details, hospital outcomes, and disposition. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients met inclusion criteria. All patients were male, of which the majority were Caucasian (81.8%, n = 54) with an average age of 36.5 ± 11.8 years, injury severity score of 9.4 ± 8.9, and Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13.8 ± 3.4. Extremity injuries were the most common (43.9%, n = 29), and most were the result of being struck by an object (40.9%, n = 27). Approximately one-third of patients (34.8%, n = 23) were admitted to the intensive care unit. Nine patients (13.6%) required mechanical ventilation while 27 (40.9%) underwent operative treatment. The average hospital length of stay was 5.8 ± 16.6 days, and most patients (78.8%, n = 52) were discharged home. Four patients suffered permanent disabilities, and there were two deaths. CONCLUSION: Increased domestic onshore oil production inevitably will result in higher numbers of oil field-related traumas. By focusing on employees who are at the greatest risk for injuries and by targeting the main causes of injuries, training programs can lead to a decrease in injury incidence.

Are university-based residency training programs lacking in resident education of proper diagnosis and treatment for common skin and breast lesions?

BACKGROUND: Skin and breast cancers are the 2 most common malignancies in US women. Early detection with appropriate therapy is essential in improving survival rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare general surgery (GS) and family medicine (FM) residents in their ability to identify and appropriately treat common skin and breast lesions. METHODS: Thirty-three-question, institutional review board-approved, Web-based surveys (1 breast and 1 skin survey) were each sent to 244 GS and 452 FM training programs (both university-based and community-based programs) uniformly distributed across the United States. Each survey included demographics and 20 multiple-choice questions (10 lesion identification questions and 10 corresponding treatment questions). RESULTS: A total of 374 completed resident surveys were collected (242 FM, 132 GS). Respondents were uniformly distributed geographically (55.9% women, 44.1% men; 54.2% community based, 45.8% university based). GS residents correctly identified 82.7% of lesions compared with 83.3% for FM residents (P = .89) and correctly treated 76.8% of lesions compared with 75.4% for FM residents (P = .81). No significant identification or treatment differences were noted by postgraduate year (PGY), but both GS and FM residents had lower accuracy of correct treatment identification compared with lesion identification, which was significant for GS PGY 2 residents (P = .02), FM PGY 2 residents (P = .03), and FM PGY 2 residents (P = .03). University-based GS residents had a more significant disparity between correct identification and correct treatment (83.6% vs 74.6%, P = .03) compared with community-based GS residents (80.4% vs 74.6%, P = .11). Both university-based and community-based FM residents had significant disparities in this comparison (university-based FM residents with 82.4% vs 69.8%, P = .02, vs community-based FM residents with 86.7% vs 74.5%, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Both GS and FM residents incorrectly treated more lesions than they diagnosed. This diagnosis-treatment disparity was more pronounced among university-based residents. Validation of this observation may better identify potential training deficiencies in breast and skin oncology to enhance GS resident education.