Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Vacunas ; 21(1): 69-72, 2020.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32313527
2.
Rev Esp Quimioter ; 32(4): 333-364, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31345005

RESUMEN

The childhood immunization schedule is well known and generally well implemented in developed countries. For various reasons, the same is not true of vaccines aimed at preventing infections in adults, in which vaccination coverage is incomplete and generally very deficient. In order to assess the situation of adult vaccination in Spain, the Fundación de Ciencias de la Salud has brought together a series of experts in different fields, including doctors, nurses, representatives of patient associations, health managers and economists, health authorities and journalists to deal with this issue. The format was that of a round table in which a series of questions previously formulated by the coordinators were to be answered and debated. The document presented is not an exhaustive review of the topic, nor is it intended to make recommendations, but only to give a multidisciplinary opinion on topics that could be particularly debatable or controversial. The paper reviews the main vaccine-preventable adult diseases, their clinical and economic impact, the possibilities of reducing them with vaccination programmes and the difficulties in carrying them out. The role of nursing, pharmacy services, patient associations and the health administration itself in changing the current situation was discussed. Prospects for new vaccines were discussed and we speculated on the future in this field. Finally, particularly relevant ethical aspects in decision-making regarding vaccination were discussed, which must be faced by both individuals and states. We have tried to summarize, at the end of the presentation of each question, the environment of opinion that was agreed with all the members of the table.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas Bacterianas/administración & dosificación , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Control de Infecciones , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas Virales/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Predicción , Infecciones por Haemophilus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Haemophilus/prevención & control , Haemophilus influenzae tipo b , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Humanos , Incidencia , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Neisseria meningitidis , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , España/epidemiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/prevención & control , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Infección por el Virus de la Varicela-Zóster/epidemiología , Infección por el Virus de la Varicela-Zóster/prevención & control
3.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 13(2): 435-439, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28027005

RESUMEN

Healthcare workers (HCW) are exposed to preventable infectious diseases, notably hepatitis B (HB). The aim of this study was to determine the immunity of HCW against hepatitis B. We made a seroprevalence study using a self-administered survey and obtained blood samples. Antibodies against the HB surface antigen (anti-HBs) and against the HB core antigen (anti-HBc) were studied. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The adjusted OR were calculated using logistic regression. Of the 644 HCW who participated (29.7% physicians, 38.7% nurses, 13.4% other clinical workers and 18.3% non-clinical workers), 46.4% were primary care workers and 53.6% hospital workers. The overall prevalence of anti-HBs was 64.4%. HCW aged <25 y had a significantly higher prevalence (86.7%) than those aged 35-44 y (adjusted OR 3.40; 95% CI 1.06-10.90). The prevalence of anti-HBc was 4.1%, and increased with age. Significant differences were found for HCW aged >44 y with respect to those aged 25-34 y. 75.6% of HCW stated they were vaccinated, but only 39.3% had a vaccination card. In HCW who stated they were unvaccinated, 10.8% had a vaccinated serological pattern (anti-HBc-negative and anti-HBs -positive). Written, updated vaccination records are essential to reliably determine the vaccination status.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis B/sangre , Hepatitis B/inmunología , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Antígenos del Núcleo de la Hepatitis B/inmunología , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , España , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
4.
Vaccine ; 32(45): 5945-8, 2014 Oct 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25219564

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine varicella-zoster virus (VZV) immunity among healthcare workers (HCWs). Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: HCWs attending voluntary periodic health examinations between June 2008 and December 2010. SETTING: Six public hospitals and five primary care areas in Catalonia, Spain. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was given to eligible HCWs. Variables including age, sex, professional category, type of centre, history of varicella infection, and VZV vaccination were collected. The study was carried out using a convenience sample. The prevalence of antibodies and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of the history of clinical VZV infection or vaccination were calculated. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR and ORa) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to determine the variables associated with antibody prevalence. RESULTS: Of 705 HCWs who agreed to participate, 644 were finally included. The overall prevalence of antibodies to varicella was 94.9% (95% CI: 92.9-96.4). Of the variables studied, only age was associated with serological susceptibility to VZV. HCWs aged 25-35 years had the highest serological susceptibility (8.1%, 95% CI: 4.6-13.0). The prevalence of antibodies was 96% in subjects reporting previous VZV infection or vaccination, compared with 93% in subjects who did not report these states or did not know. CONCLUSIONS: The high proportion of serologically-susceptible HCWs found in this study indicates the need to develop for screening and vaccination strategies in Catalonia. Due to the high capacity of propagation of the VZV in health settings and its consequences, VZV vaccination programmes in HCWs should be reinforced.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Varicela/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Varicela/inmunología , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , España/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Epidemiol Infect ; 140(9): 1599-606, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22074684

RESUMEN

Passive immunity against measles decreases during the first months of life. The objective of this study was to determine titres of measles antibodies in children aged 9-14 months and their mothers before vaccination, and the children's response to vaccination. Blood samples were collected by capillary puncture before and 28 days after vaccination. Samples were obtained between February and June 2007 during an ongoing measles outbreak. Titres of specific measles IgG antibodies were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Seroconversion was defined as the presence of antibodies after vaccination in subjects without antibodies before vaccination. Maternal antibodies were present in 37·7% of all 69 children included and in 45·1% of children aged 9 months. Of the 51 children in whom a second sample was obtained, 31 (60·8%) were seronegative before vaccination and 61·3% seroconverted. Interference of maternal antibodies was 30%. Advancing the first dose of measles vaccination from 15 to 12 months is a correct strategy, given the increase in the time of susceptibility of infants to measles.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacuna Antisarampión/inmunología , Virus del Sarampión/inmunología , Sarampión/inmunología , Vacunación/métodos , Factores de Edad , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Lactante , Masculino , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacuna Antisarampión/administración & dosificación , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , España , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA