RESUMEN
Addressing the challenge of drug-resistant epilepsy, our study offers a novel perspective by retrospectively applying the 5-SENSE score, initially created for stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) planning, to evaluate its predictive value in patients undergoing vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy. We conducted a comprehensive preoperative diagnostic work-up, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT), video-electroencephalogram (video-EEG), and clinical semiology. We then stratified 76 patients into three groups - low, moderate, and high focality - based on the focality of the seizure-onset zone. Such stratification was made to check the scoring ability in predicting VNS therapy seizure reduction. Our findings demonstrate an association between the extent of focality at the seizure-onset zone and the effectiveness of VNS, which may help to define the role of the 5-SENSE score in patient selection for VNS. This high dispersion of responses in the group with high focality reinforces the idea that outcome estimation is difficult and argues for an individualized strategy in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. A study at the level of the 5-SENSE score indicates the importance of detailed preoperative assessments that may better optimize selection for VNS therapy and further improve clinical outcomes.
RESUMEN
Background: Evaluating the differential impact of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy across various seizure types, our study explores its efficacy specifically in patients with categorized minor and major seizures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 76 patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy treated at the University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest between 2021 and 2024. Seizures were classified as 'minor' (including focal-aware and non-motor/absence seizures) and 'major' (including focal to bilateral tonic-clonic and generalized motor seizures), based on modified International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) criteria. This classification allowed us to assess the response to VNS therapy, defined by a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency at the 12-month follow-up. Results: Our findings reveal that major seizures respond more favorably to VNS therapy, significantly reducing both frequency and intensity. In contrast, minor seizures showed a less pronounced response in frequency reduction but noted improvements in neurocognitive functions, suggesting a nuanced benefit of VNS in these cases. Conclusion: The study underscores the importance of seizure type in determining the efficacy of VNS therapy, advocating for personalized treatment approaches based on seizure classification. This approach could potentially enhance clinical outcomes by tailoring VNS settings to specific seizure types, improving overall management strategies in pharmacoresistant epilepsy.