Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Hemorragia , Heparina , Humanos , Heparina/administración & dosificación , Heparina/efectos adversos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada/etiología , Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada/prevención & control , Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Hemorragia/prevención & controlRESUMEN
RATIONALE: The influence of the lung bacterial microbiome, including potential pathogens, in patients with influenza- or COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA or CAPA) is yet to be explored. OBJECTIVES: To explore the composition of the lung bacterial microbiome and its association with viral and fungal infection, immunity and outcome in severe influenza versus COVID-19 with or without aspergillosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in mechanically ventilated influenza and COVID-19 patients with or without invasive aspergillosis in whom bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for bacterial culture (with or without PCR) was obtained within two weeks after ICU admission. Additionally, 16S rRNA gene sequencing data and viral and bacterial load of BAL samples from a subset of these patients, and of patients requiring non-invasive ventilation, were analyzed. We integrated 16S rRNA gene sequencing data with existing immune parameter datasets. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Potential bacterial pathogens were detected in 20% (28/142) of influenza and 37% (104/281) of COVID-19 patients, while aspergillosis was detected in 38% (54/142) of influenza and 31% (86/281) of COVID-19 patients. A significant association between bacterial pathogens in BAL and 90-day mortality was found only in influenza patients, particularly IAPA patients. COVID-19 but not influenza patients showed increased pro-inflammatory pulmonary cytokine responses to bacterial pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: Aspergillosis is more frequently detected in lungs of severe influenza patients than bacterial pathogens. Detection of bacterial pathogens associates with worse outcome in influenza patients, particularly in those with IAPA, but not in COVID-19 patients. The immunological dynamics of tripartite viral-fungal-bacterial interactions deserve further investigation. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Observational data suggest that the subset of patients with heart failure related CS (HF-CS) now predominate critical care admissions for CS. There are no dedicated HF-CS randomised control trials completed to date which reliably inform clinical practice or clinical guidelines. We sought to identify aspects of HF-CS care where both consensus and uncertainty may exist to guide clinical practice and future clinical trial design, with a specific focus on HF-CS due to acute decompensated chronic HF. METHODS: A 16-person multi-disciplinary panel comprising of international experts was assembled. A modified RAND/University of California, Los Angeles, appropriateness methodology was used. A survey comprising of 34 statements was completed. Participants anonymously rated the appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 to 9 (1-3 as inappropriate, 4-6 as uncertain and as 7-9 appropriate). RESULTS: Of the 34 statements, 20 were rated as appropriate and 14 were rated as inappropriate. Uncertainty existed across all three domains: the initial assessment and management of HF-CS; escalation to temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support (tMCS); and weaning from tMCS in HF-CS. Significant disagreement between experts (deemed present when the disagreement index exceeded 1) was only identified when deliberating the utility of thoracic ultrasound in the immediate management of HF-CS. CONCLUSION: This study has highlighted several areas of practice where large-scale prospective registries and clinical trials in the HF-CS population are urgently needed to reliably inform clinical practice and the synthesis of future societal HF-CS guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Choque Cardiogénico , Humanos , Consenso , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitalización , Estudios Prospectivos , Choque Cardiogénico/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
AIMS: Bleeding and thrombotic complications compromise outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) and/or microaxial flow pumps like Impella™. Antithrombotic practices are an important determinant of the coagulopathic risk, but standardization in the antithrombotic management during pMCS is lacking. This survey outlines European practices in antithrombotic management in adults on pMCS, making an initial effort to standardize practices, inform future trials, and enhance outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This online cross-sectional survey was distributed through digital newsletters and social media platforms by the Association of Acute Cardiovascular Care and the European branch of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. The survey was available from 17 April 2023 to 23 May 2023. The target population were European clinicians involved in care for adults on pMCS. We included 105 responses from 26 European countries. Notably, 72.4% of the respondents adhered to locally established anticoagulation protocols, with unfractionated heparin (UFH) being the predominant anticoagulant (Impella™: 97.0% and V-A ECMO: 96.1%). A minority of the respondents, 10.8 and 14.5%, respectively, utilized the anti-factor-Xa assay in parallel with activated partial thromboplastin time for UFH monitoring during Impella™ and V-A ECMO support. Anticoagulant targets varied across institutions. Following acute coronary syndrome without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 54.0 and 42.7% were administered dual antiplatelet therapy during Impella™ and V-A ECMO support, increasing to 93.7 and 84.0% after PCI. CONCLUSION: Substantial heterogeneity in antithrombotic practices emerged from participants' responses, potentially contributing to variable device-associated bleeding and thrombotic complications.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Fibrinolíticos , Corazón Auxiliar , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Trombosis/prevención & control , Trombosis/etiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Sociedades Médicas , FemeninoRESUMEN
We present a protocol for the rapid postmortem bedside procurement of selected tissue samples using an endoscopic endonasal surgical technique that we adapted from skull base surgery. We describe steps for the postmortem collection of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, a nasopharyngeal swab, and tissue samples; the clean-up procedure; and the initial processing and storage of the samples. This protocol was validated with tissue samples procured postmortem from COVID-19 patients and can be applied in another emerging infectious disease. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Khan et al. (2021)1 and Khan et al. (2022).2.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Base del Cráneo/cirugía , Endoscopía/métodos , Mucosa Olfatoria/cirugía , Lóbulo Frontal/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is a severe superinfection with the fungus Aspergillus affecting patients who are critically ill with COVID-19. The pathophysiology and the role of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in this infection are largely unknown. We aimed to characterise the immune profile, with a focus on neutrophils and NET concentrations, of critically ill patients with COVID-19, with or without CAPA. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, retrospective, observational study in two patient cohorts, both recruited at University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium. We included adults aged 18 years or older who were admitted to the intensive care unit because of COVID-19 between March 31, 2020, and May 18, 2021, and who were included in the previous Contagious trial (NCT04327570). We investigated the immune cellular landscape of CAPA versus COVID-19 only by performing single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Bronchoalveolar lavage immune cell fractions were compared between patients with CAPA and patients with COVID-19 only. Additionally, we determined lower respiratory tract NET concentrations using biochemical assays in patients aged 18 years and older who were admitted to the intensive care unit because of severe COVID-19 between March 15, 2020, and Dec 31, 2021, for whom bronchoalveolar lavage was available in the hospital biobank. Bronchoalveolar lavage NET concentrations were compared between patients with CAPA and patients with COVID-19 only and integrated with existing data on immune mediators in bronchoalveolar lavage and 90-day mortality. FINDINGS: We performed scRNA-seq of bronchoalveolar lavage on 43 samples from 39 patients, of whom 36 patients (30 male and six female; 14 with CAPA) were included in downstream analyses. We performed bronchoalveolar lavage NET analyses in 59 patients (46 male and 13 female), of whom 26 had CAPA. By scRNA-seq, patients with CAPA had significantly lower neutrophil fractions than patients with COVID-19 only (16% vs 33%; p=0·0020). The remaining neutrophils in patients with CAPA preferentially followed a hybrid maturation trajectory characterised by expression of genes linked to antigen presentation, with enhanced transcription of antifungal effector pathways. Patients with CAPA also showed depletion of mucosal-associated invariant T cells, reduced T helper 1 and T helper 17 differentiation, and transcriptional defects in specific aspects of antifungal immunity in macrophages and monocytes. We observed increased formation of NETs in patients with CAPA compared with patients with COVID-19 only (DNA complexed with citrullinated histone H3 median 15 898 ng/mL [IQR 4588-86 419] vs 7062 ng/mL [775-14 088]; p=0·042), thereby explaining decreased neutrophil fractions by scRNA-seq. Low bronchoalveolar lavage NET concentrations were associated with increased 90-day mortality in patients with CAPA. INTERPRETATION: Qualitative and quantitative disturbances in monocyte, macrophage, B-cell, and T-cell populations could predispose patients with severe COVID-19 to develop CAPA. Hybrid neutrophils form a specialised response to CAPA, and an adequate neutrophil response to CAPA is a major determinant for survival in these patients. Therefore, measuring bronchoalveolar lavage NETs could have diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with CAPA. Clinicians should be wary of aspergillosis when using immunomodulatory therapy that might inhibit NETosis to treat patients with severe COVID-19. FUNDING: Research Foundation Flanders, KU Leuven, UZ Leuven, VIB, the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, the European Regional Development Fund, la Caixa Foundation, the Flemish Government, and Horizon 2020.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trampas Extracelulares , Aspergilosis Pulmonar , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antifúngicos , Enfermedad Crítica , COVID-19/complicaciones , Sistema Respiratorio , Análisis de Secuencia de ARNRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is a frequent superinfection in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and is associated with increased mortality rates. The increasing proportion of severely immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 who require mechanical ventilation warrants research into the incidence and impact of CAPA during the vaccination era. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, monocentric, observational study. We collected data from adult patients with severe COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of University Hospitals Leuven, a tertiary referral center, between 1 March 2020 and 14 November 2022. Probable or proven CAPA was diagnosed according to the 2020 European Confederation for Medical Mycology/International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ECMM/ISHAM) criteria. RESULTS: We included 335 patients. Bronchoalveolar lavage sampling was performed in 300 (90%), and CAPA was diagnosed in 112 (33%). The incidence of CAPA was 62% (50 of 81 patients) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Mycosis Study Group Education and Research Consortium (MSGERC) host factor-positive patients, compared with 24% (62 of 254) in host factor-negative patients. The incidence of CAPA was significantly higher in the vaccination era, increasing from 24% (57 of 241) in patients admitted to the ICU before October 2021 to 59% (55 of 94) in those admitted since then. Both EORTC/MSGERC host factors and ICU admission in the vaccination era were independently associated with CAPA development. CAPA remained an independent risk factor associated with mortality risk during the vaccination era. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of EORTC/MSGERC host factors for invasive mold disease is associated with increased CAPA incidence and worse outcome parameters, and it is the main driver for the significantly higher incidence of CAPA in the vaccination era. Our findings warrant investigation of antifungal prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva , Aspergilosis Pulmonar , Adulto , Animales , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aspergilosis Pulmonar/complicaciones , Aspergilosis Pulmonar/epidemiología , Huésped InmunocomprometidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Impella™ is increasingly used in cardiogenic shock. However, thromboembolic and bleeding events are frequent during percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS). OBJECTIVE: Therefore, we aimed to explore the optimal anticoagulation regime for pMCS to prevent thromboembolism and bleedings. METHODS: This hypothesis-generating multi-center cohort study investigated 170 patients with left-Impella™ support. We (A) compared bleeding/thrombotic events in two centers with therapeutic range (TR-aPTT) activated partial thromboplastin time (60-80s) and (B) compared events of these centers with one center with intermediate range aPTT (40-60s). RESULTS: After matching, there were no differences in patients' characteristics. In centers aiming at TR-aPTT, major bleeding was numerically lower with aPTT <60s within 48 h of left-Impella™ support, versus patients that achieved the aimed aPTT of ≥60s [aPTT ≥60s: 22 (37.3%) vs. aPTT<60s 14 (23.7%); Hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 (95%) CI, 0.28-1.38; p = 0.234]. Major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events (MACCE) did not differ between groups. In comparison of centers, TR-aPTT strategy showed higher major bleeding rates [TR: 8 (47.1%) vs. intermediate range: 1 (5.9%); HR, 0.06 (95%) CI, 0.01-0.45; p = 0.006]. MACCE were lower in the intermediate range aPTT group as well [TR 12 (70.6%) vs. intermediate range 5 (29.4%) HR, 0.32 (95%) CI, 0.11-0.92; p = 0.034]. CONCLUSION: This pilot analysis showed that lowering UFH-targets in left-Impella™ supported CS patients seems to be a safe and promising strategy for reducing major bleedings without increasing MACCE. This needs to be validated in larger, randomized clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Heparina , Tromboembolia , Humanos , Anticoagulantes , Choque Cardiogénico/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Tiempo de Tromboplastina Parcial , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia/inducido químicamente , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Monitoring of the patient supported with a temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) is crucial in achieving the best possible outcome. Monitoring is a continuous and labour-intensive process, as cardiogenic shock (CS) patients can rapidly deteriorate and may require new interventions within a short time period. Echocardiography and invasive haemodynamic monitoring form the cornerstone of successful tMCS support. During monitoring, it is particularly important to ensure that adequate end-organ perfusion is achieved and maintained. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of best practices for monitoring the CS patient supported by a micro-axial flow pump, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and both devices simultaneously (ECMELLA approach). It is a complex process that encompasses device control, haemodynamic control and stabilization, monitoring of interventions, and assessment of end-organ function. The combined, continuous, and preferably protocol-based approach of echocardiography, evaluation of biomarkers, end-organ assessment, and haemodynamic parameters is crucial in assessing this critically ill CS patient population.
RESUMEN
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition characterized by a state of inadequate systemic tissue perfusion caused by cardiac dysfunction. When to implement, change, or remove the use of a temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) in patients with CS is dependent on the aetiology and severity. Here, patient scenarios underlying the need to escalate, de-escalate, wean, or bridge from tMCS devices are taken into consideration by interdisciplinary heart failure and CS teams. This includes a comprehensive review of and focus on the rationale for specific device escalation and de-escalation strategies, device selection, and general management.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Infarto del Miocardio , Humanos , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Contrapulsador IntraaórticoRESUMEN
COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk for thrombotic complications. The trials investigating the optimal thromboprophylactic dose are performed in challenging times and seemingly produce conflicting evidence. The burdensome circumstances, divergent endpoints, and different analytical approaches hamper comparison and extrapolation of available evidence. Most importantly, clinicians should provide thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients while (re)assessing bleeding and thrombotic risk frequently. The COVID-19 Thromboprophylaxis Working Group of the BSTH updated its guidance document. It aims to summarize the available evidence critically and to guide clinicians in providing the best possible thromboprophylaxis.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trombosis , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Bélgica/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis/complicaciones , Trombosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention comprises aspirin with a potent P2Y purinoceptor 12 (P2Y12) inhibitor (prasugrel or ticagrelor) for 12 months. Although this approach reduces ischaemic risk, patients are exposed to a substantial risk of bleeding. Strategies to reduce bleeding include de-escalation of DAPT intensity (downgrading from potent P2Y12 inhibitor at conventional doses to either clopidogrel or reduced-dose prasugrel) or abbreviation of DAPT duration. Either strategy requires assessment of the ischaemic and bleeding risks of each individual. De-escalation of DAPT intensity can reduce bleeding without increasing ischaemic events and can be guided by platelet function testing or genotyping. Abbreviation of DAPT duration after 1-6 months, followed by monotherapy with aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor, reduces bleeding without an increase in ischaemic events in patients at high bleeding risk, particularly those without high ischaemic risk. However, these two strategies have not yet been compared in a head-to-head clinical trial. In this Consensus Statement, we summarize the evidence base for these treatment approaches, provide guidance on the assessment of ischaemic and bleeding risks, and provide consensus statements from an international panel of experts to help clinicians to optimize these DAPT approaches for individual patients to improve outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Trombosis Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/efectos adversos , Trombosis Coronaria/etiología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/etiología , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/efectos adversos , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Heart failure is a prevalent syndrome among older adults, with a major impact on morbidity and mortality. Higher age is correlated with underuse of guideline-directed medical therapies which, in turn, has been linked to worse clinical outcomes. Importantly, most evidence so far has been collected in adults who were younger, less multi-morbid and polymedicated compared with those who are commonly treated in daily clinical practice. Hence, we aimed to assess and describe the evidence base for pharmacotherapy in older adults with heart failure with a reduced ejection. First, a narrative review was undertaken using Medline, from inception to January 2023. Four foundational therapies were selected based on the latest European Society of Cardiology clinical practice guideline: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, beta blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Post hoc analyses from landmark heart failure drug trials were searched and included if they contained data on the impact of age on efficacy, safety and/or timeliness of therapies in the management of heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. Second, a proposal was developed to support and promote the use of evidence-based heart failure pharmacotherapy in complex, older adults. In total, 11 articles were selected: 4 meta-analyses, 6 post hoc analyses and 1 review paper. No attenuation of efficacy for any of the foundational agents was found in older adults. Regarding safety, dedicated analyses showed that beta blockers, mineraloid receptor antagonists, sacubitril-valsartan, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin retained their overall benefit-risk profile regardless of age. Time to benefit was short and occurred generally within 1 month. Consensus was achieved on a five-step proposal to manage complex medication regimens in older adults suffering from heart failure. In conclusion, older adults suffering from heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction should not be denied treatment based on their age.