Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
2.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 63(3): 581-589, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34532821

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The incidence of atrial flutter following radiofrequency ablation of supraventricular tachycardias is poorly understood. Ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia may place patients at risk of flutter because ablation of the slow pathway is in close proximity to the cavotricuspid isthmus. This study aims to evaluate the risk of atrial flutter following ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia relative to ablation of other supraventricular tachycardias. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was completed for all supraventricular tachycardia ablations performed between July 2006 and July 2016. Patient and procedural details were collected for 544 patients who underwent atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia ablation (n = 342), atrioventricular reentry tachycardia ablation (n = 125), or atrial tachycardia ablation (n = 60). Follow-up for flutter after ablation of their incident arrhythmia was assessed. RESULTS: Patients who underwent atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia ablation were more likely to develop CTI-dependent flutter than patients who underwent ablation of other supraventricular tachycardias (4.97% vs. 0%; p = 0.002). Compared with patients who did not develop flutter, patients who developed flutter after atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia ablation were more likely to have undergone ablation of atypical atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (11.8% vs. 2.15%; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: We identified an association between atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia ablation and development of CTI-dependent atrial flutter. This finding may have implications for the management and follow-up after atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia ablation.


Asunto(s)
Aleteo Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Taquicardia por Reentrada en el Nodo Atrioventricular , Taquicardia Supraventricular , Aleteo Atrial/epidemiología , Aleteo Atrial/cirugía , Nodo Atrioventricular , Electrocardiografía , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taquicardia/cirugía , Taquicardia por Reentrada en el Nodo Atrioventricular/epidemiología , Taquicardia por Reentrada en el Nodo Atrioventricular/cirugía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/epidemiología , Taquicardia Supraventricular/cirugía
3.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 33(3): 333-342, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34953091

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There exists variability in the administration of in-patient sotalol therapy for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of this variability on patient in-hospital and 30-day posthospitalization costs and outcomes is not known. Also, the cost impact of intravenous sotalol, which can accelerate drug loading to therapeutic levels, is unknown. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-three AF patients admitted for oral sotalol initiation at an Intermountain Healthcare Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were included. Patient and dosing characteristics were described descriptively and the impact of dosing schedule was correlated with daily hospital costs/clinical outcomes during the index hospitalization and for 30 days. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement for 3-day sotalol initiation is $9263.51. Projections of cost savings were made considering a 1-day load using intravenous sotalol that costs $2500.00 to administer. RESULTS: The average age was 70.3 ± 12.3 years and 60.2% were male with comorbidities of hypertension (83%), diabetes (36%), and coronary artery disease (53%). The mean ejection fraction was 59.9 ± 7.8% and the median corrected QT interval was 453.7 ± 37.6 ms before sotalol dosing. No ventricular arrhythmias developed, but bradycardia (<60 bpm) was observed in 37.6% of patients. The average length of stay was 3.9 ± 4.6 (median: 2.2) days. Postdischarge outcomes and rehospitalization rates stratified by length of stay were similar. The cost per day was estimated at $2931.55 (1. $2931.55, 2. $5863.10, 3. $8794.65, 4. $11 726.20). CONCLUSIONS: In-patient oral sotalol dosing is markedly variable and results in the potential of both cost gain and loss to a hospital. In consideration of estimated costs, there is the potential for $871.55 cost savings compared to a 2-day oral load and $3803.10 compared to a 3-day oral load.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Sotalol , Cuidados Posteriores , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/inducido químicamente , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Sotalol/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos
4.
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev ; 10(3): 205-210, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34777826

RESUMEN

AF has been consistently associated with multiple forms of dementia, including idiopathic dementia. Outcomes after catheter ablation for AF are favourable and patients experience a better quality of life, arrhythmia-free survival, and lower rates of hospitalisation compared to patients treated with antiarrhythmic drugs. Catheter ablation is consistently associated with lower rates of stroke compared to AF management without ablation in large national and healthcare system databases. Multiple observational trials have shown that catheter ablation is also associated with a lower risk of cognitive decline, dementia and improved cognitive testing that can be explained through a variety of pathways. Long-term, adequately powered, randomised trials are required to define the role of catheter ablation in the management of AF as a means to lower the risk of cognitive decline, stroke and dementia.

6.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 20(10): 915-925, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30447898

RESUMEN

Despite the development of new therapies for the treatment of femoropopliteal disease, nitinol stents remain a mainstay of therapy following balloon angioplasty. Consequently, femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (FP-ISR) remains an important clinical problem. Interventions used to treat de novo lesions of the femoropopliteal segment have been used to treat ISR lesions, with disappointing outcomes. Early interventions focused on repeat balloon angioplasty, cryoplasty, and various debulking therapies. Recently, treatment has shifted towards the use of stent-grafts, drug-eluting therapies, and combination therapies. This review analyzes the evidence behind each treatment modality and provides insight into future directions for optimal endovascular management of FP-ISR.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Arteria Femoral , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Stents , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Constricción Patológica , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Recurrencia , Retratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
7.
Open Heart ; 5(1): e000744, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29344382

RESUMEN

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) secondary to congenital heart disease (CHD) is the third most common cause of PAH, and it is becoming increasingly common as improvements in the management of CHD have led to increased life expectancy for these patients. The medical management of PAH due to CHD (PAH-CHD) is largely the same as what has been used for the treatment of idiopathic PAH, though the body of literature supporting this management decision is very small. There are currently few studies available which specifically focus on the treatment of PAH-CHD. The purpose of this literature review is to compare the results of those studies that assessed the response to medical therapy among adults with PAH-CHD; studies were excluded if they focused on paediatric patients, did not include an assessment of 6 min walking distance or specifically assessed combination therapies. This review found that riociguat, bosentan, epoprostenol and sildenafil were all capable of improving functional capacity and haemodynamic parameters in patients with PAH-CHD, but whether this corresponds to an increase in mortality remains to be seen. Limitations of this review include the small sample size and variable duration of the included studies, which makes drawing direct comparisons between studies and the study drugs difficult. The lack of large, randomised double-blind clinical trials comparing different drugs head to head highlights an area that is ripe for ongoing medical research, the results of which may help shape future treatment algorithms tailored specifically for adults with PAH-CHD.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA