Phase III clinical trial of the combination of cisplatin, dacarbazine, and carmustine with or without tamoxifen in patients with advanced malignant melanoma.

PURPOSE: A prospective randomized phase III clinical trial was conducted to assess whether the addition of tamoxifen (TAM) to the three-agent regimen of cisplatin (CDDP), dacarbazine (DTIC), and carmustine (BCNU) significantly increased the progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with advanced malignant melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced malignant melanoma were treated with CDDP + DTIC + BCNU (CDB) with or without TAM. The dose schedule was CDDP 25 mg/m(2) given intravenously (IV) for 30 to 45 minutes in 500 mL of dextrose and (1/2) normal saline (NS) on days 1 to 3 of a 3-week cycle; DTIC 220 mg/m(2) IV for 1 hour in 500 mL of dextrose and (1/2) NaCl on days 1 to 3 of a 3-week cycle; BCNU 150 mg/m(2) IV for 2 to 3 hours in 750 to 1,000 mL of dextrose and 5% water on day 1 of every odd 3-week cycle; and TAM 20 mg taken orally every morning. RESULTS: There were 184 eligible patients enrolled. These patients were observed until death or for a minimum of 1.3 years. At last contact, 12 were still alive. The median time to progression was 3.4 months on the CDB arm and 3.1 months on the CDB + TAM arm. The median survival time was 6.8 months with CDB and 6.9 months with CDB + TAM. Progression-free survival (P =.429) and overall survival (P =.545) were not found to differ by treatment. CONCLUSION: The addition of TAM to this three-agent regimen of CDB was not found to provide a meaningful clinical advantage in the treatment of patients with advanced malignant melanoma.

A randomized trial of tamoxifen alone or combined with octreotide in the treatment of women with metastatic breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen (TAM) is generally considered the hormonal agent of choice for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast carcinoma. The somatostatin analogues, including octreotide, have demonstrated inhibition of breast carcinoma cell lines and multiple endocrinologic actions, including reduction of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), a potent mitogen for breast carcinoma cells. In an attempt to improve the efficacy of TAM, this randomized trial was performed. METHODS: One hundred thirty-five eligible postmenopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma were randomized to TAM (10 mg twice daily) alone or combined with octreotide 150 microg (administered subcutaneously thrice daily). The two groups were well balanced, except the TAM group had higher proportions of patients with visceral disease (50% vs. 37%) and a disease free interval longer than 5 years (47% vs. 34%). A cohort of 18 patients was evaluated for the impact of treatment on serum IGF-I, free IGF-I, IGF binding protein 3 levels, and total IGF binding capacity. RESULTS: The median time to progression was estimated to be 14.2 months with TAM and 10.3 months with TAM plus octreotide. The distribution of progression free survival times revealed no significant difference (P = 0.26), and the progression hazard ratio (TAM/TAM + octreotide) was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.17). The distribution of survival times revealed no significant difference (P = 0.92), and the death hazard ratio was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.62-1.55). When the 106 patients with measurable or evaluable disease were considered, the objective response rate was 49% with TAM alone and 43% with TAM plus octreotide (P = 0.70). Patients who received TAM plus octreotide had higher incidences of nausea, diarrhea, and steatorrhea. The percentage of decline in serum IGF-I, from pretreatment levels to those following 3-6 weeks of treatment, was significantly greater (P < 0.01) with TAM plus octreotide than with TAM alone. CONCLUSIONS: There is no indication that the combination of TAM plus octreotide as administered in this study is substantially more efficacious than TAM alone in the treatment of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma. The limited cohort included in IGF-I studies suggests that TAM plus octreotide produces a significantly greater reduction in serum IGF-I levels.

A phase II study of high-dose cimetidine and the combination 5-fluorouracil, interferon alpha-2A, and leucovorin in advanced renal cell adenocarcinoma.

Cimetidine is an H2-receptor antagonist used in the management of peptic ulcer disease and other hypersecretory gastrointestinal disorders. This agent has intriguing immunomodulatory characteristics. A phase II trial of cimetidine in 19 patients with advanced malignant melanoma yielded an objective response rate of 16%. Having demonstrated that cimetidine is active in malignant melanoma, the authors conducted a phase II trial of cimetidine, 800 mg twice daily by mouth, in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Among the 31 eligible patients, only one (3.2%) achieved a regression. It was a partial regression lasting 93 days. Median time to treatment failure was 83 days. The combination of interferon alpha-2A (IFL-RA) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been shown to be synergistic against experimental cell lines in vitro. Citrovorum factor (CF) added to 5-FU has been shown to improve objective tumor response compared with single-agent 5-FU in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Fluorinated pyrimidines have shown some activity against renal cell cancer. We conducted a phase II trial of the combination of CF at 20 mg/m2 intravenous push followed by 5-FU at 325 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 5 days every week with interferon alpha-2A 5 x 10(6) units/m2 subcutaneously on days 1, 3, 5 in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Among the 31 eligible patients, only two (6.5%) achieved a regression. Both were partial regressions. Median time to treatment failure was 84 days. Neither regimen is recommended for further testing in patients with advanced renal cell adenocarcinoma.

Prospective evaluation of vitamin E for hot flashes in breast cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: Hot flashes represent a substantial clinical problem for some breast cancer survivors. Although estrogen or progesterone preparations can alleviate these symptoms in many patients, concern remains regarding the use of hormonal preparations in such women. Thus, there is a perceived need for nonhormonal treatments for hot flashes for breast cancer survivors. Based on anecdotal evidence that vitamin E was helpful, we designed a trial to investigate this matter. METHODS: We developed and conducted a placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover trial where, after a 1 week baseline period, patients received 4 weeks of vitamin E 800 IU daily, then 4 weeks of an identical-appearing placebo, or vice versa. Diaries were used to measure potential toxicities and hot flashes during the baseline week and the two subsequent 4-week treatment periods. RESULTS: The 120 patients evaluated for toxicity failed to show any. The 105 patients who finished the first treatment period showed a similar reduction in hot flash frequencies (25% v 22%; P = .90) for the two study arms. A crossover analysis, however, showed that vitamin E was associated with a minimal decrease in hot flashes (one less hot flash per day than was seen with a placebo) (P < or = .05). At the study end, patients did not prefer vitamin E over the placebo (32% v 29%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although this trial was able to show a statistically significant hot flash reduction with vitamin E compared to a placebo, the clinical magnitude of this reduction was marginal.

Mitoxantrone dose augmentation utilizing filgrastim support in combination with fixed-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in women with metastatic breast cancer.

Based on reports of substantial antitumor efficacy of the combination of mitoxantrone (DHAD), 5-fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV), a clinical trial was performed to attempt augmentation of the dose of DHAD with filgrastim support. The doses and schedules, all intravenous, were DHAD (total dose divided over days 1 and 2), level I, 16 mg/m2; II, 20 mg/m2; III, 24 mg/m2; IV, 32 mg/m2; and LV, 300 mg, followed by FU, 350 mg/m2, on days 1-3. Filgrastim was given at 5 micrograms/kg/day subcutaneously on days 4-13. The planned cycle length was 21 days. Three or 4 patients were to be entered at each dose level and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose immediately below that which resulted in 2 patients with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in cycle 1. Once an apparent MTD was identified, an additional 6 patients were to be entered. Twenty patients (pts) were entered: level I: 3 pts; II: 3 pts; III: 10 pts: IV: 4 pts. The major toxicity was found to be cumulative thrombocytopenia with platelet counts < or = 20,000/microL occurring after cycle 1 at all levels beyond level I and five pts (25%) were removed from treatment solely because of platelet toxicity. Additional serious toxicities included grade 4 stomatitis in one patient (level IV) and cardiac toxicity in 2 patients with prior doxorubicin exposure. Ten pts had measurable and 8 had evaluable disease, and in 17 pts assessed, 5 (29%) achieved an objective response. The response rates in this study are lower than reported in the literature for the combination of DHAD, 5FU, LV and this may be related to the fact that only 40% of the patients were removed from protocol treatment because of disease progression. On the basis of limited DHAD-dose augmentation, toxicities observed, and modest response rate, the filgrastim-supported DHAD, 5FU, LV regimen as utilized in this study cannot be recommended for further development for treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer.

Phase II study of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in recurrent primary brain tumor.

Thirty patients with recurrent primary brain tumors were treated with a combination of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. There were three responses seen. Toxicity consisted of stomatitis, diarrhea, and hematological suppression. 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin would appear to be minimally effective in recurrent brain tumors.

A prospective study of pulmonary function in patients receiving mitomycin.

Mitomycin is a chemotherapeutic agent that is used to treat a variety of solid tumors. Pulmonary toxic reactions from this agent can be life threatening. We prospectively investigated the utility of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in monitoring for the occurrence of pulmonary toxicity due to mitomycin. PFTs were obtained at baseline and after three cycles of mitomycin therapy. We analyzed the clinical course, radiologic studies, and PFT results in 133 patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the lung randomized to treatment with either mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin or mitomycin alone as part of a prospective treatment protocol of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG). The diffusing capacity (DCO) was available in only 40 patients after the third cycle due to a high rate of progression and death from their underlying disease. After three cycles of chemotherapy, there was an average decline in the DCO of 14% (p<0.0001) and no changes were observed in expiratory flows. No differences were noted between treatment arms. A significant decline in the DCO (defined as a >20% change after correcting for hemoglobin) was noted in 11 of 40 patients (28%). This decline in the DCO was not associated with a worse prognosis (p=0.77). Seven patients (5%) developed severe pulmonary toxic reactions attributed to chemotherapy, including noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, interstitial pneumonitis, and pleural effusions. Corticosteroid therapy resulted in temporary subjective improvement in three patients. The Dco did not correlate with the development of pulmonary toxic reactions in these seven patients. In conclusion, (1) the incidence of clinically significant pulmonary toxic reactions from mitomycin is relatively low (5%), (2) mitomycin therapy resulted in a greater than 20% decline in the DCO in approximately one-fourth of patients receiving three cycles of chemotherapy, and (3) the use of serial PFTs in patients receiving mitomycin was not shown to be predictive of pulmonary toxicity.

A phase III evaluation of a somatostatin analogue (octreotide) in the treatment of patients with asymptomatic advanced colon carcinoma. North Central Cancer Treatment Group and the Mayo Clinic.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine by randomized, controlled, double-blind evaluation whether therapy with the somatostatin analogue, octreotide, would delay tumor progression and improve survival of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinomas who were ambulatory with no significant symptoms. METHODS: Two hundred sixty patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and without symptoms related to colon cancer were randomized to receive 150 micrograms of octreotide subcutaneously three times daily or, initially, no treatment. After 91 patients were entered in the double-blind study, saline placebo injections were used for patients in the control arm. RESULTS: The randomization culminated in balanced assignment of patients with respect to disease site(s), presence or absence of measurable or evaluable disease, and interval from diagnosis of metastasis to protocol entry. Steatorrhea and diarrhea, usually mildly severe, resulted more often from treatment than from the placebo. The major end points were time to progression and survival. Curves for both parameters overlapped in the blind and open trial segments. CONCLUSION: Octreotide at a dose of 150 micrograms given three times daily is not effective therapy for patients with advanced asymptomatic colon carcinoma.

Phase II trial of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma.

A phase II combination chemotherapy protocol combining methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was designed to evaluate tumor response and survival in patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Thirty patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma were assigned to chemotherapy treatment at 4-week intervals with methotrexate 30 mg/m2 i.v. Days 1, 15, and 22; vinblastine 3 mg/m2 i.v. Days 2, 15, and 22; doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 i.v. Day 2; and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 i.v. Day 2. After a median of four cycles (maximum number two cycles beyond complete regression; minimum six cycles for stable partial regression), we observed objective regression in 20 patients (67%) (95% CI, 50, 84) with complete regression in 8 patients (27%) and partial regression in 12 patients (40%). Median overall survival was 9.9 months (range, 0.3-34.2), and median survival of responders was 11.0 months (range, 2.6-34.2) from initial date of response. Toxicity was substantial with two treatment-related deaths and consisted predominantly of neutropenia (grade 3 or greater in 93% of the patients), alopecia, nausea, emesis, stomatitis, and azotemia. In conclusion, MVAC is a highly active outpatient chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma, achieving a high complete and partial response rate. Toxicity is substantial in this elderly patient population.

Fluorouracil plus levamisole as effective adjuvant therapy after resection of stage III colon carcinoma: a final report.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of two adjuvant therapy regimens in improving surgical cure rates in stage III (Dukes stage C) colon cancer. DESIGN: Randomized, concurrently controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Major cancer centers, universities, and community clinics affiliated with the North Cancer Treatment Group, the Southwest Oncology Group, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. PATIENTS: Those who had had curative-intent resections of stage III colon cancer in the previous 1 to 5 weeks. INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned to observation only, to levamisole alone (50 mg orally three times/d for 3 days, repeated every 2 weeks for 1 year), or to this regimen of levamisole plus fluorouracil (450 mg/m2 body surface area intravenously daily for 5 days and then, beginning at 28 days, weekly for 48 weeks). MEASUREMENTS: Rates of cancer recurrence and death. Early- and late-treatment side effects. RESULTS: With all 929 eligible patients able to be followed for 5 years or more (median follow-up, 6.5 years), fluorouracil plus levamisole reduced the recurrence rate by 40% (P < 0.0001) and the death rate by 33% (P = 0.0007). Levamisole reduced the recurrence rate by only 2% and the death rate by only 6%. With few exceptions, toxicity was mild and patient compliance was excellent. No evidence of late side effects was seen. CONCLUSION: Fluorouracil plus levamisole is tolerable adjuvant therapy to surgery; it has been confirmed to substantially increase cure rates for patients with high-risk (stage III) colon cancer. It should be considered standard treatment for all such patients not entered into clinical trials.

Inhibition of 5-fluorouracil-induced ocular irritation by ocular ice packs.

BACKGROUND: This clinical trial was developed to determine whether ocular ice pack therapy would decrease 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-induced ocular toxicity. METHODS: Sixty-two patients who suffered from 5-FU-induced ocular toxicity, and were scheduled to receive another cycle of the chemotherapy that caused the ocular toxicity, were entered in this clinical trial. A randomized, crossover design was used, with patients documenting their ocular toxicity by the use of daily diaries. RESULTS: The results from the first cycle of treatment suggested that ocular ice pack therapy decreased 5-FU-induced ocular toxicity (P = 0.056). The 38 evaluable patients in the crossover analyses demonstrated decreased ocular toxicity with ocular ice pack therapy (p = .001). The ocular ice pack therapy was well tolerated by most of the study participants. CONCLUSION: Ocular ice pack therapy appears to lessen 5-FU-induced ocular toxicity to a clinically moderate degree. Better methods for decreasing 5-FU-induced ocular toxicity are necessary.

Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil with or without estrogenic recruitment in women with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The fraction of breast cancer cells undergoing DNA synthesis at any one time is relatively low, which is problematic because most chemotherapeutic agents are most effective against dividing cells. Estrogens administered in vitro and in vivo can increase breast cancer cell proliferation. A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if estrogenic recruitment could increase the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy. METHODS: One hundred sixty-five women were randomized, with two excluded from these analyses, to either an intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) regimen alone (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2; methotrexate, 40 mg/m2; 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2) or CMF preceded by 3 days of diethylstilbestrol (DES) at a dose of 1 mg orally per day. The planned cycle length was 3 weeks. RESULTS: Objective responses were seen in 20 of 80 patients (25%) treated with CMF and 32 of 83 patients (39%) treated with DES-CMF, and this difference almost achieved statistical significance (chi-square, two-sided P = 0.06). However, duration of response, time to disease progression, and survival time were similar for the two regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Estrogenic recruitment with DES as used in this study does not substantially increase the efficacy of a CMF regimen administered intravenously every 3 weeks.

Phase II trial of edatrexate in small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival with extensive stage small cell lung cancer is rare. There have been no major advances in the treatment of this stage of disease in the last 15-20 years. New agents with activity against this malignancy are needed. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of edatrexate against small cell lung cancer in a Phase II trial. METHODS: This was a multicenter cooperative oncology group trial. Patients were either previously untreated or had failed only one prior chemotherapy regimen. All previously untreated patients had extensive stage disease. Patients in whom prior therapy had been unsuccessful had either limited or extensive stage disease. All cases had histologic documentation. Patients received edatrexate (80 mg/m2) intravenously over 20-30 minutes every 7 days. Previously untreated patients with disease progression at any time or stable disease after 6 weeks of treatment were crossed over to treatment with cisplatin and etoposide. The primary end points of the study were clinical response and toxicity to edatrexate. All patients were observed for survival. RESULTS: Eleven previously untreated and 22 previously treated patients were enrolled. A median of five doses of chemotherapy was given to each group. No major clinical response was observed in either group. The median survival time for the 11 previously untreated patients was 9.8 months versus 3.7 months for individuals who had received prior therapy. Myelosuppression and stomatitis were the primary toxicities, and both were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Edatrexate is inactive against small cell lung cancer.

Transdermal clonidine for ameliorating tamoxifen-induced hot flashes.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of transdermal clonidine for alleviating tamoxifen-induced hot flashes in women with a history of breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, crossover design was used in this prospective study. Women with a history of breast cancer who were receiving tamoxifen and suffering from hot flashes were potentially eligible for this protocol study. RESULTS: Clonidine did reduce hot-flash frequency to a degree that was statistically impressive (P < .0001), but clinically moderate (20% reduction from baseline). It also decreased hot-flash severity (P = .02, 10% reduction from baseline). Clonidine was related to increased mouth dryness (P < .001), constipation (P < .02), itchiness under the patch (P < .01), and drowsiness (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Better means are needed to alleviate hot flashes among patients in whom estrogen therapy is contraindicated.

Sequencing and schedule effects of cisplatin plus etoposide in small-cell lung cancer: results of a North Central Cancer Treatment Group randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: The combination of etoposide (E) and cisplatin (P) is an accepted standard therapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, the optimal sequencing and administration schedule has not been defined. This study was designed to evaluate different sequencing and administration schedules of E and P in the treatment of SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred fifty-two eligible patients with limited-(LD) and extensive-stage (ED) SCLC were randomized to receive one of the following regimens: arm A, P 30 mg/m2 by intravenous (IV) bolus followed by E 130 mg/m2 bolus; arm B, E 130 mg/m2 bolus followed by P 30 mg/m2 bolus; arm C, E 130 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion and P 30 mg/m2 bolus at the end of each 24-hour infusion of E; arm D, E 130 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion and P 45 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion on day 2 and 3 only. Two 3-day induction cycles of IV EP were administered 4 weeks apart. Subsequent therapy was the same for all arms, consisting of four cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) at 4-week intervals. Consolidative thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were administered to responders. RESULTS: The overall response rate (84%) was similar in all treatment arms. Treatment arm A was associated with the best complete response (CR) rate (52%), the most favorable median survival time (MST) of 15 months, and a 26% 2-year survival rate. Patients with LD on arm A had a MST of 20 months and a 42% 2-year survival rate. Multivariate analysis indicated that extent of disease, performance status, arm of therapy, and sex were significant independent factors influencing survival. Toxicity of the four regimens was similar, except for greater thrombocytopenia on arm D. CONCLUSION: The bolus administration of EP with E following P for the first two cycles of chemotherapy was the most effective regimen, with especially encouraging survival for LD patients.

A phase III trial of mitomycin C alone versus mitomycin C, vinblastine, and cisplatin for metastatic squamous cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to confirm the efficacy of mitomycin C against metastatic squamous cell lung carcinoma and to compare the efficacy of single-agent therapy with a combination containing cisplatin, the authors conducted a randomized Phase III trial of mitomycin C alone versus mitomycin C, vinblastine, and cisplatin (MVP). METHODS: All patients had advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma, and survival was the primary end point. There were 133 eligible patients who received either mitomycin C alone (n = 64) or MVP (n = 69). The two groups were similar with respect to performance score, disease status, age, sex, and stage. RESULTS: The major objective response rates were 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-41%) and 43% (95% CI, 32-55%) for mitomycin C alone and MVP, respectively (P = 0.1). The median time to progression was 83 days for mitomycin C alone, compared with 119 days for MVP (P = 0.026). The median survival time was 114 days for mitomycin C and 163 days for MVP (P = 0.09). The 1-year survival rates were equivalent. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, and there were significantly greater leukocyte nadirs with MVP therapy (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Mitomycin C has antitumor activity against squamous cell lung carcinoma when used alone or in combination with MVP. The regimen containing cisplatin had marginally increased activity that did not translate into a clinically significant survival advantage.

A randomized prospective assessment of recombinant leukocyte A human interferon with or without aspirin in advanced renal adenocarcinoma.

We performed a prospective, controlled trial of recombinant leukocyte A interferon (IFN-alpha 2A) with or without aspirin (ASA) in 176 patients with assessable advanced renal cell cancer in light of a 34% response rate (10 of 29 patients) from the two-agent regimen in an earlier nonrandomized trial. This encouraging result was substantially higher than the 15% response rate typically achieved with IFN therapy alone. Eighty-seven patients received IFN-alpha 2A 20 x 10(6) U/m2 intramuscularly three times a week, and 89 received the same IFN therapy with ASA 600 mg orally four times each day. Each group was balanced as to relevant prognostic discriminants. Response rates were 8% for the group receiving ASA in addition to IFN, and 13% for the group receiving IFN alone (P = .30). The median times to progression were 1.9 months for the group receiving IFN with ASA and 2.7 months for the group receiving IFN alone (log-rank P = .36). The median survival durations were 8.8 months for the IFN and ASA group and 8.0 months for the IFN-only group (log-rank P = .60). These figures are also inferior to those typically reported from other studies. Our findings reemphasize the crucial role of randomized trials, admittedly cumbersome and time-consuming, to determine accurately the value of apparently promising therapies. Although some patients may derive benefit from IFN therapy, our findings raise disturbing questions regarding the potential IFN-alpha 2A according to the dose and schedule used in this trial to have any substantive impact on the ultimate outcome of disseminated renal cell cancer.

Inhibition of fluorouracil-induced stomatitis by oral cryotherapy.

Mucositis is a significant dose-limiting toxicity associated with fluorouracil (5FU), particularly when it is combined with leucovorin. We hypothesized that oral cryotherapy would cause local vasoconstriction and would temporarily decrease blood flow to the oral mucous membranes. If cryotherapy were used during the time of peak serum 5FU levels, then the oral mucous membranes would have less exposure to 5FU and thus develop less mucositis. To test this hypothesis, 95 patients scheduled to receive their first cycle of 5FU plus leucovorin were randomized to have oral cryotherapy at the time of chemotherapy administration or to serve as a control group. Subsequent mucositis was significantly reduced in the group assigned to receive cryotherapy as judged by the attending physicians (P = .0002) and by the patients themselves (P = .0001). We now routinely recommend this cryotherapy procedure for our patients receiving daily bolus 5FU plus leucovorin.

Bolus versus infusion regimens of etoposide and cisplatin in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a study of the North Central Cancer Treatment group.

In an effort to test clinically the hypothesis that the duration of cellular exposure to etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin (CDDP) is an important determinant of cytotoxicity, we performed a phase III randomized trial comparing an outpatient bolus regimen of combined VP-16 and CDDP with a sequential infusion over 72 hours of these same two drugs. All patients had stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, and survival was the primary end point. Of 113 patients randomly allocated to the study, 108 were assessable for response, survival, and toxicity. A major response was observed in 20 (37%) of 54 patients on the bolus regimen and in 16 (30%) of 54 patients receiving infusion therapy. The median time to progression was 61 and 88 days for bolus and infusion therapy, respectively. The median survival time was 148 and 157 days, respectively (P = .71). Study results were not consistent with the possibility that infusion therapy could be associated with a 50% improvement in median survival, i.e. from 5 months to 7 1/2 months. Toxicity was primarily myelosuppression and was significantly greater with the infusion regimen. We conclude that infusion therapy as tested in this protocol with VP-16 and CDDP does not offer any advantage in response rate, time to disease progression, or survival as compared with bolus therapy. In addition, infusion therapy is associated with a greater degree of neutropenia and more treatment-related deaths.

Weight change in women treated with adjuvant therapy or observed following mastectomy for node-positive breast cancer.

Six hundred forty-six women with node-positive breast cancer from two prospective, randomized, adjuvant breast cancer trials were evaluated for changes in weight during and after receiving 60 weeks of chemotherapy, chemohormonal therapy, or observation. The median weight change in the 545 patients remaining on protocol at 60 weeks for observed postmenopausal patients was +1.8 kg, for treated postmenopausal patients +3.6 kg, and for treated premenopausal patients +5.9 kg (P less than .001). After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, premenopausal women who gained more than the median weight at 60 weeks had a risk of relapse 1.5 times greater (covariate P = .17) and a risk of death 1.6 times greater (covariate P = .04) than premenopausal women who had gained less than the median weight. In the postmenopausal patients, the trend for inferior relapse-free and overall survival in those who gained more than the median weight at 60 weeks was not significant (P = .05). We conclude that, relative to observation, adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with greater weight gain in node-positive, postmenopausal breast cancer patients; the amount of weight gain appears greater for premenopausal than postmenopausal women, and in premenopausal women, excessive weight gain may be associated with an increase in relapse and cancer-related deaths in the selected patients who show no evidence of recurrence during 60 weeks of adjuvant chemotherapy. This last point must be interpreted with caution because of the exploratory nature of the analyses.