RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the degree of incorporation of cardiac rehabilitation in the Spanish National Health Service, to describe the characteristics of the programs, and to report on the opinions of those responsible for them regarding their progress. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Cardiac rehabilitation centers were identified from different sources. A questionnaire which included items about coverage, resources, activities and services, selection of patients, and opinions was mailed to the heads of all units. RESULTS: Twelve public centers with cardiac rehabilitation programs were identified. Cardiac rehabilitation was offered to 53% of all eligible patients. All units treated patients with myocardial infarction, 64% treated those with heart failure; and 60% high risk patients. Approximately 10-19% of all patients were women. The physicians involved most frequently in programs were cardiologists; nonmedical professionals who participated most often were physiotherapists, and 64% of all units had a staff psychologist. Phase II rehabilitation was provided by all units, and phase III treatment was provided mainly by units that operated in coordination with out-patient services (45%). All units provided physical exercise training and counseling about the disease and risk factors, and 73% of them provided psychological support. The main reasons cited for providing rehabilitation were its efficacy and ability to prevent illness; and the main barriers to more widespread use were lack of resources and support. About three-fourths (73%) of all doctors interviewed thought that primary health care centers could play an important role in rehabilitation programs. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac rehabilitation is poorly implemented in the Spanish National Health Service. The most significant differences between programs were related to the inclusion of high risk patients and with a diagnosis other than myocardial infarction, coordination with out-patient services, and provision of phase III rehabilitation.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Cardiopatías/rehabilitación , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administración , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Desarrollo de Programa , EspañaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: A variable percentage of patients with myocardial infarction treated with successful primary angioplasty and restoration of coronary flow show persistent ST-segment elevation, probably due to inadequate cellular reperfusion. We studied if persistent ST-segment elevation was a predictor of worse prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We comparatively studied the clinical and angiographic results of 116 acute myocardial infarction patients after successful primary angioplasty, which were classified into two groups depending on the persistence (> 50%) or reduction (= 50%) of ST-segment elevation between the electrocardiograms recorded before and after coronary angioplasty. RESULTS: In 96 patients (Group I) the ST-segment elevation improved after angioplasty and in 20 patients (Group II) there was no improvement. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups except for Killip class 4, which was more prevalent in group II (7.2 vs. 25%; p = 0.01). There were no differences in the characteristics or results of the procedure. There was more myocardial damage in group II (CK 3,149 1,636 vs. 2,185 2,010 U/l; p = 0.02), associated with a more impaired left ventricular ejection fraction in the late angiographic control (47 16 vs 55 16%; p = 0.05). At a one-year follow-up the mortality was 8.3% in group I and 30% in group II (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The persistence of ST-segment elevation after successful primary angioplasty identifies a group of patients that may suffer an increased risk of adverse events in spite of good epicardial flow.