Single nucleus transcriptomics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of combined CDK4/6 and mTOR inhibition in a phase 0/1 trial of recurrent high-grade glioma.

Outcomes for adult patients with a high-grade glioma continue to be dismal and new treatment paradigms are urgently needed. To optimize the opportunity for discovery, we performed a phase 0/1 dose-escalation clinical trial that investigated tumor pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and single nucleus transcriptomics following combined ribociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) and everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) treatment in recurrent high-grade glioma. Patients with a recurrent high-grade glioma (n = 24) harboring 1) CDKN2A / B deletion or CDK4 / 6 amplification, 2) PTEN loss or PIK3CA mutations, and 3) wild-type retinoblastoma protein (Rb) were enrolled. Patients received neoadjuvant ribociclib and everolimus treatment and no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The median unbound ribociclib concentrations in Gadolinium non-enhancing tumor regions were 170 nM (range, 65 - 1770 nM) and 634 nM (range, 68 - 2345 nM) in patients receiving 5 days treatment at the daily dose of 400 and 600 mg, respectively. Unbound everolimus concentrations were below the limit of detection (< 0.1 nM) in both enhancing and non-enhancing tumor regions at all dose levels. We identified a significant decrease in MIB1 positive cells suggesting ribociclib-associated cell cycle inhibition. Single nuclei RNAseq (snRNA) based comparisons of 17 IDH-wild-type on-trial recurrences to 31 IDH-wild-type standard of care treated recurrences data demonstrated a significantly lower fraction of cycling and neural progenitor-like (NPC-like) malignant cell populations. We validated the CDK4/6 inhibitor-directed malignant cell state shifts using three patient-derived cell lines. The presented clinical trial highlights the value of integrating pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and single nucleus transcriptomics to assess treatment effects in phase 0/1 surgical tissues, including malignant cell state shifts. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03834740 .

Oncogenic composite mutations can be predicted by co-mutations and their chromosomal location.

Genetic heterogeneity in tumors can show a remarkable selectivity when two or more independent genetic events occur in the same gene. This phenomenon, called composite mutation, points toward a selective pressure, which frequently causes therapy resistance to mutation-specific drugs. Since composite mutations have been described to occur in sub-clonal populations, they are not always captured through biopsy sampling. Here, we provide a proof of concept to predict composite mutations to anticipate which patients might be at risk for sub-clonally driven therapy resistance. We found that composite mutations occur in 5% of cancer patients, mostly affecting the PIK3CA, EGFR, BRAF, and KRAS genes, which are common precision medicine targets. Furthermore, we found a strong and significant relationship between the frequencies of composite mutations with commonly co-occurring mutations in a non-composite context. We also found that co-mutations are significantly enriched on the same chromosome. These observations were independently confirmed using cell line data. Finally, we show the feasibility of predicting compositive mutations based on their co-mutations (AUC 0.62, 0.81, 0.82, and 0.91 for EGFR, PIK3CA, KRAS, and BRAF, respectively). This prediction model could help to stratify patients who are at risk of developing therapy resistance-causing mutations.

IDHwt glioblastomas can be stratified by their transcriptional response to standard treatment, with implications for targeted therapy.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) brain tumors lacking IDH1 mutations (IDHwt) have the worst prognosis of all brain neoplasms. Patients receive surgery and chemoradiotherapy but tumors almost always fatally recur. RESULTS: Using RNA sequencing data from 107 pairs of pre- and post-standard treatment locally recurrent IDHwt GBM tumors, we identify two responder subtypes based on longitudinal changes in gene expression. In two thirds of patients, a specific subset of genes is upregulated from primary to recurrence (Up responders), and in one third, the same genes are downregulated (Down responders), specifically in neoplastic cells. Characterization of the responder subtypes indicates subtype-specific adaptive treatment resistance mechanisms that are associated with distinct changes in the tumor microenvironment. In Up responders, recurrent tumors are enriched in quiescent proneural GBM stem cells and differentiated neoplastic cells, with increased interaction with the surrounding normal brain and neurotransmitter signaling, whereas Down responders commonly undergo mesenchymal transition. ChIP-sequencing data from longitudinal GBM tumors suggests that the observed transcriptional reprogramming could be driven by Polycomb-based chromatin remodeling rather than DNA methylation. CONCLUSIONS: We show that the responder subtype is cancer-cell intrinsic, recapitulated in in vitro GBM cell models, and influenced by the presence of the tumor microenvironment. Stratifying GBM tumors by responder subtype may lead to more effective treatment.

Defining the Role of Extrachromosomal DNA Amplifications in Medulloblastoma.

Circular extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA), a common mechanism of oncogene amplification, has been identified as a major contributor to intratumoral heterogeneity and patient outcomes. In a recent publication in Nature Genetics, Chapman and colleagues further explored the role of ecDNA in the context of medulloblastoma. Using whole-genome sequencing, they found that 18% of the patients carry ecDNA amplification across a 468 medulloblastoma patient cohort. The presence of ecDNA was associated with worse survival. Single-cell FISH imaging and multiomic sequencing revealed that ecDNA copy number displayed a cell-to-cell variability within the sample, contributing to tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, through sequencing and CRISPRi experiments, the authors uncovered frequent enhancer rewiring events on ecDNA that drive proliferation.

The Epigenetic Evolution of Glioma Is Determined by the IDH1 Mutation Status and Treatment Regimen.

Tumor adaptation or selection is thought to underlie therapy resistance in glioma. To investigate longitudinal epigenetic evolution of gliomas in response to therapeutic pressure, we performed an epigenomic analysis of 132 matched initial and recurrent tumors from patients with IDH-wildtype (IDHwt) and IDH-mutant (IDHmut) glioma. IDHwt gliomas showed a stable epigenome over time with relatively low levels of global methylation. The epigenome of IDHmut gliomas showed initial high levels of genome-wide DNA methylation that was progressively reduced to levels similar to those of IDHwt tumors. Integration of epigenomics, gene expression, and functional genomics identified HOXD13 as a master regulator of IDHmut astrocytoma evolution. Furthermore, relapse of IDHmut tumors was accompanied by histologic progression that was associated with survival, as validated in an independent cohort. Finally, the initial cell composition of the tumor microenvironment varied between IDHwt and IDHmut tumors and changed differentially following treatment, suggesting increased neoangiogenesis and T-cell infiltration upon treatment of IDHmut gliomas. This study provides one of the largest cohorts of paired longitudinal glioma samples with epigenomic, transcriptomic, and genomic profiling and suggests that treatment of IDHmut glioma is associated with epigenomic evolution toward an IDHwt-like phenotype. SIGNIFICANCE: Standard treatments are related to loss of DNA methylation in IDHmut glioma, resulting in epigenetic activation of genes associated with tumor progression and alterations in the microenvironment that resemble treatment-naïve IDHwt glioma.