Medical help-seeking intentions among patients with early Alzheimer's disease.

Background: Limited information is available on the active process of seeking medical help in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) at early stages. The aim of this study was to assess the phenomenon of medical help-seeking in early AD and to identify associated factors. Methods: A multicenter, non-interventional study was conducted including patients of 50-90 years of age with prodromal or mild AD (National Institute on Aging/Alzheimer's Association criteria), a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 22, and a Clinical Dementia Rating-Global score (CDR-GS) of 0.5-1.0. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 149 patients were included. Mean age (SD) was 72.3 (7.0) years, 50.3% were female, and 87.2% had a CDR-GS score of 0.5. Mean disease duration was 1.4 (1.8) years. Ninety-four (63.1%) patients sought medical help, mostly from neurologists. Patients with help-seeking intentions were mostly female (60.6%) with a CDR-GS score of 0.5 (91.5%) and had a greater awareness of diagnosis, poorer quality of life, more depressive symptoms, and a more severe perception of their condition than their counterparts. Lack of help-seeking intentions was associated with male sex (p = 0.003), fewer years of education (p = 0.005), a low awareness of diagnosis (p = 0.005), and a low emotional consequence of the condition (p = 0.016). Conclusion: Understanding the phenomenon of active medical help-seeking may facilitate the design of specific strategies to improve the detection of cognitive impairment, especially in patients with a lower level of educational attainment and poor awareness of their condition.

Extensive pharmacokinetic variability of Levetiracetam. ¿Are doctors aware?

INTRODUCTION: Levetiracetam was presented as a drug with linear pharmacokinetics. There is currently evidence on its extensive pharmacokinetic variability in real clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To describe levetiracetam pharmacokinetic variability in patients with epilepsy in real clinical practice. To evaluate the effect on levetiracetam levels of gender, age, renal function, and polytherapy. To describe how clinicians prescribe based on age and co-medication. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of epilepsy patients treated with levetiracetam for whom plasma levels were available. RESULTS: 151 patients. Median levetiracetam level of 17.75 mg/L, median dose of 2000 mg/day. There was a significant correlation between daily dose and serum levels (p < 0.01). There was a 18.1% increase in levetiracetam concentration/dose ratio in patients over 65 years of age (p < 0.05) that also correlated with decreased glomerular filtration (p < 0.01). Clinicians corrected doses so patients over 65 years had similar levels than younger patients. There was a 30.1% decrease of concentration/dose ratio in patients on polytherapy with potent enzyme inducer antiseizure medication (p < 0.05), and a 46.3% decrease for carbamazepine (p < 0.01). Clinicians did not correct doses, so patients treated with levetiracetam and carbamazepine had 27.5% lower levels than patients taking other polytherapy. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic variability of levetiracetam is wider than originally thought. Age and co-medication with strong enzyme-inducing drugs, especially carbamazepine, significantly influence levetiracetam levels. Clinicians at our center did not consider this interaction and prescribed similar doses of levetiracetam when it was used in combination with these drugs or with others, so they probably were not aware of this interaction.

Quality of Life and the Experience of Living with Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to better understand the experience of patients living with Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the early stages. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the perception of quality of life in patients with early-stage AD. METHODS: A multicenter, non-interventional study was conducted including patients of 50-90 years of age with prodromal or mild AD, a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥22, and a Clinical Dementia Rating-Global score (CDR-GS) of 0.5.-1.0. The Quality of Life in Alzheimer 's Disease (QoL-AD) questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life. A battery of self-report instruments was used to evaluate different psychological and behavioral domains. Associations between the QoL-AD and other outcome measures were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlations. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were included. Mean age (SD) was 72.3 (7.0) years and mean disease duration was 1.4 (1.8) years. Mean MMSE score was 24.6 (2.1). The mean QoL-AD score was 37.9 (4.5). Eighty-three percent (n = 124) of patients had moderate-to-severe hopelessness, 22.1% (n = 33) had depressive symptoms, and 36.9% (n = 55) felt stigmatized. The quality of life showed a significant positive correlation with self-efficacy and negative correlations with depression, emotional and practical consequences, stigma, and hopelessness. CONCLUSION: Stigma, depressive symptoms, and hopelessness are frequent scenarios in AD negatively impacting quality of life, even in a population with short disease duration and minimal cognitive impairment.

Awareness of Diagnosis in Persons with Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease: An Observational Study in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Limited information is available on people's experiences of living with Alzheimer's disease (AD) at earlier stages. This study assessed awareness of diagnosis among people with early-stage AD and its impact on different person-centered outcome measures. METHODS: We conducted an observational, cross-sectional study in 21 memory clinics in Spain. Persons aged 50-90 years, diagnosed with prodromal or mild AD (NIA/AA criteria), a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 22, and a Clinical Dementia Rating-Global score (CDR-GS) of 0.5 or 1.0 were recruited. The Representations and Adjustment to Dementia Index (RADIX) was used to assess participants' beliefs about their condition and its consequences. RESULTS: A total of 149 persons with early-stage AD were studied. Mean (SD) age was 72.3 (7.0) years and 50.3% were female. Mean duration of AD was 1.4 (1.8) years. Mean MMSE score was 24.6 (2.1) and 87.2% had a CDR-GS score of 0.5. Most participants (n = 84, 57.5%) used a descriptive term related to specific AD symptoms (e.g., memory difficulties) when asked what they called their condition. Participants aware of their diagnosis using the term AD (n = 66, 45.2%) were younger, had more depressive symptoms, and poorer life satisfaction and quality of life compared to those without awareness of their specific diagnosis. Practical and emotional consequences RADIX scores showed a significant negative correlation with Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease score (rho = - 0.389 and - 0.413, respectively; p < 0.0001). Years of education was the only predictor of awareness of AD diagnosis [OR = 1.04 (95% CI 1.00-1.08); p = 0.029]. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of diagnosis was a common phenomenon in persons with early-stage AD negatively impacting their quality of life. Understanding illness representations in earlier stages may facilitate implementing optimized care that supports improved quality of life and well-being.

Patients' self-assessment of essential tremor severity by a validated scale: A useful tool in telemedicine?

INTRODUCTION: There are some validated rating scales to assess severity of Essential tremor (ET), the most common cause of action tremor. Clinical evaluation through telematic consultations has been expanding in the last decade. Patients' self-assessment of tremor severity at home could constitute a useful tool in telemedicine. This paper aims to assess intrarater and interrater reliability of ET severity using Fahn-Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) for patients' and neurologists' ratings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were instructed on how to perform and rate the FTMTRS tasks. Supervised by neurologists, each patient performed one FTMTRS self-assessment at the hospital, which was rated in a blinded way by two neurologists, and six more self-assessments at home afterwards. Postural, intention and specific-tasks tremor were rated. A cumulative linked mixed model was used to assess intrarater and interrater reliability. RESULTS: A total of 161 self-assessments from 19 patients were analyzed. Intrarater reliability of patients' self-ratings at home showed ICCs between 0.843 and 0.962. Interrater ICCs of neurologists' ratings were also excellent for all tremor types (0.903-0.987). Concordance between neurologists' and patients' assessments showed ICCs ranging from 0.407 to 0.824, with the higher agreement for writing/drawing-related tremor (0.824; CI 95% 0.634-0.989). CONCLUSIONS: The rating of ET severity from FTMTRS self-assessments performed by well-trained patients at home could be a suitable clinical measure to assess tremor in non-face-to-face medical consultations. The assessment of tremor during specific tasks could be the most efficient measure for the patient self-assessment at home. These results could be useful in telemedicine.

Perceived quality of life (QOLIE-31-P), depression (NDDI-E), anxiety (GAD-7), and insomnia in patients with epilepsy attended at a refractory epilepsy unit in real-life clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the relationship between psychiatric comorbidity (anxiety and depression), somnolence, and quality of life, using validated scales in patients with epilepsy in real-life clinical practice and clinical and demographic variables. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted. Self-administered scales of anxiety disorders (GAD-7), depression (NDDI-E), somnolence (Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)), and quality of life (QOLIE-31-P) in patients with epilepsy treated in the refractory epilepsy unit of a tertiary hospital were employed. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients, 44.3 ± 17.4 years, 48.2% women, epilepsy duration 21.5 ± 15.9 years, and number of antiepileptic drugs 1.9 ± 1.2 were included. Severe anxiety was present in 14.3%, depression in 20.2%, and somnolence in 14.3% of patients. QOLIE-31-P score was 62.0 ± 19.2. Depression and focal epilepsy (OR = 4.5[1.3, 20.7], p = 0.029), as well as anxiety and temporal lobe epilepsy (OR = 4.3 [1.0, 18.1], p = 0.044), were associated. Moreover, relationships between worse quality of life and higher scores from NDDI-E (ß = - 1.42, adjusted p = 0.006) and GAD-7 (ß = - 1.21, adjusted p = 0.006), especially in drug-resistant epilepsy (ß = - 8.08, adjusted p = 0.045) and female sex (ß = - 7.83, adjusted p = 0.034), were identified. Statistically significant negative associations were observed between problems to fall asleep and overall quality of life score (ß = - 11.64, adjusted p = 0.022), sleep disturbance and energy (ß = - 14.78, adjusted p = 0.027), and mood (ß = 12.40, adjusted p = 0.027) scores. CONCLUSIONS: The multidimensional evaluation revealed that higher levels of anxiety and depression are associated with worse quality of life in real clinical practice in patients with epilepsy, especially in females and drug-resistant epilepsy. In addition, sleep disturbances are associated with particular aspects of the quality of life. Further studies with longitudinal follow-up would be useful to adequately manage these comorbidities in patients with epilepsy.

Medium-term changes in patients with epilepsy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to social distancing measures and impaired medical care of chronic neurological diseases, including epilepsy, which may have adversely affected well-being and quality of life of patients with epilepsy (PWE). The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the levels of anxiety, depression, somnolence, and quality of life using validated scales in PWE in real-life clinical practice. MATERIALS & METHODS: Self-administered scales of anxiety disorders (GAD-7), depression (NDDI-E), somnolence (Epworth Sleepiness Scale; ESS), and quality of life (QOLIE-31-P) in PWE treated in a Refractory Epilepsy Unit were longitudinally analyzed. Data were collected before the beginning (December 2019 - March 2020) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (September 2020-January 2021). RESULTS: 158 patients (85 from the first round and 73 from the second round) 45.0 ± 17.3 years of age, 43.2% women, epilepsy duration 23.0 ± 14.9 years, number of antiepileptic drugs 2.1 ± 1.4, completed the survey. Significant longitudinal reduction of QOLIE-31-P (from 58.9 ± 19.7 to 56.2 ± 16.2, p = .035) and GAD-7 scores (from 8.8 ± 6.2 to 8.3 ± 5.9, corrected p = .024) was identified. No statistically significant longitudinal changes in the number of seizures (from 0.9 ± 1.9 to 2.5 ± 6.2, p = .125) or NDDI-E scores (from 12.3 ± 4.3 to 13.4 ± 4.4, p = .065) were found. Significant longitudinal increase of ESS (from 4.9 ± 3.7 to 7.4 ± 4.9, p = .001) was found. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, quality of life and anxiety levels were lower in PWE, and sleepiness levels were raised, without seizure change.

Continuous Monitoring of Essential Tremor Using a Portable System Based on Smartwatch.

INTRODUCTION: Essential tremor (ET) shows amplitude fluctuations throughout the day, presenting challenges in both clinical and treatment monitoring. Tremor severity is currently evaluated by validated rating scales, which only provide a timely and subjective assessment during a clinical visit. Motor sensors have shown favorable performances in quantifying tremor objectively. METHODS: A new highly portable system was used to monitor tremor continuously during daily lives. It consists of a smartwatch with a triaxial accelerometer, a smartphone, and a remote server. An experiment was conducted involving eight ET patients. The average effective data collection time per patient was 26 (±6.05) hours. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) was adopted as the gold standard to classify tremor and to validate the performance of the system. Quantitative analysis of tremor severity on different time scales is validated. RESULTS: Significant correlations were observed between neurologist's FTMTRS and patient's FTMTRS auto-assessment scores (r = 0.84; p = 0.009), between the device quantitative measures and the scores from the standardized assessments of neurologists (r = 0.80; p = 0.005) and patient's auto-evaluation (r = 0.97; p = 0.032), and between patient's FTMTRS auto-assessment scores day-to-day (r = 0.87; p < 0.001). A graphical representation of four patients with different degrees of tremor was presented, and a representative system is proposed to summarize the tremor scoring at different time scales. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of prolonged and continuous monitoring of tremor severity during daily activities by a highly portable non-restrictive system, a useful tool to analyze efficacy and effectiveness of treatment.