[Consensus statement "Dementia 2010" of the Austrian Alzheimer Society]. / Konsensusstatement "Demenz 2010" der Osterreichischen Alzheimer Gesellschaft.

The Austrian Alzheimer Society developed evidence-based guidelines based on a systematic literature search and criteria-guided assessment with subsequent transparent determination of grades of clinical recommendation. The authors evaluated currently available therapeutic approaches for the most common forms of dementia and focused on diagnosis and pharmacological intervention, taking into consideration the situation in Austria. The purpose of these guidelines is the rational and cost-effective use of diagnostic and therapeutic measures in dementing illnesses. Users are physicians and all other providers of care for patients with dementia in Austria.

No benefit derived from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: a prospective, single centre, randomised, double blind, sham controlled "add on" trial.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been reported to demonstrate slight effects in the treatment of depression. Hence, a novel bilateral versus unilateral and sham stimulation design was applied to further assess rTMS' antidepressant effects. Forty one medication free patients with major depression, admitted to a psychiatric unit specialising in affective disorders, were consecutively randomised into 3 groups. Group A1 (n = 12) received unilateral active stimulation consisting of high frequency (hf) rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPC) and subsequent sham low frequency (lf) rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (RDLPC). Group A2 (n = 13) received simultaneous bilateral active stimulation consisting of hf-rTMS over the LDLPC and lf-rTMS over the RDLPC. Group C (n = 13) received bilateral sham stimulation. Stimulation was performed on 10 consecutive workdays. All patients received antidepressant medication on the first day of stimulation, which was continued during and after the stimulation period. As no significant difference in antidepressant outcome between group A1 and A2 was found, the two groups were pooled. The time course of the outcome variables Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS(21)) and Beck depression inventory (days 0, 7, 14, 28) by repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no significant group differences (in terms of a group by time interaction), whereas there was a significant effect of time on all three outcome variables in all groups. The results suggest that rTMS as an "add on" strategy, applied in a unilateral and a bilateral stimulation paradigm, does not exert an additional antidepressant effect.

Fluoxetine in Alzheimer's disease with severe obsessive compulsive symptoms and a low density of serotonin transporter sites.

The treatment of behavioral disturbances is particularly challenging in patients suffering from dementia. In an 80-year-old female patient with probable AD and severe obsessive and compulsive symptoms, we demonstrated a significant reduction in the density of serotonin transporter sites using 1231-beta-CIT SPECT. Treatment with fluoxetine for 6 months resulted in significant symptom relief and an increasing density of serotonin transporter sites when compared to the beginning of treatment. Therefore, this report provides evidence that fluoxetine is a treatment option for patients with AD and severe obsessive-compulsive symptoms and highlights the importance of the serotoninergic system.

Selection bias in clinical trials with antipsychotics.

Although the selection of patients is known to be a powerful factor affecting the results of clinical trials, little is known about recruitment issues. Many patients with schizophrenia who are screened for a clinical trial of an investigational antipsychotic are ultimately not included in the study. Therefore, the question arises of whether the results obtained by studying a selected group of patients are really representative of the general population of patients with schizophrenia. The authors studied possible reasons for selective sampling in 200 patients who were consecutively admitted to inpatient units of Innsbruck's Department of Psychiatry with a diagnosis of schizophreniform or schizophrenic disorder over a time period of 33 months. Apart from demographic data and a psychopathologic rating (using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale), the authors recorded whether or not a patient was included in a phase III study and whether or not those were not included would have theoretically been eligible for such a study. Twenty-seven patients were finally recruited for a clinical trial. These patients were younger, on average, had a more recent onset of illness, and had experienced fewer psychotic episodes in the past. A history of noncompliance with previous treatment and the refusal of consent were the most common reasons for not including theoretically eligible patients in a clinical trial.