Advantages with prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF versus rhG-CSF in breast cancer patients receiving multiple cycles of myelosuppressive chemotherapy: an open-label, randomized, multicenter phase III study.

BACKGROUND: PEG-rhG-CSF reduces neutropenia and improves chemotherapy safety. In China's registration trial (CFDA: 2006L01305), we assessed its efficacy and safety against rhG-CSF, and prospectively explored its value over multiple cycles of chemotherapy. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, multicenter phase 3 study, breast cancer patients (n = 569) were randomized to receive PEG-rhG-CSF 100 µg/kg, PEG-rhG-CSF 6 mg, or rhG-CSF 5 µg/kg/d after chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were the incidence and duration of grade 3/4 neutropenia during cycle 1. Secondary endpoints included the incidence and duration of grade 3/4 neutropenia during cycles 2-4, the incidence of febrile neutropenia, and the safety. RESULTS: A once-per-cycle PEG-rhG-CSF at either 100 µg/kg or 6 mg was not different from daily injections of rhG-CSF for either incidence or duration of grade 3/4 neutropenia. Interestingly, a substantial difference was noted during cycle 2, and the difference became bigger over cycles 3-4, reaching a statistical significance at cycle 4 in either incidence (P = 0.0309) or duration (P = 0.0289) favoring PEG-rhG-CSF. A significant trend toward a lower incidence of all-grade adverse events was noted at 129 (68.98%), 142 (75.53%), and 160 (82.47%) in the PEG-rhG-CSF 100 µg/kg and 6 mg and rhG-CSF groups, respectively (P = 0.0085). The corresponding incidence of grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events was 2/187 (1.07%), 1/188 (0.53%), and 8/194 (4.12%), respectively (P = 0.0477). Additionally, PFS in metastatic patients preferred PEG-rhG-CSF to rhG-CSF despite no significance observed by Kaplan-Meier analysis (n = 49, P = 0.153). CONCLUSIONS: PEG-rhG-CSF is a more convenient and safe formulation and a more effective prophylactic measure in breast cancer patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy.

VEGF and bFGF increase survival of xenografted human ovarian tissue in an experimental rabbit model.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine whether vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) could increase the survival of xenografted human ovarian tissue in an experimental rabbit model. METHODS: Fresh human ovarian tissue was xenotransplanted into the back muscle of 25 castrated female New Zealand rabbits for 6 weeks with the immunosuppression of FTY720 (2 mg/kg/d). Rabbits were randomly divided into five experimental groups: (A) graft and host treatment with VEGF (50 ng/ml); (B) graft and host treatment with bFGF (100 ng/ml); (C) graft and host treatment with VEGF(50 ng/ml) + bFGF (100 ng/ml); (D) graft and host treatment with normal saline; (E) control group, no treatment. 4 weeks after transplantation, human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) 10 IU was administered every second day in group A, group B, group C and group D for 2 weeks. Graft survival was assessed by graft recovery rate, histological analysis, immunohistochemical staining for CD31 and Ki-67expression, TUNEL assay. RESULTS: After 6 weeks of grafting, the number of CD31-positive stained cells increased significantly in group A, group B and group C compared to the control group. All groups showed strong Ki-67 immunostaining in ovarian stroma. Only one rabbit in group C retained the grafts' follicles. Grafting resulted in relative lower fibrosis in group A and group C compared to the control group. Apoptosis was significantly lower in group C compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Fresh human ovarian cortex grafted into the back muscle of rabbit can sustain part of ovarian tissue function with the immunosuppression of FTY720, although follicle number diminishes significantly after grafting. The administration of VEGF and bFGF, especially the combination of them, may trigger angiogenesis, reduce apoptosis and fibrosis, increase survival in transplanted human ovarian tissue.

[Research on the health risk assessment of chemical pollutants in reclaimed water used for streets watering].

It is the first time for this research to utilize the method of health risk assessment. Combining with Beijing reclaimed water project, the exposure dose level and health risk to contact people are investigated and studied. The risk assessment model is built, and the exposure parameters of occupational workers and common people are provided, when reclaimed water was used for streets watering. The health risks of 19 main chemical pollutants in reclaimed water are evaluated quantificationally. The results show that the total risk caused by carcinogens is 8.47 x 10(-)6 for occupational workers and 3.78 x 10(-6) for common people.

[Exposure assessment of various reclaimed water uses].

The exposure assessment method and model of various reclaimed water uses are built combining with Beijing reclaimed water project. Firstly the daily ingesting dose and lifetime average daily dose (LADD) of exposure people are provided via field work and monitoring analysis, which could be used in health risk assessment as quantitative reference. Take park irrigation as a example, for occupational workers, the total daily ingesting dose is 0.07 L/d, LADD of disinfection by-products(DBPs) via the respiratory route is 2.8 x 10(-7) - 1.2 x 10(-5) mg x (kg x d)(-1), LADD of DBPs via the dermal route is 5.8 x 10(-8) - 2.4 x 10(-6) mg x (kg x d)(-1). For common people, the total daily ingesting dose is 0.04-0.05 L/d, LADD of DBPs via the respiratory route is 1.1 x 10(-7) - 6.8 x 10(-6) mg x (kg x d)(-1).