RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Turbo spin-echo (TSE) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences may reduce susceptibility artifacts and image distortion in sellar region, allowing better visualization of small pituitary lesions, and may be used to assist in the diagnosis of pituitary microadenomas. PURPOSE: To explore the application value of conventional MRI combined with DWI sequences in the diagnosis of microprolactinomas. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Thirty-four patients in microprolactinomas with high signal on T2WI (HT2-PRL) group (34 females, 34 ± 7 years), 26 patients in microprolactinomas with equal or low signal on T2WI (ELT2-PRL) group (21 females, 34 ± 7 years), 35 patients with hyperprolactinemia (33 females, 32 ± 8 years), and 30 normal controls (25 females, 31 ± 7 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: TSE sequence at 3 T. ASSESSMENT: Pituitary morphological parameters (such as length and volume), dynamic contrast-enhanced parameters (such as time to peak) and the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were measured in each group. STATISTICAL TESTS: ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare parameters among groups. Spearman's coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between variables. ROC analysis was used to assess the performance of the parameters. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The pituitary volume of patients in HT2-PRL, ELT2-PRL, and hyperprolactinemia group were 831.00 (747.60, 887.60), 923.63 ± 219.34, and 737.20 (606.40, 836.80) mm3. The pituitary maximum height in these three groups were 7.03 (6.43, 8.63), 8.03 ± 1.41, and 6.63 ± 1.28 mm, respectively. The lesion ADC value was significantly correlated with T2 relative signal intensity (the ratio of signal intensity of microprolactinoma or anterior pituitary to left temporal cortex) (r = 0.821). Compared with patients with hyperprolactinemia, the diagnostic efficacy of T2 relative signal intensity was higher in HT2-PRL group, with an AUC of 0.954, whereas the ADC value was the highest in ELT2-PRL group, with an AUC of 0.924. CONCLUSION: DWI sequences can be used to assist in the diagnosis of pituitary microadenomas. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the treatment of acute cholecystitis remains controversial. This retrospective study was undertaken to assess the clinical outcomes, possible advantages and disadvantages of early versus delayed LC for acute cholecystitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of all patients admitted for acute cholecystitis in whom laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted between January 2004 and January 2006, at National Taiwan University Hospital were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients were recruited to the study. Of these, 56 patients received early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC), and 33 patients received delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) following conservative therapy. There were no intergroup differences in age, gender, or days of symptoms prior to presentation. Patients undergoing ELC experienced a significantly longer operation time (109 +/- 37.59 minutes versus 77 +/- 25.65 minutes, p < 0.001), more blood loss (76ml versus 28ml, p = 0.006) and a longer post-operation hospital stay (4.5 days versus 2.6 days, p < 0.001). The conversion rate to open cholecystectomy was not significantly different (4/56 versus 2/33, p = 0.84), and there were no biliary tract injury or other major complications in either group. However, patients with ELC had a shorter total hospital stay (4.53 days versus 7.79 days, p < 0.001) and fewer admission times (1 time in ELC versus 2.4 times in DLC, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both early and delayed LC appears to be effective and safe in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Early LC may be more technically demanding and time-consuming, and may be associated with a higher rate of wound infections; however, it also tends to shorten the total length of hospital stay and reduce the risk of repeat cholecystitis. We recommend early LC for acute cholecystitis comparison with delayed LC.