Determinants of lenalidomide response with or without erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in myelodysplastic syndromes: the HOVON89 trial.

A randomized phase-II study was performed in low/int-1 risk MDS (IPSS) to study efficacy and safety of lenalidomide without (arm A) or with (arm B) ESA/G-CSF. In arm B, patients without erythroid response (HI-E) after 4 cycles received ESA; G-CSF was added if no HI-E was obtained by cycle 9. HI-E served as primary endpoint. Flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing were performed to identify predictors of response. The final evaluation comprised 184 patients; 84% non-del(5q), 16% isolated del(5q); median follow-up: 70.7 months. In arm A and B, 39 and 41% of patients achieved HI-E; median time-to-HI-E: 3.2 months for both arms, median duration of-HI-E: 9.8 months. HI-E was significantly lower in non-del(5q) vs. del(5q): 32% vs. 80%. The same accounted for transfusion independency-at-week 24 (16% vs. 67%), but similar in both arms. Apart from presence of del(5q), high percentages of bone marrow lymphocytes and progenitor B-cells, a low number of mutations, absence of ring sideroblasts, and SF3B1 mutations predicted HI-E. In conclusion, lenalidomide induced HI-E in patients with non-del(5q) and del(5q) MDS without additional effect of ESA/G-CSF. The identified predictors of response may guide application of lenalidomide in lower-risk MDS in the era of precision medicine. (EudraCT 2008-002195-10).

JAK2(V617F) positive early stage myeloproliferative disease (essential thrombocythemia) as the cause of portal vein thrombosis in two middle-aged women: therapeutic implications in view of the literature.

The present study describes portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in two women as the first and single presenting symptom of latent or masked myeloproliferative disease (MPD). Essential thrombocythemia (ET) was suspected by a sustained increase in platelet count (>400 x 10(9)/l) and slight splenomegaly on echogram. ET could be diagnosed by the presence of large platelet in peripheral blood smear, an increase in clustered large megakaryocytes in bone marrow smear and the presence of the JAK2(V617F) mutation. A subsequent biopsy specimen was consistent with the diagnosis of true ET. In patients with a first episode of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), analysis of any venous thrombophilic risk factors as well as a JAK2(V617F) mutation status indicative for MPD is warranted. Administration of heparin followed by oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists is the treatment of choice in patients with SVT. Anticoagulation therapy combined with low-dose aspirin and proper treatment of the MPD is recommended in patients with SVT associated with the JAK2(V617F) mutation.

On the target specificity of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1: the role of heparin, vitronectin, and the reactive site.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) is the fast-acting inhibitor of both tissue-type and urokinase-type plasminogen activators (t-PA, u-PA) and is an essential regulatory protein of the fibrinolytic system. In the presence of either the protein vitronectin or the glycosaminoglycan heparin, PAI-1 is also an efficient inhibitor of thrombin. To assess whether these cofactors turn PAI-1 into a general protease inhibitor or whether their influence is restricted to thrombin, the second-order association rate constants between PAI-1 and the human plasma proteases t-PA, u-PA, plasmin, thrombin, Factor Xa (FXa), and Factor XIIa (FXIIa) in the absence and in the presence of either vitronectin or heparin are determined. In addition, the role of the PAI-1 reactive site P3 to P3' residues for the specificity of inhibition was studied by using PAI-1 reactive site mutants. Our results show that: (1) Heparin exclusively increases the rate of inhibition of thrombin by PAI-1, whereas in the presence of heparin the rate of inhibition of the other proteases is not altered; (2) Vitronectin is an obligatory cofactor for the inhibition of thrombin by PAI-1. In addition, vitronectin moderately increases the rate of inhibition by PAI-1 of u-PA and of plasmin, but does not alter the rate of inhibition of t-PA, FXa, or FXIIa; (3) Apart from the important role of the P1 residue, no consensus can be presented on the nature of other residues within the P3 to P3' region with regard to target protease specificity.