Quality of life in lung cancer survivors treated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI): results from the multi-centre cross-sectional German study LARIS.

PURPOSE: We aimed at exploring the quality of life (QOL) of lung cancer survivors with proven tyrosine-kinase receptor (RTK) genetic alterations and targeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) therapy, compared to lung cancer survivors with no-RTK alterations and no-TKI therapy. METHODS: Data were collected in a cross-sectional multi-centre study. Primary lung cancer survivors were asked about their socio-demographic and clinical information, QOL, symptom burden, and distress. QOL and symptom burden were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), and distress with the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). Demographic and clinical characteristics were reported in absolute and relative frequencies, QOL, and symptom burden using mean scores. Differences in mean scores with relative 95% confidence intervals were used for comparison. RESULTS: Three groups of survivors were defined: group A with proven RTK alterations, TKI therapy at any time during therapy, and stage IV lung cancer at diagnosis (n = 49); group B: non-TKI therapy and stage IV lung cancer (n = 121); group C: non-TKI therapy and stage I-III lung cancer (n = 495). Survivors in group A reported lower QOL (mean score difference = -11.7 vs. group B) and symptom burden for dyspnoea (difference = -11.5 vs. group C), and higher symptom burden for appetite loss (difference = + 11.4 vs. group C), diarrhoea and rash (differences = + 25.6, + 19.6 and + 13.2, + 13.0, respectively, vs. both groups). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the specific side effects of TKI therapy can impair QOL among lung cancer survivors. Therefore, specific focus towards the optimal management of these side effects should be considered.

Returning to work in lung cancer survivors-a multi-center cross-sectional study in Germany.

PURPOSE: To investigate the work situation of lung cancer survivors and to identify the factors associated with their returning to work. METHODS: Descriptive analysis and logistic regression were used to evaluate study population characteristics and independent factors of subsequently returning to work. To analyze time to return to work, Cox regression was used. RESULTS: The study sample included 232 lung cancer survivors of working age from 717 enrolled participants in the multi-center cross-sectional LARIS (Quality of Life and Psychosocial Rehabilitation in Lung Cancer Survivors) study. About 67% of the survivors were not employed during the survey. More than 51% of the survivors who were employed before their illness did not return to their work. The survivors who had returned to their careers were younger, associated with higher household income, lower fatigue score, and stable relationship and vocational training. Patients who received social service counseling showed a higher chance of regaining their career. CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer survivors were found to be associated with a high risk of unemployment and very low professional reintegration after interruption due to illness. More comprehensive studies are needed to support lung cancer survivors and targeting of patients in need of special attention in rehabilitation that would benefit from the findings in the present study.

Effect of the patient information brochure in communicating the risks associated with crizotinib treatment to patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Europe.

Crizotinib (XALKORI® ) is indicated for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive and ROS1-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. This study evaluated the distribution of the crizotinib patient information brochure (PIB) in Europe and patient knowledge of the key messages in the PIB. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 10 European countries among patients who received crizotinib to ascertain whether each patient received and read the PIB, and his/her knowledge of its key messages on hepatotoxicity, interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis, QTc prolongation, bradycardia, and vision disorders. Of the 341 patients contacted, 40 responded (11.7%), and 39 patients were eligible. A total of 77% of respondents acknowledged receiving the PIB, of which, 93% reported reading it. Knowledge of the individual side effects ranged from 36% to 85%, and precautions for use ranged from 56% to 67%. Understanding the reasons for calling a physician ranged from 54% to 85%. Knowledge of each of the 6 key side effects was greater among readers of the PIB compared to non-readers or respondents who did not recall receiving the PIB. Approximately three-quarters of survey respondents recalled receiving the crizotinib PIB and respondents who read the PIB were more knowledgeable of the key side effects of crizotinib than those who did not read or receive. Caution should be taken in generalizing these results because of the potential for selection bias and small sample size. These survey results suggest that the crizotinib PIB may be an effective risk communication tool for crizotinib-treated patients in Europe.

Use of psychosocial services by lung cancer survivors in Germany : Results of a German multicenter study (LARIS).

PURPOSE: Little is known about the use of psychosocial services in lung cancer survivors and patients who have survived the diagnosis for at least one year. We investigated the frequency of use, stratified by radiation therapy received, its associated factors, and the reasons for non-use of those services. METHODS: We performed a multicenter (n = 6 hospitals) cross-sectional study using data from medical records, patient reported questionnaires, and computer-assisted telephone interviews. Odds ratios (OR) for factors potentially associated with the use of any type of psychosocial services were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We included 604 lung cancer patients/survivors. Of them, 60% (69% of those who had received radiotherapy) had used some kind of psychological and/or social service in the past (47% psychological, 42% social); 39% had used inpatient care, 24% outpatient care (cancer counselling center, general counselling center, psychological counselling by family doctor, psychotherapy, patient support group, pastoral work). Of those who visited a rehabilitation clinic, 66% received psychosocial care there. Factors associated with using psychosocial services in general were female gender (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.32-2.93), poor emotional functioning (per unit decrease: OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.996), and younger age (per year decrease: OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The high proportion of psychosocial care users among lung cancer survivors in Germany indicates that patients are interested in using it and that an unmet need exists. The creation of a broad spectrum of easily accessible services with high quality is important to enable and facilitate use.

Quality of Life in NSCLC Survivors - A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: The objective was to assess quality of life (QoL) in lung cancer survivors, compare it to the general population, and identify factors associated with global QoL, physical functioning, emotional functioning, fatigue, pain, and dyspnea. METHODS: Data from NSCLC patients who had survived 1 year or longer after diagnosis were collected cross-sectionally in a multicenter study. QoL was assessed with the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and the lung cancer module QLQ-LC13 across different clinical subgroups and compared to age- and sex-standardized general population reference values. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to test the associations of patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors with the six primary QoL scales. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-seven NSCLC patients participated in the study with a median time since diagnosis of 3.7 years (range, 1.0-21.2 years). Compared to the age- and sex-standardized general population, clinically meaningful differences in the QoL detriment were found on almost all domains: lung cancer survivors had clinically relevant poorer global QoL (10 points, p < 0.001). Whereas in 12 months or longer treatment-free patients this detriment was small (8.3), it was higher in patients currently in treatment (16.0). Regarding functioning and symptom scales, respective detriments were largest for dyspnea (41 points), role function (33 points), fatigue (27 points), social function (27 points), physical function (24 points), and insomnia (21 points) observed across all subgroups. The main factor associated with poorer QoL in all primary QoL scales was mental distress (ß |19-31|, all p < 0.001). Detriments in QoL across multiple primary QoL scales were also observed with current treatment (ß |8-12|, p < 0.01), respiratory comorbidity (ß |4-5|, p < 0.01), and living on a disability pension (ß |10-11|, p < 0.01). The main factor associated with better QoL in almost all primary QoL scales was higher physical activity (ß |10-20|, p < 0.001). Better QoL was also observed in patients with high income (ß |10-14|, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer survivors experience both functional restrictions and symptoms that persist long term after active treatment ends. This substantiates the importance of providing long-term supportive care.

[Oral health-related quality of life in cancer patients]. / Mundgesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität bei Krebspatienten.

OBJECTIVE: To date, only a few studies have investigated oral health-related quality of life (OH-QoL) in cancer patients. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has therefore developed a questionnaire, the Quality of Life Questionnaire - Oral Health Module 15 (EORTC QLQ-OH15), to enable investigation of OH-QoL. The aim of this study was to examine OH-QoL in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: OH-QoL was measured using the EORTC QLQ-OH15 in cancer patients at a non-specified time during treatment (t1) as well as two weeks (t2) and three months (t3) after baseline. Potential predictors of OH-QoL such as age, sex, education, cancer entity and therapy were explored. RESULTS: At baseline 40 patients participated in the study. At t2, patients suffered more often from sticky saliva and experienced a higher sensitivity during eating or drinking compared to t1. Additionally, dentures were worn less often. At t3, patients were less often satisfied with information concerning oral side effects. Furthermore, patients older than 50 years, women, patients with poorer education, patients with head and neck cancer, and patients undergoing palliative therapy, surgery or targeted therapy indicated worse OH-QoL at t2 than other patients. CONCLUSIONS: OH-QoL is of clinical importance in cancer patients. It seems to be decreased after the end of treatment, and not only in patients with head and neck cancer. Despite its brevity, the EORTC QLQ-OH15 is able to capture these differences, and is well accepted by patients. It can be recommended for future studies in this area.

Comprehensive Biomarker Analyses in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Prospectively Treated with the Polo-Like Kinase 1 Inhibitor BI2536.

BACKGROUND: Polo like kinase 1 (PLK1) is frequently upregulated in tumors and is thus viewed as a promising therapeutic target in various cancers. Several PLK1 inhibitors have recently been developed and clinically tested in solid cancers, albeit with limited success. So far, no predictive biomarkers for PLK1 inhibitors have been established. To this end, we conducted a post-hoc biomarker analysis of tumor samples from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with the PLK1 inhibitor BI2536 in a phase II study. METHODS: We analyzed formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded surplus tumor tissue from 47 study patients using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and DNA sequencing of KRAS, EGFR, BRAF, and PIK3CA. RESULTS: KRAS-mutated patients showed numerically prolonged progression-free survival, but statistical significance was not established. Interestingly, when pathways rather than single genes were analyzed, a positive correlation between IHC staining of activated ERK (p-ERK) and mutated KRAS was detected, whereas KRAS mutation status was found to be negatively correlated with activated AKT (p-AKT). CONCLUSION: With this hypothesis-generating study in BI2531-treated patients, we could not establish a correlation between KRAS mutations and relevant clinical endpoints. Future clinical trials with concomitant systematic biosampling and comprehensive molecular analyses are required to identify biomarkers predictive for response to PLK1 inhibitors.

[Immunotherapy in lung cancer: checkpoint inhibitors]. / Immuntherapie beim Lungenkarzinom.

Monoclonal antibodies against the PD-1 receptor or its ligands result in a recovery of T cell responses against tumor antigens. Nivolumab is the first antibody that has been approved in lung cancer. This mode of action is very intersting, especially because of long term responses and the moderate toxicity.