The Birmingham Standardized Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Shunt Protocol: Technical Note.

BACKGROUND: Insertion of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is challenging mainly due to the small ventricles and phenotypical body habitus. In this report the authors present their surgical protocol for insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) in patients with IIH and the associated revision rates. METHODS: The protocol comprises the following: shunt surgery by neurosurgeons with expertise in CSF disorders; a frontal VPS usually right sided but left sided if the left ventricle is bigger; use of the proGAV 2.0 valve with gravitational unit, set at 10 and the M.scio telemetric sensor; cannulation of the ventricle with StealthStation EM navigation system; and laparoscopic insertion of the peritoneal catheter. The authors describe the protocol and rationale and evidence behind each component and present the results of a prospective analysis on revision rates. RESULTS: The protocol has been implemented since 1 July, 2019, and by 28 February, 2022, sixty-two patients with IIH had undergone primary VPS insertion. The 30-day revision rate was 6.5%, and overall 11.3% of patients underwent revision during the study period, which compares favorably with the literature. The etiology for early failures was related to the surgical technique. CONCLUSIONS: The components of the Birmingham standardized IIH shunt protocol are evidence based and address the technical challenges of CSF diversion in patients with IIH. This protocol is associated with a low revision rate, and the authors recommend standardization for CSF shunting in IIH.

Reconfiguration from emergency to urgent elective neurosurgery for glioblastoma patients improves length of stay, surgical adjunct use, and extent of resective surgery.

Background: Glioblastoma (GB) is the most common intrinsic brain cancer and is notorious for its aggressive nature. Despite widespread research and optimization of clinical management, the improvement in overall survival has been limited. The aim of this study was to characterize the impact of service reconfiguration on GB outcomes in a single centre. Methods: Patients with a histopathological confirmation of a diagnosis of GB between 01/01/2014 and 31/12/2019 were retrospectively identified. Demographic and tumour characteristics, survival, treatment (surgical and oncological), admission status, use of surgical adjunct (5-aminolevulinic acid, intra-operative neuro-monitoring), the length of stay, extent of resection, and surgical complications were recorded from the hospital databases. Results: From August 2018 the neurosurgical oncology service was reconfigured to manage high-grade tumours on an urgent outpatient basis by surgeons specializing in oncology. We demonstrate that these changes resulted in an increase in elective admissions, greater use of intra-operative adjuncts resulting in the improved extent of tumour resection, and a reduction in median length of stay and associated cost-savings. Conclusions: Optimizing neuro-oncology patient management through service reconfiguration resulted in increased use of intra-operative adjuncts, improved surgical outcomes, and reduced hospital costs. These changes also have the potential to improve survival and disease-free progression for patients with GB.

Cerebrospinal fluid shunting protocol for idiopathic intracranial hypertension for an improved revision rate.

OBJECTIVE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is associated with high complication rates, primarily because of the technical challenges that are related to small ventricles and a large body habitus. In this study, the authors report the benefits of a standardized protocol for CSF shunting in patients with IIH as relates to shunt revisions. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients with IIH who had undergone primary insertion of a CSF shunt between January 2014 and December 2020 at the authors' hospital. In July 2019, they implemented a surgical protocol for shunting in IIH. This protocol recommended IIH shunt insertion by neurosurgeons with expertise in CSF disorders, a frontal ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt with an adjustable gravitational valve and integrated intracranial pressure monitoring device, frameless stereotactic insertion of the ventricular catheter, and laparoscopic insertion of the peritoneal catheter. Thirty-day revision rates before and after implementation of the protocol were compared in order to assess the impact of standardizing shunting for IIH on shunt complications. RESULTS: The 81 patients included in the study were predominantly female (93%), with a mean age of 31 years at primary surgery and mean body mass index (BMI) of 37 kg/m2. Forty-five patients underwent primary surgery prior to implementation of the protocol and 36 patients after. Overall, 12 (15%) of 81 patients needed CSF shunt revision in the first 30 days, 10 before and 2 after introduction of the protocol. This represented a significant reduction in the early revision rate from 22% to 6% after the protocol (p = 0.036). The most common cause of shunt revision for the whole cohort was migration or misplacement of the peritoneal catheter, occurring in 6 of the 12 patients. Patients with a higher BMI were significantly more likely to have a shunt revision within 30 days (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The Birmingham standardized IIH shunt protocol resulted in a significant reduction in revisions within 30 days of primary shunt surgery in patients with IIH. The authors recommend standardization for shunting in IIH as a method for improving surgical outcomes. They support the notion of subspecialization for IIH shunts, the use of a frontal VP shunt with sophisticated technology, and laparoscopic insertion of the peritoneal end.

Is Image Guidance Essential for External Ventricular Drain Insertion?

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the external ventricular drain (EVD) placement accuracy and complication rates, between neuronavigation-guided, ultrasound-guided, and freehand techniques in our single-center cohort, and through an additional meta-analysis of the currently available literature. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent EVD insertion from January 2016 to April 2019 was conducted. Information regarding demographics, indication, Evans index, use of image guidance, accuracy of catheter tip placement, and procedural complications was extracted from electronic records and imaging systems. The accuracy of the EVD tip placement was classified according to the Kakarla grading system into optimal, or suboptimal based on its proximity to the Foramen of Monro and involvement of noneloquent/eloquent structures. RESULTS: In total, 294 patients (median age of 54 years) underwent EVD insertion during the study period. A total of 183 catheters were placed freehand, 66 neuronavigation-guided, and 45 ultrasound-guided; the mean Evans ratios were 0.33, 0.29, and 0.31, respectively. Whilst there was a tendency for lower rates of suboptimal placement were guidance was used, with rates of 10.6% and 15.6% for neuronavigation- and ultrasound-guidance, respectively, compared to 20.8% in freehand placement, this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.168). However, pooling this data with two additional studies on meta-analysis found a significant reduction in the risk of suboptimal placement for image-guided vs. freehand EVDs (odds ratio: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.32-0.77, P = 0.002). Surgeon seniority and other procedure-related factors had no significant impact on EVD placement accuracy or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, pooled with those of previous studies, suggest image-guided EVD placement significantly reduced the rate of suboptimally placed EVDs. We conclude in appropriately selected cases that image-guided EVD insertions may improve accuracy of catheter placements and reduce associated complications of the procedure.

Comparison of outcomes of neurosurgical operations performed before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic affected outcomes for all operatively managed neurosurgical patients, not only those positive for SARS-CoV-2. DESIGN: Matched cohort (pairwise method). SETTING: A single tertiary neurosurgical referral centre at a large UK Major Trauma Centre. PARTICIPANTS: During the first COVID-19 wave, 231 neurosurgical cases were performed. These cases were matched to cases from 2019. Cases were matched for age (±10 years), primary pathology and surgical procedure. Cases were excluded from analysis if either the age could not be matched to within 10 years, or the primary pathology or procedure was too unique. After exclusions, 191 cases were included in final analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications. Secondary outcomes included Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) on discharge, length of stay (LoS), operative and anaesthetic times and grade of primary surgeon. An exploratory outcome was the SARS-CoV-2 status of patients. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the pandemic and matched cohorts in 30-day mortality, pulmonary complications, discharge GOS, LoS, operative or anaesthetic times. There was a significant difference in the variation of grade of primary surgeon. Only 2.2% (n=5) of patients had a SARS-CoV-2 positive swab. CONCLUSION: During the first UK wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the mortality, morbidity and functional outcomes of operatively managed neurosurgical patients at University Hospitals Birmingham were not significantly affected compared with normal practice. The grade of primary surgeon was significantly more senior and adds to the growing body of evidence that demonstrates how the pandemic has negatively impacted UK surgical training. Mixing COVID-19 positive, unknown and negative cases did not significantly impact on outcomes and indicates that further research is required to support the implementation of evidence-based surgical pathways, such as COVID-light sites, throughout the next stage of the pandemic.

Battery Longevity Comparison of Two Commonly Available Dual Channel Implantable Pulse Generators Used for Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.

OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease (PD) utilises an implantable pulse generator (IPG) whose finite lifespan in non-rechargeable systems necessitates their periodic replacement. We wish to determine if there is any significant difference in longevity of 2 commonly used IPG systems; the Medtronic Kinetra, and the Medtronic Activa Primary Cell (PC), which has come to replace it. METHODS: All patients with bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus stimulators for PD performed in our centre were included. Battery life was then assessed using a Kaplan-Meier approach and comparisons between the Kinetra and Activa PC batteries were performed using log-rank tests. RESULTS: Complete data was available for 183 patients. There was a significant difference in the average battery duration with an estimated median battery life in the Kinetra cohort of 6.6 years (95% CI 6.4-6.7), compared to 4.5 years (95% CI 4.4-4.5) in the Activa PC cohort (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Activa PC IPG demonstrates a significantly reduced battery life of 2.1 years, with a median battery life of 4.5 years in comparison to 6.6 years in the Kinetra IPG. Future technology developments should therefore be focused on improving the battery life of the newer IPG systems.

Subthalamic deep brain stimulation under general anesthesia and neurophysiological guidance while on dopaminergic medication: comparative cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The authors have previously reported on the technical feasibility of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) under general anesthesia (GA) with microelectrode recording (MER) guidance in Parkinsonian patients who continued dopaminergic therapy until surgery. This paper presents the results of a prospective cohort analysis to verify the outcome of the initial study, and report on wider aspects of clinical outcome and postoperative recovery. METHODS: All patients in the study group continued dopaminergic therapy until GA was administered. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative neurophysiological markers, and perioperative complications were recorded. Long-term outcome was assessed using selective aspects of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale motor score. Immediate postoperative recovery from GA was assessed using the "time needed for extubation" and "total time of recovery." Data for the "study group" was collected prospectively. Examined variables were compared between the "study group" and "historical control group" who stopped dopaminergic therapy preoperatively. RESULTS: The study group, n = 30 (May 2014-Jan 2016), were slightly younger than the "control group," 60 (51-64) vs. 64 (56-69) years respectively, p = 0.043. Both groups were comparable for the recorded intraoperative neurophysiological parameters; "number of MER tracks": 60% of the "study group" had single track vs. 58% in the "control" group, p = 1.0. Length of STN MER detected was 9 vs. 7 mm (median) respectively, p = 0.037. A trend towards better recovery from GA in the study group was noted, with shorter "total recovery time": 60 (50-84) vs. 89 (62-120) min, p = 0.09. Long-term improvement in motor scores and reduction in L-dopa daily equivalent dose were equally comparable between both groups. No cases of dopamine withdrawal or problems with immediate postop dyskinesia were recorded in the "on medications group." The observed rate of dopamine-withdrawal side effects in the "off-medications" group was 15%. CONCLUSIONS: The continuation of dopaminergic treatment for patients with PD does not affect the feasibility/outcome of the STN DBS surgery. This strategy appears to reduce the risk of dopamine-withdrawal adverse effects and may improve the recovery in the immediate postoperative period, which would help enhance patients' perioperative experience.

The effect of dopaminergic therapy on intraoperative microelectrode recordings for subthalamic deep brain stimulation under GA: can we operate on patients 'on medications'?

OBJECTIVES: Microelectrode recording (MER) plays an important role in target refinement in deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease (PD). Traditionally, patients were operated on in the 'off-medication' state to allow intraoperative assessment of the patient response to direct STN stimulation. The development of intraoperative microelectrode recording (MER) has facilitated the introduction of general anaesthesia (GA). However, the routine withdrawal of dopaminergic medications has remained as standard practice. This retrospective review examines the effect of continuing these medications on intraoperative MER for subthalamic DBS insertion under GA and discusses the clinical implication of this approach. METHODS: Retrospective review of PD patients who had bilateral STN DBS insertion was conducted. A cohort of seven patients (14 STN microelectrodes) between 2012 and 2013, who inadvertently underwent the procedure while 'on medication', was identified. This 'on-medication' group was compared to all other patients who underwent the same procedure between 2012 and 2013 and had their medications withdrawn preoperatively, the 'off-medication' group, n = 26 (52 STN DBS). The primary endpoint was defined as the number of microelectrode tracks required to obtain adequate STN recordings. A second endpoint was the length of MERs that was finally used to guide the DBS lead insertion. The Reduction of the levo-dopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was also examined as a surrogate marker for clinical outcome 12 months postoperatively for both groups. For the on-medication group further analysis of the clinical outcome was done relying on the change in the motor examination at 12 months following STN DBS using the following parameters (Hoehn and Yahr scale, the number of waking hours spent in the OFF state as well as the duration of dyskinesia during the ON periods). RESULTS: The on-medication group was statistically comparable in all baseline characteristics to the off-medication group, including age at operation 57 ± 9.9 years vs. 61.5 ± 9.2 years, p = 0.34 (mean ± SD); duration of disease (11.6 ± 5 years vs. 11.3 ± 4 years, p = 0.68); gender F:M ratio (1:6 vs. 9:17, p = 0.40). Both groups had similar PD medication regimes preoperatively expressed as levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) 916 mg (558-1850) vs. 744 mg (525-3591), respectively, p = 0.77. In the on-medication group, all seven patients (14 STN electrodes) had satisfactory STN recording from a single brain track versus 15 out of 26 patients (57.7 %) in the off-medication group, p = 0.06. The length of MER was 4.5 mm (3.0-5.5) in the on-medication group compared to 3.5 mm (3.0-4.5) in the off-medication group, p = 0.16. The percentage of reduction in LEDD postoperatively for the on-medication group was comparable to that in the off-medication group, 62 % versus 58 %, respectively, p > 0.05. All patients in the on-medication group had clinically significant improvement in their PD motor symptoms as assessed by the Hoehn and Yahr scale; the number of hours (of the waking day) spent in the OFF state dropped from 6.9 (±2.3) h to 0.9 (±1.6) h; the duration of dyskinesia during the ON state dropped from 64 % (±13 %) of the ON period to only 7 % (±12 %) at 12 months following STN DBS insertion. CONCLUSION: STN DBS insertion under GA can be performed without the need to withdraw dompaminergic treatment preoperatively. In this review the inadvertent continuation of medications did not affect the physiological localisation of the STN or the clinical effectiveness of the procedure. The continuation of dopamine therapy is likely to improve the perioperative experience for PD patients, avoid dopamine-withdrawal complications and improve recovery. A prospective study is needed to verify the results of this review.